Clayface Has Officially Passed Its Break-Even Point At The Worldwide Box Office

Clayface Has Officially Passed Its Break-Even Point At The Worldwide Box Office

Clayface has officially passed its break-even point at the worldwide box office, after taking in a reported $56.6 million domestically and $52.4 million internationally...

By MarkCassidy - Nov 08, 2026 12:11 PM EST
Filed Under: Clayface

Clayface may not have been the smash hit DC Studios was hoping for, but the James Watkins-helmed horror movie has continued to perform relatively well over the past few weeks and has now passed its break-even point at the box office.

According to the latest updates, Clayface has now taken in $56.6 million domestically and $52.4 million internationally for a global total of $109 million.

This may sound like small potatoes when compared to other recent superhero movies, but with a reported production budget of $44 million, Clayface must now be considered a minor success for the studio.

The gruesome R-rated movie has most likely peaked, however, as Godzilla Minus Zero has stomped to the top of box office charts with $31.6 million from 3,254 theaters.

“We’re so happy to see audiences embrace ‘Godzilla Minus Zero’ at an unprecedented scale for an international film,” says Chance Huskey, VP of distribution for Gkids, which distributed the movie in the U.S. “This landmark release is the result of a thoughtful campaign by Gkids and Toho that emphasized the ‘must see’ intensity of the theatrical experience.”

Meanwhile, The Cat in the Hat took in just $10 million from 60 international markets for a global start of $30.5 million. The movie received an A CinemaScore, so there is still time for it to rebound; but with a $92 million budget, the animated adaptation will likely rank as another dud for Warner Bros.

We have heard that James Gunn and Peter Safran have tentative plans in place for more smaller-budgeted movies focusing on minor characters, but it remains to be seen if Clayface has performed well enough for Skydance to give them the go-ahead.

DC Studios’ first-ever foray into the genre, Clayface is a horror thriller from director James Watkins, starring Tom Rhys Harries in the title role of the Gotham City villain. Clayface unravels one man’s horrifying descent from rising Hollywood star to revenge-filled monster in a story that explores the loss of one’s identity and humanity, corrosive love, and the dark underbelly of scientific ambition.

The film also stars Naomi Ackie, David Dencik, Max Minghella and Eddie Marsan, as well as Nancy Carroll and Joshua James. James Watkins directs from a screenplay by Mike Flanagan and Hossein Amini, story by Flanagan, based on characters from DC.

Clayface is produced by Matt Reeves, Lynn Harris, James Gunn and Peter Safran, with Michael E. Uslan, Rafi Crohn, Paul Ritchie, Chantal Nong Vo and Lars P. Winther executive producing.

Clayface BTS Video Reveals Practical, Comic-Accurate Final Form Costume In Action
Related:

Clayface BTS Video Reveals Practical, Comic-Accurate Final Form Costume In Action

X-Men: Robert Aramayo Gives Interesting Response To Wolverine Question: I Am Working On Something
Recommended For You:

X-Men: Robert Aramayo Gives Interesting Response To Wolverine Question: "I Am Working On Something"

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4
PapaSpank54
PapaSpank54 - 11/8/2026, 12:48 PM
James Gunn's DCU everybody! The movie won't lose money!
asherman93
asherman93 - 11/8/2026, 12:52 PM
@PapaSpank54 - I mean, given that 2 of the three movies have been critical and box office successes, that's actually not too bad.
(Hell, that's pretty much the same way the MCU started - up to and including the second film(s) not doing too hot in spite of actually being underrated.)
Kahron0
Kahron0 - 11/8/2026, 12:57 PM
@asherman93 - Well according to most online comic book movie and cinematic universe fandom on the site, the MCU was a breakout runaway success from day one in 2008 with no bumps or underperformance or snares or negative developments within two years whatsoever…

So yeah 🫠
UltimaRex
UltimaRex - 11/8/2026, 1:23 PM
@PapaSpank54 - See you in 2036!
NotMyDiagnosis
NotMyDiagnosis - 11/8/2026, 1:42 PM
@asherman93 - you dont pull a 'box office success' from cinemas early in an attempt to recoup.

No matter what way you lot try and spin it, superman wasnt a 'box office success'.

cincymovieguy
cincymovieguy - 11/8/2026, 1:48 PM
@NotMyDiagnosis

Minecraft went to VOD after 39 days and made almost a billion at the box office.
NotMyDiagnosis
NotMyDiagnosis - 11/8/2026, 2:13 PM
@cincymovieguy - Sarandos noted that while 45 days is the standard self-enforced exclusive theatrical window, underperforming films routinely see that window shortened. He pointed out that Superman had a shorter window (moving to digital/PVOD around 35–36 days after release) compared to overperforming films like Sinners, which had their windows extended.

We all saw what Ted said but keep up the cope.
UltronIO
UltronIO - 11/8/2026, 2:21 PM
@asherman93 - The MCU had two successful Iron Man movies before Avengers blew up. The DCU doesn't have an Iron Man.

The Batman could be their Iron Man if Gunn would find the testicular fortitude to use him. Then retroactively their first film would have been a success.

Then Superman would be The Incredible Hulk, Supergirl would be Captain America and Clayface would be Thor.
Nope, that still sounds pretty bad actually, even with The Batman.
cincymovieguy
cincymovieguy - 11/8/2026, 2:45 PM
@NotMyDiagnosis

That’s a whole lot of words that don’t address my comment at all, lmao. Do you consider Minecraft a box office success?
NotMyDiagnosis
NotMyDiagnosis - 11/8/2026, 3:10 PM
@cincymovieguy - your original comment didnt ask a question and where in my original comment did i say minecraft was pulled to recoup?
cincymovieguy
cincymovieguy - 11/8/2026, 3:23 PM
@NotMyDiagnosis

“you dont pull a 'box office success' from cinemas early in an attempt to recoup.”

Straight from the OP, lol. Minecraft made 960 mil and was pulled early. I’m just asking if Minecraft was a box office success.
McMurdo
McMurdo - 11/8/2026, 3:25 PM
@Kahron0 - I mean are we pretending IM2008 wasnt lauded?
NotMyDiagnosis
NotMyDiagnosis - 11/8/2026, 3:28 PM
@cincymovieguy - “IN AN ATTEMPT TO RECOUP”

Minecraft could have been pulled early for various other reasons but superman was pulled to recoup. Why are you struggling with a simple sentence?
cincymovieguy
cincymovieguy - 11/8/2026, 3:48 PM
@NotMyDiagnosis

How much do you think Superman needed to be a success? It overperformed domestically and underperformed internationally. It did fine. Wasn’t huge, but it was absolutely profitable.

And it made more than every MCU movie that came out that year, lmao.

“Why are you struggling with a simple sentence?”

Because it contradicts Sarandos’ statement, lmao. Minecraft was huge. 960 mil on a 100 mil budget is a huge over performance and it was in theaters four days longer than Superman.
Kahron0
Kahron0 - 11/8/2026, 3:57 PM
@McMurdo - You forgot the part where I mentioned “….with no bumps or underperformance or snares or negative developments within two years whatsoever”

People here and in a lot of CBM online discourse have really short term memory. You would think since 2008 the MCU was at InfinityWar/Endgame/HomeTrilogy and Brand New Day/ Black Panther/ Captain Marvel/D&W levels of success constantly from the get go.

When in reality, Iron Man was a huge hit, Hulk underperformed and was panned critically, Iron Man 2 was another profitable hit but received worst reception than Iron Man 1.
NotMyDiagnosis
NotMyDiagnosis - 11/8/2026, 4:04 PM
@cincymovieguy - im not sure exactly how much superman needed to be a box office success as there are a number of budget theories flying around, I just know it was pulled early to recoup as confirmed by Ted.

Beating marvel in a year where their higest grossing movie was 521 mill isn't the achievement you make it out to be.

If superman made 900 mill and was pulled early then I'd be on your side but it made less than the previous superman film which everyone and their dog claimed underperformed despite having the same production budget .
Kahron0
Kahron0 - 11/8/2026, 4:04 PM
@UltronIO - If we went by how you are assessing the DCU currently without hindsight, wouldn’t the MCU have also been in serious jeopardy or at least there have been a lot of skepticism of its future in 2010?

At this point in time, all I had were two successful Iron Man movies, one of them being a smash hit cultural phenomenon that made Iron Man a household, and the other one being profitable, but it was critically pan and had a more mixed reception. Then you have the Incredible Hulk, which underperformed and also received mixed the poor reviews.

If we went by online comic book movie, toxic discourse, and the universe and Jeopardy, a family even back then because people, for some reason when it comes to assessing this cinematic universe are extremely hyperbolic.

Shoot, even after Synder left, the DCEU still went on for seven more years. The Monsterverse despite King of Monsters underperforming is still going on. Even the failed Sony Spider-Man verse lasted for 6 YEARS!!

I’m not saying that the DCU hasn’t made some poor choices (not having a Wonder Woman movie yet is insane, not to
mention everything that went wrong with Supergirl) or that it can’t be subject to being under scrutiny but a lot of the discourse surrounding it when you put it into consideration of other cinematic universes is extremely hyperbolic.

UltronIO
UltronIO - 11/8/2026, 4:05 PM
@McMurdo - In fact both Iron Man 2008 and Iron Man 2 were huge successes.

Iron Man 1 had a budget of $150M and made $585.8M.
Iron Man 2 had a budget of $170M and made a whopping $623.9M.
In 2008 and 2010! Before inflation!

That's the first and third film in the franchise. Compare that to Superman and Clayface lol.

Then the fourth film, Thor actually made $449.4M on a budget of only $150M.
Cap didn't do so well at the box office, but it set up The Avengers which became the third highest grossing movie of all time.

The DCU is not comparable at all.
FreddyH
FreddyH - 11/8/2026, 4:06 PM
@NotMyDiagnosis - You can't wish away facts just because they are inconvenient to your preferred narrative.

Superman left theaters after 12 solid weeks. That's not early.

Superman made $125-150 million in profit, according to industry professionals.

No matter how you try to spin it, Superman was a box office success.
UltronIO
UltronIO - 11/8/2026, 4:24 PM
@Kahron0 - lol no silly rabbit.

At this point in actual real time the hype for the MCU was rising like a [frick]ing ravenous beast! Iron Man was a monster hit outta nowhere, critically commercially, it became a pop culture phenomenon. The Incredible Hulk didn't hit as well. People didn't realize it was connected at this point. But by the time Iron Man 2 came out the need for it was palpable. There was a little kick back from fans because it wasn't as good as the first one and played like a 2 hr teaser trailer for Avengers, but the thing is that teaser trailer frickin worked because people got SO ENORMOUSLY HYPED for Avengers after Iron Man 2. The internet was on actual fire. The current MCU fandom was birthed with those two films. People were actually getting hyped for a Thor movie (which sounds normal today but it was weird as shit back then).

This is all because of the strategy. Marvel had a plan and we all knew it. At the end of the first movie they told us that we were building toward Avengers and the movies were all Avengers characters that would come together in that movie (Iron Man, Hulk, Black Widow, Thor and Cap were all introduced in a movie before the final 6th movie pulled them all together and added Hawkeye).

This isn't hindsight. This is the year 2010. Were you alive back then? The MCU was in a great place culturally and were the talk of the town commercially. They were already a success story in 2010. That's why Disney bought them! Do you not remember what it was like?!

DCU? LOL Nah. It's the complete [frick]in reverse of what Marvel was after three films. The complete reverse.
NotMyDiagnosis
NotMyDiagnosis - 11/8/2026, 4:46 PM
@FreddyH - you're loud and wrong lol. superman made an estimated 125 milion in profit from ancillary revenue which is unconfirmed by the studio and is only an estimation by variety.

It wasn't a box office success at all, the cinema chains get a cut.
dragon316
dragon316 - 11/8/2026, 5:44 PM
@NotMyDiagnosis - and fantastic four was ? Barley made small profit
LoudLon
LoudLon - 11/8/2026, 6:27 PM
@Kahron0 - The Incredible Hulk was considered to have underperformed and received mixed reviews -- and it was only the second MCU flick.
jst5
jst5 - 11/8/2026, 6:42 PM
@asherman93 - Umm Superman wasn't a box success.I have no idea why this keeps being said...
Loohnutick
Loohnutick - 11/8/2026, 7:39 PM
@UltronIO - Not to mention they had an actual plan. MCU at this point had Iron Man->Hulk->Thor-> and had a Captain America film leading directly to Avengers.

People who bring this early MCU reception thing up fail to realize Marvel started with their heavy hitters and made them big names later. They didn't start with Iron Man, a Fin Fang Foom horror film, a shitty Captain America TV show where Steve is a retired old man, a Red Skull court room documentary, etc.
TheJackAss
TheJackAss - 11/8/2026, 8:33 PM
@PapaSpank54 - now take away 50 % of its domestic total after paying back theaters & add marketing
TheJackAss
TheJackAss - 11/8/2026, 8:33 PM
@NotMyDiagnosis - now take away 50 % of its domestic total after paying back theaters & add marketing
TheJackAss
TheJackAss - 11/8/2026, 8:34 PM
@NotMyDiagnosis - clayface wont be a success
TheJackAss
TheJackAss - 11/8/2026, 8:35 PM
@FreddyH - now take away 50 % of its domestic total after paying back theaters & add marketing for superman 2025
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 11/8/2026, 9:33 PM
@Kahron0 - how dare you say the truth here and antagonize the marvel fandom
bobevanz
bobevanz - 11/9/2026, 8:43 AM
@PapaSpank54 -
User Comment Image
bobevanz
bobevanz - 11/9/2026, 8:45 AM
@TheJackAss - it already is
bobevanz
bobevanz - 11/9/2026, 8:47 AM
@NotMyDiagnosis - did you factor in VOD and merch? You just won't let this go will you lol
User Comment Image
bobevanz
bobevanz - 11/9/2026, 8:49 AM
CBM in shambles
User Comment Image
User Comment Image
User Comment Image
Alex49
Alex49 - 11/9/2026, 9:38 AM
@PapaSpank54 - imagine someone take you car,then wrecks it completely. Than you need to fix it and drive it at the same time, ofc you will massively struggle.

And then I come to sarcastically say "PapaSpanks's car everybody, it can barely roll, what a victory for his effort!"
NotMyDiagnosis
NotMyDiagnosis - 11/9/2026, 10:42 AM
You're asking if i factored in VOD & Merch into the box office revenue? I knew you were a bit slow @bobevanz but jesus christ this is a new low.....even for you.

We were literally talking about if superman was a success at the BOX OFFICE, ancillary revenue wouldn't be counted in the BOX OFFICE total goofy.
DirtWolf
DirtWolf - 11/8/2026, 12:50 PM
Whoop-dee-doo
Feralwookiee
Feralwookiee - 11/8/2026, 12:52 PM
Wow. A low budgeted WB movie from DC's new failing universe barely broke even!
What a triumph!

User Comment Image
Scarilian
Scarilian - 11/9/2026, 10:30 AM
@Feralwookiee -
It's also likely inaccurate.

$44m budget, 2.5x rough break-even of $110m

Even then the original budget is likely higher than reported. Initially they claimed it was around $30m, then there were reports of $40m, now they are saying $44m, I would not be remotely surprised if the actual budget was around $75m like the terrible Resident Evil movie they did recently.
WEAPONXOXOXO
WEAPONXOXOXO - 11/8/2026, 12:52 PM
Oh boy....this is going to ruin Josh's weekend...poor kid.
1 2 3 4

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder