Wait, Has DC Studios Really Ghosted Gal Gadot After Promising Her Wonder Woman 3?

Wait, Has DC Studios Really Ghosted Gal Gadot After Promising Her Wonder Woman 3?

Recent comments from Justice League star Gal Gadot appear to confirm that DC Studios co-CEOs James Gunn and Peter Safran ghosted the actress after promising her Wonder Woman 3 in 2023.

Feature Opinion
By JoshWilding - Aug 29, 2026 11:08 AM EST
Filed Under: Wonder Woman

What happened between Gal Gadot and DC Studios? That's becoming an increasingly difficult question to answer, particularly after some recent comments from the Wonder Woman star about whether she has a future in the DCU.

Gadot previously made it sound like her return as Wonder Woman was pretty much guaranteed. In 2023, shortly after James Gunn and Peter Safran took charge of DC Studios, she revealed that she had met with both executives and was told they wanted to develop Wonder Woman 3 with her.

"I had a meeting with [DC Studios CEOs] Peter Safran and James Gunn, and they both told me that they're going to develop a third Wonder Woman with me," the actress told Flaunt. "They said, 'You're in the best hands, you've got nothing to worry about.' Time will tell."

Well, it turns out Gadot's final sentence was rather prophetic.

Speaking to ScreenRant this week, the actress said she hasn't had "any specific conversations" with Gunn or DC Studios about either reprising her role as Wonder Woman or following Jason Momoa's example by playing another character in the DC Universe. According to Gadot, her last major discussions with the studio happened when "they came to the studio, and they really wanted to develop the third one."

Patty Jenkins has confirmed that DC Studios "axed" the movie, while Supergirl writer Ana Nogueira is now penning a fast-tracked reboot. The trades previously reported that Jenkins' proposed story for the threequel "did not fit in with the [studio's] new plans," and thus far, the only characters to make the leap from the DCEU to DCU are those Gunn previously worked on (Peacemaker, for example).

The Superman director later muddied the waters, saying of The Hollywood Reporter's story, "Some of it is true, some of it is half-true, some of it is not true, [and] some of it we haven’t decided yet whether it’s true or not." 

Still, Gadot's latest comments raise a big question: Did DC Studios change its mind, or did it leave one of the franchise's biggest stars hanging?

In fairness, Gunn and Safran were under no obligation to develop any DC projects already in development. They inherited a franchise in desperate need of a creative reset, and deciding that Wonder Woman 3 didn't fit their plans is perfectly understandable. Gadot also comes with a lot of baggage, and most fans had soured on her Diana Prince after Wonder Woman 1984, Shazam! Fury of the Gods, and The Flash.

If Gadot's recollection is accurate, there's something decidedly awkward about telling an actress that you're developing another movie with her and that she's "in the best hands," only for her to later reveal that there have been no meaningful conversations about what comes next.

That leaves us with two possibilities, neither of which are particularly flattering. Perhaps DC Studios genuinely intended to make Wonder Woman 3 with Gadot in 2023 before its plans changed. If so, why wasn't she kept more closely informed? Or is Gadot trying to force their hand by putting a positive possible spin on a conversation that never progressed beyond an early-stage idea?

Either way, the optics aren't great. DC Studios didn't just cancel Wonder Woman 3; it seemingly went from telling Gadot that she had "nothing to worry about" to not even discussing what her future in this universe might look like.

All the while, after years of frustrating radio silence from Gunn—who was happy to comment on and debunk countless other rumours—he casually mentioned plans for a new Wonder Woman movie, seemingly without ever letting Gadot know that she wouldn't be coming back (a courtesy he did extend to Henry Cavill and Dwayne Johnson).

Perhaps she spoke out of turn in 2023? It certainly felt like she upset someone at DC Studios, given that her comments about a return were followed by blistering pieces in the trades with insights from insiders who essentially made her out to be a liar.  

There's often more to these kinds of stories than we'll ever know, because Hollywood remains a strange town that handles these situations in its own, often hard-to-fathom ways. Either way, with it looking increasingly like that Man of Tomorrow star Adria Arjona is the new Wonder Woman, few fans are likely to mourn Gadot's abrupt ousting.

About The Author:
JoshWilding
Member Since 3/13/2009
A lifelong comic book fan who grew up on Spider-Man: The Animated Series in the '90s, Josh Wilding has been contributing to ComicBookMovie.com since 2009.

While he's also written for websites like Batman-News, HeyUGuys, and WhatCulture, Josh is CBM's Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic and the site's #1 contributor with nearly two decades of experience covering film and TV news (including interviews with Tom Holland, Chris Pratt, Gary Oldman, Halle Berry, Jon Bernthal, Tom Welling, and hundreds more).

Based in the UK with his wife, Josh is also an avid WWE and Formula 1 fan and writes about those passions on CBM's sister sites, TheRingReport.com and FullThrottleHQ.com. Favourite superhero? Spider-Man. Favourite pro wrestler? CM Punk. Favourite F1 driver? Max Verstappen.
Wonder Woman Star Gal Gadot Shares Advice For DCU Diana Actress Amid Man Of Tomorrow Speculation
Related:

Wonder Woman Star Gal Gadot Shares Advice For DCU Diana Actress Amid Man Of Tomorrow Speculation

Madame Web Star Sydney Sweeney Suits Up As Wonder Woman In Eye-Popping New Photos
Recommended For You:

Madame Web Star Sydney Sweeney Suits Up As Wonder Woman In Eye-Popping New Photos

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Irregular
Irregular - 8/29/2026, 11:30 AM
Simply put, they had notes, Jenkins wanted full creative control and was not a good fit for James Gunn to not have a say or overstep in anyway...so WW3 was cancelled.

This was obvious when it was announced...no need for clarification.
Arthorious
Arthorious - 8/29/2026, 11:30 AM
Big studios screw over people all the time. Look at Mahershala Ali and Disney
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 8/29/2026, 11:35 AM
Doesn't come close to how dirty they did Cavil by bringing him back only to not bring him back.

Maybe Gunn was entertaining a future multiverse cross over with the Snyderverse. In all fairness, DC was always more known for that with Crisis.
Fanmar16
Fanmar16 - 8/29/2026, 11:37 AM
Gal Gadot is one of the worst actresses I've ever seen in my life, everyone should ghosted her
ParStorm
ParStorm - 8/29/2026, 11:42 AM
@JoshWilding - Respectfully can we please have a review of Batman: Knightfall Part 1? I think that movie was awesome and deserves some respect on this site.
harryba11zack
harryba11zack - 8/29/2026, 11:47 AM
@ParStorm - best dc film we've had in years,
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 8/29/2026, 12:04 PM
@ParStorm - I should be interviewing producer Jim Krieg and supervising producer Rick Morales next week, so stay tuned.
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 8/29/2026, 11:44 AM
Did these two really think they would get another chance after putting out what many consider to be one of the worst comic book movies ever made ? Why would they even bother asking; surely they knew what the answer would be in advance ?
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 8/29/2026, 11:51 AM
What really matters is, thank goodness we've gotten so many speculative articles about this, so long after it happened. "This is Pulitzer stuff".
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 8/29/2026, 11:55 AM
@Patient2670 - any reason to possibly hate on Gunn , Josh will take it.
tRuckRogers46A
tRuckRogers46A - 8/29/2026, 11:53 AM
Slow news day?
cyclopstb
cyclopstb - 8/29/2026, 12:00 PM
Well I don't approve their decision. It's one of the reasons I can't support the DCU.
ClarkJoeKent
ClarkJoeKent - 8/29/2026, 12:02 PM
Gunn would have ruined her. Zack madenher look ICONIC & EPIC ...Gunn would make her a lesbian.🙈
LeonNova
LeonNova - 8/29/2026, 12:08 PM
She’s too skinny and a god awful actress, so it’s no great loss
ModHaterSLADE
ModHaterSLADE - 8/29/2026, 12:10 PM
Meh. Been ready for a new WW anyway.
EscapeMySight
EscapeMySight - 8/29/2026, 12:16 PM
Yep. Sounds like she was really lead on. Weird, considering how they let Cavil know what was up the moment they came on board.

Any way, I’ve always said Gunn is the wrong person to be in charge of this and nothing he’s done so far has changed my mind. DC needed a clean reboot, with an entirely new cast, by a producer with a strong game plan. Not by a director who only wanted to keep his friends around and is the antithesis of versatile. The only decent thing the DCU has done so far, IMO, is Lanterns, and that seems like it’s had the least involvement from Gunn creatively.

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder