Justice League: Crisis On Two Earths Preview!

A sneak peak at the next upcoming DC direct to Blu-Ray/DVD "Justice League :Crisis On Two Earths"!

Many thanks to MTV for providing the video!

This movie is to be released sometime in the Spring of 2010.

jman1977
9/30/2009
splashpage.mtv.com

DISCLAIMER: This posting was submitted by a user of the site not from Comic Book Movie editorial staff. All users have acknowledged and agreed that the submission of their content is in compliance with our Terms of Use. For removal of copyrighted material, please contact us HERE.

Related News

Radcliffe on The Simpsons

SHS: Silver Surfer Video Profile

New Images of Planet Hulk

The Justice League: Crisis On Two Earths Trailer

Justice League: The Complete Series DVD

82 Comments

	cool Swiftsword777 - 9/30/2009, 12:37 PM
	It looks a little darker than previous movies. Should be interesting. Shame Conroy isn't back in the Bat though. hush - 9/30/2009, 12:43 PM
	I have to say DC is pushing the Anime in a big way. All the have for movies right is Batman. Marvel is going forward in a big way with there movies, but slagging in the Anime Section. That to me is ok, but I hope they just don't messed up the future movies that are coming out for Marvel. Spock - 9/30/2009, 12:43 PM
	Doesn't look as good as Superman/Batman Public Enemies, but i'll watch it. soforizo - 9/30/2009, 12:44 PM
	I can watch this one! Woohoo. Looks amazing. James Woods FTW. Rorschach01 - 9/30/2009, 12:46 PM
	Marvel anime sucks big time; but i'd give them the upperhand over DC in live-action movies. soforizo - 9/30/2009, 12:46 PM
	AWESOME!! I loved Earth 2! Nice one Jman!! Imran - 9/30/2009, 12:50 PM
	Okay James Woods Awesome. But GIBBS as Superman hmmmm I dunno. Also HELL NO on Billy Baldwin as Batman already disappointed. InstigatorGIRL - 9/30/2009, 12:53 PM
	YES!!! Thanks MTV for letting the rest of the world see it this time LOL :P It looks awesome!!! I haven't read the books but i'm eager for this :)) Plus i think it's the best animated Superman yet! And i love me some James Woods!!! :)) He was AWESOME as Hades in Hercules!!! Shaman - 9/30/2009, 1:00 PM
	DC is on a serious roll with these animated flicks. I really enjoyed Public Enemies. Action packed. hewilldefytheirgravity - 9/30/2009, 1:03 PM
	For me: That cast is amazing!! Damn right Shaman.. HADES!!! Imran - 9/30/2009, 1:06 PM
	i'll watch it just for james woods SHHH - 9/30/2009, 1:11 PM
	Typical DC, the only superhero films they can make is kiddie cartoons! rosco71 - 9/30/2009, 1:23 PM
	Just bought Public Enemies today and I reeally enjoyed it, can't wait for this one. Bandrews1 - 9/30/2009, 1:28 PM
	Awesome!!!!!! NightAvenger4 - 9/30/2009, 1:31 PM
	Yeah, I just watched Public Enemies last night on Blu Ray. This was one of the features. James Woods sounds awesome and will kill it as Owlman. Hooo Hoooooo a piece of candy! Billy Baldwin is doing his best Alec impersonation, so without having to look at him, maybe we'll get lucky and just pretend it's Alec. Ror01 You were right. The voice work in PE was flat. I was surprised by that, I didn't think it possible, but you were right. Visually it was sweet, especially on Blu Ray, but there was something missing. Damn they made Amanda Waller huge! Didn't really dig the Toy Man thing either. BillyBlack - 9/30/2009, 1:37 PM
	Cool Billy, glad i'm not the only one with ears then! I mean it wasn't all bad, just bits thats should have had more emotion, they seemed to go the other way, like they were afraid to overdo it..i dunno, just seemed off somehow. You see Lex kiss Waller?? hahah, rather you than me baldy. Rorschach01 - 9/30/2009, 1:42 PM
	this looks great, and you know when I heard billy baldwin was batman I cringed but truth be told he sounded pretty good from what little I heard in the trailer. thwhtGuardian - 9/30/2009, 1:45 PM
	Dude Ror When he planted that on her I almost yakked! There were parts like you were saying, that to me seemed very out of charater. Not bad, just off like you said. The story could've used a bit of polish too. Where's Paul Dini when you need him?! BillyBlack - 9/30/2009, 1:53 PM
	@rosco.. You've obviously been living under a rock! The Dark Knight suddenly springs to mind? @Shaman.. Yeah finally! MTV sorted that shit out! lol.. Was so annoying when we couldn't watch the vids! @Billy.. Lol Waller always scares me haha.. @Ror.. The kiss is worst in the comic! They have close up lol @Public Enemies: It was good.. I agree the voice work did seem flat.. But having Conroy as Bats is good enough :-P It was nowhere near as good at the comic though.. They missed out loads of stuff! Superboy, Nightwing, Huntress.. All that stuff.. ESPECIALLY THE SUPERMAN/SUPERMAN fight!! :-\|!!!! Captain Atom meeting an older Superman.. Some major plot points missing.. Quite disappointing in that aspect but it was enjoyable none the less.. Bit short mind.. Imran - 9/30/2009, 1:58 PM
