What went wrong with Ang Lee's HULK?

What went wrong with Ang Lee's HULK?

I recently decided to go and watch the 2003 film by Ang Lee, entitled “HULK”, which is known for being notoriously bad. And it was bad. Very bad. So I watched it over and tried to study what went wrong with it. Here is what I came up with.

Editorial Opinion
By EpitomeofAwesome - Mar 05, 2014 05:03 PM EST
Filed Under: Hulk


So now that we’ve had two great interpretations of the Hulk in film, (The Incredible Hulk and The Avengers), I decided to go and watch the 2003 film by Ang Lee, entitled “HULK”, which is known for being notoriously bad. And it was bad. Very bad. So I watched it over and tried to study what went wrong with it. Here is what I came up with.
I’m gonna have to issue a spoiler alert here, just in case you haven’t seen the movie.

STORY

There is very little story in this movie. And what there is there, it’s weird. I don’t know if the whole father/son aspect was from a comic run, but even if it was it was handled very poorly and didn’t work. And also, Betty betrays Bruce not once, but TWICE and he still trusts and loves her. A bit odd if you ask me.


VILLAIN

Ehhhh. This is definitely one of the biggest problems I had with the film. The problem is, there’s no real villain in this movie. I mean, there’s one person that apparently Betty knew in college, but he has no character development and I don’t even know his name. His dad’s a shady character, but he tries to help Bruce, and the audience is never sure if he’s good or bad, until he turns in a crazy cloud thing. One could argue that Thunderbolt Ross if the villain, but they played him to be more sympathetic and just trying to do right, and get back in touch with his daughter.


BORING

This movie is two and a half hours, but it only feels like five. Most of the film is dialogue scenes, which I don’t mind at all: IF IT’S GOOD DIALOGUE. Most of the dialogue in the movie is trash, poorly executed, and poorly acted (with a couple good actors in there).


DISTANT HULK

Whenever Bruce turns into the Hulk, it’s like he’s another character. Part of this may be due to the technology of the time, but, with the exception of about two scenes, he just seems so distant. Even with The Incredible Hulk, where he doesn’t look just like Banner like in The Avengers, you still have the feeling it’s the same dude.


HULKIFIED POODLE

One of the only action sequences in the movie is Hulk fighting a “hulkified” poodle. ‘Nuff said.


CASTING

I personally think that casting Jennifer Connelly was a mistake. I think they could have gotten another, better, actress for the role of Betty Ross. And even though Eric Bana did the best he could do with what he was given, (and was actually one of the parts I liked about the movie), I never felt like he was Banner like I did with Edward Norton, and (to a lesser extent) Mark Ruffalo. Nick Nolte was good as his father, and Sam Elliot was good as Thunderbolt Ross, but I prefer William Hurt’s portrayal.


So, these are the main reasons I think that the movie failed. That being said, there were some things I liked about it; I thought some of the (few) action scenes were good, and the comic book panel feel was pretty gutsy and it looked nice. So what do you think? Leave a comment down below and let the internet know. Until next time, I’m EpitomeofAwesome.
WORLD WAR HULK: 6 More Hulks We'd Like To See In The Rumored MCU Event Movie
Related:

WORLD WAR HULK: 6 More Hulks We'd Like To See In The Rumored MCU Event Movie

RUMOR: Marvel Studios May Be Planning To Introduce The Most Sinister HULK Yet: Maestro!
Recommended For You:

RUMOR: Marvel Studios May Be Planning To Introduce The Most Sinister HULK Yet: Maestro!

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

MrCBM56
MrCBM56 - 3/5/2014, 6:49 PM
It's actually a pretty good film.
MightyZeus
MightyZeus - 3/5/2014, 6:52 PM
I thought the film in my opinion was good. The film itself isnt as horrible as people say it is.
BenjiWest
BenjiWest - 3/5/2014, 8:13 PM
I liked this film alot, it was a unique take on CBM for its time. Bana was a great Bruce. The ending was pretty sub par. Good write up.
GuardianDevil
GuardianDevil - 3/5/2014, 8:47 PM
Funny, I was just re-watching this last night and today. I've been comparing it to the 2008 film and honestly the more I see of both the more I like Lee's Hulk better.

What's really different is that TIH wows you as a moviegoer right off the bat but with more re watches the more you feel it is a bit shallow.

Hulk on the other hand feels bland and boring right off the bat but the more I see of it the more I realize how deep, emotional and psychologically interesting this film is.

I honestly feel it was ahead of it's time in some ways. It takes the deep, dark inner character search in a time where popcorn-styled CBMs was all that people liked. I think if it had been released in say...2008, spruced up with more modern CGI it would've been adored.


All that said, Ang Lee's Hulk IMHO is pretty close to a masterpiece.
Tainted87
Tainted87 - 3/5/2014, 10:03 PM
Everyone here knows I prefer 'Hulk' to 'the Incredible Hulk'.
It's not that tIH is a bad movie, because it's actually pretty enjoyable - but the interpretation was fresh, unique, and extraordinary.

Onto your article.
Jennifer Connelly was NOT a mistake, she was in fact, one of the best aspects. Her Betty begins a crusader, wanting to fight the good fight, and then over the course of the movie, her optimism is squeezed and drained through her efforts to find answers and help Bruce. She's actually one of the most active and important love interests in a comic book movie. She's the first to meet David - and while he's a creepy character, she's fairly polite to him. When she discovers his identity, she confronts him - blaming him for Bruce's fate, and shows no fear beyond his posturing while he describes in detail just how much of a monster he really is. The scene where the Hulk reverts back to Bruce in San Francisco and the two hold each other is one of the most tender sequences in a CBM. They know they can't be together, they know that this is what it is. You can see it in their body language, their eyes.

I do understand the complaints about David Banner not being a menacing enough villain, especially in the way he gets his "upgrade" in the final portion of the film. That said, he is the film's main character in the beginning, and we get a lengthy exploration of his goals, his insanity, and his evil.

I think the "problem" with 'Hulk' is that it is in the realm of the CBM, and although it is a deep, thoughtful exploration - it's geared towards the wrong audience.

I really loved Sam Elliot's General Ross - he's not a villain, he's just an overprotective father serving in the military. He's charming to a degree, reasonable for a spell, but also very opinionated and biased. He loves his daughter, and that's the reason why he puts up a fight to protect Bruce from being turned over as a lab rat. We're meant to think that it's a grudge from the past with David, but at the end, when the two are face to face, they only glare at each other wordlessly.

One deleted scene (cut for time) showed Bruce and Betty's delivery of the nanomeds to the board, and it gets to be philosophical. Bruce explains the problem with the nanomeds is that they work too well, that they try to suppress and repair all the things that make humans/organics these chaotic life-forms. From his point of view, we know he understands this all too well, and Betty takes a long contemplative look at him, as they understand that he's disconnected in a similar way from his emotions.

A great scene that goes down in my selective memory, is when Bruce is exposed to the nanomeds and gamma rays in the lab. It's greater than Doctor Manattan's intrinsic field origin, and that's mostly because of Jennifer Connelly's Betty. She watches. She screams in terror. Bruce, however, knows what he has to do and doesn't hesitate.

It's really one of my favorite CBMs, mostly because it lacks so many elements that make it a CBM.
GuardianDevil
GuardianDevil - 3/5/2014, 10:08 PM
@Tainted
IMHO the "problem" with HULK is that it only appealed to a niche audience. It was too deep, dark and long for the CBM fans/action lovers and it was too corny in a way and too comic book-ish for Ang Lee-style drama fans. Which leaves only a handful who could really enjoy it as the great movie that it is.
Tainted87
Tainted87 - 3/5/2014, 10:24 PM
@ALmight
I thought David turning into the Absorbing Man made perfect sense. Am I supposed to care that his name isn't the same as in the comics, that it's a character with the same powers but different names...? Back when I saw it, I had no idea who Absorbing Man was. I remember seeing a Marvel mini-mate advertisement and it the Absorbing Man paired with Thor - I was like "whaaaat?"

