COMICS: Dan DiDio Reveals Plans For DC's First Big "New 52" Crossover

COMICS: Dan DiDio Reveals Plans For DC's First Big "New 52" Crossover

The co-publisher of DC Comics confirms that the first crossover for the company's "New 52" is in the works, and is planned to be released in the latter half of next year. More details after the jump.

By PaulRom - Jul 26, 2012 10:07 AM EST
Filed Under: DC Comics
Source: ICv2



In an interview with ICv2, DC Comics co-publisher Dan DiDio reveals that the comic book company is planning their first big crossover for "The New 52". He was asked about the company's future plans (including the zero issues that will be in stores this September) when he said that the first New 52 crossover will be released in the latter half of 2013. He also stated that fans should expect to see a "better continuity" between DC's comic lines.

"We have a couple of plans. I'd love to be able to celebrate the anniversary of "The New 52" with something that feels so special and something that unifies the line thematically (maybe not story-wise). We're leading to probably our first crossover event in the latter half of next year, but you're going to see a better continuity developing through the line. Hopefully through the zeroes, we'll bring some clarity to our characters. There might be some questions on how they came to be five years in "The New 52," so to speak. What I'm hoping is everyone buys in to what we're trying to do and it re-introduces people to some of the books they might have sampled, may have gotten away from, and they come back to see what's happening with the zeroes. Because it's not just about giving a snapshot or a snippet of what they are in the past, but also setting up stories for the future."

Be sure to check back to CBM for more details on DC Comics' first New 52 crossover within the next few months. For ICv2's full interview with DiDio (as well as artist Jim Lee), click the link below.










ABSOLUTE WONDER WOMAN First Look And Details Reveal That Diana Prince Is The World's First Public Superhero
Related:

ABSOLUTE WONDER WOMAN First Look And Details Reveal That Diana Prince Is The World's First Public Superhero

SUPERMAN Director James Gunn Rumored To Be Writing His First DC Comics Series For Release Next Year
Recommended For You:

SUPERMAN Director James Gunn Rumored To Be Writing His First DC Comics Series For Release Next Year

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
VicSage
VicSage - 7/26/2012, 10:51 AM
No idea why DC has to be so confusing with all their different Earths and Crises and reboots and crap. Why would the NEW 52 be only 5 years young? All this does is muddy the waters of many characters' origins.

Simple question: How did Batman have so many Robins in such a short time?

If you're going to give a time period as to how young this "reboot" is... 10 years sounds more applicable than 5.
TheGreatone0207
TheGreatone0207 - 7/26/2012, 11:02 AM
Yeah it was the dumbiest call ever to only have the heroes active for 5yrs. SMH
TheActionAce
TheActionAce - 7/26/2012, 11:08 AM
thats what I and a lot of people have been saying about the 5 years, it just does not make sense

10 years would have been much better, would have allowed for better continuity
and would have helped to explain a lot of things.

JohnnyKrypton
JohnnyKrypton - 7/26/2012, 11:12 AM
One year later (oh, wait- that was a completely different sales gimmick) and still a continuity mess. Bravo, DC.
ralfinader
ralfinader - 7/26/2012, 11:13 AM
The New52 sounded like a spur of the moment decision on DC's part, and still does.
BarnaclePete
BarnaclePete - 7/26/2012, 11:15 AM
Why does it matter how long they have been active?? I don't get why so many people are obsessed with the 5 year thing. It really doesn't matter if they have been around for 5 years or 5 days. It's new stories. That is what is important. If you actually read the first Justice League arc you would see that it takes place 5 years in the past. All of the heroes were already active individually. Flash and Green Lantern even had time to meet and help each other out. That means they have been around for a bit before they all met. DC has come out and said before The New 52 started that Batman has been operating longer than anybody else. Bottom line though, these are comics, just except them as that and enjoy the fun of them. Worrying about exactly when in a time frame something happened is pointless, especially when there was never really a set time frame for them anyway.
Tevii
Tevii - 7/26/2012, 11:18 AM
Batman and GL were not affected by the Flashpoint. The 5 years works fine. Batman was Batman for more than 5 years, just not a member of the Justice League.
Justice League began 5 years ago according to the timeline.
But at the beginning of JL Batman and GL are clearly already established.
VicSage
VicSage - 7/26/2012, 11:21 AM
If this is true, and the 5 years is just a confusing mess and that we fans are the only ones confused by it, could DC just release a timeline for crying out loud? I don't even know what about Batman is canon anymore! And he's my favorite character before The Question. Stuff is confusing.
Tevii
Tevii - 7/26/2012, 11:23 AM
And for the people that complain about DCs multiple earths thing, Marvel does the exact same thing with their "multiple earths" the only difference is they call it "Ultimate"
With them joining the Spidermen, they are doing EXACTLY what DC did in the past with the two GLS hal & Alan, or JSA & JLA... people complain about DC, but Marvel does it all the same stuff

126thst
126thst - 7/26/2012, 11:25 AM
DC is failing big time IMO. There isn't a book in the new 52 that interests me. The Batman movies were the only momentum they had, and now they're done. GL sucked, i'm hoping Superman is done well, and then what??? Marvel has movie plans through 2014. What's coming for DC? Anybody?
Tevii
Tevii - 7/26/2012, 11:34 AM
@126thst - WB is the problem, NOT DC, WB needs to clean house of their execs.
What they have coming is: Man of Steel, Lobo, Metal Men and Mandrake the Magician....

Here read this.... http://www.comicbookmovie.com/other_news/news/?a=61083
Tevii
Tevii - 7/26/2012, 11:38 AM
With preliminary work on the JLA.
WB has NO STRATEGY and they are too busy playing catch up. Wolverine was successful so the visionless suits want something comparable. so Lobo
Iron Man was very successful, so Metal Men... "heck thats a TEAM of Iron men , it MUST be successful."
Mandrake "YES! our success is with BAtman and Harry Potter, Mandrake is a comic character AND a Magician, we cant go wrong!"
WB is full of moronic, visionless suits that instead of paving the way, choose to fail miserably by doing crappy similar versions.
They are even screwing up Hobbit by splitting that small book into a trilogy
MJPETTY7
MJPETTY7 - 7/26/2012, 11:39 AM
Green Lantern and Aquaman weren't affected by the relaunch. Batman was, but very slightly. I just hope that they fix Superman. Nuff said!
Tevii
Tevii - 7/26/2012, 11:40 AM
and YES Just1Superguy is right, Animal Man, Aquaman, Action Comics, Batman, Batman & Robin, Swamp Thing, Green Lantern, Flash, Justice League and Wonder Woman are great....
and Id add, All Star Western, Suicide Squad, GL Corps
Tevii
Tevii - 7/26/2012, 11:42 AM
MJPETTY7- ive never heard Aquaman wasnt affected? Where did you hear that? Becasue the history is already a little different with Black Manta
IgnurRant
IgnurRant - 7/26/2012, 11:54 AM
The New 52 was such a half assed reboot. And Marvel Now sounds equally half assed & spur of the moment. I hate the state of comics now. Graphic Novels and out of continuity books are the only thing good now.
MJPETTY7
MJPETTY7 - 7/26/2012, 11:55 AM
@Tevii Johns said that Aquaman #1 basically picks up right where we last saw Arthur after Brightest Day.
IgnurRant
IgnurRant - 7/26/2012, 11:58 AM
Aquaman, DeadMan, Deathstroke & Suicide Squad were good 52 reads tho.

RIP Ulimate Petrr Parker. Great read.
Tevii
Tevii - 7/26/2012, 12:10 PM
MJPetty - hmm... well all New 52 pick up after brightest day and flashpoint you can still read it all in linear order. But i wonder if he actually meant there were no changes due to the flashpoint. Because there are changes for the New 52 such as the Others and his past link with Black Manta.
oh well.... either way its a GREAT book.
blueorangeny
blueorangeny - 7/26/2012, 12:11 PM
funny to read how some people comment "As if" they know better. Rather then talking about the negatives and should have done this or that...only real way to have them hear you is boycott. But that's not going to happen so suck it up.
MisterBabadook
MisterBabadook - 7/26/2012, 12:30 PM
I bet there's a time demon that has enslaved everybody for 5 years and the only thing that can stop it is the Spectre.
MisterBabadook
MisterBabadook - 7/26/2012, 12:33 PM
Here we go, something is [frick]ing with Metron.
There we can fuse the new 52 and the Age of the Crossover.
WarnerBrother
WarnerBrother - 7/26/2012, 1:03 PM
@Tevel

You haven't heard of WBs DC film strategy for 2014 and beyond because it hasn't been released yet. WB let it be known before Comic-Con that they would release their film slate in the next month and a half (August/early September)so we really don't know if the films you listed beyond MOS are really the official slate or not.If WB does release a film slate in August/September that would still be time enough for a Green Lantern 2/The Flash or Justice League film to come together for 2014 since all three have script treatments in development for some time.
Tevii
Tevii - 7/26/2012, 1:49 PM
blkyank - Im sure they are MAKING a strategy now... like always: late. I certainly hope they improve everything. but i dont think they approach anything properly. DC characters are more fantastic than Marvel and yet WB wants to approach their characters more realistically and dar and gritty. It doesnt work. So even when they finally get a strategy together, their current approach doesn't work either unfortunately.
New heads of WB need to be put in place before I think we will see GREAT DC movies like the current great Marvel movies
Havok2
Havok2 - 7/26/2012, 1:50 PM
@Tevii How is this anything like the Ultimate Marvel universe?

They've had two crossovers in 12 years, that's just a little bit different to the multiple Earths journey, DC has taken us down
Tevii
Tevii - 7/26/2012, 2:07 PM
@Havok2 - You dont see how an alternate universe known as the Ultimates is similar to multiple universes in DC? Its the exact same concept. Dc is older so they went down this road a long time ago.
But now Marvel is going down the exact same path the MOMENT they introduced the ultimate universe. then they took the next step by having a crossover of the two universes.
its a progression. Parallel dimensions to tell similar but different stories, then later have the characters meet... Im sorry. If you cant see how then there really is nothing more i can say.
Ichaos
Ichaos - 7/26/2012, 2:10 PM
Morrison is gone? Great! I always thought it was a bad idea to give control of DC comics to Lex Luthor anyway
Odin
Odin - 7/26/2012, 2:24 PM
The new 52 SUCKS!
inky
inky - 7/26/2012, 2:24 PM
C has need a ullrebofor years its thre eadership that has failed there fan base and lack of relity in all there worlds and mixed up story lines.
concentraiting on superman and batman seems to be there limit.
DC needs help
xstryker
xstryker - 7/26/2012, 3:44 PM
Zeroes. Jesus. So dumb.
GENZOD80
GENZOD80 - 7/26/2012, 4:08 PM
I am still not buying this new 52, please go back to the way it was, there was no reason for this whole reboot, they ruined all the great storyline and so forth.
WarnerBrother
WarnerBrother - 7/26/2012, 4:26 PM
@Tevii

Green Lantern was hardly realistic,dark or gritty.In fact, Green Lantern was the most Marvel studios like CBM WB has made.It just didn't klick with the public for a number
of reasons.

Sure Nolan's Batman films are realistic,dark,gritty, elect and Man of Steel SEEMS
that way.

But that could be due to people projecting it out to be that way based on Nolan's involvement and Zach Snyder's WATCHMEN, which of course was dark but never
ment to be a franchise.
brewtownpsych
brewtownpsych - 7/26/2012, 4:49 PM
guys, guys, guys ... i read a lot of comics and i don't distinguish between brands. i read DC, Marvel, Vertigo, Image, Dark Horse and just about every other independent there is. writers and artists are constantly shuffling around and everybody borrows from everybody. company allegiances are just silly. there may be things that trend a little among companies for short periods of time but that's it. just read well-written books with great art and you can't go wrong.

for me the new 52 has been great. there are a lot of lackluster books sure, but there are SO MANY WELL WRITTEN titles that i have a hard time believing a true comic book fan can't find something appealing.

Animal Man, Swamp Thing, Stormwatch (with Martian Manhunter, Midnighter etc.), Batman, Batman & Robin, Birds of Prey, All-Star Western, Blue Beetle, Batwoman, Justice League Dark, these are just a few of the many GREAT titles.

For me if you are looking to try something on the DC side, avoid the "big gun" titles (Justice League, Superman, Green Lantern, etc.) and look for the lesser known titles (except Batman, that is a MUST READ). Coincidentally this is my general approach on the Marvel side as well and personally i think the books I read on that side are the cream of the crop (Daredevil, Punisher, Winter Soldier etc.).

I will say that right now IMAGE COMICS seems to have the most consistently good titles. Check out Saga (easily one of the best books in the last 10 years), Manhattan Projects and Thief of Thieves, just to name a few. Breakout of the rockem sockem superhero world a little bit, you will find it rewarding. Saga is an ultra-hip sci fi adventure anyway. You could see Joss Whedon directing a film adaptation of it some day.
DaddyTuesday
DaddyTuesday - 7/26/2012, 5:53 PM
As a life long collector of DC comics and over 9000 comics in my collection this new 52 sucks. They rebooted the universe but they are picking bits of the old universe and dragging it into this new one. I just wish they would have restarted properly and not picked bits to carry over. And why the felt they should restart everything while in the middle of a Green Lantern story beggers belief. The whole thing has been handled poorly.
GrayMatter
GrayMatter - 7/26/2012, 6:26 PM
I've been reading several of the titles since the new 52 started, and while a lot of them are actually pretty good reads, I have to admit that it's pretty clear that DC has no real idea what they're doing with the whole "reboot" thing.

I mean, the timeline is all over the place. You have the first arc of Justice League starting 5 years ago, but Batman has been active longer. And then Action Comics takes place even before that. And then anything that Geoff Johns has been involved with recently isn't actually rebooted at all eg: Green Lantern or anything remotely tied to Brightest Day (Aquaman, Swamp Thing which then ties into Animal Man, etc).

Or how the guy who's writing Teen Titans said that Tim Drake was never Robin, he just went straight to being Red Robin, despite saying IN HIS OWN BOOK that Tim was a former Robin. Or how in Red Hood and the Outlaws they make reference to Starfire being in the Teen Titans (mentioning other classic characters), when the new Teen Titans started by Red Robin is clearly supposed to be the first incarnation of the team.

It goes on and on. So while the quality of the books themselves is generally pretty good (at least the titles I've read), the overall direction of the universe is less of a "reboot" and more of a "cluster[frick]"
1 2
View Recorder