J.J. Abrams Responds To Claims That STAR WARS: TFA Was A "Rip-Off" Of A NEW HOPE

J.J. Abrams Responds To Claims That STAR WARS: TFA Was A "Rip-Off" Of A NEW HOPE

One of the laziest and most tedious criticisms thrown at Star Wars: The Force Awakens has to be that it's basically just A New Hope (it's not). How does director J.J. Abrams feel about that? Hit the jump for his thoughts on those complaints and why he's not helming Episode VIII...

By JoshWilding - Jan 08, 2016 12:01 PM EST
Filed Under: Star Wars
Source: The Hollywood Reporter
While Star Wars: The Force Awakens initially received unanimous acclaim, the usual suspects are now taking great pride in trying (and mostly failing) to tear the movie apart. It happens with every blockbuster, but by far one of the most common - and laziest - complaints about this release is that it's basically just A New Hope. However, J.J. Abrams was more than prepared for both that and the predictable backlash, something he made clear in a recent interview with The Hollywood Reporter. "I knew that, whatever we did, there would be a group of people — and I was just hoping and praying that it would be smaller than not — that would take issue with any number of things. But I knew we weren't making the movie for any other reason than we believed that it could be something meaningful and special and entertaining and worthy of people's time."

"I can understand that someone might say, 'Oh, it's a complete rip-off!'" he admits, adding, "What was important for me was introducing brand new characters using relationships that were embracing the history that we know to tell a story that is new — to go backwards to go forwards." Abrams acknowledges the similarities then, though there's a huge difference between that and what some have claimed is a movie which is 100% identical to what's come before (the popular Star Wars Ring Theory is perhaps the best explanation out there for why that's not the case). Regardless, Abrams won't be back for Episode VIII, but why would he turn down the chance to take the helm of this entire new trilogy? "I realized when I was working on [The Force Awakens], the amount of energy that was required to tell the story, and do it justice, knowing when Episode VIII would start shooting, there was no way — if I wanted to still have my children talk to me in my old age — that doing that would make any sense. If The Force Awakens worked, it was be the perfect place to say, 'I got to make a Star Wars movie,' and not be a greedy bastard. If it didn't work, no-one would want me doing it anyway."
 
Abrams definitely achieved his goal of making a great Star Wars movie anyway, though it's become clear in recent weeks that the majority of fans do wish he was returning for the follow-ups. For now, we'll just have to wait and see how Rian Johnson and Colin Trevorrow fare when they tackle the beloved franchise. Do you think they'll top The Force Awakens?
Fear the Force? STAR WARS Horror Project In The Works According To ANDOR Showrunner
Related:

Fear the Force? STAR WARS Horror Project In The Works According To ANDOR Showrunner

STAR WARS: Ryan Gosling And Shawn Levy Movie Coming Sooner Than You Think
Recommended For You:

STAR WARS: Ryan Gosling And Shawn Levy Movie Coming "Sooner Than You Think"

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ...
HeartCollector9
HeartCollector9 - 1/8/2016, 12:47 PM
Nope. Star Wars has always been about history repeating itself. The only problem is Mary Sue Rey. lol.

Nah but it was really good....
TheLight
TheLight - 1/8/2016, 12:49 PM
A rip-off is it? Let's dance!

YeezusWept
YeezusWept - 1/8/2016, 12:49 PM
MonsterSquad35
MonsterSquad35 - 1/8/2016, 12:50 PM
"greedo bastard"
JoeMomma29
JoeMomma29 - 1/8/2016, 12:50 PM
So he said he needed to go backwards to go-forward..........sheesh. Anyways congrats on its success, but I still did not like the movie.
YeezusWept
YeezusWept - 1/8/2016, 12:51 PM
"the usual suspects are now taking great pride in trying (and mostly failing) to tear the movie apart."

WiscoJoe
WiscoJoe - 1/8/2016, 12:52 PM
Abrams response to criticisms of Star Trek Into Darkness seems very applicable as well:

"I felt like, in a weird way, it was a little bit of a collection of scenes that were written by my friends — brilliantly talented writers — who I somehow misled in trying to do certain things. And yet, I found myself frustrated by my choices, and unable to hang my hat on an undeniable thread of the main story. So then I found myself on that movie basically tap-dancing as well as I could to try and make the sequences as entertaining as possible. Thank god I had the cast that we have, who are so unbelievabljavascript:__doPostBack('ctl00$ContentPlaceHolder1$m_usComments$m_saveCommentBTN','')y fun to watch… I would never say that I don’t think that the movie ended up working. But I feel like it didn’t work as well as it could have had I made some better decisions before we started shooting."
MonsterSquad35
MonsterSquad35 - 1/8/2016, 12:53 PM
JoeMomma29
JoeMomma29 - 1/8/2016, 12:55 PM
@nomis

THEDARKKNIGHT1939
THEDARKKNIGHT1939 - 1/8/2016, 1:00 PM
It's so blatantly obvious that it's the same story, however I can look past that. There are other issues with the film that people should be looking at instead.
Forthas
Forthas - 1/8/2016, 1:04 PM
I don't know why he or anyone pays these people any mind. Just Like with the Dark Knight films, every closet critic who needed attention came out of the woodwork to point out the imaginary flaws and would declare in vague, un-provable terms that a movie was not up to their unrealistic standards. Nolan and Abrams should set up a "Hater" button on their website that should point to these idiots to their box office gross and Rotten Tomato scores...nothing else needs to be said.
JoeMomma29
JoeMomma29 - 1/8/2016, 1:05 PM
@clarkman

I read it the same way you did....that is why I commented on that.

Tasmaniac
Tasmaniac - 1/8/2016, 1:05 PM
I only have two issues with the movie:

1. Poe just showing up at the end and his return explained in the most cursory way possible, then it was like "Oh, ok. No worries"

2 ANOTHER [frick]ing Death Star. I mean, Christ, that's THREE! (And no, I don't give a shit if it's a planet, it's still a big round thing with a gun that blows up planets, has shields that need to be dropped and a weak spot for Tie fighters to chase X-Wings badly towards). Couldn't they have come up with something else?

Aside from that, loved it. Top job Abrams 👍🏻
DerekLake
DerekLake - 1/8/2016, 1:06 PM
Abrams can deflect as much as he wants, but at the end of the day, TFA is a retread of the Original Trilogy, not because it has the same plot beats (escape from a desert planet, a Sith battle, a Jedi in training), but because it has the same story, an underdog resistance going up against a more powerful Sith-led military. But it's even worse than that, because TFA goes even further, replicating Yavin IV, the Death Star, Palpatine and Tarkin. All the pieces are arranged too similarly to the Original Trilogy, and especially A New Hope, to simply dismiss this as the requisite components of the franchise formula. The only thing that feels new are the characters, and sadly that's not enough, because --so far-- the story drives them rather than the other way around.
SpiderFraud
SpiderFraud - 1/8/2016, 1:06 PM
No worries for me anymore. I doubt Rian Johnson will end up doing the same bullshit Abrams did (not that I blame him exclusively).

They know what they was doing with this movie and that was to play it safe for the Star Wars fans.
PapaEmeritus
PapaEmeritus - 1/8/2016, 1:07 PM
I enjoyed the movie, but lets be honest... JJ played really safely. Another death star? C'mon... for the third time? I wanted a more original story, and the next films will have to explain a lot of stuff. I mean... A LOT.
Tasmaniac
Tasmaniac - 1/8/2016, 1:07 PM
@Forthas

No, nothing imaginary about it - The Dark Knight Rises was shit.
Tuuralihn
Tuuralihn - 1/8/2016, 1:07 PM
I wish he would return for Ep 9. Colin Trevorrow is not a good choice. Jurassic World was sub-par at best.
JoeMomma29
JoeMomma29 - 1/8/2016, 1:09 PM
Jurrassic World was the same story as the first.....it even ended the same with raptors or raptor saving the day!
GhostofFortune
GhostofFortune - 1/8/2016, 1:09 PM
Finally J.J Abrams admits that TFA is a rip off of a new hope! I was the first person who complained about it before anyone else, cuz I saw TFA earlier than most people.
xcan
xcan - 1/8/2016, 1:09 PM
When did @frozenjoy start ghost writing for Wilding???

"but by far one of the most common - and laziest - complaints about this release is that it's basically just A New Hope."

Yeah... it's not like this movie didn't highjack MANY key character moments and story lines from ANH, which I'd consider "lazy".

Shanksman
Shanksman - 1/8/2016, 1:10 PM
"laziest and most tedious" criticism? That remark alone was lazy.
How about we argue about the subject matter of "whether it was a rip off" or "is the copy justified" instead of just "lazying" slapping people with legit criticism?

Out there with SO MANY good story to go with, they could even take alot of references from the Expanded Universe. Instead Disney/JJ Abrams plays the safest road by making it so god damn identical to the first film. A third Death Star? Fcking kidding me? Not to mention it got blow up the same way.

The criticism was well founded. Josh, stop talking shit about others who actually want something original (in the sense that its not a copy of ONE particular movie) and great by criticizing. Lazy my ass. I would say people who sugarcoating this have a "lazier" brain than one who gave this criticism.
GhostofFortune
GhostofFortune - 1/8/2016, 1:10 PM
@JoeMomma29

The Jurassic franchise isn't as big as Star Wars. I really don't care about Jurassic Park movies.
SpiderFraud
SpiderFraud - 1/8/2016, 1:11 PM
Jurassic World, Terminator G and SW all suffer from the same thing and they are all trapped by the previous movies. Luckily, SW is not complete garbage like the other two.
GhostofFortune
GhostofFortune - 1/8/2016, 1:12 PM
@shanksman

Preach, bro!
imkennypowers
imkennypowers - 1/8/2016, 1:12 PM
JJ Abrams paraphrasing Abed:
Shanksman
Shanksman - 1/8/2016, 1:13 PM
GhostofFortune
GhostofFortune - 1/8/2016, 1:14 PM
The more I think how identical TFA is compared to TFA, the more I hate Disney and the overhyped critics which I called pigs.
GhostofFortune
GhostofFortune - 1/8/2016, 1:14 PM
compared to A New Hope*
PapaEmeritus
PapaEmeritus - 1/8/2016, 1:14 PM
Again, i enjoyed the movie, liked the main characters and the visuals, i think it was an entertaining and nostalgic film.

But this guy here made very good points:



Very head-scratching! lol
GhostofFortune
GhostofFortune - 1/8/2016, 1:15 PM
I bet Disney paid the critics to compliment the movie. Star Wars: TFA is a money scheme shit hole. I got robbed.
glyoung
glyoung - 1/8/2016, 1:15 PM
I don't get it. This was in no way a bad movie regardless if it was a "rip-off" or not. If this was a flatout reboot of ANH would people say that they didn't like it because it was a "rip-off"? No, they would say that that was a damn good reboot of ANH. I don't care what parallels this movie took, none of them made the movie bad.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ...
View Recorder