Josh Wilding Reviews: Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows Part 2 (3D)

Josh Wilding Reviews: Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows Part 2 (3D)

The finale to the epic franchise is finally here, but did it live up to expectations, and was it a fitting end? Hit the jump for my in-depth and spoiler free review of what may very well have been the best Potter flick yet...

Review Opinion
By JoshWilding - Jul 15, 2011 02:07 PM EST
Filed Under: Fantasy



In Part 2 of the epic finale, the battle between the good and evil forces of the Wizarding world escalates into an all-out war. The stakes have never been higher and no one is safe. But it is Harry Potter who may be called upon to make the ultimate sacrifice as he draws closer to the climactic showdown with Lord Voldemort. It all ends here.


While I’ve made the upmost effort to ensure there is nothing in this review which qualifies as a spoiler, if you want to know nothing about the movie before it’s released across the world over the next few days, you may want to turn away now!

After the slow build up in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1, anyone with concerns that director David Yates wouldn’t be able to handle the action packed Part 2 will soon realise just how wrong that assumption is. The action never gets too frenzied or confusing, and the Battle of Hogwarts is just as epic as I always hoped and imagined. Yates brings the final, brutal chapters of the book to life in a truly amazing way, and there are simply far too many stand out and memorable moments to mention. While movies like Transformers: Dark of the Moon also deliver plenty of intense and exciting scenes, this feels like something altogether different, and a lot of that is helped by the dramatic tension and high stakes surrounding this finale. That’s right, just because there’s action aplenty doesn’t mean we only see a couple of hours of explosion after explosion! However, the few times things do seem to be heading in that direction, the director delivers a unique and different enough take to keep them fresh. (I would love to see what he could do if he got his hands on a superhero movie) While action is obviously a huge part of this movie, Yates still manages to fit plenty of emotion in to proceedings, and gets the best out of his actors. Quite honestly, this is his best Potter yet, and it’s his direction which I believe will help ensure it ends up also being many peoples favourite.

Screenwriter Steve Kloves does a great job of adapting and condensing another one of J.K. Rowling’s lengthy novels to the big screen. Of course, The Deathly Hallows is the only book to have been split in two, and with this being the second part, there’s plenty of time to get straight into the action and epic set pieces which make up the last hour or so of the movie and latter half of the book. As with the past seven films, there are some things they improve upon and others they do not. One thing I did notice was that the violence is toned down quite a bit, with many of the characters deaths occurring off screen. However, this is an understandable decision, and doesn’t impact the movie overall. For the most part though, this is a faithful and well done adaptation and while I’m there are probably more than a few scenes missing, it’s been a few years since I read the book and there was certainly nothing major not there from what I remember. If there was one major problem I had, it’s that a few of the important character moments are shortened in exchange for action. The final battle between Voldermort and Harry is lengthened in a way which actually results in it being even more thrilling than the book, but the important dialogue between the two I remember so well is nearly non-existent. This could have very easily ruined the movie for me as a diehard fan of the books, but there’s no denying that it’s a well written movie which tells the story in a satisfying and exciting way. It would be easy to tear this or any of the previous movies apart for their lack of faithfulness to some aspects of the books (many subplots, characters and moments have been cut entirely) but the adaptations of all seven have been very good in my opinion, and despite the lack of what I personally consider to be some important scenes, there’s no denying that this is probably the best film in the series yet.

In terms of acting, Daniel Radcliffe gives a strong performance, as do Rupert Grint and Emma Watson. The latter two don’t really have all that much to do in terms of dialogue (hardly surprising as this is really Harry and Voldermort’s story) but I couldn’t fault either of them as they do a perfectly good job with what they do have to work with. As for Radcliffe, I’ve been critical of him in the past, but he’s progressed well as an actor and I found myself greatly enjoying his performance here. As per usual though, it’s the older cast members who really steal the show. Without divulging any spoilers, Alan Rickman in particular delivers a touching and particularly memorable performance as Snape. Regardless of how big or small his role has been in these movies over the years, he’s always done an excellent job, but truly shines in the final instalment of the series. Hell, if you don’t at least tear up a little, you’re probably dead inside. Predictably, we get yet another quite frankly awesome take on Voldermort by Ralph Fiennes. Even more evil and twisted than usual, the man is as terrifying as ever and is without a doubt up there as one of the greatest movie villains ever, and despite the character having a considerable role in Part 2, I still wanted to see even more of him. Maggie Smith as Professor McGonagoll and Mathew Lewis as Neville Longbottom get a chance to shine in a way they never did in the past, while Tom Felton gave a surprisingly good performance in a fairly short amount of screen time. I also loved Warwick Davis as Griphook. Sadly, the focus on action as mentioned above results in us seeing less of some characters than I would have liked, and I must confess to being slightly confused by Kloves’ decision to give many of them pretty much nothing to say. Helena Bonham Carter and Robbie Coltrane are the perfect examples of this, but it’s still great to see so many of them included, and just the fact they’re there adds to the overall experience especially for any fans of the books…and if it still bothers you all that much, go read it and fill in the blanks yourself! However, this surprisingly doesn’t affect the film as much as you may think, and in all honesty it could have potentially slowed things down too much. After all, what works on the pages doesn’t always work on the screen! There are really no major faults I could find with a single actor in the movie regardless of however many lines they had anyway.

The special effects are as good as they’ve always been, and there are some even more impressive set pieces than usual in the finale. It goes without saying that the action packed fighting and destruction at Hogwarts is both breath-taking and epic, and I’m sure that a staggering amount of work was put into making it look as good as it did. In fact, I’d say it’s easily the some of the best action I’ve seen in a movie this year, possibly ever. Needless to say, the various spells and CGI enhancements are also as fantastic as usual. You only have to look at the latest trailer for the movie to see an example of the amazing visuals, so I won’t list them ALL again here, but they obviously look much better on the big screen and I can’t think of a better way of experiencing them. Whether it’s the underground scenes at Gringotts, a dragon flying over London or an intense fire in the Room of Requirement, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 is a stunning movie. Can the same be said for the 3D though? Not really. While it’s a much better conversion than THOR or Green Lantern, there’s no real need to see it in this format. It does admittedly enhance a handful of scenes, but I honestly wouldn’t advise forking out the extra cash just for those. With most of the movie taking place at night, it’s a blessing that they did do such a great job with the conversion as these scenes thankfully don’t suffer. Overall, it’s another movie unnecessarily converted in order to make more money at the box office, but if you are a fan of 3D, you’ll have little to complain about. Oh, and the score is superb! The cinema literally vibrated every now and then, and it really helped to enhance and improve the many dramatic and action orientated scenes.

While fans of the book may find something to complain about, there’s no denying just how good of a movie Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 really is. Fantastic acting, special effects and a brilliant ending to an amazing series results in one hell of great time and the best movie of the series.






Image and video hosting by TinyPic



WICKED Star Cynthia Erivo Lashes Out At Fan-Edited Posters For Being Degrading, Hurtful, And Wildly Offensive
Related:

WICKED Star Cynthia Erivo Lashes Out At Fan-Edited Posters For Being Degrading, Hurtful, And Wildly Offensive

WICKED Tickets Go On Sale Today; New Trailer And Posters Recreate An Iconic Moment From The Musical
Recommended For You:

WICKED Tickets Go On Sale Today; New Trailer And Posters Recreate An Iconic Moment From The Musical

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
cable23
cable23 - 7/15/2011, 2:16 PM
Nice review Josh. This might be the first Harry potter movie I see in theaters.
HelaGood
HelaGood - 7/15/2011, 2:16 PM
this is great news! especially since the last 3 films just blurred together into one big intro to the final film.
Brashlight
Brashlight - 7/15/2011, 2:17 PM
Im going tonight with my fiance so i didn't read the whole thing, but from what i did read. it sounds great!!!

JW@ Good stuff man!
ComicsCommando
ComicsCommando - 7/15/2011, 2:19 PM
5 stars...? I'll see.
NerdyGeek
NerdyGeek - 7/15/2011, 2:20 PM
Great review :)
MidKnight35
MidKnight35 - 7/15/2011, 2:24 PM
Sweet! I wonder did they show the prologue with grown-up Harry? I doubt it but, that would be sweet.
MidKnight35
MidKnight35 - 7/15/2011, 2:25 PM
Sweet! I wonder did they show the prologue with grown-up Harry? I doubt it but, that would be sweet.
MidKnight35
MidKnight35 - 7/15/2011, 2:25 PM
Sweet! I wonder did they show the prologue with grown-up Harry? I doubt it but, that would be sweet.
MidKnight35
MidKnight35 - 7/15/2011, 2:28 PM
Sorry for the multiple posting
axiouz
axiouz - 7/15/2011, 2:31 PM
@MidKnight yeah they did in the end
sonofsamadams
sonofsamadams - 7/15/2011, 2:35 PM
@MidKnight35

Yeah its wierd how we can't edit or delete our comments anymore.

@JoshW
Funny Animated GIFs - Bravo Good Sir
see more Gifs

By far the best review I've read from you. And by far the best movie of the year. My Mind has been blown by this cinematic achievement.
BlueArcher98
BlueArcher98 - 7/15/2011, 2:35 PM
@MidKnight35 They do show it
BlueArcher98
BlueArcher98 - 7/15/2011, 2:35 PM
@MidKnight35 They do show it
golden123
golden123 - 7/15/2011, 2:41 PM
I'm going to see it at 9:00 tonight. I can't wait. Deathly Hallows is my favorite of the HP books.
ManofSteel23
ManofSteel23 - 7/15/2011, 2:44 PM
saw this last night for the midnight showing,it was AMAZING
ManofSteel23
ManofSteel23 - 7/15/2011, 2:44 PM
saw this last night for the midnight showing,it was AMAZING
xizorkatarn
xizorkatarn - 7/15/2011, 2:53 PM
It truly did live up to everyone's expectations, and actually blew most of us out of the water. Simply phenomenal.
xizorkatarn
xizorkatarn - 7/15/2011, 2:53 PM
It truly did live up to everyone's expectations, and actually blew most of us out of the water. Simply phenomenal.
xizorkatarn
xizorkatarn - 7/15/2011, 2:54 PM
It truly did live up to everyone's expectations, and actually blew most of us out of the water. Simply phenomenal.
xizorkatarn
xizorkatarn - 7/15/2011, 2:54 PM
It truly did live up to everyone's expectations, and actually blew most of us out of the water. Simply phenomenal.
PartyHard
PartyHard - 7/15/2011, 3:02 PM
Voldemort is a terrible villain.
PartyHard
PartyHard - 7/15/2011, 3:03 PM
Voldemort is a terrible villain.
Speedy
Speedy - 7/15/2011, 3:11 PM
@PartyHard, depends on what you mean by "terrible". He is terrible if you want to like the villain, or want a cool villain. Voldemort is not cool, but villains don't have to always be cool to be effective as a villain. Voldemort is perfect as an evil, hatable, dark wizard with no redeeming qualities. He's not cool at all though, but that's not always the villain's role.
Speedy
Speedy - 7/15/2011, 3:11 PM
@PartyHard, depends on what you mean by "terrible". He is terrible if you want to like the villain, or want a cool villain. Voldemort is not cool, but villains don't have to always be cool to be effective as a villain. Voldemort is perfect as an evil, hatable, dark wizard with no redeeming qualities. He's not cool at all though, but that's not always the villain's role.
BatSupe3
BatSupe3 - 7/15/2011, 3:13 PM
I saw it last night in a double feature, part 1 at about 9ish and part 2 at 12ish, and I must say, seeing them back to back really enhanced my experience. Part 2 is without a doubt the best in the franchise, the acting was, imo, superb, and the action was too! Another great review Josh!
PartyHard
PartyHard - 7/15/2011, 3:23 PM
@AdamWarlock
I mean terrible as in he's an effeminate man child with a turtle face. I found all of the scenes he was in to be mildly to extremely hilarious. He didn't come across as the least bit intimidating.
batzack
batzack - 7/15/2011, 3:24 PM
i just got back from watching it and really didnt think it was great. maybe 3.5*. the 3d was really pointless. i genuinely couldnt tell the differnce. and....i thought tdkr was supposed to be with this ?
DaddySmooth
DaddySmooth - 7/15/2011, 3:27 PM
Best movie of the year, hands down!!!
jaycr
jaycr - 7/15/2011, 4:17 PM
It's hard to accept for GL Fans, but Harry Potter saved the day for Warner Bros. The wand is mightier than the ring...
ALmighty1080
ALmighty1080 - 7/15/2011, 4:31 PM
poor captain america, this is gona be number 1 for a good month.
thesymbiote
thesymbiote - 7/15/2011, 4:31 PM
Outstanding movie. Especially when watched back to back with Part 1.

And about the 3D, even though it isn't exactly needed or ground breaking. This is probably one of the best post conversion 3D I have ever seen.
PurpleHaze92
PurpleHaze92 - 7/15/2011, 4:35 PM
Grown up Harry looked stupid.... They didnt look old, just odd....
kingmonkeyman
kingmonkeyman - 7/15/2011, 4:43 PM
I saw this movie at the drive in last night. It was my first time seeing a HP movie and boy am i glad i haven't wasted my time on the others. I've thought about writing a review from a HP virgins point of view but decided against it because i had no clue what was going on. From the looks of the people there i am guessing HP's fanbase is very overweight 13 year old girls. Male witches are so gay. Abracadabra....really.
Kabfire
Kabfire - 7/15/2011, 4:57 PM
Spoiler Question! Did they imply that Snape was actually Harrys dad or that he was just in love with his mom?
Ryguy88
Ryguy88 - 7/15/2011, 5:19 PM
I thought it was great! I thought the first 6 movies were good enough while 7 pt.1 was very good and pt.2 even better. The movie felt like it had a lot of weight to it and that everything had meaning. The Dark Rises teaser was very good too!
Ryguy88
Ryguy88 - 7/15/2011, 5:25 PM
Party Hard, Voldemort will probably go down as one of the best movie villains of the era. Ralph Fiennes was great and the scene where he telepathically communicated to all the wizards with his Humongous from The Road Warrior speech was very chilling.
Ryguy88
Ryguy88 - 7/15/2011, 5:29 PM
Kabfire, **Spoiler** Snape was in love with Harry's mom when they were both children and when Snape got older he was unable to pursue her because of the commitment he made to protect Harry while gaining Voldemort's trust. He sacrificed his whole life and lead others to believe he was a bad guy at the same time, but no, he didn't father Harry.
Kabfire
Kabfire - 7/15/2011, 7:09 PM
Thanks Ryguy88, go flyers.
JackDexx
JackDexx - 7/15/2011, 8:54 PM
yes harry dies, but then he lives. he lives because instead of killing harry, voldemort broke their connection/horcrax (or how ever the [frick] you spell it). allowing harry to evenly fight him. fight him after a snake, tiara, locket, diary, ring, and trophy are all destroyed. not in that order, and it only took hundreds of lifes. lifes of characters built up through out the series. even one of the more memorably deaths it glazed over. so yea it is a simple death and... then not really dead?
1 2
View Recorder