Latest Tv Spot For X-Men: First Class Emerged Online With New Snippets!

Awesome. Great find DCMF! :)

Can a X-Men: First Class hater out there please explain to me why they hate this movie but are anticipating the Avengers movie? It doesn't make much sense to me since they both "screwed up" there original team line up. The Avengers has a less darastically different team, but First Class has better reasons for their changes.

you can tell that the scenes on the beach are gonna be where the team splits, i wonder if mistyque will join him in the beginning or not...... "who's with me??" epic

Damn IT! Yes Yes I wanted the orogonal 5 too but we will never get it. they probably think that original team was too boring. Im going to go see this and give it a chace. back in the 80's an X-MEN movie was a fantasy. This is the 5th one lets just all support it and hope for the best. Maybe when Singer stays the hell away from the X-MEN it will get better.

Angel Salvadore aka Tempest

@bigshow2312 Dude very simple: X men First class only has 1 original member: Beast (Excluding Xavier)... In which Hank McCoy appears in Xmen 1 or 2 as his "human" self, and in this movie, which we all know is based on 20 to 30 years before X Men 1, he already transforms.

In the Avengers: we have the 4 original members out of 6. Hulk, Thor, Captain America and Iron Man.

The Avengers is not messed up, its actually pretty good, maybe for the Avengers 2 they will add Wasp and Ant man or Giant man. We all now they can't fit that many superstars/super heroes in 1 movie, especially the first

i fart all over this movie

I'm so excited for this movie.

Sidenote. The avengers will be fun if Joss doesn't screw up the writing. He is responsible for the WORST line ever in any comic movie.."What happens to a toad when it's struck lightening..." yeah that was him. Whereas Vaughn as always delivered. SO let's wait and see. Besides this could lead into the original first class. I really believe if this does well it will be a reboot.

I don't know why, but I can't get excited over this, even if Jennifer Lawrence is a smokin' hot actress, way hotter than Rosie Huntington-Whitley (over at AICN, when discussing an early review of Transformers: Dark of the Moon, some nincom-[frick]in'-poop said that he likes that Rosie's #1 on Maxim's Hot 100).

But I would kill to see X-Men 4 happen, even if we all make rebooted fancasts. [frick] all this prequel bullshit.

@ CaptainAmerica - 5/16/2011, 8:38 PM

That's an interesting theory.

blah....I'll wait to see how much sense the movie makes, which is something people seem to be overlooking. OOOOOOO MAGNETO LIFTED A SUB, LETS GO SEE IT! Wheres my Godzilla movie.....

Hey ! did everyone noticed the thing that magneto is grabing??? with the two hands in the 2 sticks... i think is an attempt of the machine we saw in x men 1 .... you know where he used rouge...

@adamwham - Joss Whedon's line that ended up in the final X film was not originally written in exactly the way it was used on the movie. He actually rewrote the entire end fight scene back when they still had Beast involved. The final version of the script and the re-use of his lines are all out of context with the final film so its not his fault. Joss has proved himself way too many times in other projects as an excellent writer and director which is why he's landed the Job doing Avengers in the first place.

Love this TV Spot! "Who's with me?"

Can't wait for this movie.

The Emma Frost thing is simple to explain, the problem is that you're all comic fans so you have a bias in your understanding. The sheer amount of inconsistencies in comics is something readers ignore or let slip, yet when they see the same in movies it becomes a big deal.

The movies at no point are attempting to follow the comics timelines and narratives 100%. Comics do not have budgets, movies do unfortunately and on the first X-film that budget was insanely small. This is why they opted to homage certain characters by their concepts instead of trying to stick to the ridiculously complex history of the comics. For example, without the budget to explain Rogue having Ms Marvel's super-powers as well as her own they had to stick to her true mutant power. Beast was out of the question simply becasue of the budget and since Wolverine was the most popular X character he had to be in the film.

Age and time means nothing if you stick to concentrating on the concepts alone, this is why You can have Shyla Silverfox (Not Silver Fox as she is in the comics) appear in the Wolverine movie with a sister called 'Emma" displaying one of the the powers we know Emma Frost to have, yet not be 100% the same character or with the same powers. In that film those powers are shared between the two sisters, one having tactile telekinesis and the other having the diamond form ability as well as the name Kyla 'Silverfox' being a surname not a codename "Silver Fox" as in the comic. So 'Emma' in the Wolverine film is not Emma Frost, She's Emma 'Silverfox'. Emma Frost and Silver Fox are not related in the comics and the end credits of that movie has her down as "Kyla's Sister/Emma".

So now we have X-Men first class and so they have an opportunity to pay more homage to more characters which is why the Emma Frost we know and love can be included along with the Helfire club. Banshee is also there but not the Irish Banshee from the comics, Alex Summers who may or may not be related to Scott since its the movie timeline and Beast as he was already establish as a original member from X-Men 3. Angel Salvadore has her original powers in this instead of her current ones. This is really the result of them shelving the 'X-Men Origins:Magneto' movie that was to accompany the not so popular Wolverine one, It's still essentially Magneto's origin story but results in the meeting with Xavier and the forming of the first mutant team.

Its only a movie, put aside your comic check-list and allow yourself to enjoy the homage without the bias and you'll be entertained like all the other cinema-goers.