	James woods is awesome John C. McGinley for the riddler Chris pine for captain America bleedthefreak16 - 9/30/2009, 1:59 PM
	Look really good but I think Kevin Conroy should have been batman. drpunch - 9/30/2009, 2:00 PM
	is Chris pine American if not never mind bleedthefreak16 - 9/30/2009, 2:00 PM
	looks slightly better than Superman/Batman: P.E InFamouslyCool - 9/30/2009, 2:03 PM
	@ luffycapri, that video was worth watching just for the halarious commentary, didnt understand a word but damn they are way to into it I think ppl are getting way to hungup on the voice acting b/c of names they either like or dislike and arent looking hard enough at this story is gonna be awesome...that being said its james f'in woods lol good stuff Cape - 9/30/2009, 2:03 PM
	Looks sweet! Especially Supes, they did a great job on him. Is this supposed to be an adaptation of "Infinite Crisis?" Infinite Crisis has the whole, 2 parallel Earths, Good Lex Luthor, etc., but I don't remember anything about Owl Man. Gideon - 9/30/2009, 2:26 PM
	Great stuff @ JMAN! just made my day!! This looks [frick]ing sweet!!! ; ) Hey if its as good as Public Enemies, its gonna be fantastic!! Man now only could DC do the REAL CRISIS (85) into a friggin' animated movie!!!!! Cant wait! LEEE777 - 9/30/2009, 2:50 PM
	LEEE-If they do a Crisis on Infinite Earths it would have to be a pretty long movie for everything to play out right. I am looking forward to this movie though. I havent seen Public Enemies yet but I am going to get it today. ironknight27 - 9/30/2009, 3:02 PM
	Wow pretty intense voice acting for this, a lot of pretty big names. Kevin Conroy and Tim Daly still should have done Bats and Supes, they're the best. But this looks like it'll be kinda epic lol. SirExcalibur - 9/30/2009, 3:11 PM
	It looks very good! jman1977: Nice! BigNick - 9/30/2009, 3:19 PM
	I need some Dove :( teabag - 9/30/2009, 4:00 PM
	Nice @ Jman ! Definitely a real crisis on infinite earth be the next project(85 12 maxi series), hey ! if watchmen was made into a 3++ hours movie, why not this in animation ... Gose - 9/30/2009, 4:01 PM
	teabag I hear ya buddy... Lifebuoy tastes like shit! BillyBlack - 9/30/2009, 4:13 PM
	Im feeling stubbly :( Billy@ lol teabag - 9/30/2009, 4:13 PM
	see, these crisis stories are one of the big reasons i don't like DC all that much. people talk about original ideas, but my god, its another crisis story every year or two with DC. how many times do we need to hear the same multiverse nonsense?? they only do them because DC's continuity was so out of whack and messed up, that its an easy way to retcon everything, and kill a flash. identity crisis, crisis on infinite earths, infinite crisis...seriously??? how about crisis in DC's bank account?? i'd buy that if it wasn't so ironic. but i'm totally gonna watch this, lmao CorndogBurglar - 9/30/2009, 4:41 PM
	There just pissing out these cartoons every ten mins just to distract people from them not making live action movies :) teabag - 9/30/2009, 4:56 PM
	Mmmmmm.........Gina Torres. She is Awesome in Serenity/Firefly.. wipes slobber from corner of mouth Skyh00k - 9/30/2009, 5:00 PM
	NOW THIS!! MAKES SUPERMAN BATMAN PE LOOK LIKE CRAP!! THIS ACTUALLY LOOKS LIKE A WORTHY DC comic movie!!! About darn time! WarNoodle - 9/30/2009, 5:05 PM
	and new frontier was garbage. but GL was cool! haven't seen wonder woman or bats/supes, but i want to!!! CorndogBurglar - 9/30/2009, 5:11 PM
	Same voice director, but different voice talents? You've got to be kidding me. logan - 9/30/2009, 5:12 PM
	Glad I could start some anime talk with dc, marvel is really lacking in this area big time. Spock - 9/30/2009, 5:33 PM
	Looks great. At least Wonder Woman is flying in this one! I was very disappointed that they didn't have her flying in her solo movie! davidcub - 9/30/2009, 6:17 PM
	did something happen? its not working at all. KeepItReal - 9/30/2009, 6:18 PM
	buying it buying it...... saaayyyy will this have the animated short story of Jonah Hex on it, have heard no more news about the supposed shorts they were going to include on new movies. georgia49th - 9/30/2009, 6:25 PM
	Corndog, what was wrong with new frontier? It deviated a bit from the gn but I really liked how it stayed true to the art style. And logan, Andrea Romano has been the voice director for a while. She's been in charge of that since Timm started with batman almost 20 years ago. thwhtGuardian - 9/30/2009, 6:34 PM
	Andrea Romano at 00:09-12 It is not preposterous to suggest that there is only one planet with intelligent life. Phinehas - 9/30/2009, 6:42 PM
	@ thwhtknight it was really boring. there was nwxt to no action until late in the movie, and then they just showed each character do like one or two things and that was it. batman punched like, one guy i think. it was very anticlimactic. i didn't dig it at all CorndogBurglar - 9/30/2009, 7:24 PM
	I can understand that, it was less about the action than your standard comic movie, I guess I liked the gn so much that I really wasn't concerned about the action. I really dug how the writers tried to capture the golden age feel, also in the gn I loved the newspaper articles written by clark kent, it was neat to see his journalistic skills. @ Phinehas I don't know if preposterous is the right word, since it's a little demeaning to those who believe other wise, but mathematically speaking it is highly unlikely that we are the lone intelligent beings in all the universe, simply because the universe is a tremendously big place. Probability simply dictates that the circumstances that led to our existence were not a one of a kind phenomenon, unless of course one believes in the judo-christian model of creation where it is more or less stated that we are indeed unique. Nothing against you if that is the theory you old to heart, but I like to think that we are not all together alone in the cosmos. thwhtGuardian - 9/30/2009, 8:30 PM
	CDB, I loved New Frontier too! But I cant really remember how i felt about the lack of action..i just loved the animation and characters. Rorschach01 - 9/30/2009, 8:57 PM
	Nice! I look forward to seeing this. JYCowboy - 9/30/2009, 9:38 PM
	Actually thwhtknight, the probabilities against even a planet like our existing, inhabiting complex life, and sustaining it is astronomical. I can give you those figures another time. But yes, my beliefs are Christian. I don't believe science and my faith are mutually exclusive. Its not an irrational thing like the easter bunny. Furthermore, its not demeaning to me that she says that. I don't think she honors herself because she's not speaking academically, though she is speaking with an air of authority. Phinehas - 10/1/2009, 1:21 AM
	looks cool...dc animated movies hav been really good lately..enjoyed them all... does any1 know when wolverine and the x-men season 2 starts?? ~X XmutantX - 10/1/2009, 4:44 AM
	is the director single? she is smoking hot. grif - 10/1/2009, 5:39 AM
	@ phinehas the chances of our planet creating, and sustaining complex life may be astronomical, but when your dealing with something thats so close to infinite as space, that it might as well BE infinite, the word "astronomical" kind of loses its meaning. its kind of preposterous to think that our planet is the only one in the universe with intelligent life. in my opinion anyway CorndogBurglar - 10/1/2009, 6:27 AM
	you know it looks great....and i know owlman is cool....but come on, i don't see him being able to get the better of batman...what do you guys think?? Rumblebeast - 10/1/2009, 7:30 AM
	Judging from what I have seen (I haven't heard nothing), I assume this is going to be a bit more interesting than the comic book JLA: Earth-2. But that would be a spoiler... Merinator - 10/1/2009, 9:54 AM
	CorndogBurglar-The Universe at this time has not and can not been able to be measured with our current technology. To say that "it might as well BE infinite" is a presumptous speculation at best. What factors make the universe inhabitable for life? The laws of physics are balanced on a razors edge for life to occur. 1. One of those factors of physical constant laws is the force of gravity (F=Gm1m2/r^2). If you can imagine a ruler divided into one inch increments, and then streche it across the entire known universe, a distance of some four billion light-years. The ruler will represent the possible range for gravity. The strength of gravity can be anywhere along the ruler, but it has to be situated in exactly the right place for life to be possible. The effect on life from moving the inch in relation to the universe in either dirction on that ruler would be catastrophic! Anything larger than a pea would be crushed if too close. The best you'd get is bacteria. The strength of gravity is one of thirty separate parameters. It must be finely tuned to sustain life. 2. Another exampe is the Cosmological Constant. It describes the exapansion speed of space in the universe. If space expands too quickly, then material objects can't form. Astrological physistists have determined that the cosmological constant ratio of the universe is finely tuned to 1:100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. Such precision has been compared to traveling hundreds of miles into space and throwing a dart at the earth, and hitting a bullseye one trillioneth of one trillioneth of an inch in diameter. An area less than the width of a single atom. Thats just two parameters! Thats a fine tuning of the universe with just the cosmological constant and gravity with the ratio of one part of one hundred million, trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion to one(Too many zeros). Thats like one atom by itself in the entire known universe. That's just two. I could go on with electromagnetic force, speed of light, strong nuclear force, weak nuclear force, and various constants models if you like. Phinehas - 10/1/2009, 11:25 AM
