James Gunn Sparks Confusion With Contradictory Comments About Clayface's DCU Future

James Gunn Sparks Confusion With Contradictory Comments About Clayface's DCU Future

James Gunn has teased Clayface's DCU future while insisting individual stories don't need to lead to something else. So, is the DC Studios co-CEO contradicting himself, or making a valid point?

Feature Opinion
By JoshWilding - Oct 27, 2026 01:10 PM EST
Filed Under: Clayface

Clayface opened in theaters last week, earning largely positive reviews from critics and glowing audience scores. Despite that, the movie opened to only $24 million, falling slightly short of expectations and suggesting the R-rated horror tale has a long way to go before turning a profit.

On Monday, Clayface made $2.2 million, with You Can See Everything nipping at its heels with $2.1 million. It's too soon to say what this means for the DC Studios movie's second weekend in theaters, but Halloween and positive word of mouth could lead to a strong hold. 

Clayface explores Matt Hagen's descent into villainy before we met him at his most monstrous in Creature Commandos. While a Clayface sequel can't be discounted, the logical next step for the character is to show up in The Brave and the Bold or perhaps alongside Christopher Smith in Salvation.

Now, though, DC Studios co-CEO James Gunn has left fans scratching their heads. On Saturday, the filmmaker agreed with someone who said not every project needs to set up another when he wrote on Threads, "[The] DCU is just an alternate universe; we can enter at any location or time and tell that story. I dislike the idea that individual stories aren’t meaningful unless they lead to something else."

"People not understanding this is strange to me, because 'Star Wars' has essentially been doing this for 50 years across movies, shows, games and books, admittedly without the tonal variety."

However, at the Clayface premiere, an excited Gunn declared, "I think one of the most fun things about creating the DCU is being able to tell stories that are very, very different from one another, in very different genres, and yet they all come together at certain points. And yeah, this isn’t the last we’ll see of Clayface. And I can’t wait for you guys to see what we do with him."

There's an apparent contradiction in Gunn's comments, as he's simultaneously encouraging audiences to look ahead to Clayface's future while criticising the expectation that individual stories in a shared world should lead to something else.

Of course, there's a distinction between a character continuing beyond their solo movie and a film existing primarily to set up future projects. Matt Hagen can have a complete, meaningful story in Clayface while still appearing in other DCU projects. Gunn's argument is presumably that the movie shouldn't need to tease a future crossover or advance some overarching narrative to justify its existence.

Still, by promising that Clayface will return, Gunn is adding to speculation about the character's place in the wider DCU, while seemingly criticising those heading into theaters with the expectation that the movie will set up something like The Brave and the Bold.

Whether Gunn's apparent change in attitude is down to lower-than-expected box office takings or because he was trying to build excitement with a big tease before the movie's release is another debate altogether. 

Ultimately, Gunn isn't necessarily contradicting himself by planning more for Clayface, but there's an irony in teasing the character's future while pushing back against the interconnected storytelling that has conditioned audiences to look for precisely those clues.

5 R-Rated Gotham City Horror Movies DC Studios Should Make After Clayface
Related:

5 R-Rated Gotham City Horror Movies DC Studios Should Make After Clayface

Clayface Concept Art Reveals Unsettling Alternate Designs For An Early Version Of The DCU Movie
Recommended For You:

Clayface Concept Art Reveals Unsettling Alternate Designs For An Early Version Of The DCU Movie

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

narrow290
narrow290 - 10/27/2026, 1:43 PM
I think maybe you misinterpreted what he meant. I think a lot of fans of the MCU aren’t comic book readers and if a movie doesn’t directly set up the next series of films, it’s trash at least with some of my friends anyway
supermanrex
supermanrex - 10/27/2026, 1:47 PM
@narrow290 - i dont understand how this concept is so hard for people to understand. real life, me an you live on the same planet, in the same universe, yet yesterday i never had an interaction with you. why cant this work in comic book films. dont get me wrong i love a good cameo and easter egg comment showing connectivity, but still can still be stand alone.
narrow290
narrow290 - 10/27/2026, 1:50 PM
@supermanrex - absolutely
krayzeman
krayzeman - 10/27/2026, 2:42 PM
@supermanrex - EXACTLY!
SupermanFamFan
SupermanFamFan - 10/27/2026, 3:29 PM
@supermanrex - Your 💯 on the mark
SupermanFamFan
SupermanFamFan - 10/27/2026, 3:30 PM
@narrow290 - Yes this is true all of my friends who have been super pumped for Doomsday (as a DC fan I'm more reserved but will be seeing it to talk about it with them) none of my friends actually read any comics whatsoever, like not even an issue if anything...
supermanrex
supermanrex - 10/27/2026, 1:44 PM
GOOD GOD, Your just reaching for anything to criticize Gunn on now.
Polarpenguin
Polarpenguin - 10/27/2026, 2:57 PM
@supermanrex - does anyone take Wilding seriously anymore?

He’s lost any credibility he ever had.
MotherGooseUPus
MotherGooseUPus - 10/27/2026, 1:44 PM
Gunn needs to shut his mouth
themawisdead
themawisdead - 10/27/2026, 1:45 PM
nothing at all confusing or contradictory about this.
Irregular
Irregular - 10/27/2026, 1:48 PM
"[The] DCU is just an alternate universe; we can enter at any location or time and tell that story. I dislike the idea that individual stories aren’t meaningful unless they lead to something else. People not understanding this is strange to me, because 'Star Wars' has essentially been doing this for 50 years across movies, shows, games and books, admittedly without the tonal variety."

Look, cut the condescending bullshit already. It's strange to YOU because YOU and select few are the only ones who gets it. Why you think using "Star Wars" as an analogy is BOLD considering that franchise is in the shitter. Are you saying everything BUT Superman is not connected? It just exists to exist? Does that mean Lanterns has no effect on John Stewart when he appears in MoT? Is this SUPERMAN SAGA meant to be the equivalent of THE SKYWALKER SAGA where everything else is expanding it into a "will we? won't we? could it be possible" isms that creative people just love to say but have no concrete plan? I mean explains the lack of any Batman mention in GOTHAM CITY...ya know...the place he resides in? Or does it not matter because THE DCU is just an alternate universe

Kind of stupid to walk out of Marvel with this grand plan that makes absolutely no FUKING sense.

That's like beginning New 52 with a Creature Commando comic that starts the NEW 52, Superman comic, a Peacemaker comic that semi-continues from the previous universe but doesn't, maybe it does, maybe it has, maybe it hasn't, Supergirl comics and CLAYFACE spin off comic but NO BATMAN. NO FLASH. NO AQUAMAN for a whole year. All these heroes are sitting on the bench all because for over 20 years WB has had the most out of touch execs to touch DC Comics.

And sad that the director of the GOTG trilogy, is just as out of touch as the morons before.
Malatrova15
Malatrova15 - 10/27/2026, 1:48 PM
OMG he sparks so good, he sparked so hard on me that my confusion was supreme, he should be called James "The Sparker" Gunn ...ooh boi he is a sparkler
thedrudo
thedrudo - 10/27/2026, 1:51 PM
@EscapeMySight - 100%. It’s just sad at this point. People finding every damn thing to get upset about. I’m convinced the bulk of the internet is just bots stirring the pot.
SupermanFamFan
SupermanFamFan - 10/27/2026, 3:32 PM
@thedrudo - I have been feeling the same especially after falling in love with Clayface seeing it again tonight. All the complaints were completely invalid and In getting sick of the infinite griping.

Don't get me wrong I also find the infinite putting things on a pedestal just as annoying but I'm trying to find a balance lmao
supermanrex
supermanrex - 10/27/2026, 1:52 PM
i think, actual people who have issues with this stand alone movie and are not just Gunn haters no matter what I can kinda sympathize with. they are clamoring for anything Batman at this point in this universe and i feel the same way. its a travesty how warner discovery, not gunn, warner discovery is handling Batman. marvel is pumping out billion dollar spiderman hits and guest appearances left and right, yet Warner Discovery is giving us delayed out of universe movies and in the mean time shadows and innuendos. you would think they had their hands tied with batman in the sameway disney before fox merger couldnt use xmen or FF. so stupid.
krayzeman
krayzeman - 10/27/2026, 1:54 PM
You're reading waaaay too much into what he said. Simply put he said its a universe where you can tell a variety of different stories where they dont "have to lead to something." He's excited because the movie IS being well recieved despite how you may feel and that movies in the DCU can come together at certain points. That doesnt mean Clayface is gonna be a Justice League member. And where did he say this was gonna lead to Brave and The Bold?? This article of "opinion" is such a reach. If you're gonna report the news STOP putting your opinion in it. smh
EscapeMySight
EscapeMySight - 10/27/2026, 1:57 PM
Look, I really dislike Gunn. I think he's an idiot. I don't think he's a very good film maker, an even worse writer, and he's the absolute wrong person to be in charge of DC, but I don't think there's anything really contradictory here. I think you're just reading way too much into his reply.
foreverintheway
foreverintheway - 10/27/2026, 1:59 PM
Nobody is left scratching their heads here, what are we talking about?
Rpendo
Rpendo - 10/27/2026, 2:01 PM
Seems entirely straightforward, to me.

If Gunn’s comment “sparks confusion” with you, perhaps someone else should be writing commentary on what the man says.
IMCOOLURNOT
IMCOOLURNOT - 10/27/2026, 2:31 PM
@Rpendo - Some people need help with the big words. Josh might need a tutor.
TheNewYorkerr
TheNewYorkerr - 10/27/2026, 2:06 PM
I hope Gunn keeps speaking, and keeps trolling. He's undefeated. Keep the trash coming!
ElBlancoChoco
ElBlancoChoco - 10/27/2026, 2:10 PM
You're reaching here and im far from a Gunn defender. Movies can exist on their own but the characters can exist in a wider world. I can go see Clayfave 1 and 2 but dont need to see him pop up in Justice Gang or Brave and the Bold. Self contained stories, not characters.

How did you miss that point?
roboticJohnson
roboticJohnson - 10/27/2026, 2:11 PM
"We're making things that are meaningful on their own, not because they're setting up future projects"
"These characters will appear again"
I don't see how these two statements contradict each other, he's just saying they're not making projects because they have to introduce the mystical orb of mahcohk so they can use it in Detective chimp season 4
WEAPONXOXOXO
WEAPONXOXOXO - 10/27/2026, 2:20 PM

James Gunn Sparks Confusion With Contradictory Comments About Clayface's DCU Future

Yes yes yes I'm sure this is as important as solving the homeless problem.

in the mean time watch this.


Pampero
Pampero - 10/27/2026, 2:20 PM
Gunn needs to stick a gun up his ass and pull the [frick]ing trigger 'til it goes "click."
VICTHEMAN
VICTHEMAN - 10/27/2026, 2:24 PM
@Pampero - Did he phukk your mom or bomb a country killing thousands? That's a little excessive and dark.
Pampero
Pampero - 10/27/2026, 2:35 PM
@VICTHEMAN - Go watch The Big Lebowski and you will understand the quote. Less superhero films and more CINEMA is good for your brain
ManofSteel79
ManofSteel79 - 10/27/2026, 2:21 PM
Josh is confused. Shocker!
LibraMattered
LibraMattered - 10/27/2026, 2:24 PM
I watched Clayface last night and really enjoyed it. It’s a good lesson in not letting this site help determine what I might like. It’s a straightforward revenge story.
Kahron0
Kahron0 - 10/27/2026, 2:29 PM
This is such a lame nothing-burger of a story and a desperate attempt to manufacture controversy lol. Since Clayface received positive reviews and has so far performed respectably/ decently at the box office (neither a breakout hit nor a box-office disaster), apparently we need articles like this to stir the pot because the actual results aren’t outrageous enough to generate clicks.

Gunn saying individual DCU stories shouldn’t need to set up future projects to be meaningful isn’t contradictory to saying Clayface will return. A movie can tell a complete story while leaving the door open for its characters to appear in future projects. Hell, the article itself eventually acknowledges this distinction and concludes that Gunn isn’t necessarily contradicting himself. So…what exactly is the controversy here?

You know it’s bad when even people who strongly dislike the DCU, have been unimpressed with much of what it’s offered so far, and hate Jimmy Gunn’s movies and Gunn-isms are calling this kind of coverage out. Lmao.
krayzeman
krayzeman - 10/27/2026, 2:47 PM
@Kahron0 - Josh is a "news reporter" reporting on his own opinion. smh
OldManHal
OldManHal - 10/27/2026, 3:04 PM
Star Wars has done a real shit job of expanding its universe outside of the original six films. Like a really, really shit job. So if that’s his blueprint, we’re [frick]ed. Again.

Look, it’s just stupid shit now. Marvel have shown us how to successful do this, and every single time someone tries to do it a different way, we get this bollocks. At this point, they’re not proving anything other than they’re incompetent all because they don’t want to copy a tried and true method. It’d be like filmmakers not taking anything from Kubrick or Spielberg because they want to do it ‘their way’ only to fall flat on their face every time.
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 10/27/2026, 3:09 PM
So many people here clearly read the headline and quotes, and skipped straight to the comments to try and be smart. 💀

“ Ultimately, Gunn isn't necessarily contradicting himself by planning more for Clayface, but there's an irony in teasing the character's future while pushing back against the interconnected storytelling that has conditioned audiences to look for precisely those clues.”
SteviesRightFoo
SteviesRightFoo - 10/27/2026, 3:16 PM
So will we see him in 2036 or not?
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 10/27/2026, 3:25 PM
And as if to prove my point, Gunn is back to bickering with fans on Threads who don't know WTF the man is doing with the DCU. 😂 Because, guess what, his remarks have confused people. Not everyone is a die-hard fan like the people who comment on this site, folks. Article coming shortly.

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder