Spider-Man: Brand New Day Writers Explain The Hulk, Jean Grey, And Why They Didn't Use A Spidey Villain

Spider-Man: Brand New Day Writers Explain The Hulk, Jean Grey, And Why They Didn't Use A Spidey Villain

Spider-Man: Brand New Day writers Chris McKenna and Erik Sommers explain why Peter Parker no longer needs a mentor in the MCU, and how Jean Grey was the missing piece they needed.

By JoshWilding - Aug 11, 2026 06:08 AM EST
Source: The Wrap

A staple of Marvel Studios' three Spider-Man movies was Peter Parker having a mentor. In Homecoming, it was Iron Man; Far From Home saw Mysterio and Nick Fury fill that void; then, in No Way Home, it was Doctor Strange and, to a lesser extent, Peter #2 and Peter #3.

Spider-Man: Brand New Day bucks the trend by removing a mentor from the web-slinger's life. Many fans had expected that void to be filled by Bruce Banner, but that wasn't the case, and Peter ended up being Jean Grey's guiding light.

In an interview with The Wrap, Spider-Man: Brand New Day writers Chris McKenna and Erik Sommers—who worked on the previous MCU movies—revealed why it was important to them to move on from Spidey needing someone to point him in the right direction. 

"We’ve seen that he’s going to these mentors. He’s a younger character. He has people he looks up to, and sometimes it goes well. Sometimes it doesn’t. But let’s not do that anymore. We want to tell a story about him growing up," Sommers explained. "Part of growing up is that he needs to start addressing things on his own. He needs to start coming up with answers on his own and not looking to others."

"It would be fun to see him interact with people as more of an equal and an adult. His relationship with Punisher, even his relationship with [Damage Control member] Metzger or his relationship with Jean DeWolff, these are more mature relationships," the writer continued, "as a coworker, as a colleague, as a fellow adult, as opposed to he’s that kid coming to ask the older person for counsel or guidance."

McKenna and Sommers have already revealed why Yelena Belova was featured in Spider-Man: Brand New Day, but why was Bruce there? 

According to McKenna, they wanted to give Peter a "spider-problem," and Bruce was "perfect for that story, that he would go to learn about that would be Bruce Banner." 

He added, "Hulk would be a great legacy character for our villain to be able to mind control, and then we can get a great Spider-Man-versus-Hulk fight. So that was one of those things that lined up in a way, and we were really, really happy and lucky that Marvel allowed us to use Hulk in the movie because I think he just worked in so many ways."

The bigger surprise in Spider-Man: Brand New Day is Jean Grey's inclusion, of course, and McKenna told the trade that, while mind control was part of the story from the start, they "didn't have the right character for that story."

"Now we can tell a story that with a really great character that can mirror Peter’s in a really great way and we can get to a place," he said. "Because obviously she’s such an important character in the MCU. We will have even more leeway to humanise this character and redeem her by the end."

The decision to put the spotlight on a Marvel "villain" rather than a Spider-Man one certainly didn't hurt Brand New Day, and for McKenna, it was all about cementing Spidey's place in the wider MCU. "We really needed the right character playing that role," McKenna noted. "We were exploring other characters, and it just wasn’t... It was Jean really helped unlock it. She was the missing piece."

Spider-Man's link to the X-Men could be a major factor in Marvel Studios' Mutant Saga, especially as he's essentially responsible for creating an inhibitor chip that the Department of Damage Control could eventually use to capture and depower mutants.

However, heading into Spider-Man 5, it seems fair to say that most fans would like the spotlight to shift back to a member of the wall-crawler's iconic rogues' gallery.

Kevin Feige, for his part, has already weighed in on Spider-Man 5 and Sadie Sink's secret role.

Spider-Man: Brand New Day is now playing in theaters.

About The Author:
JoshWilding
Member Since 3/13/2009
A lifelong comic book fan who grew up on Spider-Man: The Animated Series in the '90s, Josh Wilding has been contributing to ComicBookMovie.com since 2009.

