Has Raimi Revealed the Villain of Spider-Man 4?

Nah just speculation, and to be honest i think its highly possible that Raimi is trying to throw people of the scent of who the real villain will be

Yeah in theory..but both of those franchises had already carved out a different niche in the superhero genre..i mean Blade was all about the gore and the action, they wer R rated movies..Spedy was obviously more family orientated. So by crossing them over they would have to either tone down Blade or up the violence of Webhead

No crossover, Blade's owned by a different company, besides, Wesley Snipes is in prison. But yeh, Morbius sucks (excuse the pun). I'd Prefer the Lizard, and returning of venom. Doc Connors is already partially set up in the movies why not continue it? Or add craven the hunter into the mix in place of venom, have him hunting the Lizard, and when thats done have his attention turn to spidey.

how about the posibility of a Spiderman - Daredevil crossover? Have Daredevil or Matt Murdock in the background somewhere, not literally just standing in the background, but sutley in a scene somwhere. As i'm writing this i'm realising some many things wrong with my idea, but who cares.

to hell with Spidey, VIVA LA DAREDEVIL(Yellow).

Hey guys, Twilight is huge and that means there should be vampires in every movie! Woo!

[frick] this!

I always wanted to see a crossover with the human torch. Spidey and the torch's personalities always meshed well together.

And the Sandman was the only villian that wasn't bastardized in the third spidey flick. He is a big villian in the Spidey-verse and I did actually say that I hope they bring in the Sandman for number 3. But ya, definitely the Lizard for the next. Can't make the movie mature enough to fit Carnage in there.

Elbeaster has alot of good points. For some reason i feel this franchise should stop at 5. I'm sorry to those of you who want the Vulture, but I just don't see it. It would be like making the Penguin again in a Batman movie. An Adrian Tombes is an old dude, older than Norman Osborn or Otto Octavius, and it doesn't seem right to have him kickin Spidey's ass on the big screen. Lizard all the way for SM3, though I am all for introducing other characters. Small part for shocker robbing a bank and Spidey foils him and then we see no more Shocker, something like that just insert your own villain. I really want to get rid of Kirsten Dunst. That leaves room for Gwen Stacey or intro Felicia Hardy. Also, I want Spidey to be the smartass he is in the comics. I'm sick of whiny, and sometimes seemingly bewildered, Parker. I want the fast talkin, make it look good style. No Carnage please I coulnd't take it to screw him up like they did Venom.

yea a daredevil/spidey cross over would work if done right. they could possibly reboot from there with a different matt because ben's affleck is being a "im too good for that role" asshole. so cast a different DD that can be the leading role in the new rebooted dd movies. whos agrees???
rUsHr

Also if Venom is back it opens up the possiblities for the other symbiotes (Carnage, Toxin, Scream, Hybrid...) And this is just my own personal opinion, but if they were gunna do Carnage they would have to do a lot of implied violence with him. Kinda like the Dark Knight did. I mean there were guys getting shot right and left in the movie but you never saw any blood. Which is fine and all, I'm not saying that there has to be gore but once again, if they are gunna do carnage they are gunna have to be pushing it to max PG-13 as far as violence is concerned.... Well those are my two cents.

NO NO NO NO NO! Everyone, i think we all agree that spidey 3 suck, for this reason because sandman is not a villian that should have taken the focus from venom, we were all excited when we heard venom would be in the movie, and we expected him to be more of a bad ass, and we thought maybe topher grace would pull it off, but he didnt and venom was at the end of the movie, ok well they screwed that up, the only way they can make spidey 4 and 5 better then all of them and for a way to redeam themselves, is to bring CARNAGE thats they only way, he is the only villian a step up on venom, the movie should be about venom comming for revenge on spidey, of course spidey beats him then the secound half should be about venom in jail, this is where carnage is created and of course hes a big threat to venom and carnage, so spidey five should be about venom and spidey teaming up to fight carnage, thats the only way your going to sell out at the box office and thats the only way anyone is going to care about the franchise from now on, make it a bad ass movie, sam rami needs to quit, and see that he has no idea what spidey is about, he says he is a fan but a true fan would never change the story, we all know that hollywood producers make directors do things but they dont want to but im sure there were better choices that could have been made in spidey 3.

Vote: Mysterio

I like Raimi's idea, superhero vs. supernatural, cool!

I'm surprised that nobody has brought up a combo like Kraven and Chameleon. They worked together in the comics and an adaptation of the "Death of Kraven" or storyline or something akin to it would be pretty interesting. I'm not saying adapt it straight from the story. But maybe just take some elements from it.

I think one of the problems with the Spider-Man movies is that they kind of blew their load (sorry for the expression) with 1 & 2. I mean you have Spidey's two biggest villains in the first two movies. Where do you go from there? To the third biggest villain and then you totally screw that up in the third movie. Just kind of leaves you nowhere to go. Unless you bring back the Green Goblin. And actually have him look like the Green Goblin (biggest pet peeve of that movie.)

I think given the right script any character/villain can be made "cool" whether it be Morbius, Kraven, Shocker, or the Spot. Okay well maybe not the Spot lol :)

I heard this rumour for Spidey 3 and we all know it wasn't true then, but hey, this is the now so it's possible Morbius will feature. Personally I hope he doesn't. Don't get me wrong, he's ok and I quite like the Cure (nice touch by the way) but I think there are many better villains for Spidey to deal with, Shocker, Scorpion (why has no one mentioned him yet, or have I just missed that?), Carnage, Kraven they would all be on my list before Michael-I'm a vampire that sucks blood through my hand for some reason-Morbius.

I've said it on another article but Doc Conners still has the Venom sample Peter gave him. So Eddie brock is dead, not the symbiote.

1.Raimi can do no wrong
2.Mysterio=yes(man I wanted that Bruce Campbell rumor to be true)
3.Larry [frick]ing David= [frick] yes!

Before the third movie I would care about this stuff, but now I don't. I like the idea of opening with a Shocker bank robbery and then moving onto the Lizard. Scorpion would be my next bet. Kraven would be good with Camelion and Mysterio would work. Thats about it. Vulture could be alright.

The only way that I would really care again is if they did some sort of team-up. Daredevil or Human Torch. I would want Human Torch because that way they could put Doctor Doom in there.


And since we're talkin' about why Spiderman 3 wasn't so great:
1.) Peter's emo dance down the street.
2.) Topher Grace as Venom
3.) VENOM DYING and not being in the movie enough.
4.) The Green Goblin suit.
5.) The characters in the movie have lost all semblence to their comic book counterparts.
6.) Why was Gwen Stacy even in there?

Well I could do this all night. But mostly it was just too many villians and too much stuff crammed into one flick.

It was still a good movie, but I have just about every comic book that Venom was in in the early 90s. You be suprised how many that is. So, I'm a mondo Venom fan and I was majorly disappointed to say the least.

I say recast it and get a new director. He captured what Spider-man is all about in the first one, but lost a little in the second and then the rest of it in the third. I'd say pick it up where they left off just with new people. And have Gwen Stacy get thrown off a bridge!

wow hahaha funny joke he just doesnt want anybody to know hes putting cool people like carnage or mysterio or hell i will take scorpion befroe morbios hes more or less a ghost rider movie or blade

Ok im going to get blasted for this..but i liked the emo dance!!..i mean i know how silly it was but that was the point..i thought it was funny but i understand why people hate it at the same time. I also liked Bryce dallas Howard as Gwen and to anser your question elbeaster she was in the movie so she could be thrown of a bridge in the next one! Spidey will try to save her and snap her neck with his webbing...providing they follow the comic of course. i think if they recast and got a new director it just wouldnt work, Raimi has created this world we all love and theres nothing broke that cant be fixed

IF morbious is in 4
He should be played by
Benicio Del Toro

JUST PUT THE LIZARD...THE LIZARD IS ALL THE MONSTER ALL THE HORROR YOU NEED!!! HE'S THE ONE CHARACTER IN THE FUTURE THAT PUTS SPIDEY OUT OF BUISNESS, STICK TO THE LIZARD, IF YOU MUST HAVE MORBIUS, MAKE HIM LIKE AT THE BEGINING OF THE MOVIE, A VILLAIN HE'S TRYING TO GET...THE LIZARD RAIMI...THE LIZARD.