	1) The number of galaxies. An estimated 50 billion galaxies are visible with modern telescopes and the total number in the universe must surely exceed this number by a huge factor, but we will be conservative and simply double it. That's 100,000,000,000 galaxies in the universe. 2) The number of stars in an average galaxy. As many as hundreds of billions in each galaxy. Lets call it just 100 billion. That's 100,000,000,000 stars per galaxy. 3)The number of stars in the universe. So the total number of stars in the universe is roughly 100 billion x 100 billion. That's 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 stars, 10 thousand, billion, billion. Properly known as 10 sextillion. And that's a very conservative estimate. 4) The number of stars that have planetary systems. The original extra-solar system planet hunting technology dictated that a star needed to be to close to us for a planet to be detected, usually by the stars 'wobble'. Better technology that allows us to measure the dimming of a stars brightness when a planet crosses its disk has now revolutionized planet hunting and new planets are being discovered at an ever increasing rate. So far (August 2003) around 100 have been discovered so we have very little data to work on for this estimate. Even so, most cosmologists believe that planetary formation around a star is quite common place. For the sake of argument let us say it's not and rate it at only one in a million and only one planet in each system, as we want a conservative estimate, not an exaggerated one. That calculation results in: 10,000,000,000,000,000 planets in the universe. Ten million, billion, as a conservative estimate. 5) The number planets capable of supporting life. Let's assume that this is very rare among planets and rate it at only one in a million. Simple division results in: 10,000,000,000 planets in the universe capable of producing life. Ten billion! For another approach I recommend The Drake Equation. This states that the number of communicating civilizations in our galaxy (note, our Galaxy only, not the universe) likely depends on a number of factors which must combine to yield a habitable planet where life has the chance to develop to a certain level of technological know-how. These factors include the rate of formation of stars like the Sun, the fraction of those with planets, the fraction of Earth- like planets, the fraction of such planets where life develops, the fraction of those where life becomes intelligent, the fraction of intelligent species who can communicate in a way we could detect, and the lifetime of the communicating civilisations. As you may imagine, There is a lot of debate about reasonable values for most of these factors. Frank Drake's own estimate puts the number of communicating civilizations in just our Galaxy alone at 10,000. Even though the figures I have used cannot of course be considered to be accurate, at least the figure of 10 sextillion stars in the universe is most definitely an underestimate. The number of life supporting planets that may be orbiting those stars is impossible to say, but by any reasonable estimate must surely run into the millions, if not billions. if that's not probable I don't know what is. thwhtGuardian - 10/1/2009, 11:25 AM
	"The number planets capable of supporting life. Let's assume that this is very rare among planets and rate it at only one in a million. Simple division results in: 10,000,000,000 planets in the universe capable of producing life. Ten billion!" Much too conservative.0 BTW, that was great timing!!! LOL Phinehas - 10/1/2009, 11:31 AM
	I erred on the conservative side, many scientists put the number of habitable planets much higher, I chose to limit my fields to show that even with the smallest numbers the results are incredibly high making the probability of other complex life in the universe very high. edit: yeah we must have been writing at the same time thwhtGuardian - 10/1/2009, 11:35 AM
	The parameters that are required for each of your planets in each of your galaxies to fulfill to sustain life is outrageously high. From planets placement to the subatomic level. It perfectly has to fit or nada! You must be a man of considerable faith. I bow to you. Phinehas - 10/1/2009, 11:41 AM
	@ phinehas "10,000,000,000 planets in the universe capable of producing life. Ten billion!" doesn't that kind of back up what i was saying?? ten billion planets are capable of producing life. so its preposterous to think only one of those (ours) has life on it. also, its been discovered that the universe is not expanding at a one rate of speed. its actually accellerating. which would mean that our universe is still feeling the effects of the big bang. a lot of scientists believe that the universe will eventually stop expanding, and then "rubber band" back on itself. eventually (we'll be long gone) you won't even be able to see a single star in the sky because the universe has expanded so far. but this also means taht planets are still being formed. i just think its ludicrous to think there is no life out there. CorndogBurglar - 10/1/2009, 11:49 AM
	numbers numbers numbers The presumption that this planet is the only planet sustaining intelligent life in the universe is arrogance. Anything that happens once can happen 100 times. Even if you believe god created the earth, and everything on it, why would he stop there? Why waste the entire rest of the universe? Seems like god would be smarter than that. BillyBlack - 10/1/2009, 11:50 AM
	@ billy black simple, but very true. but religion doesn't make sense, sooo... CorndogBurglar - 10/1/2009, 11:55 AM
	it is high, but with the sheer number of planets in the universe the probability of an event like ours happening is high as well, even if you assume it only happens once in every galaxy with the number of galaxies present in the universe that amounts to many innumerable sentient civilizations in existence. And even more if you posit a DC style Multiverse like in crisis on two earths ;p. Added to that we are just beginning to understand where life can exist, raising questions as to whether complex life even needs the parameters that provide us with life. of course all of these ideas are just theories, we know hardly anything at all about life, and I'm no scientist I admit. I suppose it is more faith than anything else at this point but it makes sense to me. thwhtGuardian - 10/1/2009, 11:56 AM
	Yeah, CDB, my last statement isn't really nullified by your last statment. What criteria is used to determine your evaluation of life sustaining planets? BillyBlack- "The presumption that this planet is the only planet sustaining intelligent life in the universe is arrogance." "Seems like god would be smarter than that." Do you know the mind of God? What were you saying about arrogance? Phinehas - 10/1/2009, 12:02 PM
	That's a lot of assumption TWK. I too am no scientist. The opposite makes sense to me. We are a diamond in the rough. Phinehas - 10/1/2009, 12:08 PM
	faith of any kind is good to me man. At any rate I just bought JLA Earth-2, so hopefully when it ships out I'll have a better idea of what this movie going to be like. I've read a few crime synidicat pieces, and I loved owlman in the superman/batman annual and the two batman the brave and the bold episodes so I have high hopes for earth-2. thwhtGuardian - 10/1/2009, 12:54 PM
	Yes, back to the comics and movie...LOL I think it will be very good. I like Owlman. Phinehas - 10/1/2009, 1:05 PM
	lol yeah, I figured I'd try and circle it back to that. Though I enjoy our more enlightened conversations I also enjoy discussing more simplistic things as well, and I did just purchase earth 2 with no other previous knowledge of it other than being mentioned in a post here. Only time will tell if it's any good. thwhtGuardian - 10/1/2009, 1:21 PM
	@ phinehas sorry i'm at work, its hard to comment, lol. a lot of things go into determining life sustaining planets. the environment being key. you are right in saying that its a "razors edge" of probability for a planet to sustain life. but the thing is, no one even knows how many total planets there are in the universe. its an estimate at best. (i mean seriously, they just recently decided that pluto ISN'T a planet. and thats in our own solar system, lol) we're constantly learning new things. alternate universes are just now becoming plausible in the scientific world. in fact, mathematically, its the only answer so far that works. more and more scientists are beginning to think the big bang was from two alternate universes colliding and creating a new universe, much like bubbles in a champaigne glass. my point is, no one knows what, and how much of "what" is out there for sure. so its kind of hard to say that there is NO life. but again man, good conversation, phinehas and whtknight. CorndogBurglar - 10/1/2009, 1:34 PM
	Yeah,I've only just begun to look at alternate realities, I saw a pretty cool documentary a while back on the history channel about them. It's an interesting theory, and it's no wonder so many comic and scifi plots hinge on it. thwhtGuardian - 10/1/2009, 1:41 PM
	@ whtknight i find it interesting that its actually being taken as extremely seriously as it is now! kinda cool! CorndogBurglar - 10/1/2009, 2:03 PM
	yeah, it's long been the stuff of science fiction, a sort of scoffed at deus ex machina plot device used in almost every medium. Like I said I don't know much about the science itself, but I've read that it's slowly gaining traction as a theory. thwhtGuardian - 10/1/2009, 3:30 PM
	corndog Religion makes no sense at all. And the laws of science exist only to be broken, in that no scientific law is exact. Not to mention that all these arguments are based soley on the formulas, constants, and elements we understand. Excluding all that exists outside our understanding and experience of the universe. I'm just saying if this is all there is, then the bar for the universal existence of intelligent life was set extremely low. Phinehas My assumption was that if there is a god, I would hope they are smarter than I am. And I am smart enough not to put all my eggs in one basket. So yes, you are arrogant to think that we are alone here in the universe. In spite of all your very impressive numbers and pretty formulas. What was it you were saying about knowing the mind of god? BillyBlack - 10/1/2009, 4:03 PM
	BillyBlack- "...why would he stop there?...Seems like god would be smarter than that." You were the one questioning His motives. I have not, nor do I claim to know the mind of God. "And the laws of science exist only to be broken, in that no scientific law is exact." I invite you to test that theory by jumping out of an airplane at 35,000 feet. Now, some fluke chance could happen that you survive it, or even go up into space instead of going towards the Earth, but I wouldn't put my eggs in that basket. I'd have better chance giving my bank account number to Bernie Madoff. Billy, wasn't Power Girl drawn very well? Phinehas - 10/1/2009, 8:47 PM
	Oooh this looks great. Not a fan of Billy Baldwin for the bats. I like Mark Harmon and James Woods is stellar! TaffetaDarling - 10/1/2009, 10:17 PM
	Yeah james woods is the man, I think it's cool that they cast different voice actors for the parallel heroes, when I saw them in the brave in the bold they were the same which was cool to an extent because BB seems pre crisis whil earth 2 is a post crisis stories where the heroes are similar but have different origins. thwhtGuardian - 10/1/2009, 11:18 PM
	Phinehas "I have not, nor do I claim to know the mind of God." I disagree. You assume to know, without a shadow of a doubt, that intelligent life can only exist here. Who can know that for sure? Green Lantern perhaps? Are you Green Lantern? "I invite you to test that theory by jumping out of an airplane at 35,000 feet. Now, some fluke chance could happen that you survive it..." Isn't the fluke chance you describe the lack of exactness I was talking about? Is the periodic table of elements as we know it a complete list of every element in the universe? Would we even be able to reach 35,000 feet if the Wright brothers had not tried to defy the laws of physics? Were Power Girls tits really that meaty? How could they stay so perky facing gravity as we know it? ^_^ I have no real interest in higher science or religion. So I cannot debate these points with any real degree of proficiency. I applaud your knowledge on the subject, and resign to your superior grasp of the material. I just have a hard time buying into the fact that a particle smasher and a pop tart is the best this universe has to offer. But we can certainly agree... Power Girl was drawn very well! BillyBlack - 10/2/2009, 11:42 AM
	Ok, BB. I'm glad were not going to beat this to death. Because I'm too stubborn not to fight. But I don't really want to either. "Isn't the fluke chance you describe the lack of exactness I was talking about?" Touche. "Would we even be able to reach 35,000 feet if the Wright brothers had not tried to defy the laws of physics?" Umm...birds. They do it all the time. But I respect your opinion. I'll drop it here...No! Wait! "Were Power Girls tits really that meaty?" Are you suggesting that all of PowerGirl is not entirely original? C'mon! You know she's Nordic! Phinehas - 10/2/2009, 5:00 PM
	hahahah Phinehas agreed Powergirl IS nordic! ^_^ BillyBlack - 10/5/2009, 11:04 AM
	sick! HavokNinja93 - 10/7/2009, 9:11 PM

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.