Michael Mando's Scorpion Will Reportedly Make His Long-Awaited Return!

@PlusUltra - I'll play, with the argument being representing them similarly to their comic counterparts and not just being there. I guess in photo order.

They turned Rha's ah Ghul and tahlia a ghul both have the same problem, and for a website whose whole existence seems to be complaining about race swapping lately, for some reason no one has a problem with Neeson or Cotillard not being arabic. I'll allow you all to draw your own conclusions as to why that is.

Bane basically isn't true to any comic counterpart, and again, let's get an English dude instead of a latino (one of the reasons he even has a luchador masks in the comics, and not because of some weird breathing thing)

Scarecrow was decent, until the third movie which was just absurd.

Joker is obviously perfect character, but he's Ledgers and Nolan's Joker, not the comics joker. The comics would go on to make Ledger like versions after Ledgers performance, but I can't think of any Ledger like Jokers before this movie.

Dent is a FANTASTIC Harvey Dent, but ends up going full blown Two face far two quickly. We all knew he was going to turn into Two Face by the end of the movie, but at the very least him going full blown crazy should've been saved for a third movie. It felt rushed in a movie we all knew was the Joker's. I don't want to get intoa whole discussion about this but the movie still couldve been called the Dark Knight and have the whole "hero it needs not hero it deserves" messaging without killing Dent and Batman taking the heat for his crimes. I also wasn't crazy about the design. He looked like one of the martians from "Mars Attacks"

I love Anne Hathaway. I do not love her Catwoman.

I'm not saying Spiderman is perfect, for example Rhino and electro in amazing spiderman 2 were both terrible, venom in 3 is atrocious, etc etc, but overall, they are much closer to the material, where Nolan made them his own. WHICH IS FINE. I have no problem with directors having their own visions and versions of the characters. This was all just a conversation about representing them held up to their comic counterparts.

@SATW42 - Most of Spidey’s on screen villains weren’t comic accurate either. Ock wasn’t. Venom wasn’t. Neither was Vulture, Electro, Mysterio, or either Harry Goblin’s. These Spidey directors took as much creative liberty as Nolan, and for the most part it worked, just like it did with Nolan. Maybe just not as well.

@PlusUltra - I knew you would say that. but compare to nolan's rogue gallery they only exist on nolan's universe. (as much as i love nolan's trilogy it wasn't comic accurate) unlike spidey's rogue gallery thanks to the multiverse they can all exist in every spidey universe. are they comic accurate? hell no.

@Vigor - ...Mac gargan was a total jobber as venom. Him being venom will turn venom into a villain of the week.

@Repian - anything close to this would be fantastic on screen

@SATW42 - That's true, could very well have been a multi picture deal and it more than likely was, but I'm pretty sure the parties involved still need to come to an agreement to confirm the reprisal (like Sony would still have to contact the actor and the actor's agent to work out details like scheduling and such) so if it is true it would have to be something that was decided prior to the strikes and then the news just happened to leak