THE HOBBIT: THERE AND BACK AGAIN Officially Retitled: THE BATTLE OF THE FIVE ARMIES

THE HOBBIT: THERE AND BACK AGAIN Officially Retitled: THE BATTLE OF THE FIVE ARMIES

Peter Jackson was rumored to be toying with a new subtitle for his final Middle-Earth saga entry, The Hobbit: There and Back Again, but the director has taken to Facebook to confirm the title himself!

By DCMarvelFreshman - Apr 24, 2014 06:04 AM EST
Filed Under: Fantasy
Source: Facebook
Our journey to make The Hobbit Trilogy has been in some ways like Bilbo's own, with hidden paths revealing their secrets to us as we've gone along. “There and Back Again” felt like the right name for the second of a two film telling of the quest to reclaim Erebor, when Bilbo’s arrival there, and departure, were both contained within the second film. But with three movies, it suddenly felt misplaced—after all, Bilbo has already arrived “there” in the "Desolation of Smaug".
 
When we did the premiere trip late last year, I had a quiet conversation with the studio about the idea of revisiting the title. We decided to keep an open mind until a cut of the film was ready to look at. We reached that point last week, and after viewing the movie, we all agreed there is now one title that feels completely appropriate.
 
And so: "The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies" it is.
 
As Professor Tolkien intended, “There and Back Again” encompasses Bilbo’s entire adventure, so don’t be surprised if you see it used on a future box-set of all three movies.
 
Before then however, we have a film to finish, and much to share with you. It’s been a nice quiet time for us—Jabez and I happily editing away in a dark cave in Wellington—but those halcyon days are quickly coming to an end. It will soon be time to step into the light. Expect to see and hear much about The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies in the coming months.
 
And there’s also The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug Extended Cut, which we’re in the process of finishing, with over 25 mins of new scenes, all scored with original music composed by Howard Shore.
 
 
It’ll be a fun year! - Peter Jackson

Starring Evangeline Lilly, Benedict Cumberbatch, Luke Evans, Richard Armitage, Orlando Bloom, Martin Freeman, Lee Pace, Manu Bennett, Aidan Turner, Cate Blanchett, with Hugo Weaving and Ian McKellen, The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies is scheduled for release December 17, 2014.
WICKED Is The Clear Box Office Winner As Musical Goes Head-To-Head With GLADIATOR II - Glicked Begins!
Related:

WICKED Is The Clear Box Office Winner As Musical Goes Head-To-Head With GLADIATOR II - "Glicked" Begins!

Does WICKED Have A Post-Credits Scene? Here's Your Spoiler-Free Answer
Recommended For You:

Does WICKED Have A Post-Credits Scene? Here's Your Spoiler-Free Answer

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
DEVLIN712
DEVLIN712 - 4/24/2014, 6:56 AM
Eh, a bit long
DEVLIN712
DEVLIN712 - 4/24/2014, 6:57 AM
They should split the last movie into 2, then one book has 3 parts, the third of which has two parts
SuperCat
SuperCat - 4/24/2014, 7:00 AM
I like it. F*ckin' good title!
SimyJo
SimyJo - 4/24/2014, 7:05 AM
LOL @ 'The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug Extended Cut' - Same old same old with Jackson.... NEVER worth getting his LOTR films straight away as there is always the 'extended cut' released later.
marvel72
marvel72 - 4/24/2014, 7:05 AM
better than there & back again.
MrCBM56
MrCBM56 - 4/24/2014, 7:05 AM
I like the title to, but There and Back Again is still better.
MrCBM56
MrCBM56 - 4/24/2014, 7:06 AM
That battle better be [frick]ing insane.
JoJo1982
JoJo1982 - 4/24/2014, 7:07 AM
@simyjo

Agreed
Abary
Abary - 4/24/2014, 7:08 AM
It's pretty neat, but There And Back Again is so much better.
batz11
batz11 - 4/24/2014, 7:08 AM
Yoss, that was going to be my exact comment, should have been "Battle of Five Armies" a little shorter
Abary
Abary - 4/24/2014, 7:09 AM
It suits better for a spin off title. As a movie subtitle, it's not that great.
Abary
Abary - 4/24/2014, 7:10 AM
It's kind of bad when a movie has the same word 3 times though.

THE Hobbit: THE Battle of THE Five Armies
KallarkKent
KallarkKent - 4/24/2014, 7:12 AM
I liked There And Back Again better.
GeneralZod1138
GeneralZod1138 - 4/24/2014, 7:14 AM
I like it!!!!

"There and Back Again" for the box set? GENIUS!!!!
QuestiontheAnswer
QuestiontheAnswer - 4/24/2014, 7:17 AM
The Hobbit: Subtitle is as unnecessarily long as the duration of this franchise.
DefcoN
DefcoN - 4/24/2014, 7:18 AM
I liked the first name, but what the hell, bring it. This movie has to redeem this trilogy in some way, especially after what we got from Desolation of Smaug. Also, I hope Howard Shore has more inspiration with his score this time.
Solar
Solar - 4/24/2014, 7:22 AM
First time commenting, been following forever. Love Gusto, and anyone who trolls hard. That said, these movies blow. So much walking, so little anything else. At the end of the Return of the Jedi, suddenly Gandolf is able to call Eagles, if he could do that why didn't he just ride an eagle to the mountain to begin with, drop the ring in, an save us 10 hours of suck.
BigMikeReviews
BigMikeReviews - 4/24/2014, 7:22 AM
Good title, implies action which is a good, there and back again would have appeared redundant and cyclical to the average movie goer
ProfessorX
ProfessorX - 4/24/2014, 7:24 AM
Makes sense.
MrCBM56
MrCBM56 - 4/24/2014, 7:24 AM
@Solar Welcome, but a Return of the Jedi?
blackandyellow
blackandyellow - 4/24/2014, 7:28 AM
The Hobbit 3: The Search for More Money
ProfessorX
ProfessorX - 4/24/2014, 7:33 AM
"suddenly Gandolf is able to call Eagles, if he could do that why didn't he just ride an eagle to the mountain to begin with"

1) Because the ring would have corrupted him (it had to be Frodo to deliver it), 2) Because the Eagles cannot be controlled like that (they intervened of their own will in the end), 3) Because the fun is in the adventure (i.e. plot convenience).
Tevii
Tevii - 4/24/2014, 7:33 AM
The last thing these movies need are extended cuts. They already stretched a tiny book out enough.

If Warner bros. was smart, after all of these movies have been out for a while, they should take key scenes from each of the three movies re-edit it into a single 3 hour movie that closely resembles the Hobbit book without the additional garbage they added to stretch it out into three, long, boring movies. It could be the Definitive Hobbit. Something that would be a great addition to the Extended cuts of the Lord of the Rings Trilogy sets.

WB could make even more money off a single book and the fans would have a great adaptation.
NeoBaggins
NeoBaggins - 4/24/2014, 7:34 AM
Weird running across this while watching Desolation. I like "There and back again", but I know its too cute of a title to contain what the last installment with hold.

Bring it.
Ranger14
Ranger14 - 4/24/2014, 7:36 AM
As it should be called! One of my favorite parts of the book. There and Back Again is fairly "blah" and says nothing. Loved the last film and I don't get all the hatred some have for these films, but to each their own. As long as I enjoy them, that's all that matters to me.
DarthSandwich
DarthSandwich - 4/24/2014, 7:37 AM
@Solar, That complaint as annoying as [frick]. To drop a ring you would need to fly into Mordor and go into the cave, 100000 Orks would just shoot you down with arrows, you couldn't get even close.
Solar
Solar - 4/24/2014, 7:41 AM
The movies are just boring. I guess that is my only point. The Hobbit doesn't need three movies to do it justice, not even two, one would do. Instead we get a sloppy snore fest.
Swiftsword777
Swiftsword777 - 4/24/2014, 7:42 AM
It's fitting
Scarilian
Scarilian - 4/24/2014, 7:44 AM
@ProfessorX

"1) Because the ring would have corrupted him (it had to be Frodo to deliver it), 2) Because the Eagles cannot be controlled like that (they intervened of their own will in the end), 3) Because the fun is in the adventure (i.e. plot convenience)"

In the films;

1 - The ring corrupts those who use it. Even if Gandalf himself could not ride to the mountain - he could have sent Frodo on an Eagle.

2 - The Eagles could have flown them most the way as they do in The Hobbit, this would have made the journey a lot less perilous and saved valuable time even if they didn't take them all the way to the mountain. We also see an Eagle save Gandalf when he is in Ortanc... which is in Gondor literally the closest place to Mordor so their is no excuse as to why they couldn't have flown Frodo their.

3 - Their is no fun in Lord Of The Rings, the scenery is nice but even online I haven't found anyone who can justify why seeing characters spend several hours walking is a good thing.

----

The films themselves are boring, the only thing people ever enjoy is the large scale and the scenery.
1 2 3
View Recorder