How Mr Plinkett Misrepresented Me To Slam The STAR WARS Prequels

How Mr Plinkett Misrepresented Me To Slam The STAR WARS Prequels

In Mr Plinkett's latest Star Wars review he criticised people writing articles defending the prequels. Well, I'm one of those "idiotic millennials" and I think the he's missed a big point.

Editorial Opinion
By ADLeadbeater - Oct 27, 2016 07:10 AM EST
Filed Under: Star Wars
Mr Plinkett's The Force Awakens review was an event not that much less exciting than the movie itself. Since publishing a 70 minute takedown of The Phantom Menace, RedLetterMedia's resident critic/serial killer has become an icon in Star Wars fandom, a beacon for all those burned by the prequels to rally around. So what would he bring to the recently released (and much more warmly received) Episode VII?

His video (link here) is certainly a massive undertaking, exploring all manner of Star Wars context, both of The Force Awakens and the wider franchise, but something didn't sit right with me. It's not the fact only half the review is about The Force Awakens, or that he's far too obsessed with diversity. No, it's something much more personal: when he slammed "idiotic millennials" for reevaluating the prequels, he used one of my articles (from WhatCulture.com) out of context as evidence.

So, here's my video response, breaking down how I was misrepresented and explaining how you should watch his reviews with a pinch of contextual salt (made with love, of course).

STAR WARS: REVENGE OF THE SITH Looks Set To Score A Shocking Upset At The Box Office This Weekend
Related:

STAR WARS: REVENGE OF THE SITH Looks Set To Score A Shocking Upset At The Box Office This Weekend

Ryan Coogler's SINNERS Set To Hit $100 Million At Domestic Box Office This Weekend
Recommended For You:

Ryan Coogler's SINNERS Set To Hit $100 Million At Domestic Box Office This Weekend

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

WYLEEJAY
WYLEEJAY - 10/27/2016, 12:07 PM
This will get deleted. Unless they find the comments amusing. So let em rip guys!
Yeaton10
Yeaton10 - 10/29/2016, 5:20 AM
@WYLEEJAY -
@WYLEEJAY -
In replies, I would like some idea how to find the any of the reviews that the author is discussing. His review, and the four reviews by Mr. Plinkett because this does not explain enough specifics to understand what he or Mr. Plinkett said.

Having said that I agree with the statement the prequels were "okay, " although that is proverbial curse of faint praise. I actually like 2 of them, and someone must have like episode 1 because it earned over a billion dollars in various releases. A movie that no one likes can only make huge amounts if makes the bulk of it's money in it's first weekend. Episode 1 actually, had a only 17% drop in it's second full week (implying good word of mouth and some repeat customers) (http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=weekly&id=starwars.htm ).
Someone enjoyed it. 55% on rotten tomatoes implies more critics like it than disliked it. It may or may not astound you, but the two movies I liked are rated as fresh (episode III is certified). So, it possible to find plenty of critics who would defend the prequels.

If as you say, Mr. Plinkett alone had a huge impact on the impression the prequels were devoid of merit (as opposed to the majority of critics listed on the rotten website): it isn't uprising. I never felt that way about the prequels, and I never listened to Mr. Plinkett's reviews. I would be curious where I could find these reviews, and where I could find the author of this essay's review. While the author is not alone in defending the prequels, it would be interesting to know just what he said, and exactly what Mr. Plinkett said.

By the way, all reviews listed as negative on rotten tomatoes are not scathing assaults. I recently read a one of negative reviews of Legends of tomorrow, Legends of Tomorrow season 2 (a show enjoy). The author gave season 2 a C+. So teachers consider C+ a passing grade. In any event, in the instances of all three movies, the majority of critics were willing to recommend the movies. I could find solid reason to recommend two of the movies (yes I am seriously suggesting a viewer watch the original trilogy, skip episode 1, and watch the remaining two movies). I seriously believe that many people who did not like the prequels were prejudiced because they watched the first movie first.

I have not difficulty believing you were misrepresented. But since you did not explain a lot of the specifics about you said and what they said you said, and Mr. Plikettes original complaints were, this video was a bit of disappointment. In particular, I'm curious if you views were very different from the large number of other critiques who thought the prequels were "okay."
WYLEEJAY
WYLEEJAY - 10/29/2016, 9:28 AM
@Yeaton10 - I find episode 1 easier to watch, if you fast forward to the part they introduce Anakin, skip the rest and watch the battle at the end. That's really all you need to see. The general audience enjoyed it, but it's the fans that hate on it. And that's what you get exposed to. Cause nobody else is talking about the prequels anymore. I didn't hate them. I just can't reach them all the way through anymore. EPISODE 3 is the only one I liked, but even that one I have many issues with.
ASGARDIANBRONY
ASGARDIANBRONY - 10/27/2016, 2:43 PM
star wars.
gamecreatorjj
gamecreatorjj - 10/27/2016, 9:33 PM
@ASGARDIANBRONY - star wars.
ASGARDIANBRONY
ASGARDIANBRONY - 10/28/2016, 3:17 PM
@gamecreatorjj - star wars?
AsgardianHobo
AsgardianHobo - 10/28/2016, 8:06 AM
Mr. Plinkett EVISCERATED the prequels, those reviews are amazing. Haven't seen this new one yet though. Thx for the heads up
pesmerga44
pesmerga44 - 10/29/2016, 8:09 PM
The prequels are plainly bad movies they just are. If you like them good for you everyone has movies they like that are bad there is nothing wrong with that. Now saying that the prequels aren't the worst movies ever made in fact the lowest grade I give any of those movies is a 4. I give Ep.1 a 4, Ep.2 a 5, and Ep.6 a 6 so again none of them are the worst movies ever made. The dialogue in the prequels is terrible, I find the writing to be pretty sub par, it does feel like Lucas first draft scripts were used, he was clearly surrounded by yes men, the movies really don't understand the phrase "show don't tell", the villains are all pretty terrible yes even Darth Maul because even though he looked threatening he was completely wasted by killing him. The only thing Count Dooku had going for him was he was played by Christopher Lee besides that I felt nothing for him with his fight with Yoda was goofy as hell and his pitiful death in Ep. 3. General Grievous I was actually furious with because they took this amazing villain that struck fear in the hearts of Jedi Masters in Gendy Tartakovsky's great Clone Wars cartoon into a wheezing coughing joke of a character in the movie. Then Emperor Palpetine looked hilarious when he was trying to fight with a lightsaber which in turn kind of insults the character much like Yoda which leads into my last point.

Lightsabers are one of the biggest problems with the prequels which sounds crazy. Who doesn't love lightsabers because I sure do and as a kid I wanted nothing more then to have a real life lightsaber. Looking back at both the prequels and the original trilogy you see why the prequel fails with lightsabers and the original trilogy succeeds with them. In the original trilogy when the characters faced off with lightsabers it meant something and had emotional heft to it hence why there were only 3 actual lightsaber duels. Especially the two matches between Luke and Darth Vader. Their first match in Cloud City where Vader toys with Luke truly showcasing a master taking on a clear novice and the battle upon the Death Star where Luke has become a master and meets Vader on equal footing all the while fighting for both of their souls. Even Vader vs Obi Wan in Ep IV. while the weakest knowing their history together makes it much more of an impactful fight. Compare that to the prequels and only one fight has any damn actual heft or real emotion to it when Anakin fights Obi Wan and it gets ruined by the fight going on forever and a terrible ending, "I have the high ground Anakin" HA! The rest are pure spectacle just a lot of glowsticks bouncing off each other. Even the fight between Qui Gon, Obi Wan, and Maul while seemingly cool it is overblown and too choreographed.

Like I said earlier lightsabers insult the characters of Palpatine and Yoda because neither of those characters would use a lightsaber. Palpatine actually looked down on lightsabers calling them a "Jedi weapon" in Ep.VI. He was so powerful in the force that a lightsaber was no more useful against him then a single blaster. Then much like Palpatine Yoda was a sage a true believer and user of the force. The ebbs and flow truly understanding the force that he would never use a lightsaber. Yet Lucas decided to give them both lightsabers even Yoda with a little lightsaber perfect for his little body to use and it was hilariously stupid especially their fight in the senate halls.

Now to finish off I do want to give Lucas credit for one thing. He actually went somewhere new with the prequels. We saw new worlds, new cultures, new technologies, we had new plots, new villains, etc... In Ep. VII we got pretty much everything from the original trilogy with a new name slapped on it. We got Tatooine, Endor, Hoth, the cantina, the Death Star, the Rebels, the Empire, Darth Vader, Boba Fett, and Emperor Palpetine all over again just with different names. This time they were called Jakku, Takodana, Star Killer Base, Maz Kanata's castle, Kylo Ren, Captain Phasma, and Supreme Leader Snoke. I am here praying that they go somewhere new for Ep. VIII because Ep. VII was really nothing more then nostalgia pure unadulterated nostalgia.
pesmerga44
pesmerga44 - 10/29/2016, 8:11 PM
@pesmerga44 - Oh forgot to put in there the Resistance and the First Order at the end.
DougMcCausland
DougMcCausland - 11/2/2016, 10:14 PM
The prequels sucked, Mr. Plinkett is God, you shot first.

"but in general the 'reviews' are one-sided attacks that drown their occasionally sound logic in thinly-veiled fan hate. Worth a watch, but don't take them too seriously."

View Recorder