Darkknight2149 Weighs In On That CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR Trailer

Darkknight2149 Weighs In On That CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR Trailer

The official teaser for a certain blockbuster instantly made headlines as soon as it was recently launched. With so much hype surrounding the trailer, one must ask: Was it worth the wait?

Editorial Opinion
By Darkknight2149 - Nov 25, 2015 04:11 PM EST
Ever since the film was announced, we've all been looking forward to the official teaser trailer for Captain America: Civil War, sequel to the critically acclaimed Captain America: The Winter Soldier and loose adaptation of the various Civil War comic events. Yes, it's true that we've already seen two Avengers films, numerous onscreen cameos and, by the time of this film's release, a fight between DC's Batman and Superman, but regardless, Civil War is such an exciting premise and the simple fact that it's from the same creative team that was behind 2014's Captain America: The Winter Soldier makes this a film worth looking forward to. And it is, after all, from the same studio that was successfully able to take a handful of relatively obscure characters and turn them into household names (although Hulk and Captain America were already A-list characters).

The internet exploded when the teaser trailer was recently released, as our anticipation was finally rewarded. Was it worth it? Let me put it this way: I've rewatched it too many times to count. The teaser was very emotionally driven and action packed, showcasing a number of characters, both returning and brand new to the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Inevitably, some will frown at the absence of characters like Ant-Man and the Vision, but do keep in mind that this is merely a teaser. It was nice to finally see the return of the dormant character, General Ross, as well as a flight-enabled Scarlet Witch and countless others. The trailer seemed to know where its focus is, so the numerous characters felt well balanced and nothing feels overcrowded, a problem that has plagued such comic book films as Spider-Man 3 and the theatrical cut of Watchmen.

The interactions between Captain America, Bucky Barnes and Iron Man all felt real and the film's story seems a lot more personal than the comic's. Friendships are at stake, especially considering that they all feel that they are doing the morally right thing. The greatest line of dialogue that has stuck with me is the exchange between Iron Man and Captain America: "He's my friend." "So was I." There certainly is a real human being underneath Tony Stark's facade. On a less emotional note, the fight choreography remains impeccable, as it was with the previous Captain America film.

We don't see any of Baron Zemo, the true villain of the picture, in the trailer. This version of the
character will be entirely reimagined and won't even have his mask, an essential element to the character. Normally this would be a huge red flag, but I'll give the Russo Brothers the benefit of the doubt. Crossbones is only seen in the background for a brief second. I wonder if Crossbones will be an exception to Marvel Studios' infamous lack of memorable villains. I predict he will be, but we simply haven't seen enough of him to properly make that judgment. I don't think we will be seeing much of Spider-Man until the film is released. Although I continue to cringe at the thought of another Spider-Man reboot, Tom Holland seems like he can pull it off. At least he nailed the Peter Parker look from the early Ultimate Spider-Man comics.

The final thing I will address mainly pertains to comic book films as a whole, rather than just Civil War. This might seem like a small issue but bare with me: white mask lenses. For the longest time, I've been wanting to see white mask lenses on a live action Batman costume. Deadpool will be the first to really do the white mask lenses in live action, but his will be CGI and intentionally cartoony in order to express the character's emotion with the comedic tone of the film. However, now we have seen Black Panther wear realistic white mask lenses in the Civil War trailer and they look awesome. At his point, I kind of feel like Batman has to wear the white lenses eventually in the DC Extended Universe. Some will argue that the lenses take away from the character's ability to express emotion, but Batman isn't supposed to be sympathetic when he's in costume. He's supposed to be frightening. And anyone who has seen 2012's Dredd knows that talented actors (like Ben Affleck) can express emotion regardless.

All in all, the trailer does a perfect job of establishing the film to the general audience and getting returning fans even more hyped for the film.
Marvel Comics Reveals New FANTASTIC FOUR Homage Variant Covers Ahead Of The Team's MCU Debut Next Summer
Related:

Marvel Comics Reveals New FANTASTIC FOUR Homage Variant Covers Ahead Of The Team's MCU Debut Next Summer

SPIDER-MAN: Tom Holland Credits Robert Downey Jr. For Stopping His CIVIL WAR Scenes From Being Cut Down
Recommended For You:

SPIDER-MAN: Tom Holland Credits Robert Downey Jr. For Stopping His CIVIL WAR Scenes From Being Cut Down

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Utopian8418
Utopian8418 - 11/25/2015, 9:04 PM
@GliderMan I completley agree. The Russos themselves said he would be nothing like the comics. I think the Russos are great but they just shouldnt do this with such a beloved character. And their excuse was that otherwise it would have been predictable? wtf
Utopian8418
Utopian8418 - 11/25/2015, 9:21 PM
I also have a big problem with the tone they are going for here. It is perfect for CA solo movies but not this. Unlike AOU, this doesnt feel 'comicbooky' enough (the lack of other heroes in the trailer didnt help). I hope they dont go with this tone for Infinity War.
Utopian8418
Utopian8418 - 11/25/2015, 9:24 PM
Also Cap 3 should have been about Baron Zemo and Avengers: Civil War should have been set after Infinity War.

(I should clarify that I am absolutley hyped for this movie and feel it will be incredibly awesome. I just have these minor problems with it)
MaximusTheMad
MaximusTheMad - 11/26/2015, 3:38 AM
@dethpillow

I dunno, deth, Osborn rose to power after blowing up Skrull Queen Veranke at the end of Secret Invasion, and gaining the people's trust.

I'm not sure how he could rise to prominence during a post-Infinity Civil War.

However, he could do some cool stuff post-Infinity if they do Secret Invasion or something like that.

I just don't want him to take over America and found H.A.M.M.E.R 'till WAY down the line.

First and foremost, I want to see his humble beginnings as Green Goblin, the crazy mob boss, then graduate to super-villainy and the death of Gwen Stacy. And THEN (depending on what they do with Harry), we could have Osborn become a global/Avengers-level threat like Ultimate Goblin or like in Dark Reign.

Some of this stuff gives me my reservations against Spidey in the MCU. If he only gets one movie per phase, then it's gonna take a long ass time to see any worthwhile arcs and developments, since Spidey has SO MUCH GREAT STUFF to pull from. I'm gonna miss seeing a Spider-Man flick every 2 years as opposed to every 4-5 years.
Utopian8418
Utopian8418 - 11/26/2015, 7:34 AM
@dethpillow @MaximusTheMad is right, didnt Civil War lead in to Secret Invasion in the comics? It makes sense to me that an alien threat unites the heroes so I see no problem on Infinity happening after CV (also Cap will probably be dead in part 1). It would also make sense that HAMMER is created by Osbourn as a result of the Infinity War (the Green Goblin would appear on the first Spiderman solo movie so there would be a character arc for Norman).

Back to Civil War, my reason for wanting it to happen post-infinity is that it feels kind of rushed to have it now. I want a world with more established superheroes. I wanted it to be an Avengers movie, a big war between superheroes. The version we are getting looks great but feels more like a spy movie or something. Do you know what I mean?
Utopian8418
Utopian8418 - 11/26/2015, 7:41 AM
The arcs I want to see are Civil War- Infinity War- Dark Reign/Masters of Evil- Siege- Secret Invasion/Kree Skrull War- Avengers vs Xmen- Axis
TomSolo
TomSolo - 11/27/2015, 8:55 PM
@MaximustheMad... I agree with your issues, but as far as Spiderman movies go, I just don't see Sony being okay with 1 Spidey film every 4-5 years. I have to think that they would have negotiated an agreement that there would be more films in less time than that. Marvel has tons of characters to film out their film slate. Sony has only Spiderman. And since they don't have many other established moneymakers in the near future, they are going to need Spidey.

They've made a ton of bad decisions in the past, but Sony has to know this superhero boom may not last forever. To agree to only 3-4 Spiderman films in 15 years could prove to be a waste.
MaximusTheMad
MaximusTheMad - 11/28/2015, 3:43 AM
@TomSolo

Yeah, you might be right. If the movies are Sony-produced, then multiple Spidey flicks per phase won't slow down the MCU.
View Recorder