SPECTRE's Monica Bellucci Shows Why She's The Perfect Bond Girl In Raunchy Photoshoot

SPECTRE's Monica Bellucci Shows Why She's The Perfect Bond Girl In Raunchy Photoshoot

Spectre is just around the corner, and Monica Bellucci has hit the cover of Esquire in a very sexy photoshoot sure to get you excited about seeing even more of her in the Sam Mendes helmed release.

By JoshWilding - Oct 17, 2015 06:10 AM EST
Filed Under: James Bond
Source: Movie Hotties
Though she may not look it, 51 year old actress Monica Bellucci (who you'll remember from her memorable appearance in The Matrix sequels) is set to be the oldest Bond Girl to date when she appears in Spectre this month. This year however, the actress was quoted as saying: "I can’t say I’m a Bond girl because I’m too mature to be a Bond girl. I say Bond lady; Bond woman. I’m proud to be a Bond lady, because actually, Bond is the most amazing man. You know why? Because he doesn't exist. Men think that women, when they’re not able to procreate any more, become old. That is not true – they are still amazing! That’s why I think that Sam Mendes [director of the new James Bond film, Spectre], in choosing me, an adult woman, created a big revolution." It's hard to argue with that, but regardless of Bellucci's age, it's fair to say she looks downright incredible...







MAN OF STEEL Star Henry Cavill Is Leaving The Door Open To Playing James Bond Despite Claims He's Too Old
Related:

MAN OF STEEL Star Henry Cavill Is Leaving The Door Open To Playing James Bond Despite Claims He's Too Old

Aaron Taylor-Johnson's Quest To Become The Next 007 Gets Ringing Endorsements From Two Former BOND Actors
Recommended For You:

Aaron Taylor-Johnson's Quest To Become The Next 007 Gets Ringing Endorsements From Two Former BOND Actors

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
MFLuder
MFLuder - 10/17/2015, 6:12 AM
You consider this raunchy??? LOL....no, it's not
JonAwesome
JonAwesome - 10/17/2015, 6:14 AM
Where's the raunchy part?
GrilledPopcorn
GrilledPopcorn - 10/17/2015, 6:16 AM
It's classy and understated raunchy! To be fair photoshop helped.
SimplyAz
SimplyAz - 10/17/2015, 6:17 AM
Nice : )
GreedoSarducci
GreedoSarducci - 10/17/2015, 6:51 AM
When I saw the word "raunchy" I excitedly clicked the link, because I couldn't wait to see how absolutely not raunchy it actually was. The man never disappoints - Josh delivers again!
Invictor
Invictor - 10/17/2015, 6:51 AM
I thought that having the name of the author in the teaser would stop people from being so surprised from what the actual article is about in contrast with it's title.
th3daftmau5
th3daftmau5 - 10/17/2015, 6:53 AM
Isn't it a little late to still be calling them 'Bond Girls'? I'm not usually one for PC bulldust, but it feels kinda weird that they can't just be referred to as by their character names. Bond Girls have always been there mainly for eye candy, which may or may not me a problem, but according to the title, how good of a Bond Girl an actress is depends on how little clothing they have on them.

The 1960s were a long time ago, fellas.
Invictor
Invictor - 10/17/2015, 6:53 AM
RULE OF THUMB: If you see an article by Josh, most likely it's not exactly what the title says it is.
DanU
DanU - 10/17/2015, 6:54 AM
These photos are barely racy much less raunchy.
th3daftmau5
th3daftmau5 - 10/17/2015, 6:54 AM
*'scuse them typos. I'm sleep deprived :S
JoeMomma29
JoeMomma29 - 10/17/2015, 7:35 AM
Josh needs to get a job at The National Enquirer............... shame on me for even commenting on this article.
JoeMomma29
JoeMomma29 - 10/17/2015, 7:39 AM
@gliderman

LMAO!!!!!!!

Dude I cannot stop laughing!!!!!!
JoeMomma29
JoeMomma29 - 10/17/2015, 7:43 AM
Oh wait guys Josh must be a Quaker....... so this would be raunchy to him!

JoeMomma29
JoeMomma29 - 10/17/2015, 8:00 AM
@Phoenixtaylor

No the site know what is raunchy or nude, it the editor who wrote this article decides to write misleading headlines to get clicks..............
JoeMomma29
JoeMomma29 - 10/17/2015, 8:05 AM
@phoenixtaylor

Awesome work!!!!!! You are very talented!!!!!!!!
BlackStar25
BlackStar25 - 10/17/2015, 8:10 AM
"Ranchy"



Lollerbate!
TheEpicJuicebox
TheEpicJuicebox - 10/17/2015, 8:19 AM
"This is sexist"
Steelmatic
Steelmatic - 10/17/2015, 8:57 AM
This is definitely raunchy.... circa 1912 or so....

Bellucci is a beautiful woman though, no doubt.
Bodwulf
Bodwulf - 10/17/2015, 9:16 AM
Bond, looks like they got her in just under the wire. She is starting to show cracks in the armor. Time does it to us all. I used to be beautiful!!!
csdot
csdot - 10/17/2015, 9:21 AM
If you think this is "raunchy" don't look up any other Monica Bellucci photo shoots because you would probably consider them hardcore XXX pornography
CaptainAmerica
CaptainAmerica - 10/17/2015, 9:23 AM
Josh also thinks holding hands is considered intercourse.
CaptainAmerica
CaptainAmerica - 10/17/2015, 9:25 AM
Josh once touched a girl's shoulder and had to go to church right after.
HulkOnion
HulkOnion - 10/17/2015, 9:27 AM
At least he didn't put the "NSFW" this time
campblood
campblood - 10/17/2015, 9:49 AM
1 2 3
View Recorder