Will Superman "Man of Steel" finally break free of the "Mild Mannered" and bring more "Kick Ass"?

I'd be okay with Lois, Lex, origin story telling having
a minor part in the flick if Zack chooses to make it
more more action oriented.
And please, no zod thank you.

It will be rushed and will fail!!!

It will be legendary, bringing some depth to Superman himself as a character and then blend a Superman movie with the capable hands of Nolan and action capability of Snyder and we have a classic in the making!!

I Don't think the casting for superman could have been better a great young actor with a solid career ...oh and have i said he's an ACTOR (Routh pay attention). The first time i saw Cavill was the Tudors and from that moment before the rumors, before WB getting its act together he was perfect!!

Bring on 2012!! Bring back Superman and bring the legend back in a fresh action filled (not kick ass lol) style!!

@Baasman
"IT IS TIME TO SHOW US A KICK ASS SUPERMAN, WITH EQUALLY KICK ASS VILLAINS!!!"

It is time indeed, but is that all you care about?

Superman is so much more than just a big guy in a cape who fights powerful villains.

Try to understand that.

Well...to be honest. I'm just happy they can finally lay the Reeve version of Superman to REST.

@Havok89- Perhaps you don't understand things yourself friend :) Superman Returns for instance was BORING. Superman layed not ONE punch the entire 2 1/2 hours. I mean, Superman Returns from what i read had one of the BIGGEST budgets for a CBM AND it was one of the longest...yet Superman never fought not once. That is pathetic. We fans understand that Superman is more than just fighting...but so far in the movies HE HAS NEVER FOUGHT. YES story is important but so is ACTION. Get a good mix of STORY and ACTION and we're all good. The last films have only been all story NO action.

That is where Bryan Singer failed miserably.

I said it before and I'll say it again- if Thor, Cap, Batman and Green Lantern are all allowed to FIGHT in their movies...why not Superman? What unwritten rule states that Superman must NEVER FIGHT ??

Well it is time they broke that 'unwritten rule' and FOR ONCE gave Superman a worthy opponent...a POWERFUL antagonist...

It is time we finally bear witness to Superman throwing a punch. The first punch he will have ever thrown will be in this film and I know that the minute he throws that punch, EVERYONE in the theater will give a standing ovation.

Story is important...but even WB admitted they messed up because the YOUNG, MALE audience DEMANDS at least a LITTLE action. Story + Action = SUCCESS

SuperHOFF looks pretty mild mannered.

I hoping for the villian to be Brainiac and Lex as a presidential candidate

@NorseGod- Asking for Superman to go up against a powerful foe is asking too much of WB. After all they are total SCREW UPS. lol

Let's hope they don't f/u/c/k THIS film up at least. :D

We should definitely not have Doomsday in this it would just rush Superman's life and the movie (although very entertaining and possibly "kick-ass") will fail in the long run. They will have no where's else to go! My opinion is to have Lex Luthor (I know he's in every movie except for Superman III, which was pretty much about Richard Prior stealing money...anyways Luthor is essential), and somebody Bad-ass he can team up with (not unknown Nuclear Man). Brainiac, Metallo, Parasite, or even Amazo are some good villains. I don't think this will turn out to be a bullshit movie like Superman vs. Superman's Inner-self or about a black comedian that has nothing to do with the story what so ever. and if it is idk what to say... btw Lois Lane is also very important to the story. Superman without Lois Lane (kinda CRAZY sounding). Just because the last movie was really shitty doesn't mean turn the Character we've all loved since the days of diapers into a completely different person.