The Case For And Against Skydance Scrapping Man Of Tomorrow And The People vs. Gorilla Grodd

The Case For And Against Skydance Scrapping Man Of Tomorrow And The People vs. Gorilla Grodd

Skydance and Jeremy Latcham face some big decisions about James Gunn's DCU. Should they scrap Man of Tomorrow and The People vs. Gorilla Grodd, or could saving one prove the smarter move?

Feature Opinion
By JoshWilding - Nov 13, 2026 10:11 AM EST
Filed Under: Man of Tomorrow

James Gunn's time in charge of DC Studios has come to an abrupt end, with Skydance deciding that a change of leadership is needed for the DCU. Former Marvel Studios executive Jeremy Latcham will replace Gunn and Peter Safran, and he's tasked with steering DC's film and television slate in a new creative direction.

That raises some big questions about the future of projects inherited from Gunn's tenure, including Man of Tomorrow and The People vs. Gorilla Grodd. While the former is already in post-production and the latter has completed filming, neither necessarily fits into the plans Latcham and Skydance have for the franchise (which reportedly includes fast-tracking a Justice League movie). 

With reports suggesting that much of Gunn's DCU blueprint could be dismantled, should Skydance cut its losses and start fresh, or would scrapping these projects be another costly mistake for the studio? There are compelling arguments on both sides, so let's look at the case for and against pulling the plug...
 

A Fresh Start For The DCU

SM The World Cvr Lee Weeks

The DCU's continuity is something of a mess. Marvel Studios started teasing plans to assemble The Avengers from the very start, and while the direction of the movie evolved (the team was originally set to assemble to battle The Hulk), fans immediately knew what the endgame was. 

The same can't be said for the DCU. Gunn has hinted at a few different possibilities—the importance of Salvation, for example—but the bigger headache for Latcham is a "GunnVerse" that's part new and part old thanks to his decision to canonise his DCEU projects, Peacemaker and The Suicide Squad. Fortunately, casual fans don't typically pay too much attention to that type of thing.

While scrapping Man of Tomorrow makes it easier to move on from Gunn's plans, it shouldn't be that hard to sideline the characters who aren't working (Rick Flag Sr., Guy Gardner, and Lobo spring to mind) and continue with a new creative direction. It ultimately hinges on how much the Superman sequel is setting up.
 

It Robs Us Of A Potentially Great Movie

superman 2025 copy

Warner Bros. Discovery wanted to scrap Coyote vs. ACME as a tax write-off. Well, it was released earlier this year and sits at 96% on Rotten Tomatoes! The decision to shelve Batgirl means we'll never see Michael Keaton's Batman fight alongside his protégé, and there's every chance we missed out on another great movie.

With 2025's Superman, Gunn delivered a fan-pleasing take on the Man of Steel that restored the hero to his former glory on screen. In Man of Tomorrow, the filmmaker has plans for Brainiac, a War Suit-clad Lex Luthor, and possibly even Wonder Woman. Even if a reboot is coming, do we really want this movie to never see the light of day? 

Art shouldn't be censored or shelved, and as we've said above, Man of Tomorrow can likely be "saved" with a few edits that make it a little more open-ended. The priority for Skydance is Justice League, so David Corenswet's ditching the Justice Gang for the A-listers is easy enough, as is cutting Wonder Woman's scenes if necessary.
 

A Smart Business Decision That Benefits The Brand

imgi 854 JUSTICE LEAGUE UNLIMITED 17 MAIN COVER REV copy

The strongest argument for scrapping Man of Tomorrow isn't necessarily that the movie will be unsuccessful. However, it sounds like Gunn once again allowed the budget to reach a point where profitability will be near-impossible.

Still, if Skydance believes the DCU needs a different creative direction, releasing another James Gunn movie could make that transition more difficult. The studio will lose money either way, and now that fans are convinced the DCU no longer matters, avoiding repeating history will be crucial for the studio. After all, this feels a lot like The Flash. 

That was supposed to be a launching platform for several projects, but when the DC Studios regime changed, characters and ideas were cut, and it bombed because everyone knew it didn't matter. Avoiding that level of bad press and starting fresh might be best for business and easier for fans, though we'd suggest Skydance and Latcham find a way to assure everyone that Man of Tomorrow still matters. 
 

Man Of Tomorrow Can Still Be A Launching Point

unnamed 4

According to recent reports, Gunn planned to follow Man of Tomorrow with another Superman movie and a long-awaited Justice League reboot (he may have even taken charge of The Brave and the Bold). With a few tweaks, the new DC Studios can still follow that blueprint. 

Some subplots and characters will likely be dropped, and we may even get the odd retcon, like Hal Jordan once again being back among the living. Ultimately, Man of Tomorrow can still serve as a launching platform for where the DCU goes next, starting with a Justice League movie that ditches the C-listers to focus on characters like Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, Green Lantern, and The Flash.

How willing is Gunn to make any changes asked of him? The last thing we need is another 2017 Justice League, with a different filmmaker asked to add new scenes. Latcham and Gunn have worked together before, so the latter could even stick around to be creatively involved beyond this sequel, albeit with someone now there to rein him in when necessary. 
 

Should It Debut On Streaming, Instead?

adobe express file 37 copy

If Skydance is determined to move on from Gunn's DCU, there's a compromise worth considering: release Man of Tomorrow directly on streaming.

That would allow the filmmaker to finish the story he's been building without forcing the studio to spend millions marketing a movie that may no longer fit its plans for the franchise. It would also give the streamer—a combined HBO Max/Paramount+ powerhouse—a major exclusive and ensure Gunn's work doesn't end up gathering dust.

Of course, a Superman sequel deserves to be experienced on the big screen, and there's no guarantee a streaming release would make the movie profitable. However, if theatrical prospects are looking bleak, this could be a better outcome than scrapping the project altogether. After all, why throw away a potentially great movie when there's still an opportunity to get something out of it?
 

As For The People vs. Gorilla Grodd...

Yeah, there's really no reason for this series to exist. With the greatest respect to The People vs. Gorilla Grodd's cast and creatives, another goofy TV-MA comedy is the last thing the DCU needs. Leave Jimmy Olsen as a supporting character in the Superman franchise and save Grodd for a clash with The Flash. We don't need to see him and a collection of D-list baddies turned into punchlines to serve Gunn's unique sense of humour.

This show will do nothing for the new DCU and is exactly what this franchise needs to leave behind as it heads into a new era of storytelling. 

So, scrap The People vs. Gorilla Grodd, but save Man of Tomorrow (with a few tweaks that ensure it better fits Latcham's new direction for the DCU). That seems like the best outcome, and with any luck, we'll finally get a great Justice League movie by 2028 at the latest. 
 

Rumor: David Corenswet WILL Stay On As Superman After Man Of Tomorrow - But Others May Not Be So Lucky
Related:

Rumor: David Corenswet WILL Stay On As Superman After Man Of Tomorrow - But Others May Not Be So Lucky

UPDATE: Skydance Less Than Enthusiastic About Man Of Tomorrow - Could The Movie Go Straight To Streaming?
Recommended For You:

UPDATE: Skydance "Less Than Enthusiastic" About Man Of Tomorrow - Could The Movie Go Straight To Streaming?

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
TheAmericanHero
TheAmericanHero - 11/13/2026, 10:40 AM
I said from the second their firing was announced that they should just do a Batgirl with Man of Tomorrow and just take the tax write-off or whatever. My only desire to ever see it is purely morbid curiosity.

I'm actually more interested in watching the forever lost Batgirl movie than I would ever be to watch Man of Tomorrow trash those characters even more.
Irregular
Irregular - 11/13/2026, 10:59 AM
@TheAmericanHero - Are you assuming that a tax-write off means that they would get like a refund on their budget or? Because that is a terrible idea to tax write off a Superman movie. A Superman movie.
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 11/13/2026, 11:10 AM
@TheAmericanHero - “With 2025's Superman, Gunn delivered a fan-pleasing take on the Man of Steel that restored the hero to his former glory on screen” Most fans, like me, were very disappointed when they walked out if that theater
bobevanz
bobevanz - 11/13/2026, 12:08 PM
I'm sorry Josh but this movie is coming out with you like it or not. Do you not realize that Superman made more money than ANY Skydance movie ever that doesn't have Tom Cruise in it? We all know how much you've hated EVERY DC project that has come out in the past 2-3 years.

You people don't seem to realize that if they reboot again for the third time in such a short window, they're not only losing the Snyder cult, but also the fans of this current iteration.
Sure this is his opinion but it's obviously biased just like most of you jokers who never have anything constructive to say. Just shitpost and troll. Do you honestly think if they decided to start all over again after 3 years that people will give a shit about whatever these [frick]s think they're going to try to achieve? No way. If they pivoted and brought back and Snyder shit it'll flop because of the brand damage. Bet a million on that. Any takers?

Let's recap:
Superman TURNING A PROFIT and getting great reviews from literally anywhere you want to look.

Clayface is now PROFITABLE despite what these hit pieces say. They didn't spent dozens of millions on marketing when they didn't. (Shoutout to Street Fighter who had double the budget and marketing, only to make less)

Lanterns is literally top three ALL TIME in terms of average viewership for any HBO show. Saying this show sucked or nobody liked it is an opinion from a small minority of objectors, not a truth.
Creature Commandos wasn't the most popular or best reviewed but it wasnt bad by any means. Plus we got a Nazi killing robot which is awesome.
Peacemaker S1 had a massive following which slightly decreased during season two, but then again the plot was all about an alternate world where Nazis are in charge. I find it funny how THOSE people were saying he's making fun of Trump supporters. congrats! You outed your nazi ass.

The worst thing about the DCU was Supergirl. That movie was always going to flop because people really don't care. Now to say it's the worst thing ever is laughable when trash like The Marvels and 2/3 of Ant-Man movies were straight doo doo.

Josh is entitled to his opinion. It is not fact. Neither are any of the trolls on here.
User Comment Image

Let me tell you what I'D like to happen next year: MoT comes out, has the same or better reviews than the first, beats MoS total box office, introduces Wonder Woman, brings back Blue Beetle, adds John Stewart and Gardner, and then Ellison will have no choice but to keep chugging along. Gunn and Safran remain as creative consultants and keep building out the universe while Bible Man gets all the credit.
Then The Batman Part 2 comes out and makes a billion dollars.

Ellison can't take any credit, and he is stuck with the people he hates politically. We all know Variety is a hit piece extraordinaire. Anyone who believed ANY of those articles is a moron. They're butthurt MAGAt [frick]s who only care about controlling the narrative.

User Comment Image

Having the privilege of watching this site and the trolls in it go bat shit crazy with rage while all of this happens will be so gratifying.
User Comment Image
UltronIO
UltronIO - 11/13/2026, 12:33 PM
@Irregular - so that they can make a better superman movie. A better Superman movie!
UltronIO
UltronIO - 11/13/2026, 12:35 PM
I mean I would much rather see Superman Vs Brainiac done right in a couple of years than see Gunn's version next year.
SuperiorHeckler
SuperiorHeckler - 11/13/2026, 1:37 PM
@TheAmericanHero -

• Kramer: "Jerry, all these big companies, they write off everything".
• Jerry: "You don't even know what a write-off is".
• Kramer: "Do you"?
• Jerry: "No. I don't".
• Kramer: "But they do, and they are the ones writing it off". 🤓
Irregular
Irregular - 11/13/2026, 1:41 PM
@UltronIO - With what money if you just did a tax-write off? You're very bad at finances as evident in the last article and it's quite clear here you still don't get it.
UltronIO
UltronIO - 11/13/2026, 1:49 PM
@Irregular - So what money will they have if they release it?

"You're very bad at finances as evident in the last article and it's quite clear here you still don't get it."

Yeah that's right I just said your line back to you like Batman in The Dark Knight Rises.
Malatrova15
Malatrova15 - 11/13/2026, 10:40 AM
Making cases for billionares is kinda cool
foreverintheway
foreverintheway - 11/13/2026, 10:43 AM
@Malatrova15 - #RestoreTheBariWeissVerse
Biggittyb76
Biggittyb76 - 11/13/2026, 10:42 AM
Does Josh Wilding like anything? Just curious why he’s a writer on this site when he clearly hates Comic Book Films. Every article he writes either slams the subject or draws attention to bad press or negative reviews. I visit this site each day but I’ve started paying attention to who the article is written by to determine if the article will be actual news or just 500 words designed to bury an IP, director, actor or film.
GunnIsDone
GunnIsDone - 11/13/2026, 10:42 AM
@Biggittyb76 - Why do you hate journalists for reporting on the news?
foreverintheway
foreverintheway - 11/13/2026, 10:44 AM
@GunnIsDone - Dude come on - this is NOT news and Josh is not a journalist. This is all speculation written by a blogger. There is ZERO journalist standards applied anywhere on this site. We all use hyperbole from time to time, but now let's not get carried away on this
Rpendo
Rpendo - 11/13/2026, 10:47 AM
@GunnIsDone - Not a journalist. Not news.
Malatrova15
Malatrova15 - 11/13/2026, 10:49 AM
@Biggittyb76 - he loves man milk.
Malatrova15
Malatrova15 - 11/13/2026, 10:50 AM
@foreverintheway - excuse but Josh is the heart and soul of this site,here in Tapachula we call him El Jornalista Cagado , wich means "Oh boy what a profesional journalist is josh"
TheAmericanHero
TheAmericanHero - 11/13/2026, 10:58 AM
@Biggittyb76 - he likes getting paid. Which is his only motivation for these "articles".
GunnIsDone
GunnIsDone - 11/13/2026, 11:08 AM
@foreverintheway - He's writing about a possibility and the pros and cons of it. What's exactly the problem?
GunnIsDone
GunnIsDone - 11/13/2026, 11:08 AM
@Rpendo - Explain why?
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 11/13/2026, 11:13 AM
@Biggittyb76 - It’s refreshing to have someone who loves this stuff actually be an opinionated discerning critic rather than most who eat up whatever slop the studios churn out and ask for more. We pay for it so we have a right to demand better
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 11/13/2026, 11:16 AM
@JoshWilding - I respect that you hive your honest opinions which I sometimes agree with and sometimes disagree with. Way too many in here act like they owe something to the billionaire studio heads and IP. If I love a film (like MOTU) I’ll shout it aloud. But I have no problem being honest if I believe something is garbage or of it objectively failed at the BO (again, MOTU, lol).
Rpendo
Rpendo - 11/13/2026, 11:20 AM
@GunnIsDone - He’s a blogger. He doesn’t really report news, he largely just repackages what other actual journalists have reported, or will occasionally link to a social media post or something. This is a blog site, not the Wall Street Journal. This thing he wrote is, at the absolute best and at my most charitable , an opinion piece, not a “reporter” reporting news.

Also, if I need to explain to you the difference between an opinion-blogpost and actual news reporting, then I don’t really know what to tell you.
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 11/13/2026, 11:24 AM
@Bucky74 - Thank you! I think some people just want to read opinions that align with their own. I'm not asking anyone to agree or disagree with me - I'm just sharing my take. I love Gunn's GOTG movies and Superman, but I don't regret holding him accountable for the missteps he was making. Ultimately, the fact that he's been fired proves he wasn't handling things the right way...this studio made no money in three years because he was making all the wrong decisions!
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 11/13/2026, 11:31 AM
@JoshWilding - While I was personally very disappointed with his Superman (the overly divisive political plot, the odd and sexually charged change to his origin with his tyrannical parents, his overly whiny demeanor and lack of self control, the tonal issues and off edits and starting the film in the second act), I too loved Gunn’s older work (his GOTG films, Slither, The Bilco Experiment, etc), but he was never a good fit to head DC. Too many on here get hostile and take opposing opinions on films personally
Loverboy83
Loverboy83 - 11/13/2026, 11:33 AM
@GunnIsDone - News about DCU must be either positive or very positive, and nothing else.
GunnIsDone
GunnIsDone - 11/13/2026, 11:40 AM
@Rpendo - I very clearly never called this specific post "actual news reporting" you [frick]ing moron. He's a comic book reviewer and movie journalist who gets exclusives and interviews. By every metric he's considered a journalist whether you like it or not. Those who post op eds are still journalists. Those who "repackage what other journalists have reported" are still journalists.

Hope this helps
bobevanz
bobevanz - 11/13/2026, 12:11 PM
@Biggittyb76 - he loves Marvel IP so much. He loved the Snyderverse so much. When you know the context it's as bright as day
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 11/13/2026, 12:14 PM
@GunnIsDone - It isn't news because everything Josh is saying in this article is speculative. While josh can, in fact be considered a journalist, most people agree that he's not a very good one. Now, if he were instead call himself a commentator, then great. He writes only his own opinions (though usually present's them using the royal "we", rather than "I," in an attempt to make them appear to have more weight or credibility than the actually do.) and occasionally passes along gossip from others that he found online, rather than through interviewing or conversations- le alone actual investigation.
UltronIO
UltronIO - 11/13/2026, 12:42 PM
@Rpendo - It's an editorial you silly silly rabbit.
JusticeL
JusticeL - 11/13/2026, 1:27 PM
@Biggittyb76 - it's because there hasn't been a good comic book film in a while.
GunnIsDone
GunnIsDone - 11/13/2026, 10:42 AM
Scrap it. No one wants to see it and it'll flop anyways.

Reboot the MCU and DCU
foreverintheway
foreverintheway - 11/13/2026, 10:50 AM
@GunnIsDone - Honestly if they scrap it now, it makes it easier to step out of this whole ecosystem.

I had high hopes for the future of DC Studios, they were apprehensive but there was potential that became clear was years away from being reached. MCU is tired and stale and in-need of a reboot that I don't expect to continue with, and the DCU/DCEU in this sisyphean cycle.

I come here and argue about box office numbers and rumours - this part of my life sucks lol
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 11/13/2026, 11:02 AM
@GunnIsDone - flop like your mama's t-bags
GunnIsDone
GunnIsDone - 11/13/2026, 11:09 AM
@foreverintheway - I couldn't agree more
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 11/13/2026, 11:17 AM
@GunnIsDone - And another flop damages the brand and characters tremendously
UltronIO
UltronIO - 11/13/2026, 12:47 PM
@foreverintheway - Do you want to see DC break free of this Sisyphean cycle?

The first step is to do right what they did wrong before. They could only batgirl batgirl, but if only they could have done the same thing with the other 4 DCEU movies that all ended up flopping very badly.

They also should have probably not stayed connected to that failed universe because of one man's ego. Or because they had things completed for that universe like Creature Commandos and Peacemaker Season 2.

They have an opportunity here again to not drop the [frick]ing rock all the way down the hill. At the bottom of that hill is their failure, where they will remain. MOT is that failure.
foreverintheway
foreverintheway - 11/13/2026, 1:08 PM
@UltronIO - those last 4 DCEU movies had massive studio interference - a movie is DOOMED to fail once the studio execs (non-creatives) start shoe-horning business decisions as plot points. If they choose this as an opportunity to hack it up and try to pivot on the direction of the universe - it's going to fail miserably and will be incredibly difficult to move forward with the DCU. If they cancel outright - they lose fans who are burnt out by consistent regime-changes.

This is a no-win situation. I don't even care which direction they go - they are losing me, here.
UltronIO
UltronIO - 11/13/2026, 1:31 PM
@foreverintheway - It's not a no-win situation it just seems like one, because if they release MOT as is it will flop and damage the brand and if they hack it up it will still flop but it'll only damage the brand a little.

However if they batgirl it that's it. Problem solved.

And you and all the others feeling burnout (and your feelings are valid) will be soothed when you see the medicine of a reboot in theatres again. You'll be excited again. Trepidatious maybe, it'll take time for you to trust it thinking it could be rebooted at any time, but if it's successful (I mean really successful) then that's the best salve available.

You won't need to form any cope narrative to delude yourself into thinking the universe is a success. You'll be so jaded that you won't have any interest in copium at all. But you won't need it because it'll be an actual success and there'll be no-one saying any different.

So go ahead. Be jaded. Be forlorn and burnt-out. Your interest will be re-ignited when you see the first teaser trailer for whatever the first movie is and you will come back. And after two or three movies it'll be a whole different feeling than when Clayface came out. All that uncertainty will be gone.
1 2 3

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder