The remakes and reboots really began to go full throttle after the success of “Batman Begins.” But, I think the reason that reboot worked so well was because of the atrocity that it followed. “Batman & Robin” was such a piece of sh*t, anything that followed it looked better. As it happens, “Batman Begins” was, actually, a great film. But, I think it’s success was due more from the morbid curiosity of people thinking, “how much worse can it possibly get,” or , “anything will be better than that Joel Shumacher disaster.” Just within the past year, there have been roughly 18 movie releases that have been remakes, in some form. What happened to the creative minds? Even Tim Burton’s previous two films have been remakes, somewhat. “Alice in Wonderland” is an obvious remake, but with Burton’s gothic style attached. I’ve complained a lot about Burton through my years, but it worked quite well with this. But, it was still a remake. His other was “Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street,” a dark and twisted musical about a scorned lover, seeking revenge on the man who wronged him. Prior to this, I don’t believe that any version of the “Sweeney Todd” story had been released on film, but it was an established story prior to Burton’s gloomy hands grasped it. But, I can’t lie, I loved this movie. Tim Burton actually didn’t tweak it all that much, solidifying my opinion about this being a remake.
      Remakes wouldn’t be so bad if they were done sparingly. But, as soon as one studio does a remake, then another studio answers with a rushed product. One that doesn’t even resemble a true attempt to make a decent movie. Look at the horror movie situation. In 2003, “Texas Chainsaw Massacre” was remade, with an impressive amount of success. From there, it snowballed, disgustingly. We got remakes of “Dawn of the Dead,” “The Hills Have Eyes,” “The Amityville Horror,” and, naturally, “Halloween,” and countless others. I’m not saying that they weren’t god, but this is just in the span of 4 years. That’s a bit on the incessant side, right?
      In the case of “Halloween,” the reasoning for a reboot was a good one. Rather than try to salvage the wreck that the original “Halloween” franchise had become, Dimension decided to wipe the slate clean. They(Rob Zombie included) felt that the story had went too far off-course, and the only way to correct it was to start over. That might be true(I disagree), but how can they possibly continue to recycle that reason after they released that atrocity, “Rob Zombie’s Halloween II?” That movie went way farther off-course than any of the “Halloween” releases after the original sequel. I’d rather watch “Cats” for the rest of my life while a real cat used my nuts as a scratching post, than to be exposed to that movie for just a moment. A reboot is supposed to give new life to a franchise, not destroy it faster than an earthquake could a house of sticks. After that, they couldn’t possibly green light ANOTHER sequel… right(Halloween 3D)?
      What about that “Spiderman” reboot? Simply because Sam Raimi didn’t want to rush the project, while Sony only sought to make a movie that they knew would be successful, whether it was a quality film or not. This isn’t so much of wanting to, “start fresh,” or, “make it better,” but more like, “you’re a poopy-head Sam, we’re going to pretend your movies never happened.” Definitely a child-like sense of revenge.
ON A SIDE NOTE:I recently watched “The Social Network,” and Andrew Garfield is an excellent actor. One who will definitely play Peter Parker very well.
      
“The Blob” is even getting a remake. Can you believe that? A crappy movie that saw an Extra Terrestrial case of Silly Putty rolling lazily about, devouring people. Why is that even popular? You’d think it was written by Stephen King with a plot like that. You’d think that with such a poopy plot, the acting would at least be good, right? But it wasn’t, “The Blob” was filled with sh*tty acting, save Steve McQueen, but even he had trouble convincing me to finish watching it.
      Another movie that’s one of my favorites is “The Crow.” But, as with any movie made within the past 20 years, it is getting rebooted. I understand that the series failed epically with its insistence of producing WAY too many sequels. Maybe that was one movie that should have just been left at one entry, especially if they really are intending of casting Mark Whalberg in the lead. Don’t misunderstand, Marky-Mark is a fine actor, but an Eric Draven he’s not.
      I’m not going to even dignify why remaking “Frankenstein” is a terrible idea. Ahh… screw it. Haven’t they learned from “Wolfman?” What a gag-inducing movie that was. It had so much promise, such a huge amount of hype behind it. I’m not sure how this movie should’ve sucked. They had plenty of time for it, and had Benicio Del Toro. Besides that, didn’t they already attempt a remake for this particular monster? Yeah, the one with Robert DeNiro playing Frankenstein’s Monster. What a low point in his illustrious career.
In closing:
                  
      
I’ve got to admit, I watch a lot of movies. I’m not saying that every remake is bad, because the vast majority do not. My issue is that it no longer seems like anyone is using their imagination anymore. What I really crave is an original story that I can’t predict. It defeats the purpose of mystery in movies if you can just watch the original to discover the conclusion. I’m not all negative, though. A great thing is accomplished with this abundance of remakes. A younger generation is introduced to characters and stories that their parents were brought-up on. This not only entertains them, but generates interest in original films lost on most of today’s youth simply because it doesn’t have all of the explosions, blood, or eye-catching special effects. I guess that what I’m trying to get across is that remakes and reboots are fine, in moderation. Remakes shouldn’t have ever reached the heights that it has. Next year alone, over 25 movies being released will be either sequel, reboot, or remake. We just need to be shown proof that originality still exists in the movie industry.
      I know that this is probably not the best place to post this particular editorial, since my argument centers around how uncreative Hollywood has become, and Comic Book movies are, largely, not creative. I was just curious what your opinions are? Let me know in the usual spot.