BOX OFFICE: JACK THE GIANT SLAYER Tracking Hints At A Disappointing Weekend

BOX OFFICE: JACK THE GIANT SLAYER Tracking Hints At A Disappointing Weekend

Director Bryan Singer's twist on the classic fairy tale is not tracking well in the build up to its release on March 1st, with analyst predicting a soft opening similar to that of 2012 box office flops Battleship and John Carter. Read on for details!

By JoshWilding - Feb 22, 2013 08:02 AM EST
Filed Under: Fantasy
Source: The Hollywood Reporter


According to The Hollywood Reporter, Jack the Giant Slayer's pre-release tracking has the fantasy adventure down as making only between $30 million to $35 million during its opening weekend in North America. With a budget of $190 million and some hefty marketing costs, numbers like this - which are almost identical to big budget box office flops Battleship and John Carter - mean that the pressure would be on for it to perform well in international markets. However, there's nothing to say that these numbers won't improve as the March 1st release dates draws near, especially as the studio are planning an 11th hour advertising blitz. Test screenings and media screenings have also gone well according to insiders at New Line and Warner Bros. Perhaps the biggest hurdle for Jack the Giant Slayer is the fact that Disney's Oz: The Great and Powerful opens just one week later. That is tracking at around the $75 million range, although many believe it could open even higher.






Jack the Giant Slayer tells the story of an ancient war that is reignited when a young farmhand unwittingly opens a gateway between our world and a fearsome race of giants. Unleashed on the Earth for the first time in centuries, the giants strive to reclaim the land they once lost, forcing the young man, Jack, into the battle of his life to stop them. Fighting for a kingdom, its people, and the love of a brave princess, he comes face to face with the unstoppable warriors he thought only existed in legend—and gets the chance to become a legend himself.


STARRING:

Nicholas Hoult as Jack
Eleanor Tomlinson as Isabelle
Stanley Tucci as Lord Roderick
Ian McShane as King Brahmwell
Bill Nighy and John Kassir as Fallon
Ewan McGregor as Elmont

RELEASE DATE: March 1st, 2013


RED ONE Star Dwayne The Rock Johnson Mocked For Sharing Bizarre Story About Watching OPPENHEIMER In IMAX
Related:

RED ONE Star Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson Mocked For Sharing Bizarre Story About Watching OPPENHEIMER In IMAX

Mattel Forced To Issue Apology After WICKED Toy Packaging Features URL For A Pornographic Website
Recommended For You:

Mattel Forced To Issue Apology After WICKED Toy Packaging Features URL For A Pornographic Website

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

P862010
P862010 - 2/22/2013, 8:09 AM
not surprised this film looks kind of bland
PC04
PC04 - 2/22/2013, 8:12 AM
At the risk of being a tool....CALLED IT
95
95 - 2/22/2013, 8:15 AM
I'm hoping to score a free screening, or else in waiting for the home release so I can rent it. The giants look like cheap versions of trolls from The Hobbit. Jack and the Beanstalk reinterpreted with war set pieces doesn't interest me the slightest.
GetsugaTensho22
GetsugaTensho22 - 2/22/2013, 8:21 AM
Well, who knows? some people might end up liking it.
shamo
shamo - 2/22/2013, 8:25 AM
190 million budget? with those shitty VFX? really?? i'm a bit worried about DOFP now.
TonyCHAOSJacobs
TonyCHAOSJacobs - 2/22/2013, 8:25 AM
So do we expect the same to happen with x-men: days of future's past??
JoeMomma29
JoeMomma29 - 2/22/2013, 8:29 AM
JoeMomma29
JoeMomma29 - 2/22/2013, 8:33 AM
For once I agree with grif and his Pedo Bear!

ManOfKrypton
ManOfKrypton - 2/22/2013, 8:35 AM
@JoeMomma29 You better hope no one sees that who's got epilepsy!

arttender
arttender - 2/22/2013, 8:37 AM
Bryan Singer Sucks. Bottom line!

Anyone who has had as many failures as he can claim has no right to love themselves half as much as he does. The man is a tweeter hound and a glory seeker and I for one am not interested in his BORING return to the X-franchise. Stop teasing pics of wheelchairs asshole, and concentrate on making the movie at least halfway decent. I'm sick of reading posts about anything he has to say.

Now I feel better.

Thanks
marcvader1
marcvader1 - 2/22/2013, 8:43 AM
Big deal. No surprise here, move along.
CavEl
CavEl - 2/22/2013, 8:43 AM


You weren't seriously thinking it wasn't going to bomb, did you?

ralfinader
ralfinader - 2/22/2013, 8:52 AM
This is just shocking. I can't believe they made a movie this stupid looking.
shamo
shamo - 2/22/2013, 8:55 AM
@arttender, as many failures as him? what failures are you speaking off? nearly all his movies have obtained both critical and box office sucess.
Nomadic1
Nomadic1 - 2/22/2013, 8:56 AM
This should surprise nobody.
DudeGuy
DudeGuy - 2/22/2013, 9:10 AM
Good. I want that kid that plays Jack and Singer out of Hollywood.
JoeMomma29
JoeMomma29 - 2/22/2013, 9:12 AM
LOL at FreakingIntelligent (forget it your screen name is to freakin long to type)!
beane2099
beane2099 - 2/22/2013, 9:17 AM
I was one of the few who expressed mixed feelings about Singer returning to X Men. Like I said, I respect the contributions he's made to comic book movies, but I've always thought his stuff has been very subdued. Where he makes up for some of that is in the character interactions and such (except when he made Superman a deadbeat dad. That was a little much). Speaking to Jack the Giant Slayer; just hearing the concept, I think most people thought it was mediocre at best. The trailers did little allay that feeling.
third3ye
third3ye - 2/22/2013, 9:22 AM
No surprises here.
IIIAdamantiumIII
IIIAdamantiumIII - 2/22/2013, 9:25 AM
lol told ya so! oz looks just as terrible ....these are way better looking franco movies


616
616 - 2/22/2013, 9:35 AM
dailycomicsfix - lol who asked?
nach1wan
nach1wan - 2/22/2013, 10:24 AM
@grif x-men 7, actually
comicb00kguy
comicb00kguy - 2/22/2013, 10:26 AM
And who is surprised at this news? Jack and the Beanstalk turned into a 190 million dollar CGI-fest movie? This sounds like it's going to establish new levels for epic fail.

How bad does this have to tank to get Singer cut off from wasting any more money?
Newbus
Newbus - 2/22/2013, 10:39 AM
"Test screenings and media screenings have also gone well according to insiders at New Line and Warner Bros."

Absolute horse s**t!!

Now I know some brown envelopes have been handed out to critics who will promptly give this film a 5 star rating.
ricko8687
ricko8687 - 2/22/2013, 11:49 AM
Bryan singer although a good director his action scences live a bit to be desired except for the opening scene of X men United his action scene are rather bland,
Tevii
Tevii - 2/22/2013, 12:39 PM
Hahahah NO KIDDING!!!! Always knew this would flop. But I have to say 30-35 million is much higher than I wouldve guessed.

But I always knew this would be the most expensive flop at least until summer when there is real competition.
arashini
arashini - 2/22/2013, 12:45 PM
surprise, surprise.... not
Skateanddestroy88
Skateanddestroy88 - 2/22/2013, 1:07 PM
Someone made a comment about wouldn't waste there time watching this online for free. . . that about sums it up

X men one was awesome at the time, great casting. X men 2 was great as well. I think it's a shame that Singer didn't finish his X men Triology, would,ve been curious to see where he would've taken that franchise.
Skateanddestroy88
Skateanddestroy88 - 2/22/2013, 1:10 PM
This is a little humerous, I must admit.
Something tells me the Zach Snyder Man of Steel is going to do really well. Phony report or not. Sorry Singer. You lost your mojo.
AIGALAN
AIGALAN - 2/22/2013, 4:26 PM
Figured this movie might fail. Didn't care too much for the cast and the cgi looked bad. I think their biggest problem was that little kids didn't seem into it , if it would have been more family friendly it would have raked in more money. Done see many teens or young adults wanting to see this either. Overall the plot and idea of this movie seemed very uninteresting to me.
Lego
Lego - 2/22/2013, 7:44 PM
[frick] Singer
ISleepNow
ISleepNow - 2/22/2013, 8:47 PM
Taboggon
Taboggon - 2/23/2013, 12:23 AM
There's no way this movie will draw as much money as John Cater and Battleship, 35 million opening? Forget it.
Optimist18
Optimist18 - 2/26/2013, 8:51 AM
F*** ALL THE HATERS! You're on a site called COMICBOOKMovie.com and you're downing the concept behind this movie? Very Interesting....
View Recorder