Robert Pattinson Is Unlikely To Stay As Batman Without Matt Reeves, According To Some Reports

Robert Pattinson Is Unlikely To Stay As Batman Without Matt Reeves, According To Some Reports

Reports are dropping that Robert Pattinson is unlikely to continue as Batman without Matt Reeves. There is also the fact that he is the strongest pick for the next James Bond which could complicate things.

By GBest - Nov 13, 2026 09:11 PM EST
Filed Under: Batman

Reports have been arriving today that Robert Pattinson is unlikely to keep playing Batman after The Batman Part II if Matt Reeves is not part of the franchise. However, Pattinson has not said this himself, and the line is from reporter's own opinions rather than a quote from the actor. Reeves stepped away from the set in October for a family matter, but he said at the time that he was not leaving the film. Refer to the official post down below:

The Batman line is part of a longer column titled One James Bond Choice Makes Perfect Sense, in which Belloni argues that Pattinson is the most logical choice to play 007 in Bond 26.

What Was Written About Batman

Many have brought up Batman while addressing the idea of one actor playing both Bruce Wayne and James Bond. He wrote that "it would be weird and potentially cannibalistic for Batman and James Bond to be the same guy," but that The Batman Part II "may be Pattinson's last turn in the cape and cowl."

"Even before director Matt Reeves was temporarily replaced by Steven Soderbergh due to a personal issue, Reeves had fallen far behind on the project, which eventually pushed the release date to February 2028,"  Pucks Belloni wrote. "It's hard to believe that Skydance, and its new DC president, Jeremy Latcham, will go down that path again. Indulging a lengthy timeline on the company's number one franchise is probably not an option for the debt-laden Skydance. And without Reeves, Pattinson is unlikely to continue in the role, I'd guess."

Belloni did not cite a source for the Batman part of the column and framed it as his own read. Skydance announced on Monday that Latcham will become President and Chief Creative Officer of DC Studios on December 1, replacing James Gunn and Peter Safran, as covered in James Gunn And Peter Safran Exit DC Studios Amid Shakeup That Sees A Former MCU Executive Replace Them. Skydance has not announced any plans for a third film in Reeves's series.

We also covered some of this earlier today, with MarkCassidy writing about it on DCU Shakeup: Skydance Reportedly Wants The Batman Star Robert Pattinson To Stay On As The DCU's Dark Knight, in which Cassidy states, "If Pattinson does wind up landing the 007 role (we're still not sure if he's actually in the running or simply tested for the part), he will most likely hang up the cape and cowl one way or the other, but if not, there's every chance he could be convinced to stay on."

JoshWilding also wrote about the topic earlier on Robert Pattinson's Future As The Batman In Doubt — But James Bond Could Be What Decides It, giving his thoughts of how juggling Batman and Bond is not likely. Stating, "Pattinson is far more expensive than them, but is used to handling the pressure that comes with a big role and is obviously an A-list star.... If Pattinson gets Bond, then Batman likely falls by the wayside. However, that could be beneficial to Skydance, which is eager to monetise the DC Universe and would like to get the Caped Crusader on screen as much as possible moving forward. "

The Bond Reports

Last week, The Hollywood Reporter reported that Pattinson had screen tested for the role in London over the weekend of October 24, while filming The Batman Part II there. That report named Callum Turner, Jack Lowden and Josh O'Connor as others who tested, with Nicholas Hoult also in the mix. Amazon did not comment.

Belloni added new details today, citing 3 sources familiar with the dealmaking. According to his report, O'Connor and Lowden had to agree to 4 Bond films if chosen, while Pattinson brought his commitment down to 3 films and a much higher fee. Belloni also reported that former Bond producer Barbara Broccoli liked Pattinson for the role around the time No Time to Die was preparing to shoot, but lost interest once he was cast as Batman. He expects an announcement before Christmas, "barring hiccups." Amazon MGM has not announced its pick, and Denis Villeneuve is directing the film.

What Pattinson And Reeves Have Actually Said

Pattinson's most recent public comments on the sequel came in October, after Steven Soderbergh stepped in to finish principal photography. "I am so happy he's come on to help Matt," Pattinson told GamesRadar. "I think Matt had put so much work into the script, and we're almost done." Those comments are covered in The Batman 2 Star Robert Pattinson On "Incredibly Generous" Steven Soderbergh Stepping In To Finish Sequel. He has not spoken publicly about the Bond tests or about playing Batman beyond Part II.

Reeves wrote The Batman Part II with Mattson Tomlin. The cast includes Pattinson, Scarlett Johansson, Sebastian Stan, Colin Farrell, Andy Serkis, Jeffrey Wright, Charles Dance, Jayme Lawson, Gil Perez-Abraham, Sebastian Koch and Brian Tyree Henry, and the film is set for release in February 2028.

Would you want Robert Pattinson to keep playing Batman if Matt Reeves does not direct a third film?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

Who Is Jace Fox? The Next Batman's Comic History Before DC's Batman: Reign Of Assassins
Related:

Who Is Jace Fox? The Next Batman's Comic History Before DC's Batman: Reign Of Assassins

The Exorcist: Martyrs Test Screening Leak Hails Mike Flanagan's Movie As One Of The Scariest Ever Made
Recommended For You:

The Exorcist: Martyrs Test Screening Leak Hails Mike Flanagan's Movie As "One Of The Scariest Ever Made"

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Forthas
Forthas - 11/13/2026, 9:15 PM
While I have very much enjoyed Pattinson's take on Batman (much more than I thought I would), it is still a bit of a letdown from the Nolan Trilogy. Perhaps I am spoiled, but I will say that I do appreciate the fact that it is one of the films and TV shows that DC has made that clearly demonstrated that grounded, character-driven storytelling is the only way DC has any chance of succeeding. They are now on their third attempt at copying Marvel when they have 13 years, including 6 films and two TV shows of hard evidence as to the effectiveness of that approach that have only brought on balance positive buzz and profits. These productions have more billion-dollar films than any other set of DC films, and the TV shows have thus far garnered Emmy nominations. That, to me, is the legacy of the Reeves Batman films if this is in fact the last one.
MisterBones
MisterBones - 11/13/2026, 9:16 PM
He should be a Bond villain, not Bond. They’re so afraid to elevate or cast lesser known actors these days
China1975
China1975 - 11/14/2026, 3:24 AM
@MisterBones - In today’s climate, with casting, it would really be taking a chance on Sean Connery, and Roger Moore, basically unknowns. Until they were cast as Bond, of coarse Sean Connery, made a career after bond, he’ll his presence was almost bigger than Bond!

I remember when they cat Craig, I was one of those doubters, I totally could not see him as Bond! Then casino Royale came out, and man he killed it!

Regardless of who gets to play the new Bond, I hope they have a killer script, and epic villains that match classic villains, and modern ones like skyfall!
UceOmega
UceOmega - 11/14/2026, 6:51 AM
@MisterBones - I said the exact same thing. Bond villain is the way to go.
TK420
TK420 - 11/13/2026, 9:25 PM
Yeah, he's gonna be the new Bond. As a longtime fan of the series, I'm alright with it.
Matchesz
Matchesz - 11/13/2026, 9:26 PM
Henry Cavill as Bond
cincymovieguy
cincymovieguy - 11/13/2026, 10:48 PM
@Matchesz

His audition for Bond is laughably bad.
GunnIsDone
GunnIsDone - 11/13/2026, 11:32 PM
@cincymovieguy - Proof?
POWERDUDE
POWERDUDE - 11/14/2026, 12:08 AM
@cincymovieguy - I bet you’re seething the Gunn verse is dead. 😂 Glorious. 😂 I love watching you Gunn Glazers secretly boiling with rage. I feed off of it. Pure bliss. 😂It’s really pissing you off, isn’t it. 😂
cincymovieguy
cincymovieguy - 11/14/2026, 12:22 AM
@GunnIsDone

https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/s/Gtp79bufjj

@POWERDUDE

Seething so hard rn laying in bed after an amazing steak dinner.
Loverboy83
Loverboy83 - 11/14/2026, 8:23 AM
@cincymovieguy - Wow, this is an audition from God knows what time. Maybe we should remember this too?

?si=iGw34nLrjbD8BL07
Matchesz
Matchesz - 11/14/2026, 12:09 PM
@Loverboy83 - it was his Audition for Casino Royale which makes it probably 2005
cincymovieguy
cincymovieguy - 11/14/2026, 6:50 PM
@Loverboy83

Cavill isn’t a good actor, lmao.
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 11/13/2026, 9:32 PM
I expect Steven Soderbergh to be brought on as a co-director for Part III like how Mattson Tomlin co-wrote the script for Part II after making some last minute changes to the first movie's script. As for Pattinson, he likely signed a 3-picture deal so whether it's Reeves directing alone, co-directing with Soderbergh, or taking a step back and only working on the script, Pattinson is contracted for a 3rd movie when Skydance decides to make one.
Ocelot
Ocelot - 11/13/2026, 11:13 PM
@TheJok3r - Part 3? LOL! Pattinson is already out and trying to be Bond.

There will be a new Batman cast by 2028
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 11/14/2026, 12:00 AM
@Ocelot - Pattinson can film multiple movies in the same year, just as he did while filming the first Batman movie. There is also the fact that he is under contract for 3 movies. The issue isn't getting him to star in another movie; they want him locked in long term for 10+ other movies.
UltronIO
UltronIO - 11/14/2026, 5:31 AM
@TheJok3r - I wonder whether his contract stipulates that Reeves must be involved or not.
Batmangina
Batmangina - 11/13/2026, 9:33 PM
I totally support him as Bond over that lame ass drawn out slow as [frick] Batman.

Cavill would also kill it as Bond.

They [frick]ed up 20 years ago by not casting Idris Elba as 007 and no one will convince me otherwise.
TheWinkler
TheWinkler - 11/13/2026, 10:56 PM
@Batmangina - Elba would've been an extraordinary Bond, man.
Gambito
Gambito - 11/13/2026, 9:34 PM
He’s gonna be amazing as Bond, in a world where social media has killed cinema having an actual box office draw as one of the biggest characters is a no brainer! Money printer right there although he must get muscle this time
Pampero
Pampero - 11/13/2026, 9:50 PM
Matt Reeves has proven difficult to work with. They should just end the saga with the second film. Pattinson should be Bond.
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 11/13/2026, 10:40 PM
@Pampero - Skydance just extended his first-look TV deal he had with HBO, so the guy isn't going anywhere.
China1975
China1975 - 11/14/2026, 3:34 AM
@Pampero - besides the obvious delays and family situations with the Batman 2, I haven’t heard about difficulties with work with Matt Reeves. Are there production stories that you’ve heard, or read? I’m honestly curious, not talking shit, or trying to be condescending

I suspect that directors that are probably protectionist, could be seen as different, and difficult. But will be given latitude if their projects make money!
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 11/13/2026, 9:52 PM
Jeff Sneider believes that Pattinson is using Bond as a way to get a better deal for Batman if Skydance wants him re-up his Batman contract after Part III. If this is indeed what is happening, I can't help but believe that his main condition will be to not only keep his version of Batman separate from the upcoming Grandmaverse, but to also remain the only actor playing Batman in live action. In other words, no Batman sharing the screen with other heroes. Considering he is slowly but surely becoming the Christopher Nolan of actors in terms of people going to see movies for the sake of seeing him on screen, I can't help but believe Skydance will cave to his demands in order to keep him on board. Simply put, both Skydance and DC need him FAAAAAAAR more than he needs them.
MarvelZombie616
MarvelZombie616 - 11/13/2026, 11:43 PM
@TheJok3r - You lost me at Jeff Sneider.
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 11/14/2026, 12:04 AM
@MarvelZombie616 - It's just speculation on his part, which isn't out of the realm of possibilities, as directors and actors do this all the time. If they want a bigger pay check or better terms in their next contract, they start looking around at other franchises from rival studios to force their employer's hand. DC on film is on fire and Skydance is bleeding money, so Pattinson currently holds all the cards. If they wait to renegotiate with him AFTER he lands the role of Bond, then his conditions will be even harder to meet. If they wait even longer and Batman II makes over a billion at the box office, then that's even more power on his side. Simply put, Skydance needs to give him what he wants before he becomes out of reach. Will they still get their Batman III with him ? yes, as he's already under contract for that; the issue is that they want him long term well after that trilogy wraps, which requires a new contract. Pattinson is in a far better position today than he was when he first signed on, and he's getting better by the year, so the longer they wait, the more they will have to give up.
Lokiwasright
Lokiwasright - 11/13/2026, 10:35 PM
Skydance needs to start things fresh


User Comment Image
cincymovieguy
cincymovieguy - 11/13/2026, 10:47 PM
No [frick]ing shit.
Knightrider
Knightrider - 11/13/2026, 11:29 PM
No one knows. I doubt he’ll stay as I think they’ll do a clean reboot.

But NOT ONE of these so called scoopers knew Gunn was being fired even as they were negotiating with his replacement for a month.
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 11/14/2026, 1:24 AM
@Knightrider - CosmicBookNews has been talking about his firing for months now. I know people don't like that site here, but they get things right, and this was one of them.
Knightrider
Knightrider - 11/14/2026, 4:21 PM
@TheJok3r - Yeah, my gut feeling with that though is a situation of a broken clock being right twice a day. The merger was happening, so change in some form was likely, they just took a shot and got lucky.
MarvelZombie616
MarvelZombie616 - 11/13/2026, 11:46 PM
The Batman II will be the last movie of this Iteration, even if it clears a billion.

Matt Reeves takes too long and Pattinson is too good an actor and costs too much.

Make a Batman movie every 2 to 3 years.
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 11/14/2026, 1:25 AM
@MarvelZombie616 - "Make a Batman movie every 2 to 3 years."

Translation: make generic comic book slop like what the MCU, DCEU, and DCU have been shitting out for the past decade.
MrDandy
MrDandy - 11/13/2026, 11:59 PM
Duh
BeNice123
BeNice123 - 11/14/2026, 12:36 AM
meh
Yetiman
Yetiman - 11/14/2026, 2:07 AM
Plz be the next 007!
DocSpock
DocSpock - 11/14/2026, 2:28 AM

1) Pattinson is a good actor who is overrated.
2) Tell him goodbye. We need a FANTASTIC Batman.
3) He's not good enough to be Bond either.

Snorrrrrkkkk....


UltronIO
UltronIO - 11/14/2026, 3:50 AM
Well... he is doing. He's literally staying while Steven Soderbergh directs him right now. And Tomlin wrote the script. So does Matt only have to be involved in some small way, because if that's the case he could have done Clayface which was a 5th and Idaho production.

You could cut Matt Reeves out he'd still be Batman. Oh wait that's exactly what's happening right now!
Why
Why - 11/14/2026, 6:28 AM
He is the sort of actor that should absolutely be the villain. I'm sure he could nail Bond, but what else is there to do with the character that's of any real interest?

Jack Lowden is great in Slow Horses, which is almost a deconstruction of the spy genre. Would be fun to see him playing it straight as Bond.

As for Batman, we have so many great Batman movies already. If Part II is the end of Reeves' involvement, so be it. I am not optimistic about Skydance's involvement and, while I've enjoyed bits and pieces of the DCEU and DCU, the approach to DC has been a Trainwreck since the 90s overall. They were first out the gate with Superman and Batman on screen. Now it feels like they're nearly 20 years too late to the party.

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder