DCU Shakeup Shocker: Social Media Reacts To News That James Gunn & Peter Safran Are Out At DC Studios

DCU Shakeup Shocker: Social Media Reacts To News That James Gunn & Peter Safran Are Out At DC Studios

The internet has been reacting to the news that James Gunn and Peter Safran will no longer serve as co-CEOs of DC Studios, with former Marvel Studios executive Jeremy Latcham set to take over...

Feature Opinion
By MarkCassidy - Nov 09, 2026 04:11 PM EST
Filed Under: DC Studios

Earlier today, the news broke that James Gunn and Peter Safran will no longer serve as co-CEOs of DC Studios, with former Marvel Studios executive Jeremy Latcham enlisted to take over.

Though this development wasn't entirely surprising, the timing of the announcement was, since it was just over a month ago that the trades reported that Gunn and Safran would remain on as co-chairs under the newly formed Skydance banner.

Apparently, Skydance boss David Ellison visited the set of Man of Tomorrow when it was filming earlier this year, and listened as the pair outlined their 10-year plan for the DCU. Evidently impressed, Ellison was said to have supported their strategy.

It was assumed that any potential shakeup would only happen after MOT was released, but either Ellison and his execs had a rethink, or Gunn and Safran made the decision to step away (Gunn's statement would seem to indicate that it was the latter, but who knows what really went down behind the scenes).

Gunn and Safran are expected to stay "in the fold creatively" for the time being, but it remains to be seen how many of the characters and storylines they established with the likes of Superman, Lanterns, and upcoming projects such as The People Vs. Gorilla Grodd will continue to inform this universe once Latcham begins making creative decisions.

Is another reboot on the cards?

As you might imagine, the news has been met with a mixture of heartbreak, elation, and indifference. Though a lot of people had grown tired of the direction Gunn was taking the DCU, others enjoyed his eclectic approach to these big and small screen projects, and looked forward to seeing how the universe ultimately came together once the likes of Wonder Woman and Batman were introduced.

Of course, this brings us to one of the biggest sticking points for many fans: the decision to leave the big guns on the shelf for so long while greenlighting the likes of Creature Commandos and Clayface.

Have a read through some of the social media responses below, and be sure to share your thoughts on the news in the comments.

Who Is New DC Studios CEO Jeremy Latcham? Why The DCU Is In Safe Hands With Former Marvel Studios Exec
Related:

Who Is New DC Studios CEO Jeremy Latcham? Why The DCU Is In Safe Hands With Former Marvel Studios Exec

DC Studios' New Mandate Includes Justice League Movie, DC Heavyweights, And No More Social Media Squabbling
Recommended For You:

DC Studios' New Mandate Includes Justice League Movie, "DC Heavyweights," And No More Social Media Squabbling

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
MisterBones
MisterBones - 11/9/2026, 4:23 PM
Adria Arjona
User Comment Image
GunnIsDone
GunnIsDone - 11/9/2026, 4:25 PM
@MisterBones - She's not fit for the role
Irregular
Irregular - 11/9/2026, 4:24 PM
It won't be a full on reboot but it will certainly be a pivot away from the C listers and focus on what makes DC so special.

Because ya know when people think of DC, they are just so pumped for a show like The People vs Gorilla Grodd!
GunnIsDone
GunnIsDone - 11/9/2026, 4:25 PM
[frick] anyone who bitched under my comments just because I saw the inevitable. GunnIsDONE 😂😂

Reboot the MCU and DCU
IMCOOLURNOT
IMCOOLURNOT - 11/9/2026, 4:29 PM
@GunnIsDone - You're are a small and insecure person to have to make that comment.
I'm glad Gunn's gone too. Have an extra cookie with your milk tonight kid.
GunnIsDone
GunnIsDone - 11/9/2026, 4:37 PM
@IMCOOLURNOT - I can hear your tears through your comment. You aren't fooling anyone chump.

COPE A MANIA 😂😂🖕
GunnIsDone
GunnIsDone - 11/9/2026, 4:37 PM
@GunnIsDone - *Can see
spr0cks
spr0cks - 11/9/2026, 6:23 PM
@GunnIsDone -

RE : "Reboot the MCU and DCU"

One out of two ain't too bad.

Sadly for you, I don't think you'll get the other half rebooted.
TheNewYorkerr
TheNewYorkerr - 11/9/2026, 4:25 PM
Now Gunn’s shitty little universe can die with him. That [frick]ing garbage 🤣
TheNewYorkerr
TheNewYorkerr - 11/9/2026, 4:27 PM
At least he never got a chance to butcher Batman.
UltronIO
UltronIO - 11/10/2026, 5:29 AM
@TheNewYorkerr - don't speak too soon. MOT with Glenn Powell as Batman is threatening to be released next year.
TheNewYorkerr
TheNewYorkerr - 11/10/2026, 7:17 AM
@UltronIO - 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
harryba11zack
harryba11zack - 11/9/2026, 4:26 PM
new article!!!
GET OUT OF My WAY EYE NEED TO COMMENT
User Comment Image
MR
MR - 11/9/2026, 4:27 PM
Maybe this Latcham fella won't punch down on DC like James Gunn did.
HashTagSwagg
HashTagSwagg - 11/9/2026, 4:29 PM
User Comment Image
BlackStar25
BlackStar25 - 11/9/2026, 4:42 PM
@HashTagSwagg -

User Comment Image
soberchimera
soberchimera - 11/9/2026, 4:34 PM
Honestly, the GA is getting tired of shared universes anyway. Hopefully the shift focuses to high quality standalone features with sequels only greenlit after the film does well. The only setup you need for a sequel is for the hero to still be alive at the end of the film a la Indiana Jones.
Urubrodi
Urubrodi - 11/9/2026, 4:58 PM
@soberchimera - They are tired of bad movies, being in a shared universe is not the reason the DCU failed lol
soberchimera
soberchimera - 11/9/2026, 5:31 PM
@Urubrodi - Stuffing Superman with GL, Mr. Terrific, Hawkgirl, Metamorpho, and The Engineer from The Authority was the result of Gunn prioritizing a shared universe over making a good movie, he literally said as much when he was questioned about the large cast, “we’re building a cinematic universe”. It’s also why phase 4 & 5 of the MCU dipped so much in quality, a shared universe isn’t sustainable. The casual moviegoer doesn’t want to keep up with 5+ movies before they walk into a movie theater.
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 11/9/2026, 5:36 PM
@soberchimera - Spider-Man just made 2 billion and the only reason it won’t be the biggest movie this year is because a shared universe movie with like 20 movies worth of characters are taking his spot. User Comment Image
soberchimera
soberchimera - 11/9/2026, 5:49 PM
@MyCoolYoung - Spider-Man just made 2 billion because it’s Spider-Man, the most popular superhero in the world by a fair margin. How many of the 3 MCU movies that came out last year placed in the top 10 highest grossing movies of 2025? I’ll wait.
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 11/9/2026, 9:04 PM
@soberchimera - you picked a random year. Not to mention, box office overall was down in 2025. Spider-Man did not make billions before the mcu. Sam’s first one the only one would come close adjusted for inflation. Why didn’t you say multiverse of madness making 900+ with no china. Wakanda forever 800+, Deadpool and Wolverine 1 billion. And the 2025 movies were all around the top ten which is indicative of the box office as a whole.

People aren’t tired of shared universes and I hate yall try to portray that around here. It’s tired. The economy sucked the last few years. There’s only two shared universes. 99% of the things you can to see at the show, isn’t a shared universe
soberchimera
soberchimera - 11/9/2026, 9:51 PM
@MyCoolYoung - Last year is a random year now lol? And even if B.O. was down in 2025, that doesn’t change the fact a single MCU couldn’t crack the top 10. How about when 2/3 MCU films were critical and commercial bombs in 2023? And y’all love to give Feige all the credit for D&W when it was the 3rd installment in an ALREADY successful SEPARATE franchise when it was part of a DIFFERENT studio. Black Panthress and Lamor made almost 500M less that BP1 and it’s “positive” reviews from critics was mostly due to emotional blackmail. Multiverse of Madness and Love & Thunder had the goodwill of the first Dr. Strange movie and Ragnarok going for it, but don’t even pretend those films were anywhere close in quality to their predecessors.
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 11/9/2026, 10:24 PM
@soberchimera - yall love to bring that goodwill stuff up. Captain marvel the first one had the goodwill of infinity war right. Why didn’t Antman and the wasp get it? The marvels didn’t get critically panned but it commercially bombed. Antman quantumania turned a box office profit.

“Yall” and it’s just me. Because you can go through my profile and every post and see when “yall” which is just me has ever given feige credit. I don’t even mention dude name. How do you know why critics gave something a positive review? And would that change that it made 800 million? Did Deadpool make a billion?

Movies making less during a time when box offices are making less overall isn’t a diss. You have some preconceived notions about who I am. I’m not yall. I’m not them. I’m not you fam. I’m not on the mcu hate train and I never will be. I’m not on the dcu hate train either. If you look up we on a comic book movie Website and “yall” are weird
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 11/9/2026, 10:25 PM
@soberchimera - and yes 2025 is a random year because there’s way more years than not that the mcu had the highest grossing movies or top 5
soberchimera
soberchimera - 11/9/2026, 10:40 PM
@ MyCoolYoung - Ant-Man and Wasp DID benefit from the goodwill of Infinity War, it was WAY more profitable than Quantumania which didn’t even break even. If you want to lower your quality standards SO low that you consider 63% on RT and 50 on Metacritic critical acclaim for The Marvels, you go right ahead. And I know critics gave Wakanda Forever positive reviews because they plastered Chadwick Boseman’s face all over the trailer and promotional materials to the point anything less than a stellar review would’ve been twisted as the equivalent of spitting on his grave. And yes there was a time when the MCU had more movies in the top 5, but not in Phases 4 and 5 which harkens back to my original point that shared universes in the long-run aren’t sustainable, no matter how hard Y’ALL desperately try to defend Feige’s bonehead decisions since Endgame.
UltronIO
UltronIO - 11/10/2026, 5:48 AM
@soberchimera - Throwing random superheroes in a movie with no explanation of how in the [frick] they have superpowers is 100% the wrong way to do a shared universe.
RedFury
RedFury - 11/9/2026, 4:35 PM
Kind of wish they just reigned Gunn in a bit without getting rid of him. But based on his comments it sounds like the position was burning him out so maybe it's for the best.

I fear what doing another shake up is going to do to the DC brand though. I really liked having a creative be a big part of the decision making, even if things were a bit wacky in terms of what IP's were being used. Here's hoping they don't try and chase the money and become creatively bankrupt in the process.
WEAPONXOXOXO
WEAPONXOXOXO - 11/9/2026, 4:38 PM
We need 20 more articles about this so we can have the same three people leave 40 comments on each of them.
HashTagSwagg
HashTagSwagg - 11/9/2026, 4:39 PM
@WEAPONXOXOXO - User Comment Image
Urubrodi
Urubrodi - 11/9/2026, 5:00 PM
@WEAPONXOXOXO - let’s hope so
Loverboy83
Loverboy83 - 11/9/2026, 4:40 PM
User Comment Image
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 11/9/2026, 4:41 PM
I’ve been working all day what I mis
User Comment Image

I said it before, put your best foot forward, James. Batman then Superman. Then you can start your pet projects when you get some good will. Creature commandos, peacemaker being a priorities it’s not the greatest way to start your universe. Then an R rated green lantern that isn’t necessarily geared towards everyone. I didn’t think they’d be out but I knew they were on the hot seat.

Execs see Spider-Man making 2 billion and the avengers tickets and believe that’s easy to do. Gunn didn’t do himself any favors but building takes time
Truebeliever333
Truebeliever333 - 11/9/2026, 4:44 PM
The contract thing with Gunn makes more sense now. And Reeves having a new contract but Gunn not having doesn’t mean much yet. Gunn’s contract would have been for co-studio head prior to this news.
NinnesMBC
NinnesMBC - 11/9/2026, 4:47 PM
I agree with what the RebelofReality user said about now this being more of another brand to this loser of Ellison. He does not give me any confidance. I disagreed a lot with what Gunn was doing but if it was true that he and Safran were reporting directly to him as they themselves said it they had a meeting with him where he was ok with their direction so far then this is just an unnecessary backstabbing move out of just more "merger business."

I blame that penny pincher moron of Zaslav for getting his way in the merger.

Gunn didn't make himself any favors by not prioritizing what he unveiled in the slate of 2023, it became clear that they needed a better producers. I'll always argue no matter what that the only ones capable of delivering a vision that have worked and built DC universes both in animation and live-action have been the likes of Bruce Timm, Greg Weisman and Greg Berlanti with Geoff Johns. (Look no further than Stargirl)

BUT if I was Ellison the last thing I would've done is remove them like this. Wait until MoT is out at least, you doofus.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 11/9/2026, 5:13 PM
@NinnesMBC - I wouldn’t mind Timm & lesser extent Weisman as consultants (YJ really lost its luster for me post S2 and even then somewhat)

I liked Stargirl and I do think having Geoff Johns atleast would be cool but oh well.
NinnesMBC
NinnesMBC - 11/9/2026, 5:24 PM
@TheVisionary25 - The five year or more gap that passed after the cancelation of S2 until it was revived in the DCU streaming app probably affected the way you felt about it. I get that. Essentially this is just of who are the storytellers that can grow their vision without much trouble.

Not having him around is to me a mistake. Another creative that knows how to build up and make all that is happening count as the stories keep growing. I think any upcoming DCU project must ooze of the hope, heart and heroism and even humor that Stargirl proudly wore. (Those 4 "h" are also exactly the formula that was used for Berlanti's universe to thrive and I'm damn sure Feige knows them as well, just look at the MCU)
Nomis929
Nomis929 - 11/9/2026, 4:49 PM
If you going to do it do it right, start with your "Big Guns" and take you time.

Give your main characters at least one sequel before putting them in a JLA team up movie.

It going take about a 7 or 8 years from now for people to forget about this debacle and start feeling "nostalgic" for these characters again on the big screen. Make the individual movies at least 6 months apart and a sequel every 3 years.

Batman is the most popular IP, but you don't have to start it out with him, his movie is going to make money regardless. You need to sell the public on the other members again. But in each movie have some very brief and cryptic reference to Batman as if he's keeping tabs on these new meta humans activities in case they go rogue i.e. like he did in the "tower of Babel " story arc.

2034 - A Superman movie (Superman-Last Son Of Krypton) and a Wonder Woman (Wonder Woman-Amazing Amazon) movie.
2035 - A Flash movie (The Flash-The Fastest Man Alive) and a Green Lantern (Green Lantern-Emerald Knght) Movie
2036 - A Batman movie (BAtman -The Dark Knight Detective) and Martian ManHunter(Last son of Mars)movie.
2037 - Superman and Wonder Woman sequels.
2038 - Green Lantern and Flash Sequels
2039 - Batman and MM sequels.
2040 - Your JLA movie.
UltronIO
UltronIO - 11/10/2026, 5:50 AM
@Nomis929 - I half agree. But you don't need a sequel to every movie before a JL movie.
Nomis929
Nomis929 - 11/10/2026, 11:32 AM
@UltronIO - I'm Just thinking with at least 2 movies for each character you will really get an opportunity to flesh out the character and supporting cast moreso so that the movie audience for the JLA movie will already have a familiarity with them.
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder