Clayface Box Office Update: DCU Horror Movie Gets A Boost From Discount Tuesday

Clayface Box Office Update: DCU Horror Movie Gets A Boost From Discount Tuesday

Clayface has passed $50 million worldwide, but can the DCU horror movie turn a profit? One box office analyst questions whether choosing the R-rated release as the DCU's third feature was the right move.

By JoshWilding - Oct 28, 2026 12:10 PM EST
Filed Under: Clayface

Clayface opened in North American theaters this past weekend, earning $24 million in the process. Now, all eyes are on the DC Studios movie's second weekend to see whether positive word of mouth will boost ticket sales and turn the DCU body horror into an Obsession-sized hit.

After earning $2.2 million on Monday, Clayface grossed $3.3 million during Discount Tuesday, taking its domestic cume to a reported $29.7 million.

This is a better result than movies like Kraven the Hunter ($1.3 million) and Other Mommy ($2.9 million), but behind Birds of Prey (and the Fantabulous Emancipation of One Harley Quinn) ($3.4 million).

Clayface has surpassed $50 million worldwide. However, it's believed the movie will need to gross as much as two or three times that to break even and turn a modest profit. That's why Halloween weekend is so important for the third DCU feature.

Exhibitor Relations Co. recently addressed Clayface's opening weekend, explaining that a $46 million debut on a $44 million production budget is "not awful." However, the outlet's Jeff Bock then added, "[It] will need to stick around a while to see a cut of the profits."

"Thing is, [Warner Bros.] isn’t mining one of the world's biggest IP libraries simply to break even. It wants a piece of the pop-culture pie. Other Mommy, also R-rated original with zero built-in IP, opened higher: $27M domestic & now $95M worldwide, on a $19M budget. And it did that with a D+ CinemaScore."

"Clayface may eventually turn a box office profit," Bock continued. "But that still doesn’t mean choosing it as the DCU’s third feature was the right move. Cost containment is not cultural momentum. And that's what [Warner Bros.] thought it was getting [by] hiring James Gunn."

In Clayface, Matt Hagen’s meteoric rise from Gotham street kid to Hollywood leading man is tragically cut short when a local crime boss’s actions leave him horribly disfigured. Abandoned by his team and with nothing left, Matt seeks out a cutting-edge treatment that miraculously returns him to his former self, but also unexpectedly affects his grip on reality, spiralling him down a destructive path of all-consuming revenge.

The movie stars Tom Rhys Harries in the title role of the "cult-favourite" villain from Gotham's rogues' gallery. The cast includes Naomi Ackie, David Dencik, Max Minghella and Eddie Marsan, as well as Nancy Carroll and Joshua James.

We concluded our Clayface review by saying, "Tom Rhys Harries shines in Clayface, an uninspired and unoriginal movie that's too light on horror and lacking in comic book personality to be anything but forgettable. It should have been a game-changer for the genre; instead, it's DC's Morbius moment."

Directed by James Watkins from a screenplay by Mike Flanagan and Hossein Amini, Clayface is now playing in theaters. 

James Gunn Sparks Confusion With Contradictory Comments About Clayface's DCU Future
Related:

James Gunn Sparks Confusion With Contradictory Comments About Clayface's DCU Future

Is Heated Rivalry Star Connor Storrie Playing Danny Ketch In Marvel Studios' Ghost Rider Reboot?
Recommended For You:

Is Heated Rivalry Star Connor Storrie Playing Danny Ketch In Marvel Studios' Ghost Rider Reboot?

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Irregular
Irregular - 10/28/2026, 12:56 PM
"But that still doesn’t mean choosing it as the DCU’s third feature was the right move. Cost containment is not cultural momentum. And that's what [Warner Bros.] thought it was getting [by] hiring James Gunn."

It was a terrible move.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 10/28/2026, 1:09 PM
@Irregular - terrible is doing some heavy lifting with that statement. Just say you don't care for certain things. Doesn't mean they're bad because YOU didn't like them. Convincing the majority is all that matters. Literally everything except Supergirl is overwhelmingly beloved and that movies was okay just like the mid Ant-Man movies and 70% of the MCU
User Comment Image
Irregular
Irregular - 10/28/2026, 2:03 PM
@bobevanz - A movie can be good and still be a terrible strategic decision. Especially since it does little to build momentum when DC prioritizes niche characters over more recognizable properties. And declaring everything beloved doesn't prove the strategy is working. You're busy defending the movies that you can't distinguish between quality and franchise management. That's the point, not whether you personally enjoyed them.

It's okay, we all know how deep you go for Gunn.
User Comment Image
krayzeman
krayzeman - 10/28/2026, 2:15 PM
@Irregular - What if the movie wasnt made to build momentum but just to tell a story that happens to be in the DC universe? Everything doesnt have to lead to something so maybe we are overhyping the expectations of what these movies are supposed to do. Maybe IT IS a good strategic move to establish that DC can produce a variety of different movies with their characters that arent super heroes? This movie paves the way for a rated R Swamp Thing and other obscure characters that dont necessarily have to cost a ton to make. IMO the move was brlliant because you DONT want to be the MCU.
Irregular
Irregular - 10/28/2026, 2:28 PM
@krayzeman - That's called creative freedom when the criticism is about franchise strategy. Nobody said every movie needs to set up another movie, but when launching a new cinematic universe, it requires some form of building so audiences can be willing to invest in. Like "WOW WE CAN MAKE DIFFERENT MOVIES GUYS!" is a creative take, not proof that prioritizing Clayface was a smart decision. Hell even Mike Flanagan thought they would use his script for later and not so soon like Gunn wanted because he was thinking "creatively" and not thinking whether it was a smart idea for DCU as a whole.

And the MCU comparison is a bullshit dichotomy. You can avoid Marvel's formula without abandoning the need to build mainstream interest. Being completely different from the MCU doesn't automatically make a decision brilliant.
jst5
jst5 - 10/28/2026, 2:43 PM
@Irregular - That guy has to be a lover of Gunn's or something...he will posted the dumbest crap to take up for Gunn.
Irregular
Irregular - 10/28/2026, 3:36 PM
@jst5 - He's not really smart. The guy called Ant-Man mid but forgot that Ant-Man made more OW domestically than Clayface made OW worldwide. So mid that more people went to go see THAT....
Baf
Baf - 10/28/2026, 4:21 PM
@Irregular - Momentum toward what?
Baf
Baf - 10/28/2026, 4:23 PM
@krayzeman - Exactly this! Just because it's a shared universe doesn't mean it all has be connected.
krayzeman
krayzeman - 10/28/2026, 4:26 PM
@Irregular - It still remains to be seen. This is only the 3rd attempt of building a superhero has been done in the movies where the first time done was a success by Marvel and the 2nd attempt by DC with Zack Snyder was a failure. I like this approach personally because you can still build the outsides of the universe fiscally and then go inside once the main characters are ready. Batman obviously isnt ready and i think that one of this universe biggest issues because of Reeves movies. When Man of Tomorrow comes out next year it will tell if any of this is making sense so I think it's still early to deem it any type of failure. There's just not enough data yet.
Irregular
Irregular - 10/28/2026, 4:42 PM
@Baf - Momentum towards getting general audiences invested in the DCU and excited about what's coming next. You can tell standalone stories without every movie setting up the next, but that doesn't mean every character deserves the same priority when you're still establishing a new universe.

That's like if Marvel's third outing was a MISTER HYDE movie. It might be a good horror, but would it actually help establish the MCU? Would it build interest in its major heroes or give general audiences a reason to invest? Or would it just tell people there's a guy named MISTER HYDE running around? Like...okay?? So what!?

That's my point with Clayface. Yeah it's good but you go from Superman, to Supergirl, to suddenly Clayface...a Batman villain...with no Batman...no Bruce Wayne...no Wayne Enterprises, could have fooled me for Detroit or NYC in the 80's.
Irregular
Irregular - 10/28/2026, 4:54 PM
@krayzeman - The argument is whether Clayface is the right strategic move for DCU. If we wanna compare DCEU, their choice for the third outing of the DCEU...was Suicide Squad and it pushed characters that are popular with fans. Harley, Deadshot, Captain Boomerang, Joker and while the execution was BAD, it was still enough to pique interest where the movie made over $700M WW when it was all said and done. THIRD FILM in the DCEU btw.

Also contradictory when it reads like this whole idea is brilliant or clever but yet there is no data to determine whether it works other than the last three films. Which if this was a line graph with the given data NOW

Superman - $618,723,803
Supergirl - $126,466,532
Clayface - $50,000,000 (as of today)

If we're discussing whether this approach is building mainstream interest in the DCU, those numbers paint a shocking picture.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 10/28/2026, 1:06 PM
Josh when he has to make a positive Clayface article
User Comment Image
THE BIG DEAL about this number is it's only 200k below the Thursday preview number. This is what we call legs. Saturdays number will be low because most people don't go to the theater on Halloween (look and see) so expect Josh to write a gOtChA article lmao.



The comments are even less on these articles. Why do most of you want DC to fail? Whiny ass clowns
User Comment Image
bobevanz
bobevanz - 10/28/2026, 1:14 PM
Quoting someone nobody knows (Jeff Bock) just to pat yourself on the back for not liking it is goofy as well.
Same with making a poll and you combined the "haven't seen it with don't plan on seeing it"
User Comment Image
SupermanFamFan
SupermanFamFan - 10/28/2026, 1:20 PM
@bobevanz - I don't want DC to fail I think Clayface was a great movie, saw it twice. On the 22nd, and last night for discount Tuesday. But I can remain skeptical of Gunn, his choices are questionable. For example I'm not crazy about the upcoming Grodd show but I may like it.

I'm hoping MOT comes in swinging 💪 as a DC fan I want Superman and Supergirl to do well. But it is hard to trust Gunn after how he treated Milly's Supergirl imo.
EscapeMySight
EscapeMySight - 10/28/2026, 1:27 PM
@bobevanz - "Why do most of you want DC to fail?"

I'd love to know this too. It's quite bizarre.

I can only speak for myself. I thought Clayface was pretty good for what it was. However, for me, I know what DC COULD be, and we aren't getting that. I'd love DC to win, but I don't think it ever will under Gunn's leadership. He was the wrong person from the get-go to be put in charge of it, and he hasn't done a single thing yet to change my mind on that, he's only just reaffirmed my stance. We deserve better, and Gunn can't deliver it.

I see the current DCU as an in-between point. Another step on the way to eventually getting a truly definitive DC Universe on screen. I'd love to be proven wrong, but I don't believe Gunn's vision is going to get us there. And I think the sooner DC moves on from his leadership, the sooner we'll have a chance of getting there.
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 10/28/2026, 1:32 PM
@bobevanz - Jeff Bock is quoted all the time by the trades and is one of the most well-known, respected box office analysts in the biz. As for that poll, the option you refer to has been the same for YEARS now, whether it's for a Marvel movie or a DC one. For example:

https://comicbookmovie.com/spider_man/spider_man-brand-new-day/spider-man-brand-new-day-spoiler-discussion-poll-how-would-you-rate-the-latest-mcu-movie-a229155

https://comicbookmovie.com/tv/marvel/daredevil/daredevil-born-again-spoiler-discussion-and-poll---how-would-you-rate-the-latest-mcu-tv-series-a216614

I know what kind of man you are too: a moron.
krayzeman
krayzeman - 10/28/2026, 2:27 PM
@JoshWilding - Not only is this guy posting "featured opinions" on his own new articles he's now calling site viewers and commenters morons. Good grief...
FireGunn
FireGunn - 10/28/2026, 1:10 PM
Finally watched the movie and it's definitely the best thing from the DCU. Not an accomplishment but it is. 5.3/10

Reboot the MCU and DCU
bobevanz
bobevanz - 10/28/2026, 1:14 PM
@FireGunn - even this chode liked it
SupermanFamFan
SupermanFamFan - 10/28/2026, 1:17 PM
@FireGunn - This is a stellar review coming from you bro! 😆
FireGunn
FireGunn - 10/28/2026, 1:32 PM
@bobevanz - Liked it is pushing it but I thought it was ok.
FireGunn
FireGunn - 10/28/2026, 1:33 PM
@SupermanFamFan - I'm sure it is
Baf
Baf - 10/28/2026, 4:36 PM
@FireGunn - That 5.3 from you is like....really good.
thedrudo
thedrudo - 10/28/2026, 1:12 PM
I think this would be less of an issue if you paired this smaller DCU movie - release wise - with a heavy hitter.


It kind of shows they can go big and small.

One issue is it’s on the heels of a true POS so people are latching on to the box office for Clayface more.
dragon316
dragon316 - 10/28/2026, 1:30 PM
Discount Tuesday you can afford pay for cellphone every month with streaming ads to it you can afford see movie discount day or not
Irregular
Irregular - 10/28/2026, 3:17 PM
@jst5 - Forreal and he's like "Oh those mid Ant-Man movies" like buddy...Ant-Man made more domestically OW than Clayface did WORLDWIDE!
Nolanite
Nolanite - 10/28/2026, 2:58 PM
Why is it that every single article from Joshua Wilder always starts with "will it make a profit?"

That has already been answered you stupid illiterate AF dumbass.

I could keep going with the words but he's had me blocked since 2011 so not worth my fingers energy.

Nolanite out
InfinitePunches
InfinitePunches - 10/28/2026, 3:46 PM
If it's already doing well on Discount Tuesday, imagine how much it'll make once it hits the Bargain Bin!
Kahron0
Kahron0 - 10/28/2026, 4:07 PM
Here we go again with another Clayface box-office update that pivots from the actual numbers to another referendum on Gunn’s leadership. I think it’s fair to question whether Clayface was the right choice for the DCU’s third theatrical release, regardless of its box-office performance. But a film can be a modest box-office performer, potentially profitable relative to its budget, and not a breakout cultural phenomenon all at once. Those aren’t mutually exclusive outcomes.

What’s particularly interesting is that Josh previously acknowledged that $125 million worldwide could be a respectable result for this horror movie, and that it didn’t need to match a major superhero blockbuster to succeed. Now we’re being told that EVEN turning a profit wouldn’t necessarily mean choosing it was the right move because DC needs to generate cultural momentum. So which is it? The criteria for evaluating Clayface seem to keep shifting whenever the results don’t support the pre-established negative outcome. If it underperforms, it’s evidence that the DCU is failing; if it performs respectably or turns a profit, suddenly profitability isn’t enough anymore, and we need to talk about cultural impact and whether it was the right project to begin with. Is that going to be the standard for DC movies moving forward? Because if so, what outcome would actually count as a win? My issue isn’t that these questions are being asked. It’s that every new development positive OR negative seems to become another opportunity to reinforce the same cliched negative verdict the DCU…

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder