Green Lantern Director Talks Villains

Green Lantern Director Talks Villains

Director Martin Campbell reveals even more information about the movie's villains in this video interview...

By JoshWilding - Jan 20, 2010 08:01 PM EST
Filed Under: Green Lantern
Source: IGN Movies

This from IGN:



Green Lantern is set for release on June 17, 2011 and will star Ryan Reynolds as the title character.
MAD MEN Star Jon Hamm Reflects On Pitching Role To Marvel And Confirms He Turned Down GREEN LANTERN
Related:

MAD MEN Star Jon Hamm Reflects On Pitching Role To Marvel And Confirms He Turned Down GREEN LANTERN

SUPERMAN: Nathan Fillion On Why He's Perfectly Suited To Play GREEN LANTERN Guy Gardner
Recommended For You:

SUPERMAN: Nathan Fillion On Why He's Perfectly Suited To Play GREEN LANTERN Guy Gardner

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

LEEE777
LEEE777 - 1/20/2010, 8:08 PM
Hurry up and talk GUY GARDNER!!!!


Good find man!!


I wonder if STRONG gets SIN??
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 1/20/2010, 8:13 PM
Oh and did i say.....

BRADLEY COOPER FOR GUY GARDNER!!!



; D
ukboy28
ukboy28 - 1/20/2010, 8:16 PM
lee@ lol every week man :)

good find josh
CaptainCanada
CaptainCanada - 1/20/2010, 8:22 PM
how do you know guy gardner will even be in this?
lc
lc - 1/20/2010, 8:34 PM
LEEE marry

BRADLEY COOPER IS A POOPER LOL
InTylerWeTrust
InTylerWeTrust - 1/20/2010, 8:39 PM
Martin Campbell is my hero :)

And Anthony Mackie for John Stewart! (Or if they go older, Idris Elba)
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 1/20/2010, 8:59 PM
: D
DogsOfWar
DogsOfWar - 1/20/2010, 10:11 PM
Good find Josh. It'll be interesting to see how forthcoming Campbell is after Edge of Darkness publicity tour.
Hawksblueyes
Hawksblueyes - 1/20/2010, 11:14 PM
Cool find josh.
RedDevil
RedDevil - 1/20/2010, 11:50 PM
great find josh! atleast we now get to see the director himself expressing his thoughts on the film and it looks like he obviously has been reading extensively into the origins of GL. Can't wait for March when filming starts!
Phinehas
Phinehas - 1/21/2010, 12:06 AM
Sinestro doesn't GO to the darkside. He's already there when Jordan comes on scene!!!
Phinehas
Phinehas - 1/21/2010, 12:26 AM
I guess. I'm afraid of too many unnecessary "liberties" taken to advance a director's vision. Hammond was really portrayed as a prick that succomed to an accident more than hapless victim of circumstance. I just hope that Campbell falls back on the source more than his concoctions of "artful" storytelling.
GuyFawkes
GuyFawkes - 1/21/2010, 12:28 AM
This video isn't working what does he over all say?
jimdrums
jimdrums - 1/21/2010, 12:34 AM
It will be interesting to see how they bring the more ''alien'' members of the core to life, I got a feelin that this movie will be successful
Phinehas
Phinehas - 1/21/2010, 12:39 AM
GuyFawkes
Interviewer asks Cambell, "if Sinestro plays mentor then turns the villian?" Which is a poor question IMO.

Then Cambell is asked if Hammond is the main villian. Cambell goes on to color Hammond as a pitiful victim of circumstance, that turns evil. But he was a kind of dirtbag to begin with in the comics.
I won't quibble with Hammond, but will put my fanboy foot down on a poor handling of Sinestro. That will require special care and a steady execution at the hand of a craftsman.
GuyFawkes
GuyFawkes - 1/21/2010, 12:49 AM
Thank you @Phinehas
Dub0ner
Dub0ner - 1/21/2010, 3:50 AM
Considering First Flight came out six months ago, Campbell has a solid foundation to simply take live action/CGI. Already having an introductory film to work off of, associate characters and their deveopment, and also visually reference the DC Univ/Oa should be extremely beneficial and help to maintain accuracy.

GL has potential to be another flagship CBM for DC and Warner Bros. Hopefully leading the way for Justice League
Sinestro should turn villain in the beginning of the GL sequel.
Imran
Imran - 1/21/2010, 4:57 AM
I think the only Martin Campbell films that I've seen are Casino Royale and Goldeneye. Could anybody recommend anything?
AlexDeLarge87
AlexDeLarge87 - 1/21/2010, 6:40 AM
´94 Campbell made the action movie No Escape aka Escape From Absolom starring Ray Liotta, Lance Henriksen and that The Mask of Zorro Bad guy?... Stuart Wilson! he was also the bad guy in Lethal Weapon 3
StephenStrange
StephenStrange - 1/21/2010, 7:45 AM
"I guess. I'm afraid of too many unnecessary "liberties" taken to advance a director's vision. Hammond was really portrayed as a prick that succomed to an accident more than hapless victim of circumstance. I just hope that Campbell falls back on the source more than his concoctions of "artful" storytelling. "

Cool. But whenever someone says that about a Marvel movie they get ousted as a "comic book purist".

But sometimes you just know way ahead if time that if they don't stick to the playbook on certain issues the result WILL be inferior.
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 1/21/2010, 8:10 AM
Thanks guys! :)

teabag: "the hilight of his career was directing 2 episodes of Minder" - LMAO! :D He does seem like a bit of an odd choice to direct the movie...still, Casino Royale was pretty good so I'll give him the benefit of the doubt for now! However, even if he [frick]s it up I wont realise, lol - I dont think I've read more than a few GL comic books!

Guys, check out my MARVEL KNIGHTS Fan Cast under "Fan Fic"!!! :)
Phinehas
Phinehas - 1/21/2010, 12:37 PM
DarthMulder
Note that I said "too many UNNECESSARY liberties". Meaning there are definite NECESSARY liberties that must be taken for the sake of story-telling onto film.

"But whenever someone says that about a Marvel movie they get ousted as a "comic book purist"."

I totally sympathize with both parties on that arguement. It does take a balance of relaying a written story onto celluloid. But, at the end of the day, the source is the source. That shouldn't be forgotten nor neglected. If you can't fit everything onto film, consider a sequel! In fact because of the nature of comics they should serialize these movies even doing a single production filming and splitting them into different films with 6 month release intervals. That way, many stories get out there before the actors get too old.
Phinehas
Phinehas - 1/21/2010, 8:42 PM
gtrman
It must have been in Emerald Dawn because it isn't in Secret Origins. I haven't had the pleasure of reading Emerald Dawn.
View Recorder