MPAA Rating For IRON MAN 3 Revealed

MPAA Rating For IRON MAN 3 Revealed

The Shane Black directed film finally gets a rating, hit the jump to check it out. No surprises here as the film is rated PG-13 but if you want to know why then continue on to read the MPAA's description of how Iron Man 3 earned it's rating.

News
By D117 - Apr 08, 2013 09:04 PM EST
Filed Under: Iron Man
Source: Marvel




The upcoming film has been rated PG-13 for: Intense Sci-Fi Action and Violence Throughout, and Brief Suggestive Content. No surprise with this rating, but be sure to check out the film when it hits theaters May 3rd.

[Note: The rating pops up on Iron Man 3's official, interactive website when the mouse hovers near the bottom.]




New Iron Patriot Hot Toys Figure Imagines What Norman Osborn's Iron Man Suit Would Look Like In The MCU
Related:

New Iron Patriot Hot Toys Figure Imagines What Norman Osborn's Iron Man Suit Would Look Like In The MCU
IRON MAN AND HIS AWESOME FRIENDS Animated Series Coming To Disney+; Will Also Feature Ironheart And Iron Hulk
Recommended For You:

IRON MAN AND HIS AWESOME FRIENDS Animated Series Coming To Disney+; Will Also Feature Ironheart And Iron Hulk

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Do you have what it takes to write for us?
Want to contribute?
JDUKE25
JDUKE25 - 4/8/2013, 10:00 PM

TheManFromMars
TheManFromMars - 4/8/2013, 10:02 PM
RextheKing
RextheKing - 4/8/2013, 10:10 PM
It says "No surprise with this rating" in the article(If you guys would actually read them), so please don't start the, "Okay, captain obvious" shit here.
Jaspion
Jaspion - 4/8/2013, 10:11 PM
May 3rd? No, thanks. I prefer April 26th.
TheManFromMars
TheManFromMars - 4/8/2013, 10:11 PM
@RextheKing

Okay, Captain Obvious
TheManFromMars
TheManFromMars - 4/8/2013, 10:13 PM
The article only has two lines. One has to be a really lazy mofo to not read it on its entirety.
SpoonWielder
SpoonWielder - 4/8/2013, 10:16 PM
Brief Suggestive Content. That means sex.
RextheKing
RextheKing - 4/8/2013, 10:17 PM
@TheManFromMars
Yet we already have two comments with a photo, the other with a gif, that's made to express surprise, but obviously in sarcasm. They didn't have to say "Okay, Captain Obvious" to get the their point across.
Don't underestimate people laziness; they'll read the Article's title and nothing else.
RextheKing
RextheKing - 4/8/2013, 10:18 PM
Oh shit, and now I notice the photo was by you. Were you yourself to lazy to read the article, or just wanted the attention.
TheManFromMars
TheManFromMars - 4/8/2013, 10:20 PM
@RextheKing

Well, considering that the rating is not on the title, I don't see how that could help.

I didn't mean any malice with my comments and the surprised monkey pic, I just like being silly.

I hope it's okay with you. Cheers.
TheManFromMars
TheManFromMars - 4/8/2013, 10:23 PM
@RextheKing

By the way, the monkey pic wasn't supposed to convey surprise. It was supposed to be more like a mocking "Oh my God! This is amazing!" type-thing.

Not that it helps matters...
RextheKing
RextheKing - 4/8/2013, 10:35 PM
@TheManFromMars
Well then I apologize, and I mean that on a serious note, I mis-interpreted your comment.
TheManFromMars
TheManFromMars - 4/8/2013, 10:39 PM
@RextheKing

No problemo

:)
RextheKing
RextheKing - 4/8/2013, 10:40 PM
I also didn't take notice to the fact, before I made my comment, that they didn't put the rating in the title, so my bad on that basis as well. Still, you wouldn't have had to read the article to know it would be rated pg-13, so you would still get the sarcastic comments, from those too lazy to read.
RextheKing
RextheKing - 4/8/2013, 10:48 PM
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Behavior like this is what I don't like. If you knew it would be PG-13 and felt the story would be pointless, why even click on the article in the first place?
batfan175
batfan175 - 4/8/2013, 11:08 PM
wow like a big studio could ever pay the MPAA and not get a PG-13.........
HongKongPooey
HongKongPooey - 4/8/2013, 11:58 PM
so still no official run time of the film?
TerminalVoyd
TerminalVoyd - 4/9/2013, 12:43 AM
For $12 and change a ticket, I expect a decent run time AND quality. I can't recall the last time I bothered with a movie that was well under two hours.
PsychoManiacJacky
PsychoManiacJacky - 4/9/2013, 1:00 AM
Oh wow i actually thought it was going to be rated PG-13 For: Intense Bloody Violence and Gore, Language, Intense Suggestive Content, Intense Sc-Fi Violence, Brief Suggestive Themes, Graphic Moments, Iron Man Getting Kicked in The Iron Balls....
staypuffed
staypuffed - 4/9/2013, 2:53 AM
Does this really require a whole article? Maybe put it in Micro-News...
jerryblake
jerryblake - 4/9/2013, 3:14 AM
"Ok, move along people, there's nothing to see here"
Zessus
Zessus - 4/9/2013, 4:31 PM
....does anyone actually care about "why" a movie got its rating? I mean, seriously
Related Headlines
Latest Headlines

Hot Headlines Hot Headlines

Sci-Fi & Fantasy

Anime & Manga

Gaming

Horror

Cartoons & Animated Features

Action Movies & TV

Pro Wrestling & MMA News
View Recorder