No Bill Murray in Ghostbusters 3?!?

No to ghostbusters 3. It'll be a disaster. They waited too long, and besides, the first two were good by themselves. Didn't they see what happened with the terminator franchise? It was fine with two movies, and then boom, a third movie comes along and disgraces the whole franchise. Remember the franchise formula, kids:

1) The first film is perfect. It does not need a sequel.

2) A sequel arrives and we are completely blown away. The film sets itself up for a third movie, which we believe will be the best one yet.

3) The third film comes out either too quickly, or too late. The movie has bad scripting. The major characters are killed off or worse. Fans become disappointed and try to forget about the franchise.


and sometimes, 4) A fourth film is made a long time after the third, in an attempt from the studio, to make you forget about the previous movie's mistakes. The fourth entry tries to ensure you that it's better than the last, but ultimately fails, because after so long, it's lost the feel of the movies that came before it

Wheh! You scared me for a minute there! I thought they were making one without him, but he's just waiting for a good reason to make it, which is great!

I loved it when he got shot in ZombieLand. Anyway I'm cool with it. I don't want to see another one if the story looks like crap. He knows what he's talking about. BTW Bill there was nothing wrong with Garfield.

I would hardly say "No Bill Murray in Ghostbusters 3" since, in all reality, there is no Ghostbusters 3 to speak of. But the fact that he won't do it is certainly something.

YOU SAID IT BILL, THE GUY KNOWS HIS SHET.

You guys see Zombieland yet?

This doesn't mean anything. There IS a script, Reitman, Ramis and Aykroyd have confirmed they've seen/read it. Good things are being said about this draft.

Bill has said he'd do Ghostbusters 3. ONLY IF THE SCRIPT IS GOOD. And that's how EVERYONE feels, not just him. They want to do it justice.

I thought that they'd get the old Ghostbusters to get some new ones and train em'

I can understand this: Murray's grown as an actor, and if Ackroyd wrote the script it was most likely horrible. (That was the rumor about the last script Ackroyd floated for it, and historically, that guy writes horribly unfunny movies.)

If Ramis handles the screenwriting chores it could turn out okay an I'll be looking forward to it.

Bill's a good man, here's hoping the script is good so he comes back.
Also here's hoping there is no new class of ghost busters, I want the originals 100%

@Shaman, the new script hasn't even been out for that long, Murray's been busy with premieres such as this, and he isn't even one of the guy's involved with the script. Dan Aykroyd and Harold Ramis are though.

I believe that Murray here's just out of the loop.

why didnt he have this same standard for ghostbusters 2.

1Rocketeer- Huh... well that writing team sounds good to me. Hopefully it's just that Bill hasn't recieved a copy yet. Cause if he read it and is just simply saying that "there isn't one" in hiding his true feelings about the script, that would suck.

Damn straight Bill Murray, I loved him in Ghostbusters 1 & 2, Groundhog Day and Scrooged

And for Ghostbusters 3, they should have the old Ghostbusters realising they are too old for the job and have to train a new group of Ghostbusters but the new Ghostbusters should have a very small role that sets them up for a future movies where the younger Ghostbusters take over. A Ghostbusters 3 should primarly focus on the original Ghostbusters and it really needs to have the quality of the original movie even though I did like Ghostbusters 2

Bill was the only thing that didn't suck about Garfield. The CGI animated films are better than both live action!

I miss Bill.

BmanHall@Yeah wasnt it cant wait till it comes out on Blu-Ray
which could be in a few months

antz1104@Yeah like Tahllase says"You got to enjoy the little things"

Now I'm off to play Brutal Legend on Ps3

Peace Out