Stan Lee Sees No Reason Why SPIDER-MAN's Race Or Sexuality Should Be Changed

Stan Lee Sees No Reason Why SPIDER-MAN's Race Or Sexuality Should Be Changed

Until Kevin Feige made it clear that Marvel will be sticking to the comic books by casting a white actor to play Spider-Man in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, there was a lot of talk about changing Peter Parker's race on the big screen. As it turns out, that's not an idea Stan Lee is too keen on...

By JoshWilding - Jun 22, 2015 04:06 PM EST
Filed Under: Spider-Man
Source: Newsarama
When it was revealed that Marvel and Sony were teaming up to find a new Spider-Man, there was a lot of speculation about Miles Morales possibly taking over the mantle or a non-white actor being chosen as the new Peter Parker. We've since learned that neither of those things are happening, and talking to Newsarama recently, Spider-Man co-creator Stan Lee revealed why that's a decision he agrees with. "I wouldn’t mind, if Peter Parker had originally been black, a Latino, an Indian or anything else, that he stay that way," Lee said about a possible race change. "But we originally made him white. I don’t see any reason to change that." That's a sentiment which has been echoed by fans of all races, but there's still a pretty vocal minority who argue otherwise. 
 
As for some recent "controversy" about Marvel once telling Sony that Spider-Man should not be portrayed as being homosexual unless that happens in the comics, the comic book creator added: "I think the world has a place for gay superheroes, certainly. But again, I don’t see any reason to change the sexual proclivities of a character once they’ve already been established. I have no problem with creating new, homosexual superheroes." The conversation then returned to the possibility of changing Peter Parker's race, and Lee once again echoed the thoughts of many fans when he stated the following. "It has nothing to do with being anti-gay, or anti-black, or anti-Latino, or anything like that. Latino characters should stay Latino. The Black Panther should certainly not be Swiss. I just see no reason to change that which has already been established when it’s so easy to add new characters. I say create new characters the way you want to." 
 
"What I like about the costume is that anybody reading Spider-Man in any part of the world can imagine that they themselves are under the costume. And that’s a good thing." Thoughts? 
SPIDER-MAN 4: Does A Sony Pictures Japan Press Release Confirm Plans For Tom Hardy's VENOM To Appear?
Related:

SPIDER-MAN 4: Does A Sony Pictures Japan Press Release Confirm Plans For Tom Hardy's VENOM To Appear?

SPIDER-MAN 4: Talk Of The Movie Being Delayed Appears To Be Much Ado About Nothing
Recommended For You:

SPIDER-MAN 4: Talk Of The Movie Being Delayed Appears To Be Much Ado About Nothing

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ...
LEVITIKUZ
LEVITIKUZ - 6/22/2015, 4:53 PM
If it was up to Andrew Garfield and Sony, TASM3 would have had Michael B Jordan as Mary Jane Watson.

Disaster adverted.
GreatRao
GreatRao - 6/22/2015, 4:53 PM
Surprise! Old straight white guy doesn't get it
SummersClan
SummersClan - 6/22/2015, 4:54 PM
@LEVITIKUZ

That disaster. We still unfortunately had to sit through Electro dubstep, and everything else in the Amazing Spiderman 2.
LEVITIKUZ
LEVITIKUZ - 6/22/2015, 4:56 PM
@SteveRogers9

I'll take Electro's dubstep over Kid Goblin, being reminded in every scene with Gwen that her destiny is to die, Peter's parents subplot, and Paul Giamatti's overacting Rhino any day.
JvIce
JvIce - 6/22/2015, 4:57 PM
Oh well. I don't consider Spider-men a character. I consider Peter Parker a character.
SAMURAI36
SAMURAI36 - 6/22/2015, 4:58 PM
The point isn't whether Peter Parker should be changed, the issue is whether they should use Peter at all, but rather Miles Morales.

Stan Lee is great at deflecting, as is most Marvel folk.
KurtCrawler
KurtCrawler - 6/22/2015, 4:58 PM
And Stan Lee hits the nail on the head. I don't want a black Peter Parker or a white Black Panther. Just stay true to comics.
Spooks
Spooks - 6/22/2015, 5:00 PM
@GreatRao oh grow up. What is there to get? The man is 100% spot on and not being offensive in any way.
Tommy24Pickles
Tommy24Pickles - 6/22/2015, 5:01 PM
SAMURAI36 is a complete idiot. He was asked a question.
Tommy24Pickles
Tommy24Pickles - 6/22/2015, 5:03 PM
GreatRao...is not to bright. ZERO reason to change an iconic character, especially because of some PC BS!
655321
655321 - 6/22/2015, 5:03 PM
Viva la Stan! I'm with him. It's kinda like movie remakes. They don't need to be remade make some new movies with new stories. Spider-Man is a white straight dude. Leave it. Spawn is a black guy,leave it. Just leave them be and get ur wheels rolling and think of new heroes, new powers new ideas, stop rebooting, remaking, changing and goofing on history just for shits n giggles, cause changing a race or sexual orientation doesn't need to be done.
TheBatmanRules
TheBatmanRules - 6/22/2015, 5:03 PM
Stan knows what's up.
BlackPhillip
BlackPhillip - 6/22/2015, 5:04 PM
@GreatRao

Dumbass! Stan Lee was one of the first to speak for people's civil rights and such. The X-Men are all about that.
jimjim
jimjim - 6/22/2015, 5:05 PM
good job stan.
Space
Space - 6/22/2015, 5:05 PM
Hell Yea! Preach!
LEVITIKUZ
LEVITIKUZ - 6/22/2015, 5:06 PM
I'm just saying, I'm rooting for the MCU Spider-Man to be Amish.

The lack of major Amish superheroes is disturbing from DC and Marvel.
ALegendaryPanda
ALegendaryPanda - 6/22/2015, 5:07 PM
I have no issue with race changes at all. But I would prefer that we start coming up with new exciting characters of different ethnicities and backgrounds instead of just saying "Let's take this character and make him black/hispanic/asian/etc."
DarkGrifter
DarkGrifter - 6/22/2015, 5:09 PM
His sentiments are understandable, after all he did create the characters and so it's perfectly rational to assume he would want the characters to remain as they are. I think the problem some see with this is that new characters often don't have the staying power as old characters, they don't have the same level of iconography and many would argue their race, orientation or gender aren't (in most cases) what make the characters who they are.

I'm not sure how I would feel if they changed Superman's race but it should never be off limits. These characters are global icons now and we can't sacrifice progression for the sake of our own comfort.

After all it's fiction, and fiction isn't, nor should it ever be, absolute.
blackandyellow
blackandyellow - 6/22/2015, 5:09 PM
That's funny, years ago he supported Michael Jackson for the role of Spider-Man.

xxxxxxx
xxxxxxx - 6/22/2015, 5:10 PM
"I think the world has a place for gay superheroes, certainly. But again, I don’t see any reason to change the sexual proclivities of a character once they’ve already been established. I have no problem with creating new, homosexual superheroes."

Exactly. This is my focal problem with Feig rebooting GHOSTBUSTERS with an all female cast just for the sake of, instead of creating a new property.
Ryden
Ryden - 6/22/2015, 5:11 PM
I honestly don't mind characters changing race or sexuality IF IT MAKES SENSE. There are characters that for years I've thought were gay, and if they were to come out in the comics, I feel would make a lot of sense. Captain America and Batman most notably. When Bobby Drake came out as gay it felt very forced. It was Marvel's most blunt attempt to have their cake and eat it too by proving to everyone that they're diverse and progressive by making an established character gay, but also tried to quell fans by picking a fairly minor character in the grand scheme of things, as well as making sure it was only an alternate/past version of the character. That sucks. I'd love it if Marvel had the balls to have the 616 Steve Rogers come out as gay. Same with race. If its forced and political then don't do it. Michael B Jordan as Johnny Storm makes total sense, he's a great actor, fits the part, no reason why he can't/shouldn't be the Human Torch. The fact that they didn't cast a black actress as Sue though bothers me. That means they cast Michael as a token and that's so [frick]ing offensive. They must have sat in a room and had that conversation 'what? we can't have TWO black people on the team are you kidding?' and then decided to force the adoption angle for.....absolutley no reason/ Ugh.
Indy
Indy - 6/22/2015, 5:14 PM
Stan the man.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ...
View Recorder