THE LORD OF THE RINGS: THE RINGS OF POWER Promo Teases Middle-Earth's Fiery Future; New Trailer On The Way

THE LORD OF THE RINGS: THE RINGS OF POWER Promo Teases Middle-Earth's Fiery Future; New Trailer On The Way THE LORD OF THE RINGS: THE RINGS OF POWER Promo Teases Middle-Earth's Fiery Future; New Trailer On The Way

Prime Video has shared a new teaser for The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power that shows a comet heading to Middle-earth, leaving many fans to wonder whether this could tie into Sauron's origins...

By JoshWilding - Jul 06, 2022 10:07 PM EST
Filed Under: Lord of the Rings
Source: SFFGazette.com

Prime Video has released a new 15-second teaser for The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power, though a minute-long version was shared exclusively on the streaming service (don't fret if you're not a subscriber, though, as you can find it below). 

Neither version gives too much away, though that's probably because a full-length trailer is coming on July 14. Ents have been added to a scene previously shown in the Super Bowl sneak peek, while we also get to take a closer look at a number of the show's lead characters.

Among them are Morfydd Clark's Galadriel, Benjamin Walker's High King Gil-galad, and comedian Lenny Henry as Sadoc Burrows. However, what's interesting is that these characters and races are currently united in the sense that they're all transfixed by the comet that's heading to Middle-earth. 

We know The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power will tell Sauron's origin story, so is it possible that this will somehow tie into that fiery villain's sinister powers? Time will tell on that front, but as this teaser notes, "The skies are strange." Something tells us things will only get stranger from here for these characters as Middle-earth braces for some seismic changes. 

The show, adapted from J.R.R. Tolkien's iconic series of novels, is set to take place during the Second Age, thousands of years before the events of The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings. This story is set to follow a cast made up of established and new characters as they "confront the long-feared re-emergence of evil to Middle-earth" (a.k.a. Sauron). 

The series boasts a massive ensemble, while J.D. Payne & Patrick McKay are set to serve as showrunners. The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power premieres on September 2, later this year!
 

THE LORD OF THE RINGS: THE RINGS OF POWER - Amazon Prime Video Has Already Started Work On Season 3
Related:

THE LORD OF THE RINGS: THE RINGS OF POWER - Amazon Prime Video Has Already Started Work On Season 3

THE LORD OF THE RINGS: Embracer Group Paid Only $395 Million For Rights To The Fantasy Franchise
Recommended For You:

THE LORD OF THE RINGS: Embracer Group Paid Only $395 Million For Rights To The Fantasy Franchise

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
GirshwinDavies
GirshwinDavies - 7/6/2022, 10:07 PM
Ok….ok…..ok so I’ll give it a look
EZBeast
EZBeast - 7/6/2022, 10:13 PM
I want to be excited for this…I want to love this…but I just have this horrible feeling this is going to be awful…
UniqNo
UniqNo - 7/7/2022, 4:13 AM
@TheFireForce - Amazon Prime’s Originals has been doing ok IMO. Not seen The Terminal List yet though, but Reacher was great and I was genuinely quite surprised how much I liked The Wheel of Time, Outer Range…i’ve not fully made up my mind on, but it was really well done, aside from some of the CGI, and im still eagerly awaiting season 2 of Carnival Row.

With so much negative exposure on this one where we've only seen a few photos and a couple minutes of footage I can't really have an opinion. I will definitely say I'll give it a chance before checking out all the reviews to validate my own thoughts.

About all the “Race swapping” stuff… I think it’s a bit silly because a production this big and expensive will be criticised no matter what… Either they are not inclusive but remain true to source (that was written in a different period of time), or are inclusive (to reflect a diverse world like ours) but didn’t remain true to source…

I think it may be a good idea for them to release it all at once though, because drawing it out week by week will only give time to people over analysing and critiquing all the "race swap issues" "storytelling fails" etc, so much that by the end of the run, people aren’t even bothering to talk about the story and if it was good or not. Won’t happen though, as they spent so much i’m sure they’re willing to sacrifice all that to make sure it’s trending week to week hopefully resulting in a subscriber jump for them.

Just my opinion though.
Toblakai
Toblakai - 7/7/2022, 5:15 AM
@UniqNo - remaining true to the source should always be the #1 imperative, who gives a [frick] if it was "from another time"?

Female Orcs?

Black Hobbits and elves?

[frick] outta here with that garbage. LOTR has strong roots and foundation in western European folklore and there's not a goddamn thing wrong with sticking to Tolkiens work.
UniqNo
UniqNo - 7/7/2022, 6:21 AM
@Toblakai - “remaining true to the source should always be the #1 imperative, who gives a [frick] if it was "from another time"?

Well it’s not the first time Race and Tolkein has been discussed, so some people do “give a [frick]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tolkien_and_race. I don’t believe he was racist thought, but I can't say that personally.

I understand your criticism and it being your opinion, but I also understand the opinions of others about inclusion and that if you’re going to do media of something at this scale nowadays you might as well try to do things better. They have more of an audience to gain than what they're losing.


“[frick] outta here with that garbage. LOTR has strong roots and foundation in western European folklore and there's not a goddamn thing wrong with sticking to Tolkiens work.”

I’m not disputing that, but Peter Jackson’s ‘original’s’ took liberties with the story but people didn’t jump up and shout about it, but when they try some aesthetic differences today and gender changes (even if the story at its CORE is the same) it’s a travesty. It is what it is I guess. I’ll be watching with interest.

I assume you’ll be ‘rage watching’. Haha.
Toblakai
Toblakai - 7/7/2022, 8:55 AM
@UniqNo - changes to the story due to time constraints for the films run time is understandable. Changing the entire foundation of the lore is not. There's absolutely no need for "inclusion" or "diversity" in any Tolkien adaptation.

If you think that I would waste 1 second of my life watching this abomination you're delusional.

I'm aborting this pile of shit and any real actual fan of Tolkien would as well.
UniqNo
UniqNo - 7/7/2022, 9:00 AM
@Toblakai - Most of the stuff that was altered wasn't down to time contraints, espeically when you take in the extended editions. All that stuff just wasn't shot. He even went and added a whole bunch of stuff not in the books just to stretch The Hobbit out. But anyway, to each their own.

I'd consider myself a fan, though obviously not by your standards. I guess you won't be taking part in the conversations around the time it comes out then if you're not going to be watching.
Toblakai
Toblakai - 7/7/2022, 9:15 AM
@UniqNo - of course it wasn't shot.....can you guess WHY it wasn't shot? I'll give you a hint....time constraints.

Adding stuff to the Hobbit is whatever, he wasn't trashing the entire mythos and Canon to do it. I didn't care for it but it wasn't a big deal.

Oh, I'll be ripping thos pile of shit apart every step of the way, I've already seen enough of the direction they're going.

If you accept black elves, black Hobbits and female orcs.....you're not a fan.
UniqNo
UniqNo - 7/7/2022, 9:25 AM
@Toblakai - But you should be upset, as according to your own ideas, it didn't stick to the source! Especially when it comes to the books! as parts of the story are quite literally made up! Just to make financial gain, espeically when talking about the Hobbit by making another trilogy instead of a single or a 2 part movie.

It's an adaption, not a straight forward retelling, but na i refuse that idea. I'm a fan of the adaptions none the less and will definitley be watching this.

Guess i'll see you later on, though it's hard to understand how you'll contribute if you're not even going to watch it properly and just hate on something before the fact.

Have a good 1.
Toblakai
Toblakai - 7/7/2022, 9:28 AM
@UniqNo - I never said it had to stick to the source. My issue is with them changing the lore and canon. [frick] me you bootlickers are stupid
UniqNo
UniqNo - 7/7/2022, 9:31 AM
@Toblakai - You literally said it yourself.

"remaining true to the source should always be the #1 imperative, who gives a [frick] if it was "from another time"?

But i'm the stupid one?... anyway.

Take it easy.
Toblakai
Toblakai - 7/7/2022, 12:03 PM
@UniqNo - yes, remaining true to the source. That doesn't mean it has to be adapted word for word, sometimes things have to be modified or left out, that can happen while still being true and faithful to the source material.

Entirely changing the concept and looks of the Races in LOTR isn't that.

Maybe I could use crayons to explain this to you? Maybe the pretty colors will help you get it.
UniqNo
UniqNo - 7/7/2022, 12:20 PM
@Toblakai - Yeah yeah, no need to rationalise your contradictions. Being modified or left out is a totally different thing to adding in a whole new sub plot with characters who didn't exist...Tauriel... who was infact created for the movies to bring in some female energy...case and point.. You're not convincing me.

You can keep your crayons for school tomorrow, seems like you need them more than me. Laters lil man.
Toblakai
Toblakai - 7/7/2022, 3:05 PM
@UniqNo - yeah, cause that's totally the same as changing the entire Canon and Lore
Ataraxis
Ataraxis - 7/6/2022, 10:18 PM
It really bothers me that the younger elves seem to have short preppy style hair.
Super12
Super12 - 7/6/2022, 10:27 PM
It's amazing how one artistic choice by the creators nearly cripples the whole show. SHORT. HAIRED. ELVES. Looks absolutely ridiculous. Stupidest decision ever.
thewanderer
thewanderer - 7/7/2022, 7:41 AM
@Super12 - if the length of a character's hair ruins a show for you, I think you have other issues to deal with.
Toblakai
Toblakai - 7/6/2022, 10:35 PM
Trash
Toblakai
Toblakai - 7/6/2022, 10:35 PM
Everyone involved in this production should be put up against the wall
MisterDoctor217
MisterDoctor217 - 7/6/2022, 10:55 PM
I think it looks…it just looks.
MisterDoctor217
MisterDoctor217 - 7/6/2022, 10:56 PM
The thing with modern shows and TV is that they can throw all the money and CGI they want at it as well as the fanciest sets, but that magic and craftsmanship of movies from 2010 and before, can’t be captured again.
EZBeast
EZBeast - 7/6/2022, 10:59 PM
@MisterDoctor217 - I wanted to argue but besides mad max fury road I can’t think of anything that supports my defense lol
MrDandy
MrDandy - 7/6/2022, 11:08 PM
@MisterDoctor217 - that’s ridiculous. Dune JUST came out.
MisterDoctor217
MisterDoctor217 - 7/6/2022, 11:41 PM
@TheFireForce -

Oh yeah Mad Max! That one was the rare exception. And to some extent Avengers too, despite all the CGI lol
MisterDoctor217
MisterDoctor217 - 7/6/2022, 11:44 PM
@MrDandy -

It’s a good film, I just don’t think it will ever reach the heights of The Lord of The Rings trilogy, Jurassic Park (1993), Jaws, Star Wars, The Matrix , Spider-Man 1 & 2 , and a bunch more I can’t remember lol

Like become a classic is what I mean.
EZBeast
EZBeast - 7/7/2022, 12:06 AM
@MisterDoctor217 - nah avengers was too much of a cgi reliant film. Good quality cgi mind you but no practical effects.
MisterDoctor217
MisterDoctor217 - 7/7/2022, 3:22 AM
@TheFireForce -

Well yeah but it bad that magic that newer CGI filled movies don’t have anymore
1 2
View Recorder