MINI EDITORIAL: Are Comic Book Films Getting Too Violent & Disturbing?

MINI EDITORIAL: Are Comic Book Films Getting Too Violent & Disturbing?

I am here to discuss comic book films today and the amount of violence displayed. Click to check it out.

Editorial Opinion
By PsychoManiacJacky - Aug 16, 2013 04:08 PM EST
Filed Under: Action



Hello everyone, I have an important issue to discuss. Ever since we have stepped in the new era of comic book films they have been getting more and more violent. More punches have been thrown and more characters have been getting killed on screen in extremely brutal ways. Some I find very unsettling and inappropriate. For a strong example Uncle Ben's disturbing death in The Amazing Spider-Man to Dr.Curt Connors terrifying transformation as the Lizard. To the amounts of unneeded violence displayed in The Dark Knight Trilogy and The Avengers array of destruction. From this years Man of Steel being a non stop fight club of action and harm. Adult audiences are not the only ones watching these films, children look up to these heroes too which is my concern. What will happen to their minds seeing all these heroes display extraordinary amounts of violence and harm on the screen. Will they want to become one in the future?

WB was on the right track with decisions to tone down both Batman Forever and Batman & Robin back in the 90s and I can see why they did. You don't need violence or so many amounts of fighting to make a good comic book film, all you need is a good story and a good idea. Making it minimal to the point and not controversially extreme. That's why I would generally want to appeal to studios to tone down comic book films. I think we are better off with films such as Batman Forever than any comic book film today. I may write about violence often but I am strongly against some of it. Jim Carrey had a point speaking out against Kick-Ass 2. If the comic book itself is violent on page doesn't mean you have to display it in it's full glory. From the page to the screen is a different matter at hand, when it comes to the screen you are dealing with reality and people seeing it in actual motion not just reading it. Somethings just don't work at all. If a some bad guy is getting his head bashed in violently in a comic book and suddenly there is crazy amounts of blood you think it would be right, but when it comes to a movie in reality that is insanity.

Thank you for reading and I hope all of you take this point in mind, we don't need to solve our problems with anger or hatred but we can by using a method of peace and salvation. Not with our fists or our greed but a little talking can do the trick at all times.

TWISTERS Star Sasha Lane On Chasing Tornados With Glen Powell, Facing Real Danger, & Sequel Hopes (Exclusive)
Related:

TWISTERS Star Sasha Lane On Chasing Tornados With Glen Powell, Facing Real Danger, & Sequel Hopes (Exclusive)

1992 Interview: Scott Eastwood Reflects On Working With Ray Liotta And Working In Shades Of Grey (Exclusive)
Recommended For You:

1992 Interview: Scott Eastwood Reflects On Working With Ray Liotta And Working In Shades Of Grey (Exclusive)

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Abary
Abary - 8/16/2013, 5:00 PM
They aren't violent and disturbing ENOUGH.
Tainted87
Tainted87 - 8/16/2013, 5:10 PM
RobGrizzly
RobGrizzly - 8/16/2013, 6:03 PM
" I think we are better off with films such as Batman Forever than any comic book film today."-

....



.........................


..

No
Abary
Abary - 8/16/2013, 6:44 PM
LMAO Tainted. I love that clip. The single greatest Robot Chicken clip in existence.
maninfinesuit
maninfinesuit - 8/16/2013, 7:02 PM
Violence exists. Let's not encourage Hollywood to start sugarcoating again, mom.
SnapperCarr
SnapperCarr - 8/16/2013, 7:20 PM
They need to tone down the violence a little bit. But who doesn't want to see the slugfests on the big screen?
maninfinesuit
maninfinesuit - 8/16/2013, 7:30 PM
Batman Forever was a great CBM.
StrangeBlackPantherDoctor
StrangeBlackPantherDoctor - 8/16/2013, 8:11 PM
Violence is awesome.
StrangeBlackPantherDoctor
StrangeBlackPantherDoctor - 8/16/2013, 8:11 PM
Avengers (Which I Love) can be viewed by anyone of any age and so can most CBM's.
Lhornbk
Lhornbk - 8/16/2013, 11:15 PM
Ummm.....I'm going to assume, from your reputation and just the way this article reads, that this is satire. If so, good job.
staypuffed
staypuffed - 8/17/2013, 3:33 AM
You say that children are looking up to the heroes.
I can understand why WB/Marvel market the CBMs to kids - it sells a butt-ton of toys and merch. But it's the fault of the parents if they chose to bring an 8-year-old into a PG-13 or 12A movie and find it's "too violent." They should read and understand the rating.

On the issue itself, you could hardly call Uncle Ben's death in TASM "disturbing" nor the Lizard's transformation "terrifying." They are not even close to Kick-Ass levels of violence. And you would prefer Batman Forver over The Dark Knight? TDK is an incredible cinematic experience. The utter chaos the Joker spreads is not needless, it serves a purpose and has a social message, too.

I'm sorry, but in the 21st century this editorial seems like a waste of time. People take a passive approach to violence, and as you say solve problems with words not fists. But that's not going to happen. It just doesn't. You can't wish for a world where we have peaceful debates, or superheroes who softly grab cats out of trees. We live in a sophisticated, complicated and sometimes uneasy world. Violence is violence. I'm not saying I support crime or horrible action, but I don't think this sort of thing will do any good.
NovaCorpsFan
NovaCorpsFan - 8/17/2013, 5:17 AM
Well done on trying to spark debate.
MrDonut
MrDonut - 8/17/2013, 10:28 AM
Im more concerned about the swearing; 12A shouldn't have '[frick]' in them... Might sound like a nitpick but when I was kid they didn't have them; they had minor curses and reasonable violence... The violence these days aint too bad, Man of Steel (which I liked) was just shocking more so than violent, whereas The Wolverine which was a 12A film, included '[frick]'- whilst it was fitting for the scenario, I watched it with my little cousin (who's 12) n he doesn't use curses like that so it seems a bit dumb to through them into films that are aimed at kids too...
MrDonut
MrDonut - 8/17/2013, 10:29 AM
*throw them
TheSuperguy
TheSuperguy - 8/17/2013, 11:30 AM
We want CBM's to become more adult and mature, therefore, they will be more violent. I don't need Superman to burn somebody alive with his heat vision, or Batman to drop somebody off a building and kill them. But I will NOT, I repeat, will NOT, go back to a Batman & Robin level of family friendliness.
kong
kong - 8/17/2013, 7:14 PM
They aren't at all too violent. Superheroes aren't in the real world but death is. There's no point in sugar coating it. And the studio does put a rating. Its the parents decision if a 7 year old can see a PG-13 movie. They're meant for people 13 and up or 18 and up or for all ages. Batman & Robin will never happen again. Avengers wasn't that light toned. People are killed everyday, why can't it happen in a movie.
kenjim152
kenjim152 - 8/18/2013, 6:53 AM
Yeah specially the ones marvel studios make :S ( sarcasm face)
GageHarts
GageHarts - 8/19/2013, 9:08 AM
The films are not violent enough
GinjaNinja
GinjaNinja - 8/19/2013, 2:50 PM
I have an idea, if you don't think your kids can handle it... Don't take your kids to the movie! I wasn't able to see the first spider-man when it came out because I was like 10. I hated it but my parents decided it was to much for me at the time. So you they didn't just take me to it and wine about the movie, they just didn't take me.
View Recorder