RUMOR: DEADPOOL & WOLVERINE Reshoots Add Even More Cameos; X-MEN Reboot Seeking POC To Direct

RUMOR: DEADPOOL & WOLVERINE Reshoots Add Even More Cameos; X-MEN Reboot Seeking POC To Direct

Another couple of X-related rumors here, and it seems the reshoots that are currently underway for Deadpool and Wolverine may be to add even more cameos to the movie...

By MarkCassidy - May 02, 2024 10:05 AM EST
Filed Under: Deadpool & Wolverine

According to recent reports, reshoots for Deadpool and Wolverine are currently underway, and could continue until the end of the month.

Additional photography is pretty much the norm for any major studio blockbuster, but some fans still tend to assume the worst. While it's true that reshoots can often alter significant plot points/character arcs, more often than not, it's something much more trivial.

According to Daniel Richtman, the D&W reshoots are mostly to add even more cameos. Marvel Studios and director Shawn Levy are pleased with the movie, and aren't attempting to "fix anything."

There's been some concern that the Merc With a Mouth's MCU debut is already shaping up to be too much of a "cameo fest," so we're not sure how well this update will sit with fans - although we've heard that most of the surprise appearances will happen during the same sequence, which might well turn out to be a parody of superhero movies that tend to cram as many characters in as possible.

In a related rumor, MTTSH has heard that Marvel Studios is looking for a POC (person of color) to direct the upcoming X-Men movie. This follows a previous rumor that claimed Mufasa: The Lion King director Barry Jenkins could be on the studio's radar to take the helm of the long-awaited reboot.

Marvel has been taking pitch meetings with writers since late last year, and recent reports indicate that we are very close to finding out who will pen the script for the project. Once a scribe is in place, the studio will turn its attention to a director - but there's a decent chance Kevin Feige and co. already have a list of filmmakers in mind that they feel could be the right person to bring the iconic mutant heroes back to the big screen.

In addition to Ryan Reynolds and Hugh Jackman in the title roles, Deadpool and Wolverine will see Morena Baccarin (Vanessa), Leslie Uggams (Blind Al), Rob Delaney (Peter), Brianna Hildebrand (Negasonic Teenage Warhead) And Shioli Kutsuna (Yukio) return as their respective characters, and they'll be joined by franchise newcomers Emma Corrin (The Crown) and Matthew Macfadyen (Succession), who will play a TV agent and Charles Xavier's evil counterpart, Cassandra Nova.

A recent synopsis for the movie reads: "After facing some professional setbacks while going through a midlife crisis, Wade Wilson decides to officially retire Deadpool and becomes a used car salesman. But when his friends, family, and the whole world are at stake, Deadpool decides to bring his katanas out of retirement. He recruits an unwilling and wary Wolverine to not only fight for their survival, but ultimately, their legacy."

Shawn Levy directs Deadpool and Wolverine from a script by Ryan Reynolds, Rhett Reese, Paul Wernick, and Zeb Wells.

The movie is set to open in U.S. & Canadian theaters on July 26, and will be available in IMAX, RealD 3D, Dolby Cinema, 4DX, Cinemark XD and premium screens everywhere.

DEADPOOL AND WOLVERINE Is The Only Positively-Reviewed Comic Book Movie Of 2024
Related:

DEADPOOL AND WOLVERINE Is The Only Positively-Reviewed Comic Book Movie Of 2024

DEADPOOL Joins Forces With Kidpool And WONDER WOMAN Star Lynda Carter For SickKids Campaign Video
Recommended For You:

DEADPOOL Joins Forces With Kidpool And WONDER WOMAN Star Lynda Carter For SickKids Campaign Video

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4 5 6
Doomsday8888
Doomsday8888 - 5/2/2024, 10:08 AM
Told ya it was for more cameos.

Who do y'all hope they got?
Goldboink
Goldboink - 5/2/2024, 10:15 AM
@Doomsday8888 -

User Comment Image
Doomsday8888
Doomsday8888 - 5/2/2024, 10:24 AM
@Goldboink
Ya reckon i'll finally get to see Cavill's Superman in this movie as well??? :')

HAIL HYDRA!!!!
harryba11zack
harryba11zack - 5/2/2024, 10:52 AM
@Doomsday8888 - Michael B Jordan as the OG human Torch would be.... Fantastic.
BigPhilbowski
BigPhilbowski - 5/2/2024, 11:00 AM
@Doomsday8888 - hear me out. You see the figure of a man cast in shadow. Music hinting at the superman theme to reveal Cavill standing there. He rips open the shirt and just before we see the "S" he gets decapitated by Wade. Followed by "wrong universe dickhead"
Vigor
Vigor - 5/2/2024, 11:32 AM
@Goldboink - hope they spend 20 mil and are adding that hulk vs wolverine fight we all want to see
Goldboink
Goldboink - 5/2/2024, 11:49 AM
@Vigor -

User Comment Image
Pathogen
Pathogen - 5/2/2024, 11:51 AM
@harryba11zack - Nah. He sucked.
marvel72
marvel72 - 5/2/2024, 10:08 AM
User Comment Image
Doomsday8888
Doomsday8888 - 5/2/2024, 10:11 AM
We all agree that the skin of the director should NOT be the main criteria for hiring em to direct X-Men, right?

I'm not addressing the dumbass people here but the smart ones. :3
bobevanz
bobevanz - 5/2/2024, 10:13 AM
@Doomsday8888 - it isn't true, it's rage bait for the usual suspects lol
Doomsday8888
Doomsday8888 - 5/2/2024, 10:17 AM
@bobevanz
Yeah, the point still stands tho.

Plus, tbf, it wouldn't be THAT strange.
SATW42
SATW42 - 5/2/2024, 10:24 AM
@Doomsday8888 - it's a scoop from what seems to be a rage baiting twitter user. It's the most random thing to report on
mountainman
mountainman - 5/2/2024, 10:33 AM
@Doomsday8888 - It really doesn’t matter what the race (or sex or sexuality) of the director is, as long as they are up to the job.
Doomsday8888
Doomsday8888 - 5/2/2024, 10:36 AM
@SATW42
Shitty ass way to get clicks, I agree.

@mountainman
User Comment Image
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 5/2/2024, 11:00 AM
@Doomsday8888 - Nope it shouldn't dictate it, there is a mild argument only that something associated with the civil rights movement having someone more sensitive at least to the standpoint of the black perspective of that could handle the race relations aspects between humans and mutants a tad better potentialy for the first movie but it being a requirement to be a black director certainly no, a preference maybe but not an essential criteria.

I would however argue that maybe a good black director would be more likely to keep the characters source accurate in appearance unless a very good reason to change. I could imagine that a white director may be prone to feel the need to force in changes and handle it poorly as they could feel more pressure to increase diversity (or at least do it badly by changing character rather than looking at who could be added) than a black director may from a human psychology POV.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 5/2/2024, 11:06 AM
@Doomsday8888 - And yes, think it is just a shitty ass way to get clicks, maybe they are looking at all available black directors as well but seriously doubt they are ONLY looking at black directors. There may not even any bias in black/white and just doing due dilligence to ensure they at least consider non white ones then weigh up who is best without leaning more one way or another in regard to race but the slightest whisper of any concerted effort to consider non-white/male options (even if the first choice is a white dude) will always be ellevated and twisted for clicks these days.
Kadara
Kadara - 5/2/2024, 11:23 AM
@Doomsday8888 - DEI is the vogue term to fear so off course it's going to attract all the ignorant people. End of the day, reasonable people know that qualification is what matters, although politics and nepotism get in the way.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 5/2/2024, 11:37 AM
@Kadara - Yeh, I do feel nepotism or always putting friends first for choices is oft WAY more a problem than anything else. That isn't to say directors having go to actors they oft hire who are good and can work well isn't unreasonable but it CAN be an obstacle and CAN cause way more issues than a directive to consider other available choices (even if keeping the close friend/family member under consideration). In some circumstance can mean so-so creatives keep getting better and better gigs than those with more talent due to the whole it is who you known not what you know skew.
krayzeman
krayzeman - 5/2/2024, 12:10 PM
@Apophis71 - What you have just described is DEI=Diversity, Equity & Inclusion which is totally fine. Considering non-white candidates just to make sure the field is exhausted for the best candidate is exactly what the definition of this is. Dont let the media dictate the "DEI" term as racist or the most overused term in history "woke." The BEST will come if you exhaust all options and consider perspectives you wouldnt normally have in regular means.
Origame
Origame - 5/2/2024, 12:35 PM
@Doomsday8888 - exactly what I've been saying. Really don't see how this could be a controversial take, but welcome to 2024, where the sh!t people like Martin Luther King were fighting against is now being called "progressive".
Origame
Origame - 5/2/2024, 12:39 PM
@krayzeman - that is objectively untrue. DEI by its very definition is about diversity for diversity sake.

Let me ask you, if they genuinely didn't consider skin color, and in the end is all white people being hired, would that be fine? The answer is no, according to DEI. Because it's not diverse, it's ignoring equity (which isn't equality fyi), and it's not inclusive.

But even then, in practice it is hiring based on skin color and gender. Hence why disney has literal diversity quotas.

https://reimaginetomorrow.disney.com/assets/ABC-INCLUSION-STANDARDS-ONE-PAGER-6-16-21.pdf
Malatrova15
Malatrova15 - 5/2/2024, 12:44 PM
@Doomsday8888 - we do not agree POCs are amazing
DarthOmega
DarthOmega - 5/2/2024, 2:50 PM
@Origame - there are companies abandoning DEI. In part because of lawsuits. Surprise Surprise it seems as if excluding the applications from entire populations might be illegal. Also incredibly racist.
Origame
Origame - 5/2/2024, 3:27 PM
@DarthOmega - yeah. I get that they're trying to help, but the road to hell is paved with good intentions
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 5/2/2024, 3:41 PM
@krayzeman - I'll be honest, can't be bothered checking into exactly how DEI is applied in practice in America but know that was/is the concept behind it...

...UK version was basicaly companies are supposed to collect blind data on applicants and employees, there is no dictate on employment quotas. That data is then supposed to be used to address issues if for whatever reason that there are retention issue for some groups or there is a lack of diversity in those applying (not to force who is hired) such as reaching out to under represented groups to encourage more application with advertising strategies or going into schools with a high ratio of under represented groups...

..but it is still down to best applicant gets the job with most companies employing some form of points system to try and minimise interviewer bias (not just on race/sex but all aspects, even white applicants such a regional dialect or class background). That isn't to say there aren't laws against discrimination cos there is but as long as a company can show they have engaged in good faith efforts to reach out to under represented groups and there is no evidence of discriminatory practice they are in the clear on all that even if they do not have a diverse workforce. It may however mean that members of an under represented group may have a better than average chance of getting an interview, but no actual advantages in chances of being hired.

Some companies may try and set quotos to avoid scutiny on hiring practices etc but not how it is supposed to work or how most go about trying to address equality issues, but that probably means there are a ton of issues going on at those companies that they don't want ANY eyes on them for ANY reason and nothing to do with good faith DEI (if anything likely the opposite).
DarthOmega
DarthOmega - 5/2/2024, 4:02 PM
@Origame - I'm not convinced they are trying to help. They get social credit from the audience and actual credit from Black Rock. This is all about optics.
krayzeman
krayzeman - 5/2/2024, 4:31 PM
@Apophis71 - I dont think there is going to be a catch-all solution that can make everyone happy. Even when you so called hire the "best" candidate you are basically still at the whim of who does the hiring and whose to say they are or are not biased? Also I there are companies that DONT practice good faith hiring and then the practice of DEI gets blamed as the new catch-all "race hiring" practice. Nothing in Diversity, Equity and Inclusion infers race no matter how much the certain media wants to characterize it. If a company is hiring because of race thats a COMPANY PROBLEM not DEI. I have a feeling we're gettin way off subject thoguht...lol
krayzeman
krayzeman - 5/2/2024, 4:41 PM
@Origame - Yeah that sounds like media regurgitation to me. If you look up the definitions of "Diversity" "Equity" and "inclusion" where do you see race involved with any of those words. If there were 3 white men one from Philly, one from Iowa and one from Los Angeles interviewing for a job in Los Angeles DEI would pose the fact that the person doing the hiring would have to consider the best person for that position not just the guy from Los Angeles. That has nothing to do with race. If a company falls back on DEI to make bad faith hiring then thats the fault of THE COMPANY not DEI. DEI by its definition includes all backgrounds, whether you are old, young, have long hair, tattoos, etc not just race to get the best in a situation. Thats why some companies apply it in their business because it works. The media defining it as strict race base and not considering those other factors I just named is inherently RACIST!
Origame
Origame - 5/2/2024, 5:03 PM
@krayzeman - again, read my link. That's directly from disney highlighting exactly how they define diversity.

Also, come on. No one thinks it's important to make sure people from different states are represented and you know it. Also, where's the equity? And who's not being included?
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 5/2/2024, 6:17 PM
@krayzeman - Agree on all counts

As always folk will selectively pick examples that fit a narrative ultimately even if that is the exception not the norm, or entirely twist the meaning of stuff around such as the word black folk created a century ago to describe being awake to the reality of injustice that is now thrown out willy-nilly for effectively the exact opposite :D
HashTagSwagg
HashTagSwagg - 5/2/2024, 10:14 AM
Stupid idea to cut off your pool of talent because of skin colour but after MOM I'm convinced that it wont matter who they get to direct. If the writing is shit then no one is going to give a shit.
1 2 3 4 5 6

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder