COMICS: George Pérez Claims He Could Not Wait To Leave SUPERMAN

@PatientZero I actually like the new 52, and Action Comics Superman is pretty good. His own book has been terrible, but that has been the writing and story.

"screw the new 52"
"I hate Superman's new suit"
LOL
I agree partially with the first quote and completely with the second.
Nuff said.

@ManOfSteel1013 Sorry I will clarify. Yes he states he didn't get information from DC, but what I was trying to say was, why did he go ahead and still write it, and why write a story based on Grant's AC story if you knew nothing about it?

Secondly, there are a number of references to Action Comics so it seemed he knew some information, he probably wasn't told completely what was going on in AC as he didn't need to know, and they didn't want him to accidentally leak stuff through his stories.

However he should have been able to write half decent stories, not containing panel upon panel of needless monologuing and dialogue without any information regarding Grant Morrisons Action Comics, so I am not really buying this excuse.

To me it smells of, He did badly, he got fired from writing for doing badly, so rather than accept responsibility he is playing the blame game.

Hope DC pull there finger out and get Superman sorted, getting tired of seeing Batman dominating everything as per usual.

i like what i've read of the new 52 but i've only read a few.

-animal man (excellent,the best title)
-aquaman (very good)
-batman (snyder,the only bat book i want to read)
-the flash (good,could be better)
-green lantern (good,could be better)
-red lantern (good,could be better)
-swamp thing (very good)
-wonder woman (very good)

i've got action comics 1-5 to read,they better be good.

Grant Morrisions not being a team player with his incoprehensible drivil that he calls writting? Shocking. Having to work after him must have been a huge chore, what with his random plot-twists, multi-layered yet horribly executed narration, complete disregard for the characters personalities and histories, complete lack of continuity and horrible dialogue. It must have been like trying to write a cohesive superman story after a writer whose sczichophrenic and just took six hits of acid. Good luck.

Perez's writing had potentinal, I could tell. I could see glimmers of a good story in his work and he had Sups actually fight things. You could tell, however, that he was not happy with the sitution and the lackluster execution of his writing showed it.

@SRS Thanks, personally in terms of the "Armour" I felt it really did not need explain all that much detail, which might sound odd, but what I mean is, writers have always wanted ways to explain why Superman's costume remains intact, now it has been his aura, and so on in the past, but i think they were doing away with that reason, so had to create a new one.

Now for me personally, all they needed to say, was the material was Kryptonian, and as such just tougher, not indestructible than any man-made material, thus a bullet wouldn't rip it, but in battle with a tough enemy it could get torn to shreds, when that happens, just use a throwaway line like he puts it in a machine in the fortress that repairs it.

I actually think they got too complex with the costume in to the how and why it doesn't rip apart when he stops a explosion.

For me if that wanted complexity I would have had the suit be a material that adjusts to the characteristics of the wearer, which it does kinda do when he puts it on in AC #8, but had it be like normal clothe, but because Superman is putting it on, while he is on Earth, thus he is enhanced, when the suit takes on his characteristics, it also takes on his denser molecular structure. So if he wore it on Krypton, it would be tear like any cloth as they are not super powered there.

Again, I would have just preferred a, it is tougher, but not indestruble suit, that was more regal than it is armour looking. However I did think it needed an update.