First Negative Review For ‘THE DARK KNIGHT RISES’ Hits The Web

First Negative Review For ‘THE DARK KNIGHT RISES’ Hits The Web

The inevitable first negative review for 'The Dark Knight Rises' has arrived courtesy of Marshall Fine of 'Hollywood & Fine'...

By CBMJamie - Jul 16, 2012 09:07 AM EST
Filed Under: Batman
Source: HollywoodAndFine.com




Amid almost universal praise from critics, Marshall Fine of Hollywood & Fine has produced the inevitable first negative review for ‘The Dark Knight Rises’, a review that slams the film’s 'over-use' use of action, citing a lack of ‘adventure’ and a script that fails to impress.

Whilst many of us will have to wait a few more days before we can definitively argue against or perhaps even support Fine’s almost scathing review, other critics have labelled the trilogy’s finale as an ‘epic’ 'masterpiece'.

Only after a what can only be described as an overly harsh evaluation of the intellect of society's youth and a critical analysis of the movies villain Bane, does Fine finally compliment an element of the film in the form of Anne Hathaway’s portrayal of Selina Kyle/Catwoman.

Fine is known by some for being one of the few critics to dislike 2008's 'The Dark Knight', his reasoning being that there were too many characters involved and therefore too many stories being told simultaneously.

In his review there is however praise given for the first film in the trilogy, 'Batman Begins', a movie that has somewhat slipped under many people’s radars since the overwhelming success of its sequel.


The question will be whether this review - harsh as it may be - is simply publicity-seeking journalism at its best, by a man who labels his own site as 'Movies for Smart People', or, simply one critic's honest opinion?



Check out hollywoodandfine.com/reviews for the entire review.
ALIENS Star Michael Biehn Reveals That He Was Almost Cast As Tim Burton's BATMAN
Related:

ALIENS Star Michael Biehn Reveals That He Was Almost Cast As Tim Burton's BATMAN

CLAYFACE Movie From Writer Mike Flanagan Rumored To Be Moving Forward At DC Studios
Recommended For You:

CLAYFACE Movie From Writer Mike Flanagan Rumored To Be Moving Forward At DC Studios

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
RidiculousFanBoyDemands
RidiculousFanBoyDemands - 7/16/2012, 9:25 AM
Anybody who is pretentious enough to call his site "Movies for Smart People" doesn't deserve our attention. Plus he didn't like Batman Begins or TDK so it's no surprise he didn't like this. That guy is the type of person who thinks Terrence esque movies are the only ones that are worth a damn.
PaulRom
PaulRom - 7/16/2012, 9:29 AM
What RidiculousFanBoyDemands says.
Yendor
Yendor - 7/16/2012, 9:30 AM
One critic's opinion my ass! He equated Christopher Nolan to Michael-freakin'-Bay essentially! This coming from a man you praised Men in Black 3 for its capacity for story and action! What a jackass. I really do hope he doesn't consider himself a valid and relevant film critic.
zware
zware - 7/16/2012, 9:48 AM
Horrible review guy just hates comic book film, disliked Avengers. Only comic book film he "liked" was Thor 2.
RidiculousFanBoyDemands
RidiculousFanBoyDemands - 7/16/2012, 9:50 AM
Seriously, he was going to hate this movie regardless. Here is what he had to say about TDK during Oscar season 2009. I think he became butt hurt from people bashing his credibility over not liking TDK. He is entitled to his opinion, but he was going in with a bias to begin with.


OK, so it’s been a week since the Academy Award nominations were released – a week since the wailing, gnashing of teeth and rending of garments began over the supposedly egregious snub of “The Dark Knight” from the major (read: non-technical) awards, with the exception of Heath Ledger’s nomination.



What – no best picture? No best director?



Really? How about most super-duper movie ever in the history of undiscriminating fanboys?



Talk about misplaced outrage. Better that energy went to questioning the way the Oscar snubbed Sally Hawkins, or “Gomorra” as best foreign film.



Perhaps people could apply that effort instead toward a campaign to convince Mickey Rourke to stop even joking about participating in Wrestlemania. (I have four words for Mickey Rourke regarding how to blow his comeback after “The Wrestler”: Burt Reynolds. “Boogie Nights.”)



So let me put this is as simply as possible:



“The Dark Knight” was not a great movie. It was only half a good movie.



It was not as good as “Batman Begins.”



It was not as consistently entertaining as “Iron Man.”



There’s a solid 90-minute movie buried within the 150-minute slog that is “The Dark Knight.” And even that wouldn’t have been worthy of an Oscar nomination.



Personally, I’m still trying to figure out why so many people got so worked up about this bloated, self-important movie. It kind of blew, in the same way that “Spider-man 3” kind of blew.



Sure, it was dark and broody. And then, for a change of pace, it was darker and broodier.



“The Dark Knight” had more prelims than a Don King undercard. You had to sit through Batman slugging it out with what seemed like dozens of faceless, generic henchmen before he actually worked his way to the Joker. It was as if Batman tried to cut in line to buy Springsteen tickets – and then had to take on everyone else in the line – before confronting the Boss himself.



Also: If you want to make a movie about Two-Face, go ahead and make one. But don’t graft it on to the Batman-Joker movie, like some weird Ray Milland/Roosevelt Grier clone. By the time Aaron Eckhart was burned into a special-effects nightmare worthy of early Sam Raimi, you mostly wished he’d just die and shut up. Or spin off to his own movie.



Too much of this over-earnest outing was devoted to convincing people to take it seriously. It practically screamed, “This is literature! This is art, by God!”



Meanwhile, writer-director Christopher Nolan left out a couple of key elements: fun, for one. Excitement, for another.



And by the way: If I wanted to listen to Nolan’s dissertation on the nature of heroism in modern society, I would have gone to grad school with him.



End of sermon.



Now let’s unite behind a cause that is crucial to our survival as a species: stopping Steve Martin from ever making another Inspector Clouseau movi
Tajin88
Tajin88 - 7/16/2012, 9:53 AM
Like I said before, critics are critics LOL!
This movie is like a unstoppable force, but this so called review is indeed an movable object.

BrotherQStark
BrotherQStark - 7/16/2012, 9:54 AM
The oscars are totally unfair, there is no way Hitchcock should have died without an oscar. The academy composes off actors who try to promote their own yet CHristopher Plummer had to wait 80 years for an oscar, bias I say.

In all fairness the academy should compose of retired actors, producers, directors and writers not people like Anne Hathway, people like Sidney Poitier, Peter O' Toole, Bill Cosby, etc.

The Dark Knight Rises will rock
DraculaX
DraculaX - 7/16/2012, 9:55 AM
Movies for Smart people? HA!
Supes17
Supes17 - 7/16/2012, 9:55 AM
The guy is getting murdered on RT lol

People are calling him "worse than Leonard Maltin" and an "attention whore"
:P


Every movie has a critic that doesn't like it...
For example:
Avengers-
"The overlong, stale experience barely raises a fast pulse, as the movie quickly stumbles into a standard film structure and doesn't even try to break free."

"Every now and then, director Joss Whedon executes a quirky camera set-up to assert that the film was created by him and not a team of marketing executives."
-Ben Sachs, Chicago Reader
DraculaX
DraculaX - 7/16/2012, 9:57 AM
@RFBD He said it blew like Spider-Man 3?



Yeah, he doesn't deserved our attention. Not that it his review will matter with all the praise TDKR has been getting.
Supes17
Supes17 - 7/16/2012, 10:02 AM
Peter Travers, Rolling Stone:
Potent and provocative, The Dark Knight Rises is the King Daddy of summer movie epics.
Tajin88
Tajin88 - 7/16/2012, 10:02 AM
As soon as BANE finds him, he will ask that guy, what he should break first... His soul or his body... It definitely will be his back LOL!

AutobotCommander84
AutobotCommander84 - 7/16/2012, 10:03 AM
I have to agree with him on The Dark Knight in some parts of his review, but I have to see TDKR for myself.
RidiculousFanBoyDemands
RidiculousFanBoyDemands - 7/16/2012, 10:05 AM
@vegakingblade

No, people are entitled to their opinion but this guy went in with an obvious bias. He just wanted to get under people's skin which is why he compared it to Transformers (I actually liked the first and third one). If you want to piss off a fanboy compare a movie they like to Transformers.
LMB10
LMB10 - 7/16/2012, 10:09 AM
There's been afew other negative reviews as well, but none that outright say it's a bad film.
Supes17
Supes17 - 7/16/2012, 10:12 AM
96% RT ;)
jumpingtheshark
jumpingtheshark - 7/16/2012, 10:15 AM
This guy gave both The Amazing Spider-man and The Avengers positive reviews, so he doesn't not like CBMs. I think he just hates Christopher Nolan's vision of Batman. He liked Batman Begins but hated TDK. I am no surprised he was the first asshat to do this Not at all. Considering he was one of the more vocal critics against TDK's cinematic greatness.

http://hollywoodandfine.com/fineblog/?p=154
jessepostal
jessepostal - 7/16/2012, 10:17 AM
Another reason to never listen to critics. If your interested in a movie go see it. People's views on movies are always going to be different. You have your own taste, use it.
LoudNoises
LoudNoises - 7/16/2012, 10:21 AM
Everyone probably remembers how bad that one female critic got hit when she wrote a poor review about the Avengers. She was probably a prime candidate for the witness protection program, lol. This guy knows he throwing fuel on the fire. I'm sure he is perfectly aware the kind of feed back he is in store for. Not that I think it's right by any means. Let him have his opinion. But if it's attention he wants, it's attention he will get, lol.
Supes17
Supes17 - 7/16/2012, 10:26 AM
TIME Magazine just put up their review
"For once a melodrama with pulp origins convinces viewers that it can be the modern equivalent to Greek myths or a Jonathan Swift satire. TDKR is that big, that bitter -- a film of grand ambitions and epic achievement."
RidiculousFanBoyDemands
RidiculousFanBoyDemands - 7/16/2012, 10:28 AM
Huh, I figured this would be the place for the trolls that perpetually bashed this movie would gather. Not really seeing much.
Supes17
Supes17 - 7/16/2012, 10:30 AM
Bro there is only ONE negative review so far, and it's criticizing the amount of action in TDKR:P
Matfin93
Matfin93 - 7/16/2012, 10:32 AM
He's doing it for a publicity stunt, so people view his shitty little website!
TayDee
TayDee - 7/16/2012, 10:32 AM
It seems like this and the avengers will have the same rating on rottentomatoes.
Tajin88
Tajin88 - 7/16/2012, 10:33 AM
@Supes17 "Bro there is only ONE negative review so far, and it's criticizing the amount of action in TDKR:P"

Thats why, I am crying and laughing at the same time LOL!

NOLAN IS BACK!!!
Supes17
Supes17 - 7/16/2012, 10:42 AM
@Tajin88: Can you get on the chat room? I have to ask you a question about the film that has been bugging me but I don't want anyone to be spoiled
Tajin88
Tajin88 - 7/16/2012, 10:45 AM
@Supes17: I would, but dont know where that chat room is... You have to guide me LOL!
Tajin88
Tajin88 - 7/16/2012, 10:48 AM
@Supes17: OK Im now in the chatroom, I think :)
Supes17
Supes17 - 7/16/2012, 10:49 AM
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/community/chat/
CaptainObvious
CaptainObvious - 7/16/2012, 10:49 AM
@RidiculousFanBoyDemands- That whole sermon wasn't The Dark Knight Review. That was a bill for health care.
Supes17
Supes17 - 7/16/2012, 10:50 AM
Alright Im on
AnditsOn1
AnditsOn1 - 7/16/2012, 11:17 AM
Well, you cannot win them all. But, seriously? We all know at least this movie won't disappoint.
Altair
Altair - 7/16/2012, 11:26 AM
Yeah he's pretty stupid.
1 2
View Recorder