"The Spirit" Reviewed - Our Worst Fears Realized

"The Spirit" Reviewed - Our Worst Fears Realized

Early reviews of Frank Miller's directorial debut are hitting the web--and they ain't good.

By ComicBookMovie - Dec 19, 2008 11:12 AM EST
Filed Under: The Spirit

"...truly a mess. Fans of 'Sin City' and '300' will populate theaters for the film's opening, but box office will fall quickly. The film's campiness might then pull in a different sort of aficionados -- those who celebrate films such as 'The Rocky Horror Picture Show' for their silly acting and overripe dialogue." - The Hollywood Reporter

"Frank Miller’s solo writing-directing debut plunges into a watery grave early on and spends roughly the next 100 minutes gasping for air. Pushing well past the point of self-parody" - Variety

"Okay, Mr. Miller. Let’s get it on." ..."You clearly don’t have any idea what you’re doing. Someone, ANYONE, over at Lionsgate should have known this. F**k, it’s their JOB to know this. But they didn’t." ..."Folks, this movie is that bad." - AICN

"I won't bore you with too many details or jokes because my job is to inform you on the quality of a feature, not do stand-up comedy. 'The Spirit' is a film that no matter how bad it looked or how bad I heard it was I still went into with an open mind. I wound up getting my mind blown and not in the fashion I like. This film is a complete mess from frame one and not even worth the film it was recorded on which should be burned immediately to save the participants from further embarrassment." - Latino Review

Anybody else want to pile on? If you've seen an early showing, load your reviews into this form, and/or in the comments section in this article.

Please, no critiques if you haven't seen it. This is for legitimate reviews only.

Related:

QUIZ: How Well do you Know Frank Miller?

Recommended For You:

The Spirit: User Reviews Compiled

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
IonParallax
IonParallax - 12/19/2008, 12:08 PM
TI don't really think there's any need to add to this debacle. The above mentioned reviews are enough to solidify the fact that I wasn't going to see this movie anyway. Not that I thought it looked terrible, I actually dug the Little Drummer Boy spot, and Samuel L is cool as can be. It looked cornball, yea, but I didn't think it looked horrid. But I still wasn't going to see it because I don't know, or care to know, anything about Will Eisner's The Spirit. It doesn't interest me one bit. Sorry.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 12/19/2008, 12:38 PM
yeah im the same. i mean obviously i wanted a good comicbookmovie to go see over xmas, but im just glad he chose this to direct instead of something i really cared about..imagine he had decided to adapt one of his own works,,like the darl knight returns! shudder
CapnGeech
CapnGeech - 12/19/2008, 12:41 PM
completely agree. i didn't care whatsoever about this movie. one thing I disagree with you on is Samuel L. I don't understand why we always have to stick him into movies that he doesnt belong in. But yeah i was definitely not going to spend my Christmas seeing this crap.
CapnGeech
CapnGeech - 12/19/2008, 12:42 PM
oh yeah Eva Mendes sucks. her acting is terrible & shouldn't even be called acting...sorry had to get that out.
adamant877
adamant877 - 12/19/2008, 12:52 PM
I think the title to the article should be:
"The Spirit- Our Not So Worst Fears Cause' We Couldn't Have Cared Less, Realized!"
BuckyB7588
BuckyB7588 - 12/19/2008, 12:54 PM
who cares about The Spirit? Why did that movie get made and not...anything else
NoobMike
NoobMike - 12/19/2008, 12:58 PM
Was thinking of seeing it for Scarlet and Eva, after reading all three reviews, will either not see it or get a huge group to point and laugh all the way through (although once word gets out might be really hard to accomplish this).

Somehow it doesn't surprise me, Miller did write Robocop 3 and a flying robocop sounds like it could make a cameo on the spirit.
IonParallax
IonParallax - 12/19/2008, 1:04 PM
Because Samuel L Jackson is well, AWESOME. From the robber in Comin to America to Jules, to Mace Windu. The man is a great actor. I've seen 2 movies with him in it that I didn't like at all, those being Formula 51 (which wasn't him, just the movie) and one where he's a diabetic cop and gets kidnapped. Can't remember the name, but it sucked as a movie. Other than that, he's great.

Coming to America,Shaft, Jurassic Park, The Man, Black Snake Moan, Farce of the Penguins, Lakeview Terrace, Pulp Fiction, Basic, A Time to Kill, Freedomland, The Boondocks (as a white guy), Afro Samurai, 1408, The Incredibles, Coach Carter, 187, Kill Bill 2, S.W.A.T., The Negotiator, Rules of Engagement, Juice, Patriot Games, Loaded Weapon 1, Amos & Andy, Mo' Better Blues, Goodfellas, Jungle Fever, Strictly Business, Menace II Society, Assault at West Point

I could go on, but I think that's enough for now.
Shadowelfz
Shadowelfz - 12/19/2008, 1:21 PM
I just don't understand why the movie industry keeps plucking these obscure characters such as the Spirit, green hornet, the Phantom (that weird Billy Zane movie)and the like with no real fan base instead of making a film about Flash, Green Lantern, or the like. Sure the movies will probably be bad, but from a financial standpoint, they will probably bring in a lot of more dough for the studio execs due to their built-in fanbases that will probably see the movie no matter what.

Oh, the rights are probably really cheap for these obscure characters, and the execs likely surmised that if it came from a comicbook, people will see it no matter how old or obscure. Very short sighted.
Shaman
Shaman - 12/19/2008, 1:32 PM
I haven't seen it... can i reply? ...can i reply or... can i??? Can you hear me now...? Can you "hear" me now...? Can you hear me, now...? Can you hear me NOW...?

The character "the spirit" sucks to begin with so it has nothing to do with Frank Miller as a "failiure" since it was doomed from the begining. It's obvious he wanted to pay "homage" to Eisner being a veteran of the comicbook industry but he could've made himself an animated movie and just air it on HBO or something. Now because of his "dillusions of grandeur", he's single handingly massacreing his career as a film maker. And on top of that, his next project is Buck Rogers?!?!?!?!?! Dude, do yourself, myself and the world a favor and get crakin' on Daredevil already for the love of Jesus jumped up Christ!!!
Hyson
Hyson - 12/19/2008, 1:40 PM
Off-topic: I might be amongst the few in the world who think this, but I think Sam. Jackson is a shitty actor. I don't know why he has such a good rep.
Spock
Spock - 12/19/2008, 1:44 PM
Shaman--God of War hmmmm! Good one!

Well I must say I'm surprised by downgrading of The Spirit. I myself am a fan of Will Einser work & looking forward to this. And as far a Samuel j.., this guy is so versatile, he could do just about anything. Besides he is the MAN & one of the most high sought after & has one of the highest Movie resumes outthere.

Since just about everyone is debucking the artwork, I guess some people aren't going to like the Black Panter Cartoon that will be on Primetime on BET. Jon Romita Jr. also paid homage to Jack Kirby style. Besides all of this stuff is different.
IonParallax
IonParallax - 12/19/2008, 1:57 PM
OK. Sam Jackson, better and more versatile than MOST douchetastic actors out there. Check the resume BRO. Then check the guy's with the biggest box office draw of ALL TIME. #1 being Daniel Radcliffe because of Harry Twatter, Ian McKellan after X-Men and the LOTR trilogies, then you guessed it Samuel L Jackson, who up until recently, was #1. So to say he is a terrible actor is purely hogwash.
redrum010
redrum010 - 12/19/2008, 2:04 PM
Well I never trust what Variety has to say about any movie and who the f**k is the Latino Review? I will still watch this movie, because while I'm not a Spirit fan, I'm a huge fan of movies that take heroes out of comic book universes not named Marvel or DC. I honestly think those three that watched it probably didn't like 300 or Sin City either. To let these "experts" dictate on what I should not watch never stopped me from seeing a movie before. And I've liked many movies that have gotten a bad review. Isn't there anyone else is like this?
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 12/19/2008, 2:14 PM
sure ive liked movies that got bad reviews, but these reviews are not bad..they are atrocious! like i buy these movie magazines, and the give reviews out of 5 stars. if i think a movie looks good i wont care if it say gets 2 stars, because it could be down to the reviewers tatses. but if a movie gets one star its 99 percent of the time going to suck. i know this because ive been reading these mags for years and have seen (on dvd!) a lot of their 1 star movies..and guess what! welcome to shitsville.

those reviews of the spirit are downright hatefull! we are talking turkey here..it would seem.obviously having not seen it i wont judge.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 12/19/2008, 2:18 PM
oh yeah and about mr sam jackson...i agree that he CAN be very good..even great when he wants to be but he is frequently a lazy git! he fones in alot of his performances and substitutes widening his eyes and shouting for acting...and ion, sorry dude but some of those movies you mentioned are truly horrific! The man, basic, swat?

that being said, he was outstanding in black snake moan and i loved lakeview terrace. i think in the action or comedic roles is when he tends to get lazy
SirExcalibur
SirExcalibur - 12/19/2008, 2:33 PM
Is there anything better than Sam Jackson's screaming and wide eyes? hahaha. I prolly wont see this movie in theaters but I'll see it sometime. From what I've seen I think I would enjoy it. True it does look kinda corny, but I love corny haha. And I do believe that a Buck Rodgers movie would be amazing haha he rocks.
ElBeaster
ElBeaster - 12/19/2008, 2:49 PM
I'm going to go see this movie the first day it comes out. Christmas day mother [frick]er! I think it looks great. I've been a little nervous about it since the day i saw the trailer though. It seems like a movie that you would really have to understand to like. And i get it; and these guys probably don't. But that being said, it still has a high probability of suckitude.

I'll put a comment on it after I see it and tell how it really is. it's either going to completely suck or be great. Looks like more of an aquired taste. Or just terrible. Fingers crossed.

And Samuel L Jackson rules. He doesn't have a magnificient performance in all of his movies, but a lot of them he does. Black Snake Moan was great. He was awesome in that. And what about Unbreakable? He owned that role.
AsiantZero
AsiantZero - 12/19/2008, 3:02 PM
this movie cant be that bad...probably would watch it anyways
NoobMike
NoobMike - 12/19/2008, 3:08 PM
yes redrum, but I have never seen so much hate being poured on a movie. And although Miller has had really good comics, all of his previous movie experiences on which he was directly involved (except Sin City, which I think worked very different) have been close to disastrous. And I did read other reviews made by the guy in Latinoreviews, and he seems to be very forgiving; look at what he has to say for the day the earth stood still. Hell he even gave a F to the transporter 3 too, and he was much more forgiving in what he said. He said he really liked Punisher. Like Ion said, something that spawns that much hate has to be really bad.

The trailer sure doesn't help, you can practically see the wires (sure they CGIed them out, but you can place them with accuracy), and some of the acting looks awful, a point that all three reviews states is extremely bad in the movie.

The real problem, and that's why we should all care, is that for studio execs, this is just a comic book movie. They don't care if it's The Shadow, Swamp Thing, Jonah Hex, Daredevil, Bone, Wonder Woman, Flash, GL, etc (hell they probably think strangers in paradise can be compared to Hate! and be compared to Preacher and Cerebus, and Flash, and the Maxx, and Maus, and Sandman). For them all of these movies-comic books are measured in the same way, they don't care if that one is a cool character or that one is boring, or if that story is more compelling than that one they are all grouped as comic book movies and measured with the same ruler.

So if they make enough awful movie adaptation of comics and they bomb, they'll think that comic book movies have cooled down and they will stop making them. So far punisher seems to be strike one, apparently the spirit will be strike two, let's hope there's no strike three. I know there have been many comic book bombs (Ultraviolet anyone?) but if they start happening too many too soon, studios will shutdown their comic adaptations.
IonParallax
IonParallax - 12/19/2008, 3:15 PM
Basic was a great film, IMO obviously. Yes SWAT and The Man were terrible movies, but Sam's cool in anything he does. I'd say 99% of his work is worth watching again.
IonParallax
IonParallax - 12/19/2008, 3:15 PM
OH, and Paul Blart Mall-Cop, looks great. Kevin James is a funny dude.
Hyson
Hyson - 12/19/2008, 5:14 PM
Biggest box office draw = great acting

I think not... Not to me. He's a bald black guy with a foul mouth. At least Dave Chappelle is funny. When is Jackson actually acting? Just think he's typecasted all of the time because, well, that's the only role that he can play. What versatility is there? Wellp, good luck riding on the Bandwagon.
IonParallax
IonParallax - 12/19/2008, 5:27 PM
OK Hyson, you're absolutely right about that, big box office doesn't mean great acting. That's very true. HOWEVER let's look at some of his work shall we?

Samuel L in Coach Carter (uplifting mentor type) vs Samuel L in 187 (broken, downtrodden, homicidal teacher). WOW, he's a teacher in both. Other than that, they are complete opposites of the acting spectrum.

Samuel L in Pulp Fiction (philisohpical, calculating killer) vs Samuel L in Jurassic Park (intelligent, intellectual scientist). WOW, there's another one where the roles have NOTHING in common and he does both of them well.

Here's another; Samuel L in A Time to Kill vs Samuel L in Star Wars

One more Samuel L in Black Snake Moan vs Samuel L in Basic.

OK. Enough point making, i'm going to smoke.
Hyson
Hyson - 12/19/2008, 6:14 PM
I didn't know people smoke after making pointless points.

Anyways.

Coach Carter? Black coach teaching black kids. All right. Let's stop making racial movies so we can forget that we have these issues already. They shouldn't be issue. The only issue here is that Sam. Jackson is a bad actor.

Pulp Fiction could've been done by any man with Jheri curls and a foul mouth. Star Wars... um, what acting? To me, he was a jedi reading his lines.

Black Snake Moan is dumb.

Basic... is weak.

Seriously, let's all just admit that Sam. Jackson is made for only one role in the world of comic book movies and that is Nick Fury. End of all discussions.

P.S. Even then, he will fail as an actor while playing a character that was based on himself.
IonParallax
IonParallax - 12/19/2008, 7:00 PM
Wow. I think we've finally gotten someone who is WORSE than warpath. That's amazing. You now take the cake as the guy with the most sand in his vagina. Good job.

So Hyson, what movies do you like? Since obviously nothing with Samuel L in it is good enough for all the grittiness you posess. How about you enlighten us? Please.
TeenIdol
TeenIdol - 12/19/2008, 8:14 PM
This movie has the Miller style that looks awesome, so I'm going to see it anyway. Besides AICN (which I have questioned in the past), why the hell would anybody believe a movie review from "Latino Review" anyway? I also sure as hell don't believe Variety either. There are alot of great films out there that major critics bash on that I love to death, and alot of shit movies that great praised when they really shouldn't. If you're a fan of Miller, Spirit, or just think the trailer is awesome, chances are you're going to enjoy this movie.

PS: I [frick]ing hate Sam Jack as well (except in Pulp of course. He's probably the most overrated actor in the past decade. But I could look past that for this flick.
Hyson
Hyson - 12/19/2008, 8:38 PM
I don't like sand. It's coarse and rough... and it gets everywhere.

Anyways, once you've removed the [wiener]s from your ass, I'll enlighten you on what good movies are, such as Sin City. A Frank Miller-involved movie that didn't have Sam. Jackson that succeeded. Could you imagine Sam. Jackson playing Manute? No, I cannot because it would fail horribly. Thank you and good night.

These are the old days, the bad days, the all or nothin' days.
Kovacs
Kovacs - 12/19/2008, 9:35 PM
i will admit im a fan of sam jackson and i will also admit he is not a very good actor but does have some great one liners

btw this movie is gonna get killed all kinds of dead at the box office but im might still watch it online


ComicMans1234
ComicMans1234 - 12/20/2008, 12:57 AM
i cant wait to give my review
QuaMan
QuaMan - 12/20/2008, 1:11 AM
Hyson, thank you for the Episode 2 segwey. Ion I agree with you that Sam is a great actor. But Mace Windu...really? If anyone can say he did a good job acting in that movie you need to have the same perspective as George Lucas-and he directed the films-and they sucked...anyone else?
JohnDoeMoFo
JohnDoeMoFo - 12/20/2008, 1:49 AM
I honestly think this movie is not as HORRIBLE as you all put it.
I admit, Maybe im not going to leave the theater FULLY satisfied...
But I think it's going to be decent.

Now I know one thing we can all agree on...

WATCHMEN!!!!

YEAHHHHYAH!!

=]
IonParallax
IonParallax - 12/20/2008, 8:03 AM
I didn't say he did a good job acting as Mace Windu, I was merely pointing out the differences in ROLES, not how well he acted in them.
darkcrow
darkcrow - 12/20/2008, 11:06 AM
I'm not going to say it's going to be a horrible movie, but i will say a few things.
#1 - 2 reviews are b.s. on there, the AICN reviewer is nameless and just gripes about the choices of actors. Maybe a couple of credible sources, maybe a couple of b.s. sources to this.
#2 - Millers first film, probably should have been released in early September and had fewer big names attached to the project. Noone wants big big names attached to your first project let alone be released in Oscar season. I mean this movie has HUGE competition over the next 2 weeks, wtf was lionsgate thinking.
#3 - Miller blatantly stole Sin City's idea from Rodriguez....that's just a no-no. He needed to create his own style, not borrow from someone who taught him how to direct on the film hew as taught.
#4 - Critics hate comic book movies becasue they don't understand the characters or the people who watch the movies. Critics are fairweather friends, when a movie sucks they pour the hot oil on it, when it's good they praise it like it's mana from heaven.
#5 - Miller would have been beter off to do a small movie witha small budget based on something he created in his head for a movie, that way.....when you rake in 18 million dollars, it looks great when you have a budget of 10 million dollars, profitable first films are orgasmic for studios.
IonParallax
IonParallax - 12/20/2008, 11:58 AM
Excellent and compelling points Darkcrow
parascythe
parascythe - 12/20/2008, 12:42 PM
Miller is a very good comicbook writer...IMHO, because of the sucess of his previously work into big screen he himself is tempted to taste a double hit profit...writer and director..

and some movie critics dont understand comicbook movies like comicbook fanboys...
TheUnknown
TheUnknown - 12/20/2008, 1:28 PM
ouch.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 12/20/2008, 3:01 PM
I just read a review over at totalfilm.com..guy says this replaces battlefield earth as the worst movie hes ever seen! Jesus it really must be garbage..have you seen battlefield earth??
knight30
knight30 - 12/20/2008, 3:33 PM
okay, before i write about the movie, i have a few things to say about you weird people,

first of all tho, i haven't read all the comments on this page so maybe not everyone feels this away...

but...what the f**ck is wrong with all you people??? you should GIVE A SHIT that frank miller ruined that comic- you SHOULD ALL give a crap about the Spirit in General!! you should all know as comic book fans , that probably most if not all comics you all read are based apon, inspired by or heavily influenced from any kind of comic that will eisner has produced.- for he revolutionised comics as we know it.

if you are saying this about the spirit- a comic that set the scene and was a massive fundimental yard stick for american action comics- then you will probably be pretty much speaking badly about all of the other comic artists and comics you love. if you are not, then all the comics you read probably just aren't very good.

will eisner is revolutionary in his story telling, tecniques, characters, everything- because his stories actually MEAN something, his characters ACTUALLY have depth, and If you think the acutal art, or sequential tecnique of the spirit, or any will eisner comic for that matter is terrible and not worth making a movie out of, you absolutley know nothing about comics. he was working alongside steve ditko back in the day, when marvel was indeed in it's silverage, and Mr. Eisner's comics were the beggning of a new and better, more creative and more intelligent way of doing comics.


even if the spirit isn't really your thing (because, it isn't the kind of genre i usually read, either) you should all AT LEAST have buckets mount of respect for that comic artist- he was a F**ing genius, I'm shocked that people are syaing they don't even care that miller ruined this movie- let alone that miller should have done one of his own comics- no!! Miller's comics are nothing compared to an eisner comic- just no!!

sorry- it's a VERY strong opinion of mine...but no-one should have dis-respect for will eisner.

*sigh*- secondly, yeah unfortinatly Frank Miller didn't do sin city, 300 and the spirit, he just did, sin city, sin city an sin city...- i mean, they all look the same as eachother. (and they all have bad cheesy scripts) 'nuff said, didn't portray the spirit at all.
1 2
Related Headlines
ComicBookMovie
Apr 06, 2009 12:04 PM
Powergirl
Jan 13, 2009 12:01 AM
Superman4
Jan 04, 2009 12:01 AM
ComicBookMovie
Jan 01, 2009 12:01 AM
bigdogg263
Dec 30, 2008 01:12 AM
View Recorder