WILLOW: Warwick Davis Finally Responds To Disney's "Embarrassing" Decision To Pull Series From Streaming

WILLOW: Warwick Davis Finally Responds To Disney's "Embarrassing" Decision To Pull Series From Streaming

Earlier this year, Willow was among the shows pulled from Disney+ in a series of cost-cutting measures by the streamer. Now, star Warwick Davis has finally weighed in, calling the decision "embarrassing."

By JoshWilding - Oct 18, 2023 05:10 AM EST
Filed Under: Fantasy
Source: SFFGazette.com

Willow star Warwick Davis has finally decided to address the show's cancellation and subsequent removal from Disney+, describing the decision to stop people from being able to watch the 8-episode sequel as "embarrassing."

After a largely muted response to the long-awaited revival from fans and critics alike, the decision was made to cancel plans for future seasons back in March. However, amid a series of cost-cutting measures, the House of Mouse completely removed it from Disney+ just two months later.

"I meet lovely people on a daily basis who are fans of Willow," Davis said on Twitter/X, "who are the reason the [Disney+] Series was made. Please tell me [Disney], what do I say to these subscribers when they ask why they can’t watch the series any more?" He concluded his post with the hashtag, "#Embarrassing."

The series, based on George Lucas and Ron Howard's fantasy-adventure film, began streaming on Disney+ last November, and there was initially a lot of excitement surrounding the long-overdue return to Andowyne. The original movie has become a beloved cult classic since it was released in 1988, and fans were eager to see what became of Davis' Willow Ufgood.

Unfortunately, the story told simply wasn't that compelling; the spotlight shifted to younger cast members (Ellie Bamber's take on Elora Danan was a highlight, though the same couldn't be said for the rest of the ensemble) and Davis' work...well, his stilted performance did little to help the series. 

Still, to pull Willow completely from streaming feels unnecessarily harsh and there's now no way for fans to watch the show. It's yet to find a new home and, with no physical release, the only way to watch is to pirate it (and, given the risks involved there - including the fact it's illegal - we wouldn't recommend it). 

Set in a magical world where brownies, sorcerers, trolls and other mystical creatures flourish, Willow is the story of an unlikely group of heroes who set off on a dangerous quest, facing their inner demons and coming together to save their world.

Willow is bound to show up somewhere down the line but we don't anticipate the story ever continuing. 

THE LAST WITCH HUNTER, One Of Vin Diesel's Biggest Flops, Is Getting A Sequel Following Streaming Success
Related:

THE LAST WITCH HUNTER, One Of Vin Diesel's Biggest Flops, Is Getting A Sequel Following Streaming Success

Djimon Hounsou Joins Henry Cavill's HIGHLANDER Remake As Another Immortal - But Is He A Friend Or Foe?
Recommended For You:

Djimon Hounsou Joins Henry Cavill's HIGHLANDER Remake As Another Immortal - But Is He A Friend Or Foe?

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Origame
Origame - 10/18/2023, 5:52 AM
A handful of people doesn't change the fact the show did terribly. According to the writer, disney literally thought it wasn't worth paying the residuals. Does that really sound like a show people are genuinely watching?
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 10/18/2023, 6:42 AM
This show was a lot of fun, and I would have loved to see it continue.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 10/18/2023, 8:33 AM
@ClintThaHamster - I enjoyed it too, but I don't need to see it continue. The season worked well on it's own imo
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 10/18/2023, 9:19 AM
@bkmeijer1 - Oh, for sure. Not like there were any dangling plot threads that'll keep me up at night. I Just really liked the cast they put together, and I'd like to see more of that ensemble.
Timerider
Timerider - 10/18/2023, 7:20 AM
They should either do a season 2 or make another film with Val Kilmer appearing very briefly. He could be locked up in a dungeon and injured in the neck from a sword, unable to speak, but have a magical creature or shape shifter be an interpreter. He could speak once using the same technique they used in Top Gun Maverick.

If you bring his character back people might return. He doesn’t have to be in the film or series too long, just a few scenes, the end perhaps. He is either saved or he sacrifices himself to save the hero. I’m all for saving here, seeing as he didn’t make it in the Top Gun sequel.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 10/18/2023, 8:33 AM
@Timerider - I don't think Kilmer is enough reason for people to come back to this honestly. It would be fun to see him again though
Saintsinnister
Saintsinnister - 10/18/2023, 7:36 AM
Tell them the truth Warwick, the show did so bad they want people to forget it was ever made. He should pretend he doesn’t have a clue what they’re talking about when fans ask him about the show 🤣
Urubrodi
Urubrodi - 10/18/2023, 7:40 AM
I mean... was it was not good imo, but it's their own show, why remove it for no reason? It's not like it was some ancient content that no one was viewing, they had just released it.
Rokhorn
Rokhorn - 10/18/2023, 8:52 AM
@Urubrodi - they didn't remove it for no reason. When a company removes content from a streamer and deletes it, it's done for taxes. Just like WB did with Batgirl if they delete it they can claim it as a lose on their taxes and get a deduction on taxes owed. So not done for no reason, done for a very large tax reduction on an IP that wasn't worth keeping.
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 10/18/2023, 9:25 AM
@Rokhorn @Urubrodi - A tax write-off is why they might decline to release a finished product, a la Batgirl. Once it's out in the world, it's more likely that they believe the show won't drive new subscriptions, and that they can make more money from the property by licensing it to other streamers.
marvel72
marvel72 - 10/18/2023, 8:31 AM
It was crap though and Disney have a problem with hiring Dwarf actors.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 10/18/2023, 8:31 AM
Removing the series to cut costs sounds like such a weird reason, but then I remember WB cut a full movie for a similar reason. It's probably another write-off.

As for the show itself, I actually quite enjoyed it. Wished it went into a more fantastical setting, but the cast made up for it (and with cast I mean Christian Slater).
JDL
JDL - 10/18/2023, 8:42 AM
@bkmeijer1 - It can't be a tax write-off since it actually was released. But that said it's something in the license fee/residual area.
Rokhorn
Rokhorn - 10/18/2023, 8:54 AM
@JDL - it's taxes, just like WB did with Batgirl. Not worth keeping a show with minimal engagement and basically hated my general audience.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 10/18/2023, 9:04 AM
@JDL - yeah that makes the most sense. Either way, I do certainly believe it is a way to save money on Disney's part
Timerider
Timerider - 10/18/2023, 9:20 AM
@bkmeijer1 - I think it came down to Willow or Star Wars and they chose Star Wars because of how big the IP is compared to Willow.
JDL
JDL - 10/18/2023, 10:10 AM
@Rokhorn - Sorry, not taxes. In order to write-off the entire cost in one year it must never have opened. Otherwise it gets amortised over 15 years like all the others. I'm an accountant/retired CPA.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 10/18/2023, 11:12 AM
@Timerider - yeah, Star Wars is easily more the more popular Lucasfilm IP. Probably because it's the only true franchise they possess.

There are also movies like Labyrinth, but it's just not as franchise-able. And that is what Disney wants I guess. And Star Wars provides that (and maybe Indiana Jones)
theFUZZ008
theFUZZ008 - 10/18/2023, 8:42 AM
Very strange article.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 10/18/2023, 8:55 AM
Fire that idiot at Disney who keeps bringing back properties like this, only to fail miserably
NinnesMBC
NinnesMBC - 10/19/2023, 1:06 AM
Disney+ following Zaslav's steps of tax-writes off or something close to that is awful, no different than Paramount+ when they did the same thing to other original streaming series earlier this year.

They deserve to lose suscribers for that stunt.
View Recorder