While he's also written for websites like Batman-News, HeyUGuys, and WhatCulture, Josh is CBM's Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic and the site's #1 contributor with nearly two decades of experience covering film and TV news (including interviews with Tom Holland, Chris Pratt, Gary Oldman, Halle Berry, Jon Bernthal, Tom Welling, and hundreds more).

Based in the UK with his wife, Josh is also an avid WWE and Formula 1 fan and writes about those passions on CBM's sister sites, TheRingReport.com and FullThrottleHQ.com. Favourite superhero? Spider-Man. Favourite pro wrestler? CM Punk. Favourite F1 driver? Max Verstappen.
Spider-Man: Brand New Day Passes Avatar: The Way Of Water To Become 3rd Highest-Grossing Movie Worldwide
Related:

Spider-Man: Brand New Day Passes Avatar: The Way Of Water To Become 3rd Highest-Grossing Movie Worldwide

Onslaught's Rotten Tomatoes Score Revealed - What Critics Are Saying About Adam Wingard's New Film
Recommended For You:

Onslaught's Rotten Tomatoes Score Revealed - What Critics Are Saying About Adam Wingard's New Film

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
blacksocksdaily
blacksocksdaily - 8/11/2026, 6:38 AM
Even as a Spider-Man fan I didn’t mind that the movie didn’t focus on “a Spider-Man villain.” I thought that the montages and the bit with Scorpion gave a taste for what that movie could’ve been like had it focused on that side, which is truly impressive to pull off in such a small amount of screen time. I thought the movie was a great Spider-Man movie, focused on Spider-Man. The other characters in it ultimately supported further Spider-Man development and also let him shine as a more mature version of the character. So much whining from “fans” that don’t sound like fans at all. The movie was fun and showcased A LOT in one movie and somehow didn’t feel overstuffed, in my opinion. Again, major accomplishment.
Fogs
Fogs - 8/11/2026, 7:05 AM
@blacksocksdaily - Totally agreed. It's crazy we got to a point where we can enjoy a film like that. We've come a long way since SM1 in 2000.
Hobmoblin
Hobmoblin - 8/11/2026, 7:25 AM
@the - Yeah it's like they'd be ok with it being a worse movie as long as it had a Spider-Man villain. It lacks perspective. I'm old. They made a lot of Spider-Man movies before, they're not going to stop. I think it's ok to do something different for one movie for the sake of telling a great Peter Parker story.
2 billion in 2 weeks? We got another 30 years of Spider-Man movies even if they all fail (just look at terminator or Ghostbusters).
IAmAHoot
IAmAHoot - 8/11/2026, 8:04 AM
@blacksocksdaily - Haven't seen the movie yet, but what a great comment.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 8/11/2026, 8:48 AM
@Hobmoblin - Lets be honest, it would have probably been a better movie with a Spider-Man villain. But since neither of us have seen this non-existent movie we can't say for sure.

And the movie is making a lot of money so there's that. I think it was always destined to make at least 2 billion, just because of the combination of Holland, Zendaya and Spidey a few years after NWH. The hunger for this new flick was palpable before they even wrote it.

One is left wondering just how much it could have made if it had featured an actual Spider-Man villain instead of being an X-Men primer. Probably a ridiculous amount of money. But nobody ever misses a ridiculous amount of money, because the very idea of it is ridiculous to begin with. So I guess it doesn't matter to them that it could've made way more than it s making.

Hypotheticals are fun.
Lucasberg
Lucasberg - 8/11/2026, 2:52 PM
@blacksocksdaily - Exactly correct! Huge freakin accomplishment and likewise didn't mind a movie that used the wider MCU to develop Peter's character. Comics have done this a billion times and this movie demonstrated that it can be done exceptionally so, because this movie plays so well.
Lucasberg
Lucasberg - 8/11/2026, 2:56 PM
@ObserverIO - Conversely: Jean's powers have always been exciting in comics and on screen. For this movie she created a lot of scenarios for wild visuals and psychological trouble for Peter Parker. From a movie going experience, what Spidey villain do you think coulda woulda shoulda done better and created greater draw?
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 8/11/2026, 4:04 PM
@Lucasberg - Well any of them if written right. But I think Feige's got the long game i mind and he wanted to introduce the idea of prejudice against mutancy at the same time as setting up an origin for one of the most important characters in the X-Men reboot, maybe even a pivotal character in the next saga.
TheJackAss
TheJackAss - 8/12/2026, 7:02 PM
@ObserverIO - No ones seeing this 4 Zendaya. They tried a movie once or twice where she was the only so called "star" & they FLOPPED
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 8/13/2026, 5:47 AM
@TheJackAss - Zendaya is undoubtably one of the biggest stars in Hollywood right now. She might not have been 3 years ago but she is now.

But it's more-so the combination of Zendaya with Holland that's driving this. I think that combo drives maybe 30% of internet traffic atm too
Nonameforme
Nonameforme - 8/11/2026, 6:47 AM
They thought up some cool scenes and worked a movie around them then?
heisei24
heisei24 - 8/11/2026, 7:42 AM
@Nonameforme - Surprisingly common in MCU
Nonameforme
Nonameforme - 8/11/2026, 7:44 AM
@heisei24 - that's sadly true
Mrnorth1921
Mrnorth1921 - 8/11/2026, 6:52 AM
If they keep going down this route? What’s next? Void vs Spiderman? Honestly that would be cool to see. If we’re just coming up with really cool ideas and making that into a movie. Then do it! Sentry vs Spider-man!
Hobmoblin
Hobmoblin - 8/11/2026, 7:32 AM
@Mrnorth1921 - I bet it would be Thor or Dead pool or Wolverine. They usually go with a character even grandpa knows is a part of the MCU. Iron Man,Nick Fury,Hulk. But NWH was more like a commercial for their next movie, hence Dr.Strange. So Sentry has a chance if they're pumping a Sentry movie or Thunderbolts sequel as the next big event.
OneMoreTime
OneMoreTime - 8/11/2026, 6:55 AM
Marvel Studios Spider-Man: Brand New Day 10 Stars / 10 Stars Masterpiece

User Comment Image
McMurdo
McMurdo - 8/11/2026, 7:17 AM
@OneMoreTime - they botched Jean Grey and made her a murderous sociopath who mind rapes without consent and of course no one in the movie gives a single shit that Banner ends up in a psych ward. But hey at least Holland was solid. So yeah 10/10.
OneMoreTime
OneMoreTime - 8/11/2026, 7:43 AM
@McMurdo -

User Comment Image
OneMoreTime
OneMoreTime - 8/11/2026, 8:01 AM
@McMurdo -

User Comment Image
TheFinestSmack
TheFinestSmack - 8/11/2026, 7:03 AM
Guess we never got a gray Hulk in BND like the scoopers said.
dragon316
dragon316 - 8/11/2026, 7:34 AM
@TheFinestSmack - do they feel stupid and foolish make stupid theries up nope they will continue make more be proved wrong time and time again
Shasvre
Shasvre - 8/11/2026, 11:19 AM
@TheFinestSmack - Jean was in his head, so I guess it was Grey Hulk. :P
Arthorious
Arthorious - 8/11/2026, 12:51 PM
@Shasvre - Ha I see what you did there!
TheFinestSmack
TheFinestSmack - 8/11/2026, 9:49 PM
@Shasvre - that's all it took to trick the scoopers 🤣
KennKathleen
KennKathleen - 8/12/2026, 12:02 AM
@Shasvre - User Comment Image

User Comment Image

User Comment Image
LittleSween
LittleSween - 8/11/2026, 7:11 AM
Just swap Jean with Mister Negative. Job done.

Really liked the film overall too, the best of the Holland movies I think, but personally would've preferred a spidey villain. Especially considering NWH used the Raimi and Webb antagonists.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 8/11/2026, 7:19 AM
@LittleSween - but edgy Jean from Stranger Things.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 8/11/2026, 7:33 AM
@LittleSween - that might have worked though Negatives mind control works differently then Jean’s which could have been changed and isn’t a big deal.

However if the intent was to make the character a teenager/young adult as Cretton said to reflect Peter’s character at the time then i feel Jean was the better choice.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 8/11/2026, 8:51 AM
@LittleSween - They "Didn't have the right character for that [mind-control] story." lol. They don't play video games I guess.
dragon316
dragon316 - 8/11/2026, 7:33 AM
Story my ASS all comic movies and books story and plot are always all that changes is characters he used goood vs bad gooood wins again predictable obvious they want excuse have another Spider-Man movie have it be with Spider-Man and his avenger friends same theme as usual nothing ever changes
YonnyLayna
YonnyLayna - 8/11/2026, 7:36 AM
And they already introduced 2 or 3 new characters on each movie on past movies on this movie more or less we have already an idea of who they were and we didn't need that much context.
TheRationalNerd
TheRationalNerd - 8/11/2026, 8:25 AM
Mr. Negative (also known as Martin Li) possesses superhuman physical traits, energy manipulation, and mind control powered by a unique connection to the extradimensional Lightforce and Darkforce.

Literally could've utilized Mr.Negative and would've had the same result.

Just saying.

ninerstreet
ninerstreet - 8/11/2026, 8:45 AM
@TheRationalNerd - you’re missing the point of the redemption angle. Would Mr. Negative have been able to control minds like Jean in the movie? Yes, but it’s Peter being able to help redeem Jean at the end that is the point. Peter having been where she is, having lost someone, and being able to help her through his experience. Being almost the, for lack of a better word, mentor type character to her, showing that he is now an adult and doesn’t need a mentor figure. Which now sets up Jean’s growth as a character in the upcoming X-Men movie rather than just starting out as a superpowered telekinetic mutant with no backstory like in the previous film versions of her.
TheRationalNerd
TheRationalNerd - 8/11/2026, 9:01 AM
@ninerstreet - okay, I hear you out and you're making a great post/point but why do we need to discover/set that up in a Spider-Man movie? Especially when Secret Wars literally resets the entire timeline and we are bound to have an X-Men movie AFTER that movie takes place? I feel like mutants were shoehorned into this movie to build up the next era of Marvel and that's fine but why shaft villains in his gallery that could've benefited some form of storytelling. Redemption isn't always relating to someone else. It could be the mere idea of changing an individuals way of seeing things. Mr. Negative is still an antagonist at the end of the day but Peter could've planted a similar seed to him within this story they were telling here.
Irregular
Irregular - 8/11/2026, 9:31 AM
@TheRationalNerd - "okay, I hear you out and you're making a great post/point but why do we need to discover/set that up in a Spider-Man movie?"

Because why the hell not? Why did we need Spider-Man, Ant-Man or Black Panther to be set up in Civil War? I mean because the same argument applies to that, where it feels like these heroes are shoehorned in right? But that "shoehorn" catapulted that movie to make over a billion dollars. They did it, because it WORKS. And honestly I don't think having X-Men characters in a Spider-Man movie is any different from having the Illuminati appear in Doc Strange 2...and Doc Strange, BP or Namor aren't even apart of the Illuminati oddly enough.

I also think you missed the point of the element of surprise, because isn't Mr. Negative a villain in the comic titled "Brand New Day?" How obvious would that be to audiences? Not to mention there is a lot more history and a lot more expectations that become built up but they could still lose that element of surprise. There is no telling Mr. Negative would have maybe helped the BO here, but I feel Jean Grey paid off regardless.

Even if some are just hellbent on having everyone know in the comments "they did Jean Grey wrong" because they need some sort of validation in their life...
TheRationalNerd
TheRationalNerd - 8/11/2026, 10:05 AM
@Irregular -

Why did we need Spider-Man, Ant-Man or Black Panther to be set up in Civil War? I mean because the same argument applies to that, where it feels like these heroes are shoehorned in right?

LOL! No, this is incorrect and your argument here is very opposite because of the prime fact that Captain America: Civil War is based on the "Civil War" story arc that features a huge ensemble of numerous characters. To be honest, they could've added more characters here to make the stakes even higher and different ideologies towards the superhero registration act resonate with the overall theme of the film.

But Mr. Fantastic and Charles Xavier are part of the Illuminati though? Chadwick passed away two years before that film released. Yes they could've used a different Black Panther actor here but the Illuminati is an actual group that has ties to Doctor Strange. The examples you're providing here are great but at the same time they contradict the fact that the characters have ties to the story arcs and groups you're using as examples.

I also think you missed the point of the element of surprise, because isn't Mr. Negative a villain in the comic titled "Brand New Day?" How obvious would that be to audiences?

LMBO!! Dude are you really serious? EVERYONE knew Jean Grey was in this film. I saw this film three times in the theaters and you barely got any shock factor when her name was revealed. There was little to none of a surprise, Steve Lacy literally spoiled her role in the film ON the Red Carpet. lol Every tabloid and comic book site relied heavily on her being Jean Grey. I gotta disagree with you here man, you're talking about box office and I'm talking about the story itself having the SAME effect with using similar characters in Spider-Man's gallery.

Irregular
Irregular - 8/11/2026, 10:24 AM
@TheRationalNerd - "LOL! No, this is incorrect and your argument here is very opposite because of the prime fact that Captain America: Civil War is based on the "Civil War" story arc that features a huge ensemble of numerous characters."

So you're saying SPIDER-MAN WAS NEEDED FOR SURE IN CIVIL WAR!? Like there was NO DOUBT his role was essential to the rest of the film, or was it just for an action sequence and to hype up a future Spider-Man movie? And first off, do you even know why Spider-Mans role in the comic was so important to begin with? I guarantee it wasn't just a flashy action sequence or to hype up a future movie...so again, same shit! Same with Black Panther, wasn't he BARELY apart of the main story and was only factored in once Giant Man died? Sure that was glossed over to hype him up for his own franchise pic though, right? My point exactly LOL.

"LMBO!! Dude are you really serious? EVERYONE knew Jean Grey was in this film. I saw this film three times in the theaters and you barely got any shock factor when her name was revealed."

WOAH! You mean in a country where you live in where there is MILLIONS OF PEOPLE, in a town where there is a HUNDRED THOUSAND, your consensus was that EVERYONE KNEW JEAN GREY WAS IN THE MOVIE!? Every single general audience member?? LMDO! Again I don't see any argument other than he can use mind control to "corrupt" people and that he's a Spidey villain? Lmao....yeah....GREAT ARGUMENT THERE 🫩🫩🫩🫩??
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 8/11/2026, 8:53 AM
Acting like they had a story and needed characters for it rather than a mandate to use certain characters and then needing a story for it.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 8/11/2026, 9:14 AM
A top three Spider-Man movie that loses points for adding Meager potatoes and this roll that could have literally been Mr Negative or any other person. People want to act like they had to use her because they had to redeem the person in the end, which would take 2 seconds of rewriting. I bet this was Avi Arads doing
User Comment Image
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 8/11/2026, 9:16 AM
I’m personally someone who didn’t mind this Peter having “mentors” such as Tony because Watts’s trilogy was a coming of age story/extended origin story that had Peter go from boyhood to adulthood basically so it makes sense to explore the latter more in BND…

Part of the reason that is so satisfying imo to see him just be Spider Man at his peak in this film is because we have seen his journey from the start where he was a more naive , inexperienced & less confident person and hero learning the ropes essentially.

User Comment Image

Also in regards to Bruce being in this film , it’s cool that we get to see the fight between him & Spidey with Punisher and Jean in the midst but like Jean & Frank are a reflection of Peter being alone and dealing with grief , Bruce is also someone who reflects the internal change that Peter is going through and the worry that he’s becoming a monster…

I honestly kinda wish they delved more into it then they did but it was enough to make it work fine for me in a film that i liked quite a bit overall!!.
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder