Why Did Kit Harington Join Harry Potter? Game Of Thrones Star Has His Say Amid J.K. Rowling Controversy

Why Did Kit Harington Join Harry Potter? Game Of Thrones Star Has His Say Amid J.K. Rowling Controversy

Kit Harington has addressed the ongoing discourse surrounding J.K. Rowling after joining HBO's Harry Potter series, revealing the personal reason he wanted the role of Gilderoy Lockhart.

By JoshWilding - Sep 18, 2026 09:09 AM EST
Filed Under: Harry Potter
Source: SFFGazette.com

HBO is rebooting Harry Potter, starting with Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone this Christmas and continuing with multiple seasons of television, each adapting another of author J.K. Rowling's books.

The writer's views on the trans community continue to divide opinions, with many Wizarding World fans critical of the actors willing to star in the series. The main argument is that the cast is somehow giving Rowling's opinions their seal of approval by agreeing to play the characters she created. Of course, just as many Harry Potter fans have found it easy to separate art from artist (and some agree with the writer). 

Several actors have been asked how they feel about the writer's stance on this hot-button topic, and now Kit Harington has been asked about the continued discourse surrounding the author.

The Game of Thrones star was recently cast as Gilderoy Lockhart in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, taking over the role from Nicholas Hoult after he dropped out of the series due to scheduling issues. Harington previously played Lockhart in Audible's Full-Cast Editions.

"I’ve been a lifelong Harry Potter fan," Harington told TODAY (via SFFGazette.com), explaining why he joined the series. "I was a fan when I was a kid, and then I rediscovered it as an adult, listening to it every night. I listen to it every single night, and it helps me go to sleep, and I know other people do that as well, so they’re really important books to me."

He continued, "When I knew this was happening as a series, I thought it was the best idea. Because I love the films, but with this, they can really explore the books at their fullest, and for a book nerd like me, that was a really great idea."

While Rowling is an executive producer on the HBO series, she isn't expected to be heavily involved creatively. The author has said relatively little about the new cast, but hit out at original Harry Potter stars Daniel Radcliffe and Emma Watson for criticising her views on trans people, saying the latter is "ignorant of how ignorant she is."

Rowling's opinions on transgender issues have been a problem for HBO's Harry Potter from the start. While she continues to deny being transphobic, she hasn't shied away from sharing her opinions about trans women being allowed in spaces reserved for biological women and has celebrated legal and political developments opposed by trans-rights advocates.

Asked about Rowling's views last year, HBO boss Casy Bloys said, "The decision to be in business with J.K. Rowling is not new for us. We’ve been in business for 25 years. It’s pretty clear that those are her personal, political views. She’s entitled to them. Harry Potter is not secretly being infused with anything. And if you want to debate her, you can go on Twitter."

The main cast of Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone includes Dominic McLaughlin as Harry Potter, Arabella Stanton as Hermione Granger, Alastair Stout as Ron Weasley, John Lithgow as Albus Dumbledore, Janet McTeer as Minerva McGonagall, Paapa Essiedu as Severus Snape, Nick Frost as Rubeus Hagrid, Rory Wilmot as Neville Longbottom, and Lox Pratt as Draco Malfoy.

Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone premieres on HBO Max this Christmas.

About The Author:
JoshWilding
Member Since 3/13/2009
A lifelong comic book fan who grew up on Spider-Man: The Animated Series in the '90s, Josh Wilding has been contributing to ComicBookMovie.com since 2009.

While he's also written for websites like Batman-News, HeyUGuys, and WhatCulture, Josh is CBM's Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic and the site's #1 contributor with nearly two decades of experience covering film and TV news (including interviews with Tom Holland, Chris Pratt, Gary Oldman, Halle Berry, Jon Bernthal, Tom Welling, and hundreds more).

Based in the UK with his wife, Josh is also an avid WWE and Formula 1 fan and writes about those passions on CBM's sister sites, TheRingReport.com and FullThrottleHQ.com. Favourite superhero? Spider-Man. Favourite pro wrestler? CM Punk. Favourite F1 driver? Max Verstappen.
Harry Potter: HBO Boss Addresses Yearly Release Timeline And J.K. Rowling's Involvement
Related:

Harry Potter: HBO Boss Addresses Yearly Release Timeline And J.K. Rowling's Involvement

Harry Potter Season 2 Casts Arthur Weasley, Moaning Myrtle, And Colin Creevey For The Chamber Of Secrets
Recommended For You:

Harry Potter Season 2 Casts Arthur Weasley, Moaning Myrtle, And Colin Creevey For The Chamber Of Secrets

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

newhire13
newhire13 - 9/18/2026, 9:36 AM
I understand Rowling sucks but it’s lame to hassle these people for joining the franchise. Harry Potter is beyond her at this point and obviously they don’t all share her views. Let these people work on something they’re interested in and be fans.
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 9/18/2026, 9:39 AM
@newhire13 - Why does she suck because she stands up for actual women and believes men shouldn’t be trouncing women in sports or be in female locker rooms?
savhcc
savhcc - 9/18/2026, 2:35 PM
@Bucky74 - It's such a shame that Incels such as yourself have infested comic book-related entertainment
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 9/18/2026, 3:15 PM
@savhcc - “Incels” Did you post that with your free hand while you spanked it 😂😂😂

You losers are the biggest incels out there and the fact you couldn’t resist commenting on my post shows how simple minded and weak you are
newhire13
newhire13 - 9/18/2026, 3:38 PM
@Bucky74 - 🙄 Miss me with your bigoted, right wing, pearl clutching bullshit. You suck too.
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 9/18/2026, 4:12 PM
@newhire13 - “Bigoted” you don’t know the meaning of the word you FK’n moron. “Anything I don’t like is racist” 🤣🤣🤣
Dunejedi
Dunejedi - 9/18/2026, 6:28 PM
@newhire13 - After she’s dead maybe. She is actively benefiting from this program right now, as she continues to spread her harmful, hateful views. As the audience , we have a moral obligation to direct our money, attention, influence away from bigots and to sanction their income. ‘Going without’ a bit of preferred entertainment is a small price to pay for keeping your soul.

You can’t get ‘a little bit pregnant’. If you’re in for a penny, you’re in for a pound.
CreateNowSlpL8r
CreateNowSlpL8r - 9/18/2026, 9:51 AM
"Rowling's opinions on transgender issues have been a problem for HBO's Harry Potter from the start."

No they haven't. Only for online weirdos who aren't going to watch the show anyway.
savhcc
savhcc - 9/18/2026, 2:36 PM
@CreateNowSlpL8r - The true online weirdos are Incels.
CreateNowSlpL8r
CreateNowSlpL8r - 9/18/2026, 10:48 PM
@savhcc - oh wow, do your fingers hurt from pounding the keyboard keys so hard? Get lost weirdo.
rebellion
rebellion - 9/18/2026, 9:58 AM
Josh must be into tgirls.

JK did nothing wrong.
savhcc
savhcc - 9/18/2026, 2:36 PM
@rebellion - Yet another Incel.
FIREFIREGUNN
FIREFIREGUNN - 9/18/2026, 10:00 AM
If hoult isn't going to be Lockhart anymore... I wouldn't mind him as Voldemort.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 9/18/2026, 10:00 AM
Sounds good!!.

He was great as Gilderoy Lockhart in the Full Cast Audio Editions so to have him reprise the role on screen could be really fun even though he would likely have to modulate his performance to some degree given he’ll be on camera now but still…

Also i know sometimes actors say they are fans of something just to get brownie points with the fans or something but Kit is most definitely a legit fan so im happy he gets to be involved with a property he loves across 2 different mediums!!.

?is=4bczFqPEo-ghZG2w
Imprtracr1
Imprtracr1 - 9/18/2026, 10:29 AM
It's not controversial at all unless your part of the segment of idiots who think it is.
savhcc
savhcc - 9/18/2026, 3:09 PM
@Imprtracr1 - It's so sad that the Incels turn comments into a sewage ditch.
Grimfoe
Grimfoe - 9/18/2026, 10:31 AM
You don't have to like her views. That doesn't mean they "suck." From what I've seen she has a very reasoned position on the whole trans issue. It's obviously not popular with those that don't share her views, but that's how views work. Some people tend to believe one thing and some another. That's good. I don't think she's ever spoken ill of someone with different views. If you're an adult and you want to alter your body, go ahead. It's literally none of my business. When you start dictating what I can and can't say, that's an issue. When you allow minors to permanently alter their bodies, that's an issue.

This is a reasonable point of view that is shared by 90% of the population. I have a friend with a trans or non binary child. (I'm not 100% sure of the child's views) He agrees with this point of view. I've never read Rowling saying anything that 90% of the population doesn't agree with. By definition, that's not controversial.
TheFinestSmack
TheFinestSmack - 9/18/2026, 12:45 PM
@Grimfoe - 100% this. The media NEEDS it to be controversial.
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 9/18/2026, 1:22 PM
@Grimfoe - "When you allow minors to permanently alter their bodies, that's an issue."

It's very fortunate, then, that that doesn't happen. Of course, that hasn't stopped bad faith culture war grifters from lying about that in an effort to get good people to turn against a maligned minority.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11211955/
savhcc
savhcc - 9/18/2026, 3:10 PM
@Clintthahamster - Thank you. The Incels in the comments rarely know any facts.
Dunejedi
Dunejedi - 9/18/2026, 6:32 PM
@Grimfoe - I’m gonna need you to pipe down while the rest of us calmly, and indifferently discuss whether or not you have a right to exist. Don’t worry, we’ll let you know what we decide. In the meantime, best not to draw any attention to yourself.
TheFinestSmack
TheFinestSmack - 9/18/2026, 11:03 AM
"Rowling's opinions on transgender issues have been a problem for HBO's Harry Potter from the start."

They've only been problems in countless articles where the headlines attempt to make it a problem. Outside of that, it doesn't seem like JK's views are hurting this production in any way. And I doubt the ratings with reflect it's any sort of "problem" either once it premiers on Christmas.
Fudgeclank
Fudgeclank - 9/18/2026, 11:37 AM
People need to learn to separate life from art again. Does Rowling even have much involvement in this? IIRC she was pretty hands-on with the original film scripts and at least some of the casting, that's clearly not the case here.
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 9/18/2026, 1:24 PM
@Fudgeclank - People don't "need" to do shit. Folks can decide for themselves what's a bridge too far and what isn't.
LiquidSwords
LiquidSwords - 9/18/2026, 9:14 PM
@regmovieguy - They wiped the other comments page. Don't worry. I saved it. 😁

"It made 764 million before Brand New Day"

You keep throwing out giant totals like they settle the argument, but where are the actual receipts breaking down how much of that $764M came from which formats, showtimes, pre-sales, repeat business, etc.? A headline gross doesn't tell us that, dumbass. lol

User Comment Image

And yes, IMAX exclusivity has happened before. Nobody disputed that. The point is that "3 weeks of IMAX" by itself doesn't explain the entire performance. IMAX itself reported that the movie was generating an unusually large share of its business from premium formats and that 70mm demand was producing sellouts well into the run.
So, if your argument is "$764M = proof there's nothing unusual to examine," that's not an argument.

Show the underlying data and receipts, not just the headline total.

User Comment Image

"Again, you had all this information"

You're conflating two completely different arguments. Knowing before release that it would have IMAX screens doesn't mean you knew the actual demand, premium-format concentration, second-weekend performance, or eventual gross. Those are things you measure after the fact.

And the $1.6B line is the same nonsense. The question is whether the $1.6B figure is actually supported by receipts and what accounting assumptions produced it, not whether $1.6B is mathematically larger than $800M, Gomer.

User Comment Image

"You’re moving goalposts so fast"

Nope, I'm pointing out that you're treating the bet like every variable was known in advance because you now have the benefit of hindsight. The bet was based receipts, not a crystal ball showing the supposed gross, premium-format demand, and distribution of the revenue.

And "crying over how much Universal is making" is just another dodge. If your argument is simply "the movie made X, therefore I win," then show the receipts. Don't rewrite the argument after the fact and call it moving goalposts.

You're still all over the place and can't seem to let it go. I got to you. That's what counts.

User Comment Image
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 9/18/2026, 1:19 PM
A Harry Potter story without any direct mention of Rowling or her transphobia? Just throw it in there anyway! Gotta angry up the nerds somehow.
Ha1frican
Ha1frican - 9/18/2026, 6:48 PM
Money.

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder