Resident Evil: Does Zach Cregger's Reboot Include A Post-Credits Scene? Here's Your Spoiler-Free Breakdown

Resident Evil: Does Zach Cregger's Reboot Include A Post-Credits Scene? Here's Your Spoiler-Free Breakdown

Sony Pictures and director Zach Cregger's Resident Evil movie is about to hit theaters, and if you want to know whether it's worth staying in your seat until the credits have rolled, right this way...

By MarkCassidy - Sep 17, 2026 01:09 PM EST
Filed Under: Horror
Source: Via GameFragger.com

Zach Cregger's Resident Evil hits theaters this Friday (it opens in some locations later tonight), and there have been conflicting reports from early test screenings about whether the movie will feature a post-credits scene.

Though we're not going to go into much detail, there will be some mild spoilers from this point on.

Somewhat surprisingly, the reboot does not include a stinger, but it does end on a pretty big cliffhanger that leaves the door open for a sequel (we'll share a detailed breakdown soon) should Sony Pictures decide to keep the franchise going.

The ending also features a very recognizable nod to the games.

Resident Evil looks set for an $80 million opening at the worldwide box office, and with highly positive reviews (it's currently sitting at 97% on Rotten Tomatoes), there's every chance that the $75M budgeted movie will be successful enough to warrant a follow-up.

The question is, would Cregger return to direct?

The filmmaker could be persuaded to helm a sequel, but the backlash he's received from some fans may factor into his decision, and he did indicate that he might be done with franchises after this movie during a recent interview with Deadline.

"I have never been approached by another franchise. Maybe I have, but it would never get to me because I have been very clear that I’m not doing that. I’m doing this, and that’s it for me," Cregger said. "So I’m not going to go tackle any other franchises — just because I’m a writer, and I want to write whatever I want to write. I don’t want to write something where I have to make sure I’m tagging different data points to satisfy X. I just want to satisfy me."

"And the only reason that I think Resident Evil is OK for me to do is because I’m enthusiastic about the games and I like the story that I thought of with the games and I’m making it for me. I think this movie is cool, and I hope it checks the fan boxes because I’m a fan and I’m checking my boxes. I’m making the Resident Evil movie that I wish existed, so I can do that with a clean heart and a clear conscience and not feel like I’m getting f**ked by some weird industry thing."

You can check out our review here.

From the mind of visionary filmmaker Zach Cregger (Weapons, Barbarian) comes a thrilling — and terrifying — reinvention of the Resident Evil franchise. In an all-new story, Resident Evil follows Bryan (Austin Abrams), a medical courier who unwittingly finds himself in an action-packed, non-stop race for survival as one fateful, horrifying night collapses around him in chaos.

The cast also includes Zach Cherry, Kali Reis, and Paul Walter Hauser. Cregger directs from a screenplay he wrote with Shay Hatten, and producers include Robert Kulzer, Zach Cregger, Roy Lee, Miri Yoon, Carter Swan, and Asad Qizilbash. The executive producers are Oliver Berben, Victor Hadida, Richard Wright, and Robert Bernacci.

Do you plan on seeing this one on the big screen?

Call Of Duty: Modern Warfare 4 Trailer Introduces Doctor Strange Star Mads Mikkelsen As The Lead Villain
Related:

Call Of Duty: Modern Warfare 4 Trailer Introduces Doctor Strange Star Mads Mikkelsen As The Lead Villain

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Malatrova15
Malatrova15 - 9/17/2026, 1:52 PM
El teporingo hahahhaa
Vigor
Vigor - 9/17/2026, 1:58 PM
I respect him and his vision more and more every interview.
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 9/17/2026, 2:05 PM
If a sequel can't be made by Zach Cregger himself, then it shouldn't be made at all.
Feralwookiee
Feralwookiee - 9/17/2026, 2:12 PM
I've never been a big fan of horror flicks because I find 98% of them pretty dimwitted with no genuine suspense or surprises, but I was always a fan of the games.
I'm checking it out Saturday, and while I know there's no Leon or Jill etc, I'm hoping it's close to the spirit of the games.
MahN166A
MahN166A - 9/17/2026, 2:24 PM
Nah, he isn’t coming back. There a members of the fan base who wax themselves as “die-hard”, that complained about his interviews or what they saw with trailers that they can’t be convinced of giving it a chance but will bash on it. Meanwhile they’ll watch fan films made by Residence of Evil such as Resurrection and go: “THIS IS RESIDENT EVIL!”
“Better than anything Hollywood has ever produced”.

They saw what “Dave/Arklay” could have brought in terms of a proof of concept and LOVED THAT (even when it had none of the main characters from the games but its set in that universe). But they can’t grasp Cregger’s attempt as a possible win for the franchise. Snow, iPhones and all.
ferf
ferf - 9/17/2026, 3:35 PM
@MahN166A - his interviews were annoying because he clearly had no idea what he was talking about and just bluffed his way through making a horror movie tenuously connected to the games. he started by telling us that leon was on the other side of town, which would be cool and fine, but then changed the setting, year, mythology, etc. to the point that it is irreconcilable with the games. for no reason other than not really giving a shit. he could have made this same exact movie and even kept it a resident evil movie if he just made it a different city and removed the dumb shit like "Leon S Kennedy gun shop"
MahN166A
MahN166A - 9/17/2026, 3:56 PM
@ferf -

I would say that that would be yours and most of the fan base’s fault for taking him at face value from him saying, “I’m a fan of the games”, to that degree. And we have seen it all numerous times where a film or random script gets inserted into a franchise to sell a movie. This isn’t new.
Especially when you have all seen and heard Paul Anderson say the same thing and when Johannes Roberts said the same thing as well and you still got dog shit adaptations.

Like….you didn’t see this coming with Cregger’s??

And for all intents and purposes they could be fans. But that doesn’t make them as dedicated as most to know EVERYTHING regarding the lore. They just played a few games and were like, “Ah! Yes, Resident Evil! I definitely could make a movie about that.”
Paul Anderson, enough said.
Roberts was the worst of them cause he gave us the Mansion and Raccoon Incidents, all familiar set pieces, the characters we wanted but completely missed the mark with everything about it all.
And a lot of you wanna cry about the snow, or the fact that he is using current technology when its supposed to be September 1998. Or that we aren’t getting any characters from the main games during the Incidents. When anyone who actually truly pays attention to the lore knows that the main character(s) of the franchise are Ozwell Spencer and the Umbrella Corporation. But no one is ready to have that conversation.

And speaking of Leon S. Kennedy…..

You’re drawing the line over a gun shop named after him?

We are never going to get a straight 1:1 adaptation. Just learn to accept that.
You’ll be less disappointed in the future.
Scarilian
Scarilian - 9/17/2026, 6:07 PM
@MahN166A -
My introduction to Resident Evil was through the Paul W. S. Anderson films so I'm open to interpretations that don't really stick to the source, but this doesn't really grab me as even having a tiny connection to the Resident Evil franchise.

I'm guessing he pitched this as a low budget zombie horror survival movie and the studio decided to slap 'Resident Evil' on it due to a lack of faith in original movies as a whole. The notion that this was originally a lot more comedic also leans towards the notion that they were trying to find ways to sell the original concept which led to the branding.

From an original movie perspective the trailers don't really make it feel like there will be a story, as opposed to a series of set pieces, that could be down to the marketing yet I've seen films like that before so wouldn't put it past them.

Even the main moments feel kinda derivative of other media such as the notion of a multi-humanoid limbed antagonist (Mannequin spider from Silent Hill: Revelation) the zombies jumping off the roof (Marvel Zombies). This doesn't exclude them being done again differently but it's a 90 minute movie so not sure if it has much more to offer.

User Comment Image

I'm curious enough to watch clips of it online, but I'm not really feeling like this is a 'need to see in cinemas'.
ferf
ferf - 9/17/2026, 6:21 PM
@MahN166A - yeah I’m not taking responsibility because I didn’t hire the twat, so I don’t see your point here. I certainly don’t have to watch it either
MahN166A
MahN166A - 9/17/2026, 6:41 PM
@ferf -

You definitely should take responsibility, since you believed what he and everyone else said prior that you went full in, thinking you were going to get what you wanted. Just because you can’t take personal accountability for how you received the information you were told and shown, doesn’t mean you didn’t see my point.
It means you are incapable of self-introspection.

And nobody said a damn thing about you HAVING to watch it.
Just go write some fan fiction, put it into a AI generator, watch YOUR head canon, and smile. That’s what a lot of people who don’t get their way seem to be doing.
MahN166A
MahN166A - 9/17/2026, 6:58 PM
@Scarilian -

You’re right on a lot of points.
I am with you. With prior films and series that were live action, I am not keen on the idea of spending money at a theater to see this.
Based on what we were shown, it doesn’t convince me that it would be good, or at the very least to the standards that I set for myself in terms of what Resident Evil WOULD look like.
Could it give us that feeling that Cregger talked about of playing the original games? Possibly. The idea of setting the film around an NPC who has no experience such as Chris Redfield or Leon Kennedy is actually a smart idea when I think about it.

Not really worried about the comedic elements too much. Especially since we are “supposed” to appreciate the PS1 FMVs and Voice Actors inadvertently being funny. We literally watched a cutscene of Chris Redfield punching a boulder, and we got fans (not saying you) who would hate seeing comedy put in this? I am glad though that he had some realization to dial back in the excessive amount of it. Over-saturation definitely would have made it receive worse reviews. Whether he did it to secure funding or the title of the IP is just pure speculation.
And Cregger put out Barbarian and Weapons before this which were very successful financially and critically, all on their own so that to me defeats the theory that he needed the IP to get this movie off the ground (if it was an original piece).

Personally, Resident Evil doesn’t work as a film franchise. Its needs to be an episodic season with seasons devoted to various parts of the lore.
CaptainMexico
CaptainMexico - 9/18/2026, 2:09 AM
@ferf - angry nerds who are not confident enough to go to a theatre anyway. Most people who go to this movie will enjoy it, it’s a good time. Funny, creepy, classy nods to the games but still its own story and feeling like a resident evil story.
ferf
ferf - 9/17/2026, 3:38 PM
the live action commercial for resident evil: requiem remains the best adaptation if the franchise outside of the games
MahN166A
MahN166A - 9/17/2026, 4:14 PM
@ferf -

For what a 4 minute trailer could give us, you are absolutely correct.
Really wish they could have made that into a small episodic series of some sort.
MarvelZombie616
MarvelZombie616 - 9/17/2026, 4:49 PM
As a really big fan of the games, i was okay with the movie being only Resident Evil in spirit.

My only gripe with it is that it was way too funny and that a total idiot survives way too long on pure luck, weapons and plot armor.
From the point of the "vomiting zombie chokehold" i couldn't take the movie serious anymore.
I still liked the ending, but my 2 buddies did not.
8.5/10

I still like the Milla Jovovitch series better, even though they are not games accurate.
It's a guilty pleasure.

Welcome to Raccoon City was dogshit.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 9/17/2026, 6:59 PM
@MarvelZombie616 - That was pretty much the point that it dipped in quality for me too. It needed to get more serious then, but it went the other way.
Knightrider
Knightrider - 9/17/2026, 7:42 PM
I would have gone back to the roots, have a Special Ops team trapped in mansion. So remake the first but be less early 2000s about it
Hobmoblin
Hobmoblin - 9/17/2026, 9:29 PM
"SPOILER FREE" then immediately spoils the end of the movie by saying it ends on a cliffhanger. What a [foo foo].
Hobmoblin
Hobmoblin - 9/17/2026, 9:30 PM
@Hobmoblin - c. U. N. T.
MarvelZombie616
MarvelZombie616 - 9/18/2026, 2:06 AM
@Hobmoblin - It really doesn't end on a cliffhanger imo.

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder