EDITORIAL: Age of the Remake (Reflections of a Heirophant)

EDITORIAL: Age of the Remake (Reflections of a Heirophant)

I grow weary from a lack of originality in Hollywood. It seems, now more than ever, that it is considered “cool” to remake and reboot movies and franchises.

Editorial Opinion
By YakeTheSnake - Dec 20, 2010 01:12 AM EST
Filed Under: Other

      The remakes and reboots really began to go full throttle after the success of “Batman Begins.” But, I think the reason that reboot worked so well was because of the atrocity that it followed. “Batman & Robin” was such a piece of sh*t, anything that followed it looked better. As it happens, “Batman Begins” was, actually, a great film. But, I think it’s success was due more from the morbid curiosity of people thinking, “how much worse can it possibly get,” or , “anything will be better than that Joel Shumacher disaster.” Just within the past year, there have been roughly 18 movie releases that have been remakes, in some form. What happened to the creative minds? Even Tim Burton’s previous two films have been remakes, somewhat. “Alice in Wonderland” is an obvious remake, but with Burton’s gothic
style attached. I’ve complained a lot about Burton through my years, but it worked quite well with this. But, it was still a remake. His other was “Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street,” a dark and twisted musical about a scorned lover, seeking revenge on the man who wronged him. Prior to this, I don’t believe that any version of the “Sweeney Todd” story had been released on film, but it was an established story prior to Burton’s gloomy hands grasped it. But, I can’t lie, I loved this movie. Tim Burton actually didn’t tweak it all that much, solidifying my opinion about this being a remake.

      Remakes wouldn’t be so bad if they were done sparingly. But, as soon as one studio does a remake, then another studio answers with a rushed product. One that doesn’t even resemble a true attempt to make a decent movie. Look at the horror movie situation. In 2003, “Texas Chainsaw Massacre” was remade, with an impressive amount of success. From there, it snowballed, disgustingly. We got remakes of “Dawn of the Dead,” “The Hills Have Eyes,” “The Amityville Horror,” and, naturally, “Halloween,” and countless others. I’m not saying that they weren’t god, but this is just in the span of 4 years. That’s a bit on the incessant side, right?

      In the case of “Halloween,” the reasoning for a reboot was a good one. Rather than try to salvage the wreck that the original “Halloween” franchise had become, Dimension decided to wipe the slate clean. They(Rob Zombie included) felt that the story had went too far off-course, and the only way to correct it was to start over. That might be true(I disagree), but how can they possibly continue to recycle that reason after they released that atrocity, “Rob Zombie’s Halloween II?” That movie went way farther off-course than any of the “Halloween” releases after the original sequel. I’d rather watch “Cats” for the rest of my life while a real cat used my nuts as a scratching post, than to be exposed to that movie for just a moment. A reboot is supposed to give new life to a franchise, not destroy it faster than an earthquake could a house of sticks. After that, they couldn’t possibly green light ANOTHER sequel… right(Halloween 3D)?

      What about that “Spiderman” reboot? Simply because Sam Raimi didn’t want to rush the project, while Sony only sought to make a movie that they knew would be successful, whether it was a quality film or not. This isn’t so much of wanting to, “start fresh,” or, “make it better,” but more like, “you’re a poopy-head Sam, we’re going to pretend your movies never happened.” Definitely a child-like sense of revenge.



ON A SIDE NOTE:I recently watched “The Social Network,” and Andrew Garfield is an excellent actor. One who will definitely play Peter Parker very well.



      “The Blob” is even getting a remake. Can you
believe that? A crappy movie that saw an Extra Terrestrial case of Silly Putty rolling lazily about, devouring people. Why is that even popular? You’d think it was written by Stephen King with a plot like that. You’d think that with such a poopy plot, the acting would at least be good, right? But it wasn’t, “The Blob” was filled with sh*tty acting, save Steve McQueen, but even he had trouble convincing me to finish watching it.

      Another movie that’s one of my favorites is “The Crow.” But, as with any movie made within the past 20 years, it is getting rebooted. I understand that the series failed epically with its insistence of producing WAY too many sequels. Maybe that was one movie that should have just been left at one entry, especially if they really are intending of casting Mark Whalberg in the lead. Don’t misunderstand, Marky-Mark is a fine actor, but an Eric Draven he’s not.

      I’m not going to even dignify why remaking “Frankenstein” is a terrible idea. Ahh… screw it. Haven’t they learned from “Wolfman?” What a gag-inducing movie that was. It had so much promise, such a huge amount of hype behind it. I’m not sure how this movie should’ve sucked. They had plenty of time for it, and had Benicio Del Toro. Besides that, didn’t they already attempt a remake for this particular monster? Yeah, the one with Robert DeNiro playing Frankenstein’s Monster. What a low point in his illustrious career.


In closing:


                  

      I’ve got to admit, I watch a lot of movies. I’m not saying that every remake is bad, because the vast majority do not. My issue is that it no longer seems like anyone is using their imagination anymore. What I really crave is an original story that I can’t predict. It defeats the purpose of mystery in movies if you can just watch the original to discover the conclusion. I’m not all negative, though. A great thing is accomplished with this abundance of remakes. A younger generation is introduced to characters and stories that their parents were brought-up on. This not only entertains them, but generates interest in original films lost on most of today’s youth simply because it doesn’t have all of the explosions, blood, or eye-catching special effects. I guess that what I’m trying to get across is that remakes and reboots are fine, in moderation. Remakes shouldn’t have ever reached the heights that it has. Next year alone, over 25 movies being released will be either sequel, reboot, or remake. We just need to be shown proof that originality still exists in the movie industry.


      I know that this is probably not the best place to post this particular editorial, since my argument centers around how uncreative Hollywood has become, and Comic Book movies are, largely, not creative. I was just curious what your opinions are? Let me know in the usual spot.
Holiday Gift Guide 2024 - Essentials From Disney, Jakks Pacific, LEGO, Universal, & More
Related:

Holiday Gift Guide 2024 - Essentials From Disney, Jakks Pacific, LEGO, Universal, & More

A BARBIE Sequel May Be In The Works At Warner Bros. - Will Margot Robbie And Ryan Gosling Return?
Recommended For You:

A BARBIE Sequel May Be In The Works At Warner Bros. - Will Margot Robbie And Ryan Gosling Return?

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

LEEE777
LEEE777 - 12/20/2010, 3:15 AM
Great article and I totally agree mainly I hate reboots and remakes now, its got old fast, NIGHTMARE, HALLOWEEN, etc all sucked donkey chunks!

Only franchise that even needs REBOOTING is the X-MEN one!

(Too messed up to even care about that franchise now : ( )

So many comic books that need putting on the screen (FABLES etc) that whats the point of remaking movies?

TRON: LEGACY proves 9 out of 10 remakes suck!

I hope HOLLYWOOD wakes up and sees TRON: LEGACY is the way to go as Joe Public will soon be sick of remakes/reboots they wont care no more and thats bad for everyone!


p.s. I know its not original to adapt comic books to movies but its much more creative than telling more or less a the same story over and over again, like REMAKES/REBOOTS do...

If they can't stick with their own franchises an try and make them better, then they should stop and adapt original stuff ripe for an adaption!

So glad MARVEL STUDIOS has THOR, AVENGERS etc!
YakeTheSnake
YakeTheSnake - 12/20/2010, 5:29 AM
@LEEE777: I totally agree, my good sir. Especially about X-Men. They really dropped the ball on that one.
ManThing
ManThing - 12/20/2010, 5:46 AM
I'm excited about True Grit
TheDarqueOne
TheDarqueOne - 12/20/2010, 5:55 AM
"I know that this is probably not the best place to post this particular editorial, since my argument centers around how uncreative Hollywood has become, and Comic Book movies are, largely, not creative."

Care to explain what you meant by that 'not creative' part?

MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 12/20/2010, 6:47 AM
I don't think Batman Begins can be described as a remake. It didn't remake anything it just told a different story using the same character that we had seen before. Alice kinda the same. It was actually more of a sequel than a remake. I think ideally a remake should attempt to better a lousy movie. But more often than not its already great films like Halloween or foreign stuff like Vannila Sky that get inferior American versions. But, sometimes they do get it right. Let Me In was every bit as good..in some ways better than Let The Right One In and True Grit is apparently amazing too. I don't mind them once they are of a high enough standard, but I agree that the majority of Horror remakes have been awful.
golden123
golden123 - 12/20/2010, 6:55 AM
Alice and Wonderland wasn't a reboot or remake it was a sequel/spin-off. Oh and you want originality watch Inception.
TucsonRican
TucsonRican - 12/20/2010, 7:05 AM
The problem is that Hollywood isn't being run by people that want to be creative, its a business. And I understand that it is, so they try to do things that have a preconceived audience so that would guarantee some money back on their investment.

Unfortunately, the days when a young Alan Lladd Jr. could look into the eyes of an unproven director and say, "I'm in" no matter what anybody said, are gone. That happened, back in 1977, and we got a little gem of a film called Star Wars. And they've been reeling ever since, looking for the next big tentpole franchise.

I want to be a filmmaker. I'm going to film school, and should be graduating in less than a year, but the state of the industry scares the shit out of me.....
CaptainQuirk
CaptainQuirk - 12/20/2010, 7:12 AM
Independent movies are as original as they've ever been but they struggle at the box office because modern audiences generally can't comprehend or appreciate good art.

Therefore production companies are forced to manufacture mindless garbage and aim it at the ignorant just to stay financially sound.

JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 12/20/2010, 7:18 AM
You make some good points, but I'm not totally against remakes. Tron: Legacy had it's faults, but I'd rather sit through that a hundred times before watching the original. It's the low budget horror crap that's the main problem...but as they make a lot of cash, don't expect to see them gone anytime soon!

Oh, and one slight pet peeve - it's Spider-Man, not Spiderman. It always bothers me when people forget that. Sad, but true. :P
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 12/20/2010, 7:46 AM
People should stop thinking as reboots being the problem. They're movies like any other. They can be great if done right, and if not, then they suck.

But no, the actual reboot isn't the problem. Otherwise we never would have gotten the new Batman movies, and I don't see anyone complaining about that reboot.

Also, the "Hollywood has no original ideas" line is complete nonsense. There are FAR more original movies that come out every year than reboots.

And lets face it, CBM's are not original. They are movies about characters and stories taht were created by someone else. Thats the entire definition of UNORIGINAL. But we all love our CBM's don't we?
dancingmonkey08
dancingmonkey08 - 12/20/2010, 8:58 AM
Very nice article, ReflectingHeirophant! I was just talking about this the other day! It is a major issue in Hollywood these days, I hate remakes and I ESPECIALLY HATE REBOOTS! If Hollywood is really running out of originality, why dont they just turn every book or comic in existence that hasnt been turned into a movie and turn them into movies instead of going back and re-doing old franchises and individual movies!

You talked about the Haloween franchise and in my opinion, that never should of been resurrected. The original is a superb horror movie and Rob "talentless" Zombie could not & did not improve upon the original and in my opinion, no-one could have. This goes for the other horror franchises too.

A re-make or reboot should only be implemented if the original was bloody terrible and it could be improved upon!

I know so many people would disagree with me, but the SPIDER-MAN REBOOT WAS NOT NEEDED! I hate that we have to start all over again with the Spider-Man story. The comics dont have to be constantly rebooted, why the hell does the movies have to be? Now, dont get me wrong, I hated Spider-Man 3, but they could of retconned some elements in Spider-Man 3 and continued on with a total re-cast. Really, apart from the stupid dancing & Venom's death (which could of been retconned), did anything deviate from the comics. No, it didnt, Harry became the goblin in the comics and died in the comics, so no deviation there (Okay he looked retarded in that ski mask but apart from that)

But, anyway the studio just had to go with a [frick]ing reboot when the original Spider-Man franchise was beyond saving yet. I didnt mind bringing in a new director and cast because after a trilogy, it is nice to get new blood in to make it but there should have been no reboot

The only time reboots should be implemented is in a Batman & Robin situation. There was no way they could of continued on after that abortion of a movie. It completely forgot who the character of Batman was and I hope we never see a failure of a movie like it again. Batman Begins was the perfect reboot which portrayed Batman perfectly. But that brings me to the danger of yet another reboot. So many comic book fans are saying that after a third Nolan Batman movie, the series should be rebooted again! I SAY NO [frick]ING WAY. A total re-cast is fine but it should continue on in the same continuity with a new director who will introduce the more fantastical villains such as Killer Croc who Nolan never would have introduced, they also should introduce Robin & transition the franchise into JLA territory too. Why should they reboot it again?

@LEEE
I do agree that the X-Men should be rebooted. But wouldnt you rather wait a few years for Marvel Studios to a proper reboot with the original five X-Men rather than Fox make a reboot that fails horribly all over again?! I would rather Fox continue to [frick] up their one X-Men franchise rather than start all over again and [frick] it up all over again!

And I like the style of Tron Legacy or even the upcoming The Thing prequel where they are a sequel or a prequel to a previous movie rather than rebooting and re-making the franchise all over again!

@Ror
Couldnt have put it better myself. And you are right about Alice in Wonderland, it was more of a sequel to the original story, because Alice was said to be in Wonderland before.
GUNSMITH
GUNSMITH - 12/20/2010, 9:24 AM
PEOPLE WANNA SEE STUFF AGAIN..TRON WAS COOL BRING IT BACK, WITH COOLER GRAPHICS AND NEW CGI...SAME GOES WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE GREW UP WITH, FROM MOVIES TO SONGS TO THEM DAMN CABBAGE PATCH KIDS..ONE WAY OR ANOTHER GOOD THINGS NEVER GO AWAY, LIKE THAT ROCK U THREW INTO THE POND, ITS GONNA MAKE RIPPLES, REBOOTS AND REMAKES....RIPPLES FROM SOMETHING THAT MADE A IMPACT ON US. AN WHEN WE GROW OLD AND TURN TO DUST PEOPLE WILL STILL BE BRINGING BACK WHAT DID SO WELL BEFORE.
YakeTheSnake
YakeTheSnake - 12/20/2010, 10:00 AM
@TheDarqueOne: I only meant that Comic Book movies are movies based on established characters and stories. No disrespect meant to the Comic Book Movie community.

@wards: I know that. The poster in the article comes from that remake. But, it's getting yet another remake.

@RorMachine: I said that "Batman Begins" was a reboot. I used to b*tch that there wasn't a differnce, but I understand better now. Remake aims to make a sinle movie better, while a reboot's target is to better an entire franchise. I guess you're right, "Alice in Wonderland" is more of a sequel. But, it introduces characters who seem to be established, but didn't appear in the previous Disney cartoon(to the best of my knowledge, it has been years and years since I've seen it). So, I'd say 50% Sequel, and 50% Remake.

@Golden123: I'm actually getting ready to watch "Inception." I'm stoked. Do you think I could get away with posting a review of it on here?

@TucsonRican: Good luck in your venture. I hope more filmmakers with your mentality come about.

@CaptainQuirk: Well put, sir...

@JoshW: I thought "Tron: Legacy" was a sequel. Either way, I'm not totally against remakes and reboots, I just think they shouldn't be released so damn close together. In some cases, reboots are neccessary(*sigh* "Batman & Robin").
@CorndogBurglar: First of all, love the name. But, I don't hate all remakes or reboots. I understand that Hollywood is a business, and they are typically the easy paydays. A lot of remakes or reboots are great, like "Batman Begins." While there might be some original movies release, they are always buried by the remakes or reboots, which is what really bugs me.

@canadiancastaway: I concur. They're even attempting to remake "The Wizard of Oz." I don't like that movie in the least, but that should be off limits.

@dancingmonkey08: I totally agree... sort of. The original "Halloween" was pefect, no reason for a remake, or a reboot to the franchise. I disagree that the story went too far off-course from the original story, but I understand what they mean. But, they definately can't use that anymore after "Rob Zombie's Halloween II." I wouldn't say that Rob Zombie is "untalented." His music is good, and his own films are pretty damn cool, particularly "Devil's Rejects." But he p*ssed all over the new "Halloween II." I definitely agree that Batman's reboot was a neccesity after "Batman & Robin." It would've been impossible to take any sequel serious after that atrocity. It shouldn't be rebooted again, but should be monitered closely after Nolan leaves. My biggest beef with Nolan leaving: Not seeing Gary Oldman as Gordon... sad face...
Ibz
Ibz - 12/20/2010, 12:12 PM
i dont thing nolans batman movies are a remake of the comics, there a totally different take on them but i do agree with most of your points though, great article

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/ibz/news/?a=26767 my review of tron legacy check it out
Optimist18
Optimist18 - 12/20/2010, 12:17 PM
If we are living in the age of the remake, it is only because there is a great deal of people (mostly, but not completely, younger) who lack culture. I used to think that it was true of every younger generation to look down upon the ways of the older, with there being a few, much-appreciated, indivduals in this younger generation with some longevity. I'm only 19 years old, and I'm glad I love and appreciate classic films, where as most other people my age don't show any respect to anything that's older than five years. I guess these are the average "movie-goers"; the people simply looking for the next thrill rather than art. It's a shame a great portion of our population is like that. As for myself, I'm definitely not against remakes because I don't really think of any films as being sacred. If somebody can have another go at a story and do it well, than do it. If it's not that good, than that's that. I'm in agreement with GUNSMITH and DerekDecay. The reason I like remakes is because I get to see something familar get a "fresh" look. And remakes have been around since the early days of cinema. Hollywood is indeed a business, and if something has worked before, then they are going to do it again, especially if this concept hasn't seen the light of the cinema for a good while. So, in conclusion, if you feel you have to blame someone for remakes, blame the un-informed people who lack culture. But, seeing as how there will always be those people, remakes are here to stay. And I'm going to happily live with it.
pollix22
pollix22 - 12/20/2010, 12:49 PM
Historically 25% of the movies made each year are in some way remakes. It's been this way for about 50 years, its not a new thing. Personally, I agree, that % is way too high.
Ibz
Ibz - 12/20/2010, 12:59 PM
prime example is tron yes it more of a sequel then remake, but it introduced me too tron, and left quite a good impression on me. some times reboots get the younger generation interested in the original movies
punishermax12
punishermax12 - 12/20/2010, 1:28 PM
i agree with you completely. the only kind of remakes that i enjoy are re-imaginings, where they tell a virtually new story but not without incorporating some elements that fans of the original franchise liked while still retaining a sense of unpredictabilities, like the new james bond series
YakeTheSnake
YakeTheSnake - 12/20/2010, 2:07 PM
@DerekDecay: I agree that the practice of remaking or rebooting movies has always existed in Hollywood, but I don't think it was to the degree it is now. The percentage of films that are remakes of older movies is entirely to high. And I've never got around to reading the Alice book, sadly. So, I will take your word on it, sir. You're absolutely right, comic books are no different from films. I understand when another artist comes around, and they want to put there own spin on a classic story. I'm not saying all remakes and reboots are bad... Just too frequent.

@Optimist18: Very well worded, and I agree. But, I did make the point that a good thing that all of these remakes and reboots accomplish is that younger generations, that are clueless to classic movies, get introduced to them through the new versions. Much like "Tron: Legacy" did for Ibz. I, too, enjoy "fresh" versions of my favorite movies, books, comics, or games. But, sometimes, too many liberties are taken.

@punishermax12: Yes, re-imaginings are fantastic, when done correctly. But some of these "re-imaginings" stray too far from its source material. Bond is whole other monster...
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 12/20/2010, 3:11 PM
REF @ Hellz yes!

JOSH @ TRON: LEGACY is a SEQUEL dude!!!

dancing @ If we wait, it'll never happen lol!
Bartman87
Bartman87 - 12/20/2010, 3:42 PM
I think that the big thing is that the re-makes are backed so much more by the studios that produced them because they are the money makers and in the last few years the economy has hit everyone so people would rather put their money into seeing a movie that they knew about than on something that they may not like. That being said some of the remakes have been spot on and others have been crap but I'm tired of having to watch foreign films to get an original story; please no mention of Inception unless you can name another original
GinGer23
GinGer23 - 12/21/2010, 4:48 AM
you know what they need to reboot is Robot Jocks. with todays graphics and a updated story that movie could be pretty cool. i mean come on who doesnt like giant robots.
comicb00kguy
comicb00kguy - 12/21/2010, 6:40 AM
I am not totally against the idea of remakes. Some films, especially older sci-fi films can benefit from technical advances that make it possible now to tell the story that the original director and/or writers intended, but just couldn't do based on cost or technical limitations. I just hate the idea that they have to remake a lot of movies that don't need to be redone, but are being done just because it worked once so it will work again. Some movies are also so great that they should remain off-limits. Who here REALLY wants to see someone else remake Star Wars, for example? Or, just to illustrate the full absurdity of remake fever, Animal House? Nobody can outdo Belushi. Why bother trying? Now, I'm not opposed to doing sequels. Many films leave the door open at the end for more stories with their characters. Just don't do a watered-down version of the first film!

Reboots are another thing. Some potential series get screwed up so bad that it's necessary to go back to the beginning and start over. It's being done too much and too quickly now. Spider-Man didn't need a total reboot. A good makeover, yes. That would do the job without having to go back to square one and see Uncle Ben killed for the 5,437,926th time.

I do understand that part of the reasoning for this is to introduce younger moviegoers to classic films and characters. That can be accomplished just as easily through DVD's, and through those of us who are older showing younger friends, and our kids and their friends, these films and talking about them. I find a lot of younger people that fall in love with the classics of the 70s and 80s that I grew up with if they get the chance to see them. Some things are a little dated now, but great stories and really funny movies are timeless.
marvelguy
marvelguy - 12/23/2010, 9:58 PM
Though I have enjoyed my favorite characters coming to the big screen, this has been my contention all along. Hollywood has turned to comic books because they are out of ideas. There is a wealth of source material in comics. Now I know there is Chris Nolan and Tarantino, they are the exceptions.
Hollywood further proves their lack of vision by rebooting comic book movies that weren't in dire need of a fix (Spider-Man).

My last word, it's all about the money. I don't blame the money end so much as I wish they would do it right the first time and stop with crap like "Dukes of Hazard," "Beverly Hillbillies," and the rest.
YakeTheSnake
YakeTheSnake - 12/25/2010, 10:30 PM
In all honesty, I dug "Dukes of Hazard." It was a funny movie. But, it didn't need to be called "Dukes of Hazard." Maybe "Stereotypical Funny Guys F*ck Sh*t Up."
View Recorder