STAR WARS: THE LAST JEDI Director Rian Johnson Explains Why He Chose Not To Reveal More About Snoke

STAR WARS: THE LAST JEDI Director Rian Johnson Explains Why He Chose Not To Reveal More About Snoke

In a new interview, director Rian Johnson reveals why he chose not to delve any deeper into the origins of Supreme Leader Snoke. If you still haven't seen Star Wars: The Last Jedi yet, SPOILERS ahead...

By MarkCassidy - Jan 10, 2018 05:01 AM EST
Filed Under: Star Wars
Source: Walt Disney Studio Awards
J.J. Abrams' Star Wars: The Force Awakens introduced us to Supreme Leader Snoke, and while he was one of the more divisive elements of the film, fans were looking forward to discovering more about the mysterious new villain in The Last Jedi.

STAR WARS: THE LAST JEDI SPOILERS - Counting Down All Of The Biggest Reveals And Most Shocking Moments

However, Rian Johnson chose to take an unexpected route with the character, having him killed off before we had the chance to learn his backstory - essentially making him a plot device to fuel Kylo Ren's arc.

During a BAFTA Q&A session, Johnson explained why Snoke's origin was left deliberately vague:


“In this particular story, it’s much more like the original trilogy, where with Snoke if you think about the actual scenes, if suddenly I had paused one of the scenes to give a 30 second monologue about who he was, it would have kind of stopped the scene in its tracks, I realized. Even though it could have been interesting, something that fans were interested in, as storytellers, we have to kind of serve what the scenes need to be. It was a tough thing, even though I knew some fans were interested in it I also knew it wasn’t something that dramatically had a place in this movie. Hopefully it can be addressed elsewhere or even J.J. may address it in the next movie. But it’s not something that’s particularly interesting to Rey, so we kind of had to follow through.

There's a good chance we will eventually find out exactly who Snoke was and why he was so powerful with the dark side of the force, but it's more likely to be in a tie-in novel or comic than in the next film.

What do you guys think? Do you agree with Johnson's decision? Sound off below.
STAR WARS: George Lucas Scrapped Plans For A Bombshell Obi-Wan And Qui-Gon Twist In THE PHANTOM MENACE
Related:

STAR WARS: George Lucas Scrapped Plans For A Bombshell Obi-Wan And Qui-Gon Twist In THE PHANTOM MENACE

Daisy Ridley's STAR WARS Return Hit By Another Setback As Writer Steven Knight Parts Ways With Lucasfilm
Recommended For You:

Daisy Ridley's STAR WARS Return Hit By Another Setback As Writer Steven Knight Parts Ways With Lucasfilm

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
G
G - 1/10/2018, 5:55 AM
i.e. I couldn't think of anything, and I didn't want to, so I kicked that can down the road for someone else to deal with.

Lazy
rebellion
rebellion - 1/10/2018, 6:03 AM
@G - a competent filmmaker just gave you a valid explanation which you can politely disagree with. but no, he is a liar because you know better.
sure, dislike the movie if you want, but to say rian johsnon lacked imagination, and refused to think about snokes backstory during the entire preproduction/production period, just stinks of entitled, know-it-all, toxic, fanboysim.
Canon108
Canon108 - 1/10/2018, 6:13 AM
@rebellion - competent film maker? why was there a 40min subplot that ultimately went nowhere and had zero impact on the plot? Why did he completely negate every film that came before it and ruin the sequel trilogy by throwing out the groundwork laid out in VII? Cause that doesn't seem very competent to me.
BloodyBed
BloodyBed - 1/10/2018, 6:17 AM
@G - I guess you can’t read very well.

Do you really think a professional storyteller couldn’t come up with some backstory for an evil emperor? Lol.
right
right - 1/10/2018, 6:19 AM
@rebellion - how do you know youre not just a defensive fan? Film clearly has flaws that critics are ignored both as a movie and as star wars film
rebellion
rebellion - 1/10/2018, 6:21 AM
@Canon108 - yes, i liked his other movies, and thought this one was great (flawed, but still great). 40min subplot had its moments, but ultimately, didnt work. i didnt say the movie was flawless. i understand people who say it kinda ruined the experience for them. it's a valid complaint and a matter of taste. all cool.
i dont see how this negated things that came before. i see it as evolving the franchise. cant think of anything contradictory. also, what groundwork? also, there's still a movie left in the trilogy.
right
right - 1/10/2018, 6:21 AM
@BloodyBed - idk did he? No evidence of it
rebellion
rebellion - 1/10/2018, 6:26 AM
@right - i will do you the honor of being respectful, something you are clearly incapable of doing, judging by your comment below.

i'm not defensive, i acknowledge the flaws and respect that there are people who wanted something different. ultimately, good far outweighed the bad for me. for some people it's the opposite.

what i am against, and what absolutely disgusts me, is the toxic atmosphere on forum, fansites etc.

the attitude that 'if you like it, you're not a real fan'.
i find that to be immature and stupid.
EskimoJ
EskimoJ - 1/10/2018, 6:34 AM
@rebellion - PREACH!
right
right - 1/10/2018, 6:45 AM
@EskimoJ - I don’t go to church.
right
right - 1/10/2018, 6:47 AM
@rebellion - I didn’t say anybody wasn’t a fan, I called a newb a newb bc he’s a newb and lacks perspective especially with a movie that rehashes the old ones he hasn’t watched. Oh And being sassy passively insulting isn’t respectful ;3
megabatfan
megabatfan - 1/10/2018, 6:48 AM
@G - Preach brother... He's like, let an anthology film, comics or tv series deal with that... WTH!!! You know what was not needed? The casino planet scenes. Could've left that out and developed Snoke more
rebellion
rebellion - 1/10/2018, 6:51 AM
@right - it read as dismissive bullshit if you ask me. you would know all about sassy, wouldnt you?
BloodyBed
BloodyBed - 1/10/2018, 7:10 AM
@right - did he what?

Could he? Yeah, he could. The guy that wrote looper would have no trouble writing the backstory for an evil bad guy. Seriously, we all could come up with a decent backstory probably.

It just wasn’t needed, and I applaud him for not wasting our time with that. Wish he didn’t waste our time in the casino however.. my only real gripe with the film.

BUT it was perfect for a bathroom break. Maybe that was rian’s intention all along.
theFUZZ008
theFUZZ008 - 1/10/2018, 7:10 AM
@G - So, basically what J.J. did.
RivalSpy
RivalSpy - 1/10/2018, 7:11 AM
@G - Agreed, too many of Johnson’s decisions were just lazy writing. I don’t hate the film like many, I actually liked what they did with Luke. But it was a horrible script with a decent director.

Johnson has talents, writing isn’t one of them.
BackwardGalaxy
BackwardGalaxy - 1/10/2018, 7:46 AM
@G - The people who are lazy are the fans. The movie didn't do the things they wanted it to do, and instead of actually thinking about what it is, they dismiss it. That is the height of laziness and shallow thinking.
G
G - 1/10/2018, 8:30 AM
@rebellion - I'm sorry you were offended. Normally, I might agree with you, if it were just that one thing about Snoke. But it wasn't. It was the whole movie.

George Lucas had a plan. A storyboard. A general screenplay and structure for how things would play out. Sure, he tweaked and changed things as he went along over the years, but for the most part, he had his whole story mapped out. Kathleen Kennedy, JJ Abrams and Rian Johnson? No plan. No plan, whatsoever. JJ teed it all up with new characters, but had no plan. But, he set up certain things that could be expanded on. They gave Rian Johnson free reign to do whatever he wanted. And, Rian Johnson is making excuses. Each director and writer just keeps kicking the can down the road. There's no plan, and it really shows. They're just making it up as they go along, and each person is kicking the plot points down the road for someone else to address, because they don't want to touch it.

(SPOILERS!)

Snoke? Rian Johnson says it's not important. That's b.s. He's just kicking the can down the road. He didn't want to touch Snoke. I don't care what the director says. There's no other reason. He just didn't want to come up with anything.

Mazda and her story about the lightsaber? "A story for another time". Because JJ was lazy, and didn't have an idea yet. Kicked the can down the road? Rian kicked it again. Said "no thanks, me either".

Rey's parents? Rian Johnson says it's not important. Again, that's b.s. He kicked the can down the road, because he didn't want to touch it.

And, just a whole list of complaints from me. Everyone was disappointed that there was no reunion of Han, Luke and Leia in The Force Awakens. So, what does Rian Johnson do? He throws it in everyone's face, and does it again! He fails to do a reunion for Luke and Leia. Yeah, yeah, I get it. They had a "reunion", but not really, though. It was a cheat. A "sort of" reunion. It didn't really happen.

Everyone wanted to see Luke use a lightsaber. Did he? Again, it was a cheat. He "sort of" did (flashbacks, force projection, etc). Another disappointment. Rian Johnson didn't want to use a stunt double for an older actor. I say b.s. They did it for Christopher Lee several years ago, and it worked. They could have done it here, too, with even better results with technology now.

Force Ghost Yoda? What a disappointment. There was something "off" about this scene. The way he looked, and especially the way he acted. He was just acting goofy (Even by Yoda standards). I wanted to see a much more serious and in depth conversation between them. But for the most part, Yoda was just acting like an idiot. Missed opportunity. Oh, and hitting Luke with his cane? (WTF?) Ok, whatever.

Luke? Not my Luke Skywalker, that's for sure. Never left the island. Throwing the lightsaber over his shoulder. Breastfeeding himself off of an animal (sigh) WTF

No Knights of Ren, and no explanation of that scene from TFA of Kylo and the Knights standing in the rain over the dead bodies.

No Force Ghosts Obi-Wan and Anakin? I'm sorry, but I'll never understand this. This should have happened. I hate all the excuses for why they didn't do it. That will never make sense to me. Huge missed opportunity.

Rian Johnson didn't change anything in the ending regarding Leia because he wanted to "honor" Carrie Fischer's performance and leave it intact. Yeah, whatever, buddy. Again, that's a bunch of b.s. He totally used that as an excuse not to have to come up with anything to explain her absence in the next movie. You can't have it both ways.. either she's in the next movie, or she's not (She's not). So, therefore, it needs to be explained. Honoring her performance doesn't change the fact that she won't be there. It needs to be written into the story somehow. But he just kicked the can down the road again. He forwarded the problem to someone else.

This whole movie was just lazy writing, all the way around. I can't believe this movie was allowed to move forward. I was mortified. Kathleen Kennedy and Rian Johnson ripped the box out of our hands (with an "f-you" attitude), turned it upside down, and dumped all the toys out onto the floor. They stomped on and broke all the legacy characters, and whatever wasn't broken, they kicked down the road for someone else to pick up.

The movie was disrespectful and lazy.
nhoj3
nhoj3 - 1/10/2018, 8:44 AM
@rebellion - Actually everything I hear from RJ stinks of entitled, know-it-all director hubris. Here to say that the scene could not have possibly worked any other way, and again with Luke tossing the lightsaber over his shoulder saying that he couldn’t possibly think of any other honest reaction from the character in that moment. What sort of ego must someone have to rule out any other possibilities as being viable? The more he talks, the more I come to understand why I didn’t like TLJ.
TeeKay421
TeeKay421 - 1/10/2018, 8:48 AM
@G - did you like the movie tho?
Chaos200
Chaos200 - 1/10/2018, 8:56 AM
@G - Well said mate, well said.
Fogs
Fogs - 1/10/2018, 9:19 AM
@G - "Hopefully it can be addressed elsewhere"

And........ They DON'T have a plan. Not even 12% of a plan.
TeeKay421
TeeKay421 - 1/10/2018, 9:39 AM
@G - Hate doing this but your fanboy rage needed to be addressed.

1. Snoke isn't important, just like the Emperor in the original trilogy. We get a hint at of the Emperor in ESB and then a he's in ROTJ where he dies with no backstory... Sound familiar? The Prequels were don't count here because they were an afterthought of Lucas. I don't disagree the Johnson probably didn't want to come up with anything because it would have been pointless to the the story he was telling.

2. Maz* and the lightsaber was just a story tool to get the lightsaber into Rey's hands. Only fanboys really care how it got there, even though I am a fanboy I am also rationals so I can accept that we wouldn't get an answer to that, again it has no purpose to the story.

3. Rey's parents are not important. Period. It was never a mystery in the sense that most people make it out to be. They didn't tell you who they were in TFA, so people ASSUMED that they had some interesting backstory. I could care less about her parents. The fact that they included as plot point about them was purely fan service, because there was so much speculation on them. They say it like 10 time in the movie, “Let the past die” ie it doesn't matter.

4. Yes it was a missed opportunity not to reunite Luke, Han and Leia... but they've made it clear that this story isn't about them. They had their 3 movies and frankly I don't need to see trio of old heroes running around like its 1977. Time to move on.

5. Everyone wanted to see Luke with a lightsaber? Ok maybe we did, but the dude is 65 years old, what kind of fight did you want to see? Like a CGI Christopher Lee prancing around in AOTC? Screw that, they did something interesting and unexpected that I loved. CGI doubles should be a last resort and only if necessary, and for this story, we didn't need action hero Luke, you can watch ESB or ROTJ to see Luke fight.

6. I can sympathize with the Yoda critique, he did look a bit off, I think it had to do with the way the lit the puppet, certainly didn't break the movie though. And as far as him acting goofy, you seem to forget how Luke was first introduced to Yoda in ESB, goofy as hell. And sure he calms down after revealing himself, but I always felt like the force ghosts where sort of a figment of Luke's mind and that it makes sense for Luke to remember Yoda in that way. Also why the adding Hayden Christensen to ROTJ was so stupid, Luke never saw that guy before.

7. Irrelevant. This movie wasn't made for you, get over it.

8. Knights of Ren could always come back into the fold, but again this seems like a backstory thing that served no purpose in this story. The “scene” you're referring to was one shot in a dream sequence, hardly a major plot point in either movie.

9. You were expecting force ghosts, didn't get them, get over it. I'm glad there was no Anakin ghost, less prequel references the better. And Rian had mention that he considered using McGregor as a ghost but simply didn't find the right place to put him, I accept that, especially in the state that Luke is in in this movie, I don't think he'd want to see Obi-Wan. He speaks about him with a lot of disdain, also would make no sense to for him to see a young Obi-Wan when he only knew the old.

10. Very rational criticism. Why is it BS to want to leave an actress' last performance intact? Actors are people and they deserve respect especially after they die. You can cry about how you don't know where its going but that in no way means its lazy to honor her performance by not cutting it.

11. You sound like a child, probably are. I don't get how the entire point of the movie went over so many people's heads... It was meant to turn everything upside down, “Let the past die” they literally spelled out what they were trying to do. You don't own these movies, they aren't made to please you. You don't like it, get over it. Watch movies you do like. Like Star Wars...
Scarilian
Scarilian - 1/10/2018, 10:57 AM
@TeeKay421 -

1. A character who is 'not important' took the screen-time away from our main characters who needed development. Now the only thing you have to hype for with Episode 9 is Rey Vs Kylo again.

2. An unnecessary story tool with a cameo of a character nobody cares about to explain aspects that were not needed in both movies. Remove the light saber plot-line and Rey still would have been tasked with finding Luke due to exhibiting force powers.

3. Rey's parents was a mystery as established by J.J. he was brought on to create mysteries and the only non-repeated aspects of the Force Awakens are him creating mysteries.

4. If this movie series was not about them, then they should not have returned and been given so much focus that it distracts from the new cast.

5. Luke was a CGI double/CGI enhanced for most the end fight regardless.

6. In ESB it was used to take the audience and Luke by surprise. In TLJ it's done solely so Yoda can mess with Luke for no reason

7. This movie has no clear idea of its audience. It drags up the past to get people in seats, it does not focus on developing the new cast and it shoves in Porgs and tonally inconsistent humor to get the younger fans watching. If the movie does not have a clear focus then you certainly have no grounds in telling someone that the movie was not made for them.

8. They could, but they were important to Kylo's backstory and to have them return randomly for Episode 9 without them appearing in Episode 7 or 8 would be contrived.

9. Force Ghosts did appear, we got Yoda. Concept art and story boards confirm that Luke was originally meant to be killed by a Sith ghost and the only aspect Rian seemed solid on was the idea that he wanted to see a Sith Ghost fight a Jedi Ghost.

10. A lot of Carrie Fisher's scenes were cut, to leave in a scene that made everyone laugh at how ridiculous it looks and generally demeaned the character of Leia was a mistake.

11. If the person you were responding to was a child, they would be part of the audience that TLJ was targeting. Your 'entire plot' is a summary of the villain (Ben's) motivations which are born solely from Snoke saying he looked ridiculous with a Darth Vader style helmet on.

The movie also revealed that this is an idiotic and stupid asinine thing to do. It's flat-out told to us that characters are meant to remember the past and learn from it, that was the entire point of Luke Skywalker's role in the movie.

• You dont own these movies either
• They are made to please you (as in the audience) otherwise they dont earn as much money
• People have already gotten over how bad the movie was as demonstrated by the comments, all the support is resting on those calling Rian out on his nonsense.
JFogg
JFogg - 1/10/2018, 11:27 AM
@G - did you have a problem with them not addressing who the emperor was in the original trilogy?
MyBeard
MyBeard - 1/10/2018, 12:07 PM
@megabatfan - I will not argue that is was as effectively done as it could be, but I think the point of the Casino boondoggle was to give Finn and Rose a shared, extreme experience to set up a love triangle. ANH and Empire utilized the Luke - Leia - Han thing well until the decision to make Luke and Leia siblings in RotJ.

Finn has known Rey for a few days at most, and he seems way more into her than vice versa. We got more than a hint of Rey - Kylo tension as well, so I expect all of them to be changing their relationship statuses to "it's complicated" in the next film.
MyBeard
MyBeard - 1/10/2018, 12:16 PM
@G - Your notion of Lucas's plan applies to the prequels, but not the original trilogy. The original plan did not have Vader as Luke's father, Leia as Luke's sister, or Leia and Han winding up together. These are not minor changes, they are central to the stories of Empire and RotJ, and did not even appear in Lucas's first set of plans after ANH.

I understand not liking the decisions that were made, but that shifting gears movie to movie isn't the crucial difference from the original films. With the possible exception of the prequels, Star Wars has always been making it up as they went along.
boiling
boiling - 1/10/2018, 12:26 PM
@G - More like kicking the can to oblivion so all left for Abrams is a pile of shit. But HEY he gets Rose instead and a kid with a broom to work with so what. [frick] Johnson.
boiling
boiling - 1/10/2018, 12:28 PM
@rebellion - You can like the movie if you want but it’s still just a big pile of trash. Toxic pile of shit it is. Doesn’t make it better if someone likes it.
boiling
boiling - 1/10/2018, 12:29 PM
@Canon108 - This.
boiling
boiling - 1/10/2018, 12:31 PM
@rebellion - real fan or not isn’t the point - the film ist just shit.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
View Recorder