Base Studio Effects On The Process Of Converting Captain America: The First Avenger To 3D!

Base Studio Effects On The Process Of Converting Captain America: The First Avenger To 3D!

'The Base Studio', who have worked on converting Captain America to 3D, talk about working with Joe Johnston, the differences between this and THOR, getting the shield to come out of the screen and much more...

By JoshWilding - Jul 10, 2011 09:07 AM EST
Filed Under: Captain America
Source: Comicus

Our friends over at Comicus have posted an interview with 'The Base Studio' about their work on converting Captain America: The First Avenger to 3D. Most interesting is their mention that, "Secret rumors have been floating around about another super hero movie." Could they be referring to The Avengers? Below are some brief excerpts (where they also talk about working on The Smurfs) but you can read the whole thing by clicking on the link below.

When did you start working on Captain America and on Smurfs? And when did you finish?

The Base Studio began working on Captain America in February of 2011. Smurfs started slightly before that in late January.

How many people did work on both movies? Which technology did you use in the two movies?

We had a total of 75 people at our company. On Captain America we did some traditional visual effects work, set extensions within a matte painting sequence, on top of doing rotoscope work for 42 minutes of the film for it's 2D to 3D conversion. On Smurfs we used proprietary methods for the 2D to 3D conversion process which includes custom programs and scripts created by our pipeline TD, Charles Pina.

Our guess is that particular beautiful 3D effects will be applied to Cap's shield, especially when it is tossed. Having already worked on Thor, this is not the first time that you deal with a "flying" weapon. From your point of view which has been the major difference between the hammer and the shield?

Thor's hammer by nature is a more organic and complicated shape. It required specific roto shape construction to aid in the conversion process, however, Captain America's shield is a simple round shape so conducting work on it was actually “easier” for our artists. (I use the word “easy” lightly, because at the end of the day each portion of the stereosopic conversion process is quite difficult and tedious)


Has the director Joe Johnston also joined your work? If so, how? And which directions did he give to you?

While working on the visual effects shots for Captain America, we had calls with Marvel Studio's production each day. Their visual effects supervisor would communicate with us and provide feedback on our shots. The director of the film interfaced with the supervisor who would relay to us as a visual effects vendor.

Which are your next projects? Any other superhero we should expect?

We are currently working on a 2D to 3D conversion for an IMAX feature film and starting production on 3 music videos for well known music acts here in the states. Secret rumors have been floating around about another super hero movie, but I can't say which one. Thanks again for interviewing us!


With an all star cast which includes Chris Evans as Captain America, Sebastian Stan as Bucky, Hugo Weaving as Red Skull, Hayley Atwell as Peggy Carter, Tommy Lee Jones as Col. Chester Phillips, Stanley Tucci as Abraham Erskine and Dominic Cooper as Howard Stark, Captain America: The First Avenger will be released in 3D on July 22, later this year!




Image and video hosting by TinyPic



F1 Driver Esteban Ocon Reveals Epic CAPTAIN AMERICA Helmet Ahead Of This Weekend's Las Vegas Grand Prix
Related:

F1 Driver Esteban Ocon Reveals Epic CAPTAIN AMERICA Helmet Ahead Of This Weekend's Las Vegas Grand Prix

MCU Rumor Roundup: CAPTAIN AMERICA TV Series, Liam Neeson's Secret MCU Role, And Plans For Donald Glover
Recommended For You:

MCU Rumor Roundup: CAPTAIN AMERICA TV Series, Liam Neeson's Secret MCU Role, And Plans For Donald Glover

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

marvel72
marvel72 - 7/10/2011, 10:13 AM
i personally wasn't a fan of 3d until i saw transformers dark of the moon which looked shit hot in 3d.

but unless a film is shot in 3d & is shitty converted to 3d instead.

i'm not gonna bother,2d will do.
DaenerysTargaryen
DaenerysTargaryen - 7/10/2011, 10:21 AM
damn 3D
gaikinger
gaikinger - 7/10/2011, 10:27 AM
If given a choice i watch everything in 2D. I will however go see the next Avatar movie in 3D as its the only franchise that got it right.
Jimdlux
Jimdlux - 7/10/2011, 10:28 AM
Converting Captain America to 3D!?!?!? You mean it wasn't filmed in 3D?
cable23
cable23 - 7/10/2011, 10:35 AM
3D just blew a hole in my pocket after Transformers 3. I love Cap but 2D will have to do.
dahamma
dahamma - 7/10/2011, 10:39 AM
am NOT seeing this in 3D. I just hope they give me the option of seeing IMAX 2D
dahamma
dahamma - 7/10/2011, 10:40 AM
Yeah i only see 3D films if they were filmed in 3d. TO hell with conversions
ALmighty1080
ALmighty1080 - 7/10/2011, 10:45 AM
the 3D looks really really bad on this movie
duncboy
duncboy - 7/10/2011, 10:51 AM
The Dark Knight Rises maybe?
duncboy
duncboy - 7/10/2011, 10:56 AM
Avatar was filmed in 3d with custom designed cameras - best 3d film ever made by far too.
LOL
LOL - 7/10/2011, 11:17 AM
really stupid move.... the movie doesn't even NEED a 3D conversion. having captain america on screen is already icing on the cake... why add more shit to something that's already sweet enough as it is?
GUNSMITH
GUNSMITH - 7/10/2011, 11:24 AM
IF THE MOVIE ISNT MEANT FOR 3D DO NOT CONVERT IT, BUT YOU WILL ANYWAYS.....BECAUSE ITS JUST TO GET EXTRA MONEY AND ITS A WASTE.
Sanderman
Sanderman - 7/10/2011, 11:25 AM
When will 3d just die!
SKOne
SKOne - 7/10/2011, 11:32 AM
The Captain America 3D trailers looked good, but I won't see it in 3D unless there is a Blu-Ray combo pack this Christmas that is cheap. They did a terrible job on Thor, by far the worst 3D I've seen aside from Green Lantern. I really want 3D to end too, they should go back to just showing movies in 2D until holographic projectors are out and they will make more money because people avoid going to a lot of movies now because of expensive 3D tickets.

I think their secret movie is probably Ghost Rider because Spiderman 3D was already announced, Nolan doesn't want Batman in 3D and it is way too early to convert the Avengers and Superman.
marvel72
marvel72 - 7/10/2011, 12:54 PM
i can't wait to see the amazing spider-man in 3d next year.
ISleepNow
ISleepNow - 7/10/2011, 3:15 PM
Converting sucks the biggest of big d|cks. If the movie can't stand on its own in 2D then you shouldn't bother anyway..
ClarkFarley2012
ClarkFarley2012 - 7/10/2011, 3:23 PM
No need for Cap in 3D. 2D shall do. I'm going to see it in a drive-in theater.
CelluloidDreams
CelluloidDreams - 7/10/2011, 4:04 PM
The theater ran the most recent Cap trailer in 3D just before the screening of Transformers 3 I saw here & the difference between how the 3D was handled was made abundantly clear:

Whereas the First Avenger footage looked like cutouts placed before a matte screen...an effect that actually took you out of the images presented... the Bay flick was a wholly immersive, seamless experience.

The best compliment I could give it was that, within moments, I bought into the world that was being presented onscreen.

That (and the fact I don't wish to pay for the headaches upconverted-to-3D wreaks on me) is why I'll agree with the forum at-large:

I'll take mine in 2D,thank you.
Starlight
Starlight - 7/10/2011, 4:12 PM
NOOOOOOOOO !!! [frick] 3D !!!!
njferns
njferns - 7/11/2011, 12:49 AM
Yup, I think I'll watch this in 2D too, cos Thor in 3D wasn't anything much either!

Check out the Avengers in action in this Avengers poster I made!
Orphix
Orphix - 7/11/2011, 1:26 AM
2D all the way.

The only time I have EVER been impressed with 3D is (embarrassingly) whilst watching Disneys Tangeled.

That is it!

Plus I hate the fact that they 'charge' you for the glasses seeing as you NEED them to watch the film.

Thats kind of like ordering a cup of coffee and then being asked "Would you like a cup with that?" ARGGH!
Ichaos
Ichaos - 7/11/2011, 1:37 AM
Last time I was impressed with 3d was way back in the 80s and mostly because I was young and more easily impressed.

Its not worth the extra 3 or 4 bucks and it all just seems like glorified pop up books. Its far from 3d. Maybe 2.25d
Ichaos
Ichaos - 7/11/2011, 1:38 AM
I dont think they charge you for the glasses persay. They just crank up the cost just because. I mean if you buy your own would you get a discount?
croniccris
croniccris - 7/11/2011, 2:56 AM
ill wait for the amazing spider-man for a movie to see in 3D ill never pay to see a movie thats converted into 3D
ROMACK
ROMACK - 7/11/2011, 7:30 AM
I saw Transformers DOTM in 3D against my better judgement, and that is the LAST time a pay money for a headache that doesn't do squat for the movie. I want Cap to make a ton of money so I guess I'll just go see it 3 times in 2D. Ok maybe 4 times
superotherside
superotherside - 7/11/2011, 11:42 AM
I loved 3D! thor was epic and I saw it in 3D!
gaikinger
gaikinger - 7/11/2011, 5:39 PM
The only exception to Avatar being the best 3D was Tron Legacy which was pretty damn good too.
View Recorder