I never thought it was stupid, or bad, or terrible... so maybe I'm a little biased.
Tainted87
Tainted87 - 3/5/2014, 10:26 PM
@JJ63
I know a lot of Ang Lee fans actually think that he dumbed it down for 'Hulk'. There's no real happy medium for most people. Having never cared about the Hulk in general, I guess I managed to fit into that niche.
Lhornbk
Lhornbk - 3/5/2014, 10:34 PM
Tied with Superman IV for worst cbm ever. Absolutely unwatchable. I think it took me 5-6 tries to actually watch the entire movie from start to finish, and I had to force myself to do it. Will never torture myself like that again. Awful, terrible, horrible movie.
Highflyer
Highflyer - 3/6/2014, 4:55 AM
Comparing Ang Lee's Hulk to The Incredible Hulk isn't a good idea. The main things I hated about Ang Lee's Hulk, was Hulk's design (Shrek) and the false advertising. With that said I still believe Norton's movie was better. I think they should have released Ang Lee's Hulk in 2030. When adaption a comic book character don't show us the unfamiliar before the familiar. If they released Norton's Hulk back 2003 it would have been much more successful while if they released ang lee's 'Hulk' way later it might have been better received.
MisterHolmes
MisterHolmes - 3/6/2014, 11:43 AM
i like how everyone hates this movie, but then an article about why it sucked people defend it and say they acctually liked it, Its ok to say it, bc i agree with you...........ITS A LONG SHITTY ASS BORING MOVIE!
Brainiac13
Brainiac13 - 3/6/2014, 12:07 PM
I'm a huge Hulk fan and this was boring......boring like Superman Returns.

Norton's Hulk/Banner is the best interpretation from the comics.....yes better than the Avengers version IMO......both still way better that Lee's.



gamecreatorjj
gamecreatorjj - 3/6/2014, 4:20 PM
It's a good movie, it was something original and unique. It's not the action movie every body wanted. It's a much more personal movie about Banner's psyche, which made the Hulk scenes all the more impactful.
ThunderKat
ThunderKat - 3/6/2014, 10:30 PM
If this movie opened mid-90's, it would seem classic.

Opening post "Spider-Man" and "X-Men," makes you realize that this guy was out to inadvertently ruin the genre. He was more about putting his stamp on the film than making it about the characters and the source material.
GuardianDevil
GuardianDevil - 3/7/2014, 10:44 AM
Ang Lee's HULK = best Marvel movie tied with Spider-Man 2.

Funny thing is, I hated it as a kid but the older I get the more I love it. I grow to appreciate how deep, gripping and psychological it is as an adult. ALMOST on par with Nolan's films....
Highflyer
Highflyer - 3/7/2014, 11:50 AM
@JJ63 The best? Really? I appreciate it for what it was. I wouldn't really call it 'deep' but it sure deal with interesting issues concerning the Hulk. I wasn't (And still) not happy about how they handled his father issues. It would have been an interesting sub-plot but making him the absorbing man wasn't a good idea.
Highflyer
Highflyer - 3/7/2014, 11:52 AM
@dethpillow how did the movie deal with the character of the hulk? I mean I say Bruce have a troubled child-hood but I never felt that the Hulk was even a real character in the movie.
GuardianDevil
GuardianDevil - 3/7/2014, 12:07 PM
@highflyer
I would argue it is one of the best because of the depth and psychological aspects of the film that make it much more interesting than any other Marvel film. Spider-Man 2 is probably the best, but Lee's HULK if its not my favorite it's top two with Spidey 2. Daredevil (Director Cut), First Class, Wolverine and Iron Man are the top five IMHO.

I like Lee's HULK the best because of the creativity, but also the dark psychology it had in the film. Hulk has always been my favorite Marvel hero, and growing up it was The Incredible Hulk (2008) that made and kept me a huge fan of the character. I love that movie as well because of the Hulk action and the excitement of the story. But I like Ang Lee's effort better because it focuses on what makes the character who he is. Why he is what he is, not just what he is capable of. (avengers, TIH) HULK is all about the character of the Hulk and when he transforms you can just feel the burn, the hate, the bitterness and resentment and just the rage piled up within the character that is absent from the other versions of the character. What is interesting is that Bruce LIKES transforming into the Hulk, he feels that it gives him freedom in a world where he has next to none. I liked the stuff about it "already being inside" and even the father thing was interesting. I liked every single live action depiction of Hulk to date, but Ang Lee's movie has become my favorite. The story, the character development, performances, even most of the action is top-notch. Not to mention the downright beautiful score, and the epic scenery.

