James Gunn Details Stan Lee's Original Cameo; Debunks Claims That Disney Interfered

James Gunn Details Stan Lee's Original Cameo; Debunks Claims That Disney Interfered

James Gunn has shared a BTS photo from Stan Lee's original cameo, along with a very detailed description about what the hilarious moment would have entailed. The director also clears up claims that Disney would not allow him to keep the scene in the movie because Lee gave Groot the finger...

By JoshWilding - Sep 03, 2014 09:09 AM EST

#gotgpicoftheday At a panel on Sunday at Dragoncon, I talked about a deleted @realstanlee cameo in Guardians, and promised the folks there I’d post a photo on Instagram - so here it is! As you can see, this is not Stan, but a double. In the original cut of the film, when the Guardians enter the Collector’s museum, Rocket looks over and sees Cosmo the dog in one display case, Quill looks over into another display case and is surprised by a tentacle slapping against the glass, and Groot looks over and sees, in another display case, Stan Lee.

In one take, Stan Lee just slowly turns up his finger, flipping off Groot. We shot this footage with a Stan Lee double because Stan wasn’t able to come to the UK at the time. The plan was to shoot Stan in the same lighting when I was back in LA, and we’d digitally replace the double’s head with Stan’s actual head (not quite as difficult as it sounds). Although I thought the cameo was funny, I thought the flipping off joke was too similar to the moment earlier in the film where Quill flips off the Nova Corps, so I excised that part of it immediately.

A couple of the guys at Marvel thought Stan Lee in a case was too broad of a joke in general, and that it took the audience out of the movie. I argued about it for a bit, but we ended up not keeping it in the film. In a pretty typical case of Internet-journalism-telephone, articles online yesterday said that Disney forbade the scene because of standards . However, that’s incorrect - no one at Disney ever even saw the scene, and it was cut solely for creative reasons. #gotg #guardiansofthegalaxy


The more we hear about this scene the better it sounds, but now that Gunn has put it into context, it's easier to understand why it ultimately didn't make the cut. Despite the fact that it does sound as if there was a bit of fight to have Stan Lee's Guardians of the Galaxy cameo be as part of The Collector's collection, reports that Disney wouldn't allow it are obviously not true and have been blown way out of proportion. What did you guys think of the scene that was in the movie?
NOVA: Everything You Need To Know About The Disney+ Series' Rumored Villain Annihilus
Related:

NOVA: Everything You Need To Know About The Disney+ Series' Rumored Villain Annihilus

GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY Director James Gunn Talks Scrapped Spin-Off Plans And Dave Bautista As Bane
Recommended For You:

GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY Director James Gunn Talks Scrapped Spin-Off Plans And Dave Bautista As Bane

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
ChrispyG
ChrispyG - 9/3/2014, 9:23 AM
It is stupid how quick so many people are to jump on the "If you don't like this about the movie is is Disney's fault" bandwagon.
Reasonnnn
Reasonnnn - 9/3/2014, 9:26 AM
^ Disney only helps with the marketing, everything is under Feige's watch
Pasto
Pasto - 9/3/2014, 9:29 AM
@RebelVulcan
It's on the mainpage.
Bekss
Bekss - 9/3/2014, 9:29 AM
James Gunn really hates "internet journalism"

I hate when rumors or speculation are taken as real news
Pasto
Pasto - 9/3/2014, 9:30 AM
Oh, I see what it is. The Dwayne Johnson article date has changed from today to September 29th.
Pasto
Pasto - 9/3/2014, 9:30 AM
....Odd....
Pasto
Pasto - 9/3/2014, 9:31 AM
@HeavensWarrior
Look at all the shits I give.
Bekss
Bekss - 9/3/2014, 9:32 AM
Just like with the DC domains. Almost every site reported that shit without even knowing they were from a decade ago
yossarian
yossarian - 9/3/2014, 9:32 AM
It was my fault.

When you don't like something, blame:
1 - Yossarian
2 - Disney
3 - Canada
Scarilian
Scarilian - 9/3/2014, 9:33 AM
Kind of agree, would probably have taken me out the movie also. I prefer the Stan Lee cameos that would be in the background of scenes or just not noticeable unless you look for it.

A perfect example of a cameo would be Michael Bay appearing as a character who was flipped by Megatron in the first movie. Granted its a fairly terrible movie, but that is the sort of cameos that Stan Lee should have.
sjoerdo0
sjoerdo0 - 9/3/2014, 9:33 AM
But in the begin of the movie starlord gave the nova corp the finger, and it wasn't censored like in the trailers.
cipher
cipher - 9/3/2014, 9:34 AM
@yoss

* 4 - cipher's ex.

Ahem.
MecoBoy
MecoBoy - 9/3/2014, 9:36 AM
Para la siguiente, deberian meter al Chapulín Colorado en el cuarto del Collector
yossarian
yossarian - 9/3/2014, 9:48 AM
Very true Ciph. Your ex is #4.
McGee
McGee - 9/3/2014, 9:50 AM
"They wanted Donald instead of Howard...but I put that shit out with my boot."
LensmanMatt92
LensmanMatt92 - 9/3/2014, 9:51 AM

The way the Infinity Stones stories are evolving do not paint Thanos in a flattering light. Either he's an incompetent buffoon who keeps sending incompetent proxies to gather the Stones (and epic-fail in every instance), or else he's a manipulative genius who's deliberately letting douches like Loki and Ronan fail so that he can steer the Stones towards a place of his choosing before making his final bid to assemble the Gauntlet.

But let's face it: if Thanos was the omniscient mastermind supervillain that we know/want him to be, he wouldn't be having to rely on incompetent heroes and villains to find/gather them for him. 
baszs
baszs - 9/3/2014, 9:51 AM
Disney should visit the hood sometime and grow some balls!
Brady1138
Brady1138 - 9/3/2014, 9:58 AM
baszs Read the article.
String
String - 9/3/2014, 9:59 AM
I thought the whole Disney objecting to the scene was a bunch of shit. Especially since they allowed the lead character to do the same earlier in the movie. This is a perfect example how the media can effect public opinion when they don't get their facts straight.
yossarian
yossarian - 9/3/2014, 10:11 AM
I guess you could also blame it on the rain.
Rhinoman
Rhinoman - 9/3/2014, 10:11 AM
Anyone else thinking Stan doesnt look too good there?
cipher
cipher - 9/3/2014, 10:14 AM
I blame my ex for the life-threatening dehydration.
batz11
batz11 - 9/3/2014, 10:27 AM
The Fappening....
SageMode
SageMode - 9/3/2014, 10:41 AM
It was already established that Disney doesn't interfere with the creative process of Marvel's movies. So that's that.
NoAssemblyReqd
NoAssemblyReqd - 9/3/2014, 10:47 AM
I agree the cameo would have taken the audience out of the movie...but it would have made for a hilarious after credits scene to show Stan Lee stuck in a case next to Howard the Duck.
patriautism
patriautism - 9/3/2014, 10:48 AM
Why the hell does Stan Lee have a Cameo in this movie. I feel bad for Arnold Drake,Gene Colan (69 team), and Dan Abnett, Andy Lanning (08 team) because now the general audience believes Stan Lee created GotG also.
Lobo89
Lobo89 - 9/3/2014, 11:06 AM
@yoss
I blame you for the Navy loss Saturday
MrCBM56
MrCBM56 - 9/3/2014, 11:18 AM
So why didn't they go with Stan Lee being a Xardarian gigolo?
yossarian
yossarian - 9/3/2014, 11:27 AM
@lobo - That is hard for me to take the blame for. I hate Ohio State. I watched that game and was pulling for Navy.
1 2
View Recorder