Lanterns: Grant Morrison Slams "Incoherent" Finale That Failed The "Basic Premise Of The Franchise"

Lanterns: Grant Morrison Slams "Incoherent" Finale That Failed The "Basic Premise Of The Franchise"

Prolific comic book writer Grant Morrison has weighed in with his take on the controversial Lanterns finale, and he too has some major issues with how the DCU series handled Hal Jordan and John Stewart.

By JoshWilding - Oct 10, 2026 05:10 AM EST
Filed Under: Lanterns

Lanterns may have been a ratings hit for HBO, but the DC Studios TV series continues to divide opinions. The finale has proven particularly controversial, with the reveal that Sheriff Kerry killed Hal Jordan ultimately falling flat.

That's not a great outcome for a series that set out to be the DCU's answer to True Detective, and the main sticking point is that John Stewart allowed Kerry to go free (apparently, it's what Hal would have wanted). John also chose to allow Noah, a Manhunter with a very real desire to conquer the planet, to remain out in the world so he can go to college and play football. 

Comic book writer Grant Morrison has previously clashed with Lanterns executive producer Damon Lindelof, but had a change of heart about the series after initially criticising the premiere. Now, though, he joins the chorus of voices expressing dissatisfaction with the finale, "Dirt and Stars."

While it was easy to dismiss artist Ethan Van Sciver's take given past controversies, Morrison is one of James Gunn's favourite comic book writers, so these complaints, published on his Substack, have to sting...

Lanterns worked as a show and it’s mostly down to the two leads, particularly Kyle Chandler as Hal Jordan. They have a great supporting cast which helps, but it’s the two principals and their chemistry and charisma that sells the whole thing – so maybe those True Detective comparisons had some basis after all!

Having said that, I didn’t really like the ending, although it was all neatly put together. I found it hard to accept that the Kerry Kane character played by Kelly McDonald shot Hal Jordan in the head, and everyone seemed fine with that psychotic break. There should probably have been some response to that, because otherwise it makes it really hard for the audience to work out what makes the Green Lantern Corps an intergalactic law enforcement agency at all. The Guardians are now fine with their operatives being murdered while other officers simply ignore the fact and let the perps walk free?

I read writer Tom King’s explanation for why this choice was made – she killed the man she loved and was suffering enough – and wondered how that defence would fly in a court of law after some ghastly crime of passion.

‘The horror of murdering his wife in cold blood is punishment enough for this man, your honour. Let him walk free with a gun in his hand, and we’ll just hope it never happens again, okay?’

I watched the show; Kerry lost her shit in a way that made her seem unhinged and she shot a superhero in the head out of pique. John Stewart also let the Manhunter go free, knowing that he could one day destroy the world. For a show that’s not about masked vigilantes with their own personal code but deals with weird space policemen working for an interplanetary judiciary, it was a morally and legally incoherent conclusion that backed out of its own implications and the basic premise of the franchise.

There are rumours of a potential second season but even with the compelling Aaron Pierre, it’s hard to imagine the formula working as well without Kyle Chandler as Hal Jordan, and they’d have to find a way to recreate the partnership (Sinestro did say he could bring Hal back to life, so maybe Hal as Parallax would be good, with John having to save him). We’ll see.

It will be hard for even Lanterns' most ardent supporters to argue with anything Morrison says here. The justification that positive reviews (critics were only provided with seven out of eight episodes) and strong viewership invalidate these complaints is debatable, and DC Studios will need to take note if Season 2 does happen.

"Lanterns' leads shine bright," we wrote in our Season 1 review, "but even they can't save this abysmal adaptation of the comics that, embarrassed by the source material it's based on, delivers a woefully bland and uninspired take on Green Lantern that's another miss for the DCU."

Lanterns follows new recruit John Stewart and Lantern legend Hal Jordan, two intergalactic cops drawn into a dark, earth-based mystery as they investigate a murder in the American heartland.

Alongside Kyle Chander and Aaron Pierre, Kelly Macdonald, Garret Dillahunt, Poorna Jagannathan, Nicole Ari Parker, Jason Ritter, J. Alphonse Nicholson, and Jasmine Cephas Jones round out the cast.

Lanterns is now streaming in its entirety on HBO Max.

Lanterns Season Finale Burns Bright With Record 10.5 Million Viewers Worldwide
Related:

Lanterns Season Finale Burns Bright With Record 10.5 Million Viewers Worldwide

Lanterns Season 2: Is The DCU Series Returning? Renewal Decision Said To Be Pending Following Finale
Recommended For You:

Lanterns Season 2: Is The DCU Series Returning? Renewal Decision Said To Be "Pending" Following Finale

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 10/10/2026, 5:33 AM
User Comment Image
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 10/10/2026, 5:34 AM
☝️ For anyone looking for quality superhero storytelling.
jondavis0323
jondavis0323 - 10/10/2026, 5:49 AM
@JoshWilding - did you really post your own tweet about a different show to your own article about another show and then reply to your own comment? Dude, go outside and touch some grass
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 10/10/2026, 6:07 AM
@jondavis0323 - I’m good staying indoors and making money, but appreciate the concern! Thanks for the click. 😘
RobertARZVenez
RobertARZVenez - 10/10/2026, 9:30 AM
@JoshWilding - Look, man, I find your attitude pathetic; you keep proving that you shouldn't be covering DC Comics articles. I like Marvel just as much as DC, and I’d say the same thing if the roles were reversed. Honestly, your ego is consuming you—you’re coming across as incredibly arrogant. It’s obvious you’re just chasing clicks. You’ve lost your passion for the work here, and the dark side has taken you over, man—just my humble opinion!
RobertARZVenez
RobertARZVenez - 10/10/2026, 10:07 AM
@RobertARZVenez - P.S. I’ve been visiting this site for over 10 years, though I haven’t commented much. I’ve always followed your articles—man, I really valued them for the great information and your writing style—but in recent years, you’ve become like that Harvey Dent quote from *The Dark Knight*: "You either die a hero, or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain."
BeyondtheFuture
BeyondtheFuture - 10/10/2026, 5:41 AM
Yeah they very nearly stuck the landing but the finale was a disappointing mess.

Hal should have been brought back, there should have been hints of Jon being corrupted by the yellow lantern, Kerry should have gone to jail and Noah should have been put down.

Guy still comes down but fights with Hal and Jon before getting his handed to him. Leaving a massive cliffhanger for season 2.

That said I did the final wink moment.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 10/10/2026, 6:17 AM
MF ain't wrong.

The two leads were great. The tone was great. The rest of the show, the story, the characters, everything.... no. It just wasn't. In fact it was pretty bad all things considered. Just a big mess.
catmandom
catmandom - 10/10/2026, 6:42 AM
In the Gunn universe Supers and cops, kill.
LoudLon
LoudLon - 10/10/2026, 9:42 AM
@catmandom - Cops killed in Nolan's Batman trilogy. Superman killed in the Snyderverse. Batman killed in the Snyderverse. Wonder Woman killed in the Snyderverse...
Truebeliever333
Truebeliever333 - 10/10/2026, 9:47 AM
@catmandom - The killing isn’t unprecedented the lack of ethics or morality is. And leaving a global threat free is just fantastic work from someone who claimed the job of Earth’s protector.
TheUnworthyThor
TheUnworthyThor - 10/10/2026, 6:52 AM
Hard to argue with anything he said after that mess of a finale.
TheUnworthyThor
TheUnworthyThor - 10/10/2026, 6:58 AM
I do find it ironic that despite the DCU’s clear attempt to push John over the other two Lanterns that in almost every positive review of the show I’ve seen they always praise above all else Chandler’s Hal Jordan. Simultaneously making a season 2 hard to pull off and proving that even this bastardized version of Hal Jordan is a more interesting character than John Stewart.
Truebeliever333
Truebeliever333 - 10/10/2026, 9:49 AM
@TheUnworthyThor - The choice to have JS as the main GL in the DCU makes sense. But the show didn’t do John or Hal or the DCU any favors.
TheUnworthyThor
TheUnworthyThor - 10/10/2026, 10:00 AM
@Truebeliever333 - It really doesn’t. John Stewart is a supporting character who has to borrow everything from Hal Jordan. His origin is tied to Hal, he has to borrow Hal’s villains and supporting cast. Hal is the character that was a founding member of the Justice League. Hal is Barry Allen’s best friend. Hal is the one with the amazing layered relationship to Sinestro since he was the one trained by him and then defeated him. Hal is the one that brings this unique energy to the League, the energy unlike any other member, and that Batman has friction with. Hal is the foundation. Any DC film universe not built on the foundation of Clark, Bruce, Diana, Barry, and Hal is lesser than it should be and a lot less secure.
Truebeliever333
Truebeliever333 - 10/10/2026, 10:53 AM
@TheUnworthyThor - More people are familiar with GLs from the popular JL cartoon than the comics. Or from both. Not just from the comics. So yes it does make sense.
DocSpock
DocSpock - 10/10/2026, 7:23 AM

Nothing about Lanterns worked for true GL comics fans.

It was horrible unrestrained radical leftist trash at its very worst.

Next up: Wally West Flash as the complete destruction of DC CBMs/shows continues unabated by these dogma spewing humanity hating hacks in the new DCFU V2 continue their rampage.
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 10/10/2026, 9:05 AM
@DocSpock - They’ll go with an African American Wally. “He’s fast, but can he outrun “racism”? That will be the theme of the show
agnosticbatman
agnosticbatman - 10/10/2026, 9:17 AM
@DocSpock - I’m sorry that you don’t get laid anymore. I feel like that’s the largest contributing factor to why guys like you turn crusty and want to blame everything on the left.
agnosticbatman
agnosticbatman - 10/10/2026, 9:20 AM
@Bucky74 - Wow, what a racist piece of trash you are. Genuinely hoping that you get a traffic ticket or something equally bad happens to you today.
DocSpock
DocSpock - 10/10/2026, 9:55 AM
@Bucky74 -

100%.
DocSpock
DocSpock - 10/10/2026, 9:59 AM
@agnosticbatman -

Nah. Half my old body is messed up, but that still works.

Thank your Mom and apologize to your Grandmother for me basement boy.
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 10/10/2026, 10:22 AM
@agnosticbatman - How is that at all racist you stupid FK. It’s what these creators did in Lanterns and have been doing the last 10 years you FK’n moron. There are plenty of great black characters. It’s racist to race swap and make their skin color the entire identity of that character you brainwashed idiot
ClarkJoeKent
ClarkJoeKent - 10/10/2026, 7:27 AM
When Grant Morrisson & Alex Ross says Lanturds is a bad show............
captainwalker
captainwalker - 10/10/2026, 9:39 AM
@ClarkJoeKent - I want an Alex Ross Superman movie.
MR
MR - 10/10/2026, 7:54 AM
Im not a Marvel guy but I just watched Spiderman and I thought it was excellent. I don't need to explain why because most of us on here have seen it. Spiderman was actually more heroic than Superman was last year. And so my ask of DC is just do that. Give us what the dang superhero is meant to be doing. Stop messing with the characters and their origins or whatever. Just give us what's on the page. It's really simple.
Vigor
Vigor - 10/10/2026, 7:59 AM
A compelling premise for season 2 to keep the buddy cop dynamic is to team sinestro and John up
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 10/10/2026, 8:08 AM
@Vigor - that could be interesting…

Could be a good where are you to have Kyle too in a limited capacity as we might get Hal in flashbacks…

It’s implied that Sinestro’s betrayal is what really broke this Hal to become the jaded , cynical version we meet as he considered him a mentor/father figure but maybe we could see some of that aswell.
WEAPONXOXOXO
WEAPONXOXOXO - 10/10/2026, 8:02 AM
As a true GL comic book fan I just want to say that, over all the show was entertaining. I looked forward to the next episode the same way ALLSGOOD looks forward to a second piece of cake. Hopefully I get a second season.....and a second piece of cake. On to VisionQuest.
Vigor
Vigor - 10/10/2026, 8:09 AM
@WEAPONXOXOXO - lol the stray shots at POOR Allsgood
WEAPONXOXOXO
WEAPONXOXOXO - 10/10/2026, 8:04 AM
Josh's jaw is on the floor......that means nothing to me. His jaw was on the floor for this magic trick too.

User Comment Image
roboticJohnson
roboticJohnson - 10/10/2026, 10:13 AM
The guardians were fine with that because hal wasn't their operative anynore, guy gardner didn't even know he was dead.
The only one that knew about kerry's "psychotic break" was john, nobody else knew about it. He's the only one that thought exposing her and having her arrested was unnecessary.
John letting noah live, hoping he would choose a life different than what his programming tells him, is morally and legally coherent with john's character arc. If anything, killing him because one day he might be a threat would be immoral and illegal.
I don't understand how grant morrison can be such a great writer when he can't read the meaning of a scene, it's disappointing
RobertARZVenez
RobertARZVenez - 10/10/2026, 10:40 AM
@roboticJohnson - this
MrDandy
MrDandy - 10/10/2026, 10:24 AM
I actually agree with everything he said here, and I say that as someone who enjoyed the show all the way up to the last episode. They really fumbled at the finish line imo
Kahron0
Kahron0 - 10/10/2026, 11:05 AM
@MrDandy - I agree. The article’s framing is doing a ton of heavy lifting though. Grant basically had the same take as you.
VampMime187cbm
VampMime187cbm - 10/10/2026, 11:12 AM
[frick] James Gunn
Kahron0
Kahron0 - 10/10/2026, 11:13 AM
@JoshWilding, genuine question: Have you consistently given comparable coverage to comic-book creators criticizing Marvel adaptations, the MCU, the DCEU, and standalone comic-book movies and treated them as authoritative voices? Or has this become a particularly recurring editorial focus with the DCU? If it’s the latter, then this is yet another poor example of editorial consistency and your predictable bias.

I actually agree with Morrison’s central criticisms of the Lanterns finale. Kerry facing no consequences for killing Hal on a whim and John letting Noah go were among the finale’s worst decisions. But Morrison generally liked the show, particularly its leads and their chemistry. His criticism of specific finale choices is a far cry from the broader doom-and-gloom narrative your article tries to push.

Your coverage repeatedly follows the same pattern: Negative developments are taken at face value while positive ones are met with skepticism or qualified until they appear less impressive. Both are always tied back to all become further alleged ‘evidence’ of the DCU’s supposed failure and Gunn’s inability to lead it/eventual firing. The result increasingly feels less like open-ended reporting and more like selectively aggregating developments to reinforce a predetermined narrative.

This was also noticeable with your examples of Rotten Tomatoes and viewership: favorable negative audience scores become a win, declining scores become evidence of failure, and positive reviews are downplayed and strong viewership was scrutinized against established syndicated streaming juggernauts like OG Game of Thrones and Big Bang Theory of all things. At what point does contextualizing the data become selectively scrutinizing it because it doesn’t support your conclusion? Morrison’s criticism is similarly used to reinforce that narrative, despite his generally positive view of the show.

Given your recent DC coverage, I’m skeptical you’ve applied this same standard consistently to Marvel adaptations and standalone comic-book films, where creators and fans have also criticized characterization, comic accuracy, and creative decisions. I don’t recall those criticisms receiving the same level of attention or routinely being treated as authoritative indictments of a project’s success.

If you’ve applied this standard consistently across Marvel and DC over the years, I’d genuinely be interested in comparable examples.
NGFB
NGFB - 10/10/2026, 11:26 AM
John Stewart = Boring.

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder