James Gunn Was Reportedly Developing His Own DCU Batman Movie Before DC Studios Exit

James Gunn Was Reportedly Developing His Own DCU Batman Movie Before DC Studios Exit

Former DC Studios co-CEO James Gunn was reportedly developing a third Superman movie, a Justice League team-up, and his own take on Batman before the studio's recent leadership shakeup.

By JoshWilding - Nov 12, 2026 06:11 AM EST
Filed Under: DC Studios
Source: IndieWire

If the rumours that new DC Studios CEO Jeremy Latcham is plotting a reboot instead of sticking to James Gunn's DCU blueprint—initially dubbed "Chapter 1: Gods and Monsters"—are true, we may never find out what the Superman director had planned for this franchise.

Whether Gunn even had a plan has long been debated, though most reports suggest the filmmaker had at least two more Superman movies in the works, with the fourth one likely spotlighting the Justice Gang/League.

One of DC Studios' biggest issues has been an apparent inability to get The Brave and the Bold into theaters. Whether it's been a case of having to avoid stepping on Matt Reeves' toes as he develops The Batman Part II or struggles to figure out what a new take on the Caped Crusader looks like, the Batman and Robin film promised at the start of 2023 never materialised.

Andy Muschietti and Christina Hodson were attached to The Brave and the Bold as director and writer, respectively, reuniting them after 2023's The Flash (a movie Gunn hailed as among the greatest ever made). However, a new report from IndieWire suggests the Man of Tomorrow helmer was considering taking charge of the DCU's Batman. 

"Insiders also note that Gunn and Safran didn’t have a chance to fully realise their vision of making superhero films featuring a wider variety of characters across a greater diversity of genres made for a broader range of budgets," the site explains. "[Gunn] had outlined a third 'Superman' film and was working on a 'Justice League' and a 'Batman' film, either one of which was expected to be his next project."

There have been rumblings about the DCU's Batman appearing in Man of Tomorrow's post-credits scene. While the role presumably hasn't been cast yet, Gunn would have plenty of time to prepare for that as his Superman sequel doesn't drop until next summer. 

With The Batman Part II set for a 2028 release, it seems likely that Gunn might have made Superman 3 a Justice League movie and followed it with his take on the Dark Knight in 2031. Either way, fans have long suspected that he might take charge of The Brave and the Bold, and it's hard not to wonder what that might have looked like. 

Other minor tidbits in the piece include Gunn and Peter Safran's earnings being a little too high for Skydance's tastes, with it mentioned that Gunn was potentially making as much as $10 million per film, including those he didn't write or direct. The Guardians of the Galaxy helmer's social media activity is also said to have "raised eyebrows."

As of now, Batman's DCU future is uncertain, though it's possible Skydance could choose to focus on The Batman franchise for the time being. 

Francis Lawrence Slams James Gunn For Blocking Constantine 2 As Frank Grillo Hits Out At Instagram Jerkoffs
Related:

Francis Lawrence Slams James Gunn For Blocking Constantine 2 As Frank Grillo Hits Out At Instagram "Jerkoffs"

The People vs. Gorilla Grodd Star Unsure About DCU TV Show's Status Following DC Studios Shakeup
Recommended For You:

The People vs. Gorilla Grodd Star Unsure About DCU TV Show's Status Following DC Studios Shakeup

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

NotMyDiagnosis
NotMyDiagnosis - 11/12/2026, 6:48 AM
You sure he wasn't developing batmite?
Moriakum
Moriakum - 11/12/2026, 6:50 AM
User Comment Image

Aged like fine milk.
MaxPaint
MaxPaint - 11/12/2026, 7:00 AM
@Moriakum - Insane, out of those 10 projects, they only materialized 4 and all those turned out between mediocre and bad.
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 11/12/2026, 7:08 AM
@Moriakum -
harryba11zack
harryba11zack - 11/12/2026, 6:50 AM
thank phuck it will never happen
User Comment Image
Presto76
Presto76 - 11/12/2026, 6:52 AM
His idea to do the batfamily was a good and interesting take on batman, but he would have ruined it by jumping into the middle. you really need to let stories breath, and let arcs gradually unfold, all the phase one marvel movies had great heroes arcs.
Presto76
Presto76 - 11/12/2026, 6:54 AM
Except incredible hulk, forgot about that. all the other phase one movies had awesome character journeys.
MaxPaint
MaxPaint - 11/12/2026, 6:57 AM
"Insiders also note that Gunn and Safran didn’t have a chance to fully realize their vision of making superhero films featuring a wider variety of characters across a greater diversity of genres made for a broader range of budgets"


Right, they only were studio heads for 4 years and prioritized supergirl, clayface, pissmaker and wife, creature commandos, polka dot man, dynamic duo, gorilla grodd over the most popular DC superheroes that people want to see. But I guess making shitty decisions for 4 years wasn't enough for jimmy and the crew. You don't get to fully realize your vision if you [frick] up in everything along the way. This isn't an ONG, it's a business. Jimmy should've learned a thing or two from Marvel studios instead of criticizing their approach to build a cinematic universe.
Moriakum
Moriakum - 11/12/2026, 7:07 AM
@MaxPaint - Exactly. They had more than enough time to launch projects featuring DC’s biggest names. But,and it’s still incredibly hard to understand why, Gunn decided to move forward with projects featuring characters that no one gives a shit.
OrgasmicPotatoe
OrgasmicPotatoe - 11/12/2026, 7:03 AM
User Comment Image
Arthorious
Arthorious - 11/12/2026, 7:20 AM
He probably should’ve started with those instead of D list cast
SaxoWolf
SaxoWolf - 11/12/2026, 7:20 AM
Batman Beyond with Keaton and Tim Burton to complete the trilogy.

One can dream
OrgasmicPotatoe
OrgasmicPotatoe - 11/12/2026, 7:35 AM
@SaxoWolf - Cyberpunk Batman would go so hard with mainstream audiences. They could probably squeeze out 3 or 4 movies out of it.
catmandom
catmandom - 11/12/2026, 7:23 AM
Oh, I saw some scribbles on toilet paper the other day was that him? Sorry, hope that wasn't important...
PartyKiller
PartyKiller - 11/12/2026, 7:25 AM
Gunn's Batman would've been a serious guy mocked by an unserious sidekick. Guest starring 70 DC characters.
MGSSnake1988
MGSSnake1988 - 11/12/2026, 8:02 AM
@PartyKiller - Didn't Batman & Robin tell that story decades ago?
MGSSnake1988
MGSSnake1988 - 11/12/2026, 7:36 AM
Profit-wise, DC outside of Batman couldn't reach the success of established IPs like the MCU, Star Wars, James Bond, Harry Potter, and The Lord of the Rings. They have a mountain packed with 90 years of endless material to choose from, and never understood what success really means.

Apart from the $1 billion porfit that the 1989 Batman film made from tickets, home video, toys, and merchandise, as well as the 78' Superman film and The Dark Knight being preserved in the National Film Registry, there's no clear path other that poaching filmmakers and executives from Marvel to launch their IP.

This is not James Bond where you can change the actor, the story, and the aesthetics multiple times, and expect those same people to show up. A good-looking guy in a toxedo suit travelling around the world to charm women and fight bad guys is easier to relate to than some person in tights with mumbo jumbo nonsense and trauma baggage, regardless of how many times that story is told. Only Batman has that luxury.

Either they'll have to continue where they left off since it's the same exact scenario where streaming subscription matters, or let it rest and get someone new and not the same people who run the MCU.
UltronIO
UltronIO - 11/12/2026, 7:41 AM
So add Muschietti to the list of filmmakers he screwed over.

Gillespie, Flanagan, Reeves, Francis Lawrence and the Muschiettis.
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 11/12/2026, 7:49 AM
I said it then and I'll say it now: There was never going to be another Batman franchise while The Batman trilogy was in the process of being released.
MGSSnake1988
MGSSnake1988 - 11/12/2026, 8:01 AM
@TheJok3r - Which is probably why Gotham characters appear constantly in the DCU, with Batman himself showing up later and maybe face guys like Clayface and that lady who killed Hal Jordan.
MonkeyBot
MonkeyBot - 11/12/2026, 7:53 AM
Yeah, we knew that right?

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder