Snake Eyes And Storm Shadow Do Battle!!

Snake Eyes And Storm Shadow Do Battle!!

In this article you will find two new G.I. Joe pics. One is the Baroness firing a gun, which is something you can probably see Sienna Miller doing in real life if you look hard enough. The second one is the money shot of Snake Eyes and Storm Shadow getting in to it!

By jman1977 - Jul 31, 2009 03:07 PM EST
Filed Under: G.I. Joe
Source: Latinoreview.com

Thanks to Latinoreview.com for providing these awesome pics.




Head on over to catch their exclussive interview with Joe Producer Lorenzo De Bonaventura.
SNAKE EYES Star Henry Golding Says Paramount Has Grand Plans For The G.I. JOE Franchise
Related:

SNAKE EYES Star Henry Golding Says Paramount Has "Grand Plans" For The G.I. JOE Franchise

G.I. JOE: Concept Art Emerges For Unmade ADVENTURE TEAM Animated Prequel TV Series
Recommended For You:

G.I. JOE: Concept Art Emerges For Unmade ADVENTURE TEAM Animated Prequel TV Series

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
valeriesghost
valeriesghost - 7/31/2009, 4:08 PM
first!! this movie is gonna blow chunks. there goes my childhood. if duke dances at all in this movie i'm sending the FanBoy Avenger to pick off each and every one of the executives.
Scorpioxfactor
Scorpioxfactor - 7/31/2009, 4:09 PM
YEE HAH! Back in the Saddle!!
Scorpioxfactor
Scorpioxfactor - 7/31/2009, 4:09 PM
damn. guess not.
animeex
animeex - 7/31/2009, 4:09 PM
Several great fights between these two, awesome effects, a good script and a sex scene between Scarlet and the Baroness... We have a movie!
Scorpioxfactor
Scorpioxfactor - 7/31/2009, 4:11 PM
I think it's gonna suck. I can't stand the fact of the casting. None of the character fit. They need big name mothers in this. Throughout the whole cast. WE ARE talking GI JOE here.
valeriesghost
valeriesghost - 7/31/2009, 4:14 PM
hahaha
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 7/31/2009, 4:21 PM
OZYMANDIAS @ SUCKS MEN! ; D

BUTT its true ; )
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 7/31/2009, 4:22 PM
Sweet news!!!

Anyone who wont like this movie has no BALLZ! : D
Scorpioxfactor
Scorpioxfactor - 7/31/2009, 4:23 PM
the only one I want to suck is the baroness!! LMFAO
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 7/31/2009, 4:27 PM
SCORP @ LMAO!
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 7/31/2009, 4:33 PM
TUT TUT! Heh heh!

I cant believe someone as closed minded as you enjoyed THE WATCHMEN??? ; D
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 7/31/2009, 4:42 PM
Leee, its not closed minded to think this movie looks shit! Im not saying it will be shit, but it LOOKS shit. That is undeniable but you are like one of only 3 or 4 people on this whole site that doesn't think so. That's cool and all but i think its less a case of the doubters having no balls as the optimists having no taste!:)
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 7/31/2009, 4:45 PM
By the way, is anyone else getting sick of hearing that little prick have an orgasm while eating his [frick]ing sandwich on the main page? I dont know who came up with that Hero for Night shit but he/she needs a stern talking too!
IronGrenadier
IronGrenadier - 7/31/2009, 4:46 PM
YEEEAH!!
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 7/31/2009, 4:50 PM
ROR @ But you liked BORIGINS lol!

I believe in seeing a movie before i judge it! ; D

An W*NKERINES was SH!T! : D
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 7/31/2009, 4:54 PM
That's Bobby Peru from Wild At Heart, played by Willem Dafoe..maniac!

LEEE777
LEEE777 - 7/31/2009, 4:56 PM
Heh heh heh
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 7/31/2009, 4:56 PM
Yeah but leee...IT WASN'T SHIT! There goes that taste again! It was below average yes, but shit is reserved for movies like Spawn and FF..which i believe you also like!

LEEE777
LEEE777 - 7/31/2009, 5:04 PM
Ozy @ Heh heh heh! ; D

ROR @ Again, SPAWN is a 12 year old movie, whats W*NKERINES excuse??

Lol @ SirPrize!
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 7/31/2009, 5:09 PM
Who gives a [frick] how old the movie is! Blade Runner was made in the 80s and is still head and shoulders above modern sci fi shit like Strange Days or Paycheck! Sure, special effects date but that's all. Effects don't make a movie. Wolverine had bad effects and a dodgy script but it also had Jackman and Schreiber being awesomely awesome as Wolvie and Sabertooth, as well as some very good action scenes..it was disappointing but it wasn't shit.
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 7/31/2009, 5:18 PM
All the millions FOX had and they made DOGS POOP!

If you accept it, they will make more DOGS POOP!

We want a good WOLVERINE 2 not BORIGINS 2! ; D

I'll give you that, JACKMAN & SCHREIBER were perfect (Even though they was brothers lol) but that's it, it was like FOX was trying to pimp out lots of X-MOVIES outta it instead of making a darn good movie, and don't say they wasn't, they was! It was a SELL-OUT movie and i feel for the actors because they, especially JACKMAN 'n' SCHREIBER deserved better!
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 7/31/2009, 5:25 PM
I don't know if thats the case. They certainly crammed too many characters in but that was more a case of bowing to the fanboys! People wanted Gambit and Deadpool and they gave em to em..ok so the [frick]ed it up! But i enjoyed the movie for what it was, im not a huge stickler for accuracy to the comics really, as long as they get the essence of the characters..and they did that. I want a better sequel too though.

Either way, i bet Wankerines will still be better than GI Blow!
superdog
superdog - 7/31/2009, 5:57 PM
Lee777 your always getting down on us about prejudging this movie, at the exact same time that you keep saying it's gonna be good and the darkhorse of the summer. Aren't you prejudging too? Am I missing somehting?
CRITIC17
CRITIC17 - 7/31/2009, 6:04 PM
This movie looks cool. But it looks like Snake-Eyes makes the movie good. Without him, I don't think I could like it.
GUNSMITH
GUNSMITH - 7/31/2009, 6:16 PM
WE SHOULD MAKE A WORD FOR PEOPLE THAT CRAP ON A MOVIE BEFORE IT COMES OUT.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 7/31/2009, 6:19 PM
What are you on about! Superdog is spot on, what you and Lee are doing is no different than what the people that think it looks shit are doing! Its just negative and positive opinions on how it looks.
fastracer
fastracer - 7/31/2009, 6:48 PM
I have to go with leee on this one, this movie looks good but I did like watchmen
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 7/31/2009, 6:51 PM
OZY @ ; )

An ROR/SUPER @ I did not prejudge WOLVERINE! Im just hoping GI JOE will be half good! Though i was hoping W*ANKERINES was gonna be half good too an look how that turned out lol!

Okay, we should all agree to disagree, different tastes for different ppl an leave it at that lol! GI BLOW lmao ROR, i'll probably use that later on heh heh ; D

ROR @ I think as long as they keep WOLVERINE in JAPAN as promised and no X-men cameos for no reason WOLVERINE 2 will be good an much better, we all win!

GUNSMITH @ what word shall we use? Hehehe

Fastracer @ WATCHMEN was the comic book movie of this decade hands down! I think we've all got a good wait till we see something like that again and fastracer @ Good man! ; )
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 7/31/2009, 7:01 PM
It will be good to see peoples reactions after it comes out. Im gonna go see it prob opening night cos a bunch of my mates are and im curious to see if its as bad as it looks! But if i end up liking it i will be the first to admit i was wrong. BUT , if that does happen, the people in charge of marketing the thing did a shit job!

I watched a movie online last night called Long Weekend with Jim Caviezel..its alright, worth a look.

Go SEE MOON!

LEEE777
LEEE777 - 7/31/2009, 7:04 PM
ROR @ Are you MOONING us????? :shock

Heh heh, hey looks sweet!
loganoneil
loganoneil - 7/31/2009, 8:06 PM
I for one am going to TOTALLY reserve judgement until I actually see the film. Both sides COULD be right - it may blow serious chunkage, or it might be the next 'Iron Man' (okay, that may be streatching it a bit...actually, a lot). The point is (as you all seemed to agree), you never know. As for it being a 'classic' and standing the test of time, that's another story. Ror's example 'Blade Runner' is one becasue it DOES stand the test of time and still looks as BRILLIANT today as it it did back in 1982 (1982?!! God, I'm old).

Of course, I think we're all forgetting the other side of the 'classic' spectrum - the total stinkers. You know the ones I'm talking about... the movies SOOOOOO bad, you've compelled to watch them (kinda' like watching a car wreck) - 'Nick Fury: Agent of SHEILD' comes to mind...
1 2
View Recorder