CAPTAIN MARVEL Is Strong Enough To Move Planets According To Brie Larson

@BlindWedjat - I'm not happy. Too OP for MCU IMO, but maybe they are going for even stronger villains in the future. Still I think that Thanos should be strongest "normal" villain.

@MrMasculinity - Exactly, to me it seems like she is so powerful that Infinity Stones can't even kill her and that's some BS.

@BlindWedjat - As long as she doesn't spin the globe to time travel, the MCU should be safe. But this can also be the safest way to reboot. Lol Henry Cavil needs this power for the DCEU.

@mastakilla39 - Henry should do what Deadpool did...go back in time and shoot himself in the head while reading BvS script!!!

@BlindWedjat -

It's effectively giving the powers of someone with four Infinity Stones to a single character.

Thanos with four Infinity Stones struggled to break pieces of a moon away from it's surface in order to throw it at the Avengers.

Captain Marvel meanwhile is going to be able to move planets - regardless of whether this is a 'binary form' or not.

The Infinity Stones are meant to be the most powerful things in the multiverse, yet Captain Marvel already is stronger than four of them combined. It's surpassing 'One-Punch Man' levels and that was designed as a parody of invincible superheroes who are never at threat.

@Poochie - well, Thor is really OP but he doesn't even know it, the dwarf said the neutron star would kill him but it did not, and Odin said he was more powerful than Odin himself he just needed help in channeling his energy. It may be that Carol is also super OP but that she can only channel it when needed and even then there can be limitations or stuff she is subjected to that will make her lose faith in using it. Tony's armor was taking the power of the stones on Titan as well. That's pretty OP. StarLord could handle a stone directly. Jane Foster was subjected to one... even with Thanos glove, the stones survived the snap but the glove no so much. It is possible the stones are more powerful than there is someone to wield them available and therefore their relative strength to a hero is moot since the hero or the stone may never be shown at full force against each other. In the end, if they want to put storytelling limitations on either i am all for it as it makes the movie better than just a bunch of video game level OP people going at it.

@JonC - Thor was only more powerful in IW because Russos knew how strong he really is and should be. All other directors have nerfed him down. He still isn't planet pulling strong and Carol is if she meant that literally and that's some BS IMO.

@BlindWedjat - I’m not happy either. Seriously, moving planets is for the villain, how are Wes supposed to connect with a hero who can do that? All my life I thought “hey, I can be one of the top 10 billionaires that develops tech that is superhuman and be like a regular dude, like I am, right?” Now this chick comes around and does stuff unrealistic? BS.

Lol.

But seriously, I’m afraid it will make her hard to connect with, she should just be able to move comets if Thanos can move moons.

@Unites - welcome to nerd culture

@WakandaManAreU - Umm

@Nebula - Because this feat would make her stronger than all her male counterparts. Nerds dont know how to handle that at all. All they'll do is chalk her up as a mary sue. Wash, rinse, repeat. Its like clockwork with every movie.

@Nebula - No one said it was but if you wanna pretend like the sexist bigots dont exist in the nerd community you're just sticking your head in the sand. Nerds have turned into annoying bullies ever since nerd culture went mainstream. If you dont see yourself as one of these people then I'm not talking to you but dont pop up trying to rationalize, defend, or ignore this type of dickhead behavior.

@WakandaManAreU - I'm not pretending sexist bigots don't exist in the nerd community. I haven't mentioned any kind of defence for anybody like that.

But as you said, there are sexist bigots in the nerds community.

By saying that the entirety of nerd culture is sexist is disingenuous, and you know it.
Speaking of being disingenuous, attempting to spin anything I've said into 'defence of sexist bigotry' is.

@sikwon - Then ask yourself: would you be mad if Adam Warlock or Sentry came into the picture and outdid Thor??

@Nebula
Ah you see, that's a common defense mechanism!
Because, you know what they say, "the best defense is a good offense" :P
Once they realize that something they like is subject to some criticism, they quickly start covering all their bases by throwing labels left and right and twist other people's words.
A common strategy used by keyboard warriors on the internet, be careful my friend! :P

@WakandaManAreU -

Unites: "That's just pure sexism"
You: "Welcome to Nerd culture"

Me: "Everyone's been on board with them entirely - why would this change that?"
You: "Because this feat would make her stronger than all her male counterparts. Nerds dont know how to handle that at all."

You realise I have this thing on the side of my screen which allows me to go back through the conversation, right?

"I didn't say 'sexist dudes'"
Dude-bro: Dudebro (also dude bro, or dude-bro) denotes a white cishet man, usually in his late teens to mid twenties, who is characterized by casual misogyny, e.g., objectifying women.


SEMANTICS

@Nebula - Nerds are mad. What a surprise.