KRAVEN THE HUNTER Star Aaron Taylor-Johnson Has Supposedly Signed Up To Play The Next JAMES BOND

KRAVEN THE HUNTER Star Aaron Taylor-Johnson Has Supposedly Signed Up To Play The Next JAMES BOND

From the MCU and Spider-Verse to 007? According to a new rumour which is gaining traction today, Kraven the Hunter star Aaron Taylor-Johnson is days away from signing up to play the next James Bond...

By JoshWilding - Mar 19, 2024 09:03 PM EST
Filed Under: James Bond
Source: The Sun (via ActioNewz.com)

There's still a massive amount of intrigue surrounding who will be chosen to play the next James Bond. However, many of the most popular suggestions - Henry Cavill, Idris Elba, and Jamie Dornan, for example - are being aged out of the role due to how long it's so far taken to find Daniel Craig's successor. 

In 2022, producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson said they were looking to find an actor willing to commit to the role for the long haul. The latter later explained that while they're not planning to cast a considerably younger actor as the new 007, they want whoever is cast to play the iconic spy for a decade or more.

Kick-AssAvengers: Age of Ultron, and Kraven the Hunter star Aaron Taylor-Johnson fits the bill and, in the past, multiple sources have claimed he's met with Broccoli and Wilson to discuss playing 007. 

The Sun (via ActioNewz.com) has followed up with a report today which claims Taylor-Johnson has been "formally" offered the role. He's supposedly expected to officially board the franchise later this week, with the new James Bond movie likely to begin shooting later this year. 

"Bond is Aaron’s job, should he wish to accept it," a source tells the tabloid. "The formal offer is on the table and they are waiting to hear back. As far as Eon is concerned, Aaron is going to sign his contract in the coming days and they can start preparing for the big announcement."

The report says the script is being worked on with production scheduled to take place at Pinewood Studios in Buckinghamshire. As of now, there's no mention of a writer or director and we'd assume the ever-busy Christopher Nolan won't be taking the helm of the next instalment despite him previously expressing interest. 

Another source adds, "Aaron may not be the best known in his field but he is an incredibly talented actor. His role in Nocturnal Animals showed his depth as an actor. He is the perfect person to play Bond and will pick up well from where Daniel left off."

The Bullet Train star would be a great pick for the new Bond and, last year, Taylor-Johnson addressed the rumours head-on. 

"It’s flattering. You can have something really positive [written about you], but you can also have something really negative that can circulate."

"You just want to stay in your lane, stay grounded, stay around the people that you love and love you back, and stay in that world. Because the moment you start believing the sh*t people say about you, you’ve lost your f***ing mind. You’ve lost it."

If there's any truth to this report, expect an official announcement to be made sooner rather than later. While we'd recommend taking this source with a pinch of salt, several reliable outlets (including the trades) are sharing the story and it feels like there may indeed be something to this one...

MAN OF STEEL Star Henry Cavill Is Leaving The Door Open To Playing James Bond Despite Claims He's Too Old
Related:

MAN OF STEEL Star Henry Cavill Is Leaving The Door Open To Playing James Bond Despite Claims He's Too Old

Aaron Taylor-Johnson's Quest To Become The Next 007 Gets Ringing Endorsements From Two Former BOND Actors
Recommended For You:

Aaron Taylor-Johnson's Quest To Become The Next 007 Gets Ringing Endorsements From Two Former BOND Actors

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
HashTagSwagg
HashTagSwagg - 3/19/2024, 9:13 PM
They had no clue what the hell they were doing with Craig's bond as they kept trying to continually update him for the "modern audience" when they had already cracked it with Casino Royale. He's a decent choice but I feel the ones calling the shots are gonna mess it up.
Origame
Origame - 3/20/2024, 5:41 AM
@HashTagSwagg - I'm genuinely surprised they didn't go with a DEI choice as they were clearly implying they'd do post craig.
HammerLegFoot
HammerLegFoot - 3/20/2024, 6:14 AM
@Origame - What the heck is DEI? I keep seeing it but I've never heard that until a few months ago on this site.
DeadClunge
DeadClunge - 3/20/2024, 6:31 AM
@HammerLegFoot - diversity equity & inclusion. It's the main thing the fragile complain about on this site 🤣
Origame
Origame - 3/20/2024, 6:41 AM
@HammerLegFoot - it stands for diversity, equity, and inclusivity. In layman's terms, it's a diversity quota meant to remove the disparity between races by lowering the standards.
MuadDib
MuadDib - 3/19/2024, 9:15 PM
Never should have let Craig’s Bond die the way they did.

Actors who get fed up with playing a character always want to leave their mark.

But he was one in a long line of actors who played Bond and none of them ever died. The whole premise with the 007 series is the story goes on, even if they need to recast.

Let’s see what convoluted story they come up with to explain how he survived

That is to say unless this is a reboot of some sort and they’re throwing out everything that came before which I seriously doubt
dracula
dracula - 3/19/2024, 9:24 PM
@MuadDib - will probably be a full reboot

which sucks considering the they put together a great supporting cast
MuadDib
MuadDib - 3/19/2024, 9:53 PM
@dracula - I heard a rumor it would be a reboot focusing on Bonds early years.

If true, it would be a big insult to all the movies that came before and to all the fans that were so invested in all the backstory.

If they go that route, it’ll feel more like a cheap cash grab more than a serious attempt to further the franchise they seemingly killed when they let Craig dictate his own death scene
Nightwing1015
Nightwing1015 - 3/19/2024, 9:53 PM
@MuadDib - that’s not the premise of the James Bond series - the story is a different continuity each time. I love that Craig’s bond had a beginning, middle and end. How anyone could watch Casino Royale and think it was related to all the other bond films I don’t understand…
AleSir19
AleSir19 - 3/19/2024, 10:30 PM
@MuadDib - Bond movies doesn't work like that. There Is no Lore. Bond movies were the firts Big primitive franchise of His kind AND thanks to it, there Is no continuity.

Craig bond films where the first to establish some kind of continuity through the films.

But If you watch any of the others Bond films, they dont follow any kind of continuity.

So we could say, that Bond films are not sequels, but instead "self conteined" films Made using the same actors.

Until they recast.

When they recast, then they began from scratch.

Casino Royale was a reboot from Zero, AND each Bond film has been in a Sense.
dracula
dracula - 3/19/2024, 10:34 PM
@MuadDib - well Casino Royal was also pretty much a reboot

It is mentioned that he had just gotten his double o ranking

And obviously Blofeld was completely new, unrelated to the ones Connery, Lazenby and Moore (sort of) dealt with
dracula
dracula - 3/19/2024, 10:45 PM
@AleSir19 - actually Conner through Brosnan does have some level of continuity (kind if a sliding timescale for Bond)

With the exception of Goldfinger, the first 8 films deal with Specter (they even considered throwing in an explanation for the switch to Lazenby, which is why Blofeld doesnt recognize him in that film)

Then there is there is the nameless blofeld cameo in one of moore’s films, including the grave of Bonds wife

There are even subtle stuff in the Brosnan films
AleSir19
AleSir19 - 3/19/2024, 10:48 PM
@dracula - Again, Yes, you could say that. But they break continuity with each actor.

But the biggest break point was Craig. With Craig they Made a full reboot, from Zero.

And i Guess they are going to make it again and Is okay. Bond Is an old Franchise.
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 3/20/2024, 1:25 AM
@MuadDib - 007 is a mantle.
TheMetaMan
TheMetaMan - 3/20/2024, 5:29 AM
@MuadDib - Nah I disagree. I love the fact that they killed Craig’s bond. Made his version so much more authentic and tangible. For the first time ever I felt emotionally invested for Bond and the Craig films did an excellent job of differentiating his version from others. His version felt more three-dimensional to me. Therefore the conclusion of NTTD was justified because it ended an overarching story spanning five films. For Craig’s version of bond it was the right call. Most likely it will never happen again but the death wasn’t a cheap cop out. They spent five films building momentum in story and character development and the payoff in the last film, was simply the icing on the cake for me. I like resolutions to my stories. A story has to end one way or another and if that means killing off the main character then so be it. Craig’s version was distinguished in that it never copied what came before, his bond was on a completely different direction from others and it worked!
RolandD
RolandD - 3/20/2024, 7:39 AM
@dracula @MuadDib - I agree that they should not have had Bond killed. Even so, his Bond was definitely a reboot of the character with Casino Royale set very early in his care yet Dame Judy Densch continued as M so who knows what supporting actors/characters will continue.
grif
grif - 3/20/2024, 2:33 PM
@MuadDib - couldnt even finish the movie. i have seen every bond movie.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 3/19/2024, 9:29 PM
I don’t buy it personally but if true , I can kinda dig it.

The dude has the physicality for the role and is a good actor however I do see his Bond being akin moreso to Craig , Connery and Dalton’s then Moore , Brosnan or Lazenby which is fine.

My biggest concern is that he has a soft voice which i don’t feel fits Bond but I guess I could get over that.

User Comment Image

Also , Correct me if I’m wrong but would this make him the youngest Bond so far (he’s 33)?.
CerealKiller1
CerealKiller1 - 3/19/2024, 9:36 PM
@TheVisionary25 - Lazenby was 29 and I believe Connery was 32 (but I could be mistaken)
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 3/19/2024, 9:39 PM
@CerealKiller1 - oh damn , you are right

They just looked older to me.
CerealKiller1
CerealKiller1 - 3/19/2024, 9:42 PM
@TheVisionary25 - 100%, movie stars tended to have that more rugged, aged look back in the day

I like ATJ enough to give him a chance if this ends up being true, but I hope they go for a more outside the box choice
TheMetaMan
TheMetaMan - 3/19/2024, 9:32 PM
I saw this elsewhere. ATJ is a good actor but I’m more concerned with what direction they are going to take Bond into next. I feel like the franchise needs a switch up. I think a futuristic sci-fi setting or period piece could work much like the last Kingsman film (also featuring Johnson) could also work. Imagine Bond working for the MI6 during the 1st world war against the Nazis. Anyway let’s wait and see what this reboot does with the character.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 3/19/2024, 9:34 PM
@TheMetaMan - a 60’s set period piece would be cool!!.

User Comment Image
CerealKiller1
CerealKiller1 - 3/19/2024, 9:33 PM
“Aaron Taylor-Johnson Has Supposedly Signed Up To Play The Next JAMES BOND”

“Aaron Taylor-Johnson is days away from signing up to play the next James Bond”

Which is it? How can you be so contradictory within the space of two sentences?
RolandD
RolandD - 3/19/2024, 11:51 PM
@CerealKiller1 - Yep. I thought the same thing.
SolarSoldier
SolarSoldier - 3/19/2024, 9:33 PM
Bond has become what Fast & Furious is.
dracula
dracula - 3/19/2024, 10:48 PM
@SolarSoldier - no, the Bond films have gotten stupid from time to time but eventually bounce back

Fast and furious drove beyond stupid and never turned back
GhostDog
GhostDog - 3/19/2024, 9:35 PM
I don’t buy it. They took Craig for granted. ATJ would be an uninspired choice. He’d be fine but nothing interesting.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 3/19/2024, 9:41 PM
@GhostDog - I do think he’ll be more interesting then obvious choices like Cavill

With Cavill , I feel like I’ll get Napoleon Solo again to an extent while I feel like I’m not entirely sure with ATJ which seems more exciting

Who would be your pick?.
CerealKiller1
CerealKiller1 - 3/19/2024, 9:50 PM
@TheVisionary25 - I know it won’t be a popular choice, but performance wise, my ‘unexpected’ choice for awhile has been Riz Ahmed
GhostDog
GhostDog - 3/19/2024, 9:50 PM
@TheVisionary25 - yea cavill is a boring choice.

My pick is Dev Patel, Elba or Matthew Lewis
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 3/19/2024, 10:04 PM
@GhostDog - not sure I see Dev in the role , even with Monkey Man

Elba would be great but probably too old now

Matthew Lewis is interesting , I like it!!.

User Comment Image
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 3/19/2024, 10:06 PM
@CerealKiller1 - idk if I see it personally given the roles I’ve watched him in

I could see him more as a Q type character
bcom
bcom - 3/19/2024, 10:30 PM
@TheVisionary25 - Matthew Lewis is an interesting choice. He also has similar-ish features to Ian Fleming's originally sketch of how Bond should look

User Comment Image
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 3/19/2024, 10:34 PM
@bcom - yeah , I can see it

Thinking about it more , ATJ is interesting me more because he can actually be goofy & comedic if they go the Moore route (which I don’t think they will) or the more serious , cold yet still suave & confident side like Craig or Connery (maybe even a mix if both like Brosnan)

Basically , he has range.
bcom
bcom - 3/19/2024, 10:55 PM
@TheVisionary25 - Agreed. I like unexpected 'left field' choices like this.

I've read all of Ian Fleming's Bond novels and in terms of the movies I think Daniel Craig and Timothy Dalton have portrayed Bond as closest to how he's written in those books. Fleming wanted him to be an uninteresting person that interesting things happen to. An emotionally cold blunt instrument who only turns on the charm when required to get what he needs. He even chose the name James Bond because it was the dullest name he could think of. Basically, he wanted the reader to view the story vicariously through Bond's eyes.

I think Daniel Craig struck a fine balance between giving us a familiar Bond while leaning more towards Fleming's original vision where as Timothy Dalton literally played it as how Bond was written.

This is just my personal thoughts but I'd like to see that type of Bond continue but with a bit of something new and original injected into it. Given that Bond was killed off in the last movie it'll be interesting to see if this is somehow addressed (perhaps he did make it off the island or was blown into the sea and somehow survived) or if it will be a hard reboot like Casino Royale was.
solskulldeath
solskulldeath - 3/19/2024, 11:36 PM
@bcom - based on Ian Fleming's sketch...if you put the mustache...boom...that's Alfred Pennyworth.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 3/20/2024, 4:35 AM
@bcom - I think we’ll be going into hard reboot territory

Also from what I read & know of the character , you are right in that Craig & Dalton we’re definitely the closest

Dalton would apparently even read the books in between filming his movies

I think if the ATJ rumor is true , giving Bond this more youthful makeover could be that new & interesting thing

What do you think of them possibly going a period piece route with this iteration?
1 2 3

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder