THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN Concept Art Featuring A New York Chase Scene That Was Cut

yep, better than what we got.

That last picture is what I wanted to see in the movie, and of course was cut out

retardedfish- I got my point across at length and on multiple occasions on this site thank you!

The only reason people think concept art looks better is because Comics are a visual medium. When it comes to comic based properties, ANYTHING will look better than the live-action version because it's a 2 dimensional image, just like the original source. D-uh.

Also, even though i sometimes over-exaggerate my hate for the movies, one thing i can say honestly is that the movie could have been so much better, but simply didn't live up to the hype. It's a decent movie, with some beautifully directed visuals and shots, but just flounders as a whole, in my own opinion.

Thanks for deleting a great action scene. From all of us Spider-Man fans...we salute you. Of all the scenes to delete, a CBM deletes an action scene. Dumb asses.

Great movie, but that scene could've elevated it even higher, it looks like it would've been a really cool scene. Dunno how/where it'd fit in though, hopefully it wouldn't have replaced the high school fight. I guess it would've been an extension of the bridge scene, which would also give Spidey a valid reason for not checking all the cars after he saved that kid. Probably would've made the movie too long though.

Man, that double-decker bus fight would have been [frick]ing awesome! That picture/drawing of the mask-less fight is totally awesome, too!! :-)

So.........Garfield is going to be pumping the hell up. The while toning was fine for this movie but Spidey aint a petite guy.

wow. All I can say is... wow, cause this would've been awesome to see

That would have made it so much better..

I really liked it anyway, but still, these scenes would have made it more of a contender with TDKR and Avengers.

Luminus - You know we're talking about Spider-Man, right? The car thief wasn't a threat to him AT ALL. Spidey usually plays around when criminals are too dumb to attack him, but this wasn't the case in the scene. In the scene the thief pulled out the knife in self-defense, and this was plain wrong. He didn't attack him once. But Spidey did. If he had pulled out the knife and attacked Spidey first, I wouldn't mind it at all. But here, that scene made Spidey look like a bully even though the guy was a criminal. This is not how Spidey operates.

@ Manodsuperguy
It's so stupid when people say Peter is a d*ck then list the exact same reasons as you. Those are all natural human responses. You telling me you've NEVER taken your anger out on someone? Try imagine confronting someone who you thought may have killed your father. Uncle Ben was Peter's father. He's going take his anger out on him, because he's the cause of it all. Humiliating him temporarily takes the pain out of Peter and puts it into the criminal. Have you ever had a family member close, as close as parent to you, murdered? Have you been bullied for all your teenage years? Anger corrupts people, even the best. Hell, watch what happens to Ned Flanders when he gets angry. Right and wrong are blurred, there's only unthinkable action, this is beyond anger, it's rage and pain.
That's gonna make you do things that aren't exactly reasonable to the views of others, but seem reasonable to yourself. Also, have you ever had a first love? Someone that goes beyond just lust, but actual love with someone who've you had a crush on? It's not easy to let go, because you'll feel like you'll never find anyone else. That's the one and only. Peter isn't going to just stay away from Gwen, just because he said that at the end of the movie doesn't mean in TASM2 he'll be making out with her at the beginning of the movie. He could have simply meant that as I still love you. It's called forbidden love, it isn't easy to resist. Peter is NOT an a**hole in this movie, he is just very human, something people aren't used to seeing movies. Most heroes in other movies aren't like regular people, they're more over the top, more comedic like, more symbolic. They don't necessarily react like we would. Tony is overly comedic, Thor is overly dramatic, Cap is a symbol of heroism and freedom, Batman has always been a darker more brooding character. Peter is just a regular teenager.

@nail, i understand Yossarian's point. In general, it's more difficult working with large amount of writers. GL had 9 writers and, well... we all know what's happened! It depends on the director.

@CrimsonArk - Fair enough, I see your point. But I wouldn't have a problem with all these character things if Peter actually grew into something else or acknowledged some of his flaws at least near the end of the movie in a self-realization moment. There are core elements regarding Spider-man's mythos that cannot be changed in my opinion, like the fact that he MUST feel responsible for the death of Uncle Ben. I understand the urge for revenge and I was on board with it for a while until I realized that it eventually lead nowhere. My problem was that his first reaction was: "I'm going to get that guy because it's his fault and he must pay". It is understandable from a human stand point but that also sends the message that Peter doesn't really see himself a part of the reason his father figure was killed. He exteriorizes any form of guilt on the killer. He's the one responsible and he has to pay, period. Peter goes through that at first which is normal, but I thought he would eventually faced the killer and realized that he's also responsible and there, with this confrontation, he would undertand the value of responsibility and that venting on criminals is not the way to go. Instead another character had to point out that he wasn't being a hero. Fine, but what about the lesson he was supposed to learn from Uncle Ben's death?

@ SpidaTrev
Oh yeah, because Spider-Man grew famous because of Spider-Man, it wasn't in fact because of Peter Parker. You people SAY you know the character, but I'm starting to doubt that with a lot of what you people are saying here. It sounds more like blind bias or only a surface of understanding. Either that or you're out of touch with life and the responses of humanity.