How Long Was the First Cut of Christopher Nolan's THE DARK KNIGHT RISES?

How Long Was the First Cut of Christopher Nolan's THE DARK KNIGHT RISES?

Last week Joss Whedon revealed that the first cut of his new movie The Avengers came in at about three hours, but what about Christopher Nolan's The Dark Knight Rises?

By nailbiter111 - Mar 20, 2012 02:03 PM EST
Filed Under: Batman
Source: mtv.com



MTV's Kevin Sullivan is reporting that the run time for Christopher Nolan's third and final Batman film is clocking in at four hours!

"The Dark Knight Rises is real and finished, presumably in the form of a four-hour rough cut. There's no official word on the reaction to the screening, as of yet."


So what you say? You might be saying that isn't unusual for a first cut of a film, they'll just chop it down to two hours or two and half hours like most films, but that isn't Nolan's style. During a special screening of 2008's The Dark Knight Christopher Nolan revealed that his first cut of the masterpiece was only fifteen minutes longer than the final cut of 152 minutes. So, there is a good chance that The Dark Knight Rises which is currently 240 minutes long, might not be getting too much of a haircut. We could be looking at run time of over three hours. Hell, if this was a Harry Potter production they would've cut this up into three films.



The Dark Knight Rises hits theaters July 20th 2012 and stars Christian Bale as Bruce Wayne/Batman, Michael Caine as Alfred Pennyworth, Gary Oldman as Jim Gordon, Tom Hardy as Bane, Anne Hathaway as Selina Kyle, Joseph Gordon-Levitt as John Blake and Marion Cotillard as Miranda Tate.

BANE Creator Graham Nolan Walks Back ABSOLUTE BANE Comments, Sort Of
Related:

BANE Creator Graham Nolan Walks Back ABSOLUTE BANE Comments, Sort Of

Nathan Fillion On Playing The GREEN LANTERN No One Likes In James Gunn's SUPERMAN
Recommended For You:

Nathan Fillion On Playing The GREEN LANTERN No One Likes In James Gunn's SUPERMAN

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4 5 6
DaenerysTargaryen
DaenerysTargaryen - 3/20/2012, 2:44 PM
I got 4 hours to spare. Bring it on!
WolvieCBM
WolvieCBM - 3/20/2012, 2:45 PM
The final cut will probably be the same or maybe a little bit longer than TDK's one. Nolan won't go over 160 minutes. TDK was little over 150 minutes, the pacing was not perfect so it felt slow in parts, but with this being the final chapter, it will definitely be over 2 and half hours. Bring on that new trailer!
LMB10
LMB10 - 3/20/2012, 2:46 PM
4 Hours? There's no way I would sit through that.
Boyle360
Boyle360 - 3/20/2012, 2:51 PM
4 hours is far too long for any movie. Even an epic like this. Under 3 hours is fine, as long as it doesn't drag out.
ksommer
ksommer - 3/20/2012, 2:52 PM
There is no way in heck I'll sit through four hours.
batfan175
batfan175 - 3/20/2012, 2:52 PM
@LMB10: you never know. meybe the film's entertaining enough to keep you invested for 4 hours; But i expect the guy reporting this is just exaggerating and it may be a 3 hour movie. Also, it's a rough cut so nolan will obviously trim some fat before it gets released.
WolvieCBM
WolvieCBM - 3/20/2012, 2:57 PM
This is just a first cut. That is something directors show to studios. Now, they are editing and removing scenes that won't be in the theatrical cut. Probably on Blu-Ray/DVD.
superotherside
superotherside - 3/20/2012, 2:59 PM
Wow... I love Nolan's films, but he could trim that a bit. LOL. Still I'd love to watch all the deleted scenes.
fattieacid
fattieacid - 3/20/2012, 2:59 PM
4 HRS!!! HELL YES! If they made a Batman movie that last 24 hrs I WOULD WATCH THAT AS WELL!!!
Fogs
Fogs - 3/20/2012, 2:59 PM
WOW, if the movie is THAT good I could watch it easily! Return of the king extended edition has more than that if I'm not wrong.

And I love westerns and some other 60's movies so I really don't care when they're kinda long like that.
PaulRom
PaulRom - 3/20/2012, 3:02 PM
Holy crap.
But I'd prefer if they cut around 45-60 minutes out of that, four hours is crazy.
jazzman
jazzman - 3/20/2012, 3:03 PM
4 Hours i guess he doesnt want us to RISE from our seats to go to have a toilet break LOL
RidiculousFanBoyDemands
RidiculousFanBoyDemands - 3/20/2012, 3:03 PM
Yeah that is normal. I would assume the rough cut of The Avengers was in the three plus hour range as well. I'm thinking this movie will be around 2 1/2 hour range.

Although I would LOVE a directors cut that could add an hour or so on. I know Whedon said we wouldn't get one for The Avengers just a lot of deleted scenes.

What I really want from Nolan is a delux Dark Knight Blu Ray. I want a lot more special features and behind the scenes video from that movie. The first release left much to be desired. Here's hoping they do something similar when they re released Batman Begins.
batfan175
batfan175 - 3/20/2012, 3:03 PM
he's devised the perfect way to keep haters at bay: make a movie so long they'll leave before the end but since they didn't watch the whole film they cannot criticise it because they've not seen it in its entirety.
Irons
Irons - 3/20/2012, 3:03 PM
I'm pretty sure that was an exaggeration, but I would watch it if it were true. I thought Nolan doesn't do the deleted scenes thing for extra features.
Chevy1981
Chevy1981 - 3/20/2012, 3:05 PM
I doubt it will be that long, but if it was a nice "intermission" section at the half way point would put a huge grin on my face. It would be so old school and Kubrick'y that it would just add to the epicness.
Asterisk
Asterisk - 3/20/2012, 3:06 PM
YES!
MrReese
MrReese - 3/20/2012, 3:06 PM
4 hrs long!!! now that shit really cray!! XD
SuperFrost
SuperFrost - 3/20/2012, 3:06 PM
A 4 Hour comicbookmovie! That would be great! I hope....
Quasimodo
Quasimodo - 3/20/2012, 3:06 PM
Oh no. TDK was so long that it got pretty boring at times
headlopper
headlopper - 3/20/2012, 3:07 PM
@nailbiter111- Thanx for posting this. I've been waiting to hear this news.
It's just what I hoped to hear!

Three hours MINIMUM for both TDKR AND the Avenger's.

Respective director's , if you're reading this, don't trip over the short attention span of us American's, just make the damn film's as long as possible.
REDSTORM
REDSTORM - 3/20/2012, 3:09 PM
For the s&g's they should have an intermission if Bane snaps Batman's back... BREAK TIME!
MovieMann
MovieMann - 3/20/2012, 3:10 PM
that's a lot of material.
RidiculousFanBoyDemands
RidiculousFanBoyDemands - 3/20/2012, 3:10 PM
I think it's funny though, because execs and the people he has shown it to had to sit through the 4 hour rough cut. He will be editing it right up until the release. Remember he didn't finish The Dark Knight's editing until two weeks before it was released.
marvel72
marvel72 - 3/20/2012, 3:10 PM
4 hours is alright for the right movie i.e lord of the rings,batman no thanks.

2.5 hours is more than enough.
SebHope
SebHope - 3/20/2012, 3:11 PM
4 hour blockbuster movie wont happen. Because alot of the making money is linked to how many screenings they cant fit in the cinema per day, we'll be looking at a similar if slightly longer film then tdk.
MassExecutions
MassExecutions - 3/20/2012, 3:11 PM
@REDSTORM - I think your on to something there!
StarkRaving
StarkRaving - 3/20/2012, 3:12 PM
Just because the rough cut of TDK was only 15 minutes longer than the final cut, doesn't mean that the same will be true for TDKR. It's a different story and a different shooting experience. He will cut out the scenes/shots that don't serve to move the story forward or don't even work at all, and trim whatever is needed to maintain the pacing of various scenes. He may cut 15 minutes, he may cut an two hours.
dahamma
dahamma - 3/20/2012, 3:12 PM
wooww thats alot, I wouldn't be surprise if the final cut would be 3 hrs though
RidiculousFanBoyDemands
RidiculousFanBoyDemands - 3/20/2012, 3:12 PM
Hmm Nailbiter does bring up an interesting point. Do you think WB would be greedy enough to release The Dark Knight Rises part one and two this year? Perhaps part one is released in the summer, and part two will be released in November/December. I mean they did push back Superman right? I would be pissed, but all the studio execs see are dollar signs in their eyes.
SmellofDuty
SmellofDuty - 3/20/2012, 3:13 PM
I don't mind a 4 hour long movie as long as the pacing is kept up. TDK was decent at that (The only thing wrong with it) But I expect it to start fast paced and end that way too. But there's no way we'll see a four hour movie anyways, it'll be cut down to about 2:45 maybe.
superbatspiderman
superbatspiderman - 3/20/2012, 3:13 PM
This is just the rough cut it will probably be cut down a little bit. I am guessing around 3 hours.
Irons
Irons - 3/20/2012, 3:14 PM
RFBD: I'd say there's a .00001% chance they split it up into two parts.
lnTylerWeTrust
lnTylerWeTrust - 3/20/2012, 3:15 PM
wow! 4 hours haha damn that is looooonnnggg!!!
MovieMann
MovieMann - 3/20/2012, 3:15 PM
@ironman53

I would say May

ThreeBigTacos
ThreeBigTacos - 3/20/2012, 3:15 PM
Nolanite: If it's the traditional IMAX then yes there is a time limit. I'm talking film, however, I don't know the specs of digital IMAX (is that real?)
KilledHal9000
KilledHal9000 - 3/20/2012, 3:16 PM
We can only hope it's over 3 hours long.
Spidey91
Spidey91 - 3/20/2012, 3:16 PM
more that 2 and a half hours would be too much,TDK suffered a little at the end because of this,I was like "c'mon,just rap-up already!"
1 2 3 4 5 6
View Recorder