Also, what I loved is that it found a medium between comics and movies in a way no other CBM has. It looks and feels like a direct comic-to-movie adaptation but also makes changes and finds it own identity as a deep, dark MOVIE. I loved Lee's Hulk, one of my all time favorite CBMs.
Highflyer
Highflyer - 3/7/2014, 1:37 PM
@JJ63 if there is one thing I've enjoyed about all portrayals of Bruce Banner/Hulk is how he doesn't seem like a COMPLETELY innocent guy. I also like how he said he likes it when the hulk takes over. It would have been cooler if the hulk himself had a bigger personality in that movie. I LOVED the build-up to the first transformation. So far, the hulk hasn't had a bad first appearance in any film yet. It always kicks ass. I liked how the imagery of a door breaking down was done. I liked Eric Bana as Bruce but at certain times his lines could have been delivered better (like when he was talking to his dad on the phone) aside from that he was great. P.S the daredevil director's cut is also one of my favorites along with Watchmen, The Incredible Hulk, Ang Lee Hulk and Superman Returns (I know its controversial).
GuardianDevil
GuardianDevil - 3/7/2014, 5:25 PM
@highflyer
Agreed on Hulk having his own personality. As for my all time favs, there's too many but the best of the best are Batman Begins, The Dark Knight, HULK, Hellboy, Spider-Man 2, Daredevil (Director's Cut), Watchmen and The Wolverine.

For the record I loved The Incredible Hulk, but it's in the same way I loved Man of Steel, Avengers, Blade 2 or Punisher: War Zone. It's escapism, fun and excitement but not exactly the most well made.

Superman Returns was good, unfairly hated IMHO.
Wolf38
Wolf38 - 3/7/2014, 5:52 PM
Well, I differ strongly from this editorial. This is just a divisive film. It failed because of its style, which to say the least does not appeal to everyone, not because it's a horrible failure of a film.

I happen to love this film, unabashedly. To me, it's one of the most ambitious, character-driven, visually intrepid CBMs ever made. It's kind of surreal and almost impressionistic. But that's because it suits my personal tastes - for one thing, it doesn't bore me. I understand why others dislike it.

And I think that Jennifer Connelly is great. The entire cast is top-notch IMHO. Again, that's just me.

I do think that Ruffalo is the best fit for the part, and obviously the CGI in The Avengers was superior to anything previous. The Incredible Hulk is everything that Ang Lee's Hulk is not. It's inoffensive, but also lacking in ambition, I would say. I appreciate the ambition more.

Wolf38
Wolf38 - 3/7/2014, 5:58 PM
Also, on the villains angle, I think that Hulk is an excellent film, because it's complex and shows a bunch of characters making compromises and struggling with demons. The enemy isn't some overt "bad guy" but something that might be inside everyone. You have a crazy, hard to gauge father figure, a simple greedy businessman, a general approaching the situation from a military perspective, and at the center of it all, an innocent guy who can't control his "inner self."
Wolf38
Wolf38 - 3/7/2014, 6:02 PM
@JJ63, I agree with what you're saying. Hulk is cool because it's psychologically dark (i.e. Nolan-esque in a way) but visually like a pure, primary-color comic book. The set in the underground base, with all of the red, yellow and blue colors is one of my favorite details.

Anyway, the contrast between the look and the tone is really compelling to me. Or maybe it's not a contrast so much as that it's different from the typical dark/light paths that most CBMs follow.
CherryBomb
CherryBomb - 3/8/2014, 1:54 PM
Jennifer Connelly was just fine.
ThunderKat
ThunderKat - 3/8/2014, 4:47 PM
Let me restate my points:

Terrible writing, terrible directing, and good actors who can't make diamonds out of mud.

The only likeable character was the Hulk.

The Iron Man series is the comic on film that has managed to be interesting and entertaining while having weak, almost unchallenging villains.
The hero is best defined by the depth of his villain: Magneto, Doc Ock, Goblin, Joker, (Donner's)Zod, Loki, Malekith, and the Red Skull.
EpitomeofAwesome
EpitomeofAwesome - 3/8/2014, 5:12 PM
@Thunder
Yup, that pretty much sums up the movie.
EpitomeofAwesome
EpitomeofAwesome - 3/8/2014, 6:35 PM
@Holmes Haha yeah, that's what I was thinking
View Recorder