SPIDER-MAN 3: 10 Must-See New Pieces Of Concept Art/BTS Photos Reveal A VERY Different Venom

SPIDER-MAN 3: 10 Must-See New Pieces Of Concept Art/BTS Photos Reveal A VERY Different Venom

Spider-Man 3 remains Sam Raimi's worst movie featuring the web-slinger, but these alternate designs for Venom may have gone some way towards redeeming him...or making the villain look even worse!

Feature Opinion
By JoshWilding - May 26, 2021 08:05 AM EST
Filed Under: Spider-Man 3

Spider-Man 3 was released in 2007 to mostly negative reviews, and one of the biggest issues fans had with the movie was the portrayal of Venom, a beloved and iconic character from the comic books.

Played by Topher Grace, director Sam Raimi being forced by producer Avi Arad to shoehorn the villain into the movie ensured that he was the most underwhelming bad guy in a threequel full of them. However, while the character was a forgettable part of Spider-Man 3, a lot of work was put into designing him!

That's evident from a new gallery of concept art/behind-the-scenes photos shared by The Venom Site, and we've now rounded up ten jaw-dropping pieces - some of which are better than others. 

Some of these would have been an improvement, while others are even worse than that final version. However, they're all worth checking out, and we suggest you do so by clicking the "Next" button!
 

10. A Very Different Venom

3049340933333

This early design for Venom is different to anything we've seen in the comics, and clearly an effort to bring some realism to a character who might otherwise look cartoonish on screen. 

While there are homages to Spider-Man's costume, the symbiote's presence can be felt, particularly with those claws and the emergence of a very different mouth. This Venom looks very human, albeit with fangs and eyes we're willing to bet were going to be white and bear a resemblance to Spidey's.

We're not disappointed this didn't make it into Spider-Man 3, but it's certainly pretty damn unique. 
 

9. A Comic Accurate Venom

3049340933333

From one extreme to another, this comic accurate Venom would have ditched visual effects and brought the iconic villain to life with the use of a practical costume. 

It does look a little stiff and may have been difficult for a stunt performer to move around in, but the chest logo and "mask" both feel like they've been pulled straight from the source material. The problem with going for a headpiece like that is it probably would have had zero movement on set. 

CGI could have helped in that respect, of course, and we'd love to know what Raimi had planned for this particular version of the character. Unfortunately, like that Green Goblin from Spider-Man, this isn't something the filmmaker moved forward with. 
 

8. Venom's Mouth

304934093333312

Figuring out how to make Venom talk was clearly an issue for Spider-Man 3, with this costume borrowing the textures of Spidey's suit, layering it with the alien symbiote, and exposing the villain's mouth. 

It's a cool design in some respects, but there's no way this would have worked on screen. Grace could have been given more fake fangs to talk through, and it's worth noting that when Venom debuted, it was minus the massive fangs and tongue. However, it's hard to believe exposing part of Eddie Brock's face stood a chance of making any fan happy. 

The eyes are pretty cool, but we're relieved this one never made it to the big screen. 
 

7. The Chest Logo

30493409333331

While the version of Venom who was featured in Spider-Man 3 did have the classic logo on his back and chest (well, a version of it, at least), it didn't exactly jump off the screen. 

By muting its colours, the threequel made it fade into the background, and Venom didn't really have enough screentime for us to get much of a lasting impression from that iconic logo. However, as this very early sketch reveals (along with more of the concept art you'll see here), a white version was considered and it would have looked badass. 

For whatever reason, it wasn't used, and we've now got used to seeing Venom without it thanks to its absence in the 2018 movie and this year's Venom: Let There Be Carnage
 

6. A Vastly Improved Design

304934093333312442

The way the symbiote is creeping up Eddie's face still looks pretty lame, but the overall aesthetic of the Venom costume is vastly improved when that white symbol is put front and centre. 

We're still not sure what the thought process with those goofy fake teeth is, or why it was necessary for Eddie to have them when he removed his "mask." Regardless, while Grace was badly miscast as the classic Spider-Man villain, the addition of that spider alone might have helped us warm to him.

Stick that logo on the current Venom, and we'd arguably be on to a real winner in that franchise. 
 

5. A Horror-Inspired Take

3049340933333

Raimi may be best known to comic book fans for his work on the Spider-Man trilogy, but there are many moviegoers out there who will most fondly remember his horror movies (like Evil Dead). 

That horror influence can be felt here with a great sketch of Eddie Brock's painful transformation into Venom. Elements of this certainly made it into Spider-Man 3, but that PG-13 rating limited what the filmmaker could do and visual effects distracted from what was an otherwise pretty cool transformation.

The teeth creeping across the villain's face is a nice touch, and a great way to tease the alien's true nature.
 

4. What's This Supposed To Be?

3049340933333124

We're not sure if this is supposed to be mid-transformation or just a unique way of portraying Venom's mouth minus the huge fangs and tongue. Either way, it's certainly pretty alien! 

With visual effects, it's possible that this might have looked pretty solid in motion. Unfortunately, this photo alone isn't enough to convince us that would be the case, especially when it's such a departure from the comic books. At least the chest symbol we've talked so much about here looks good, though. 

It's interesting to see the wacky ideas Raimi and Sony Pictures explored for Spider-Man 3, but not remotely difficult to understand what led to this never making it beyond this stage.
 

3. Venom's "Human" Mouth

30493409333331244

It's easy to forget that when Venom was first introduced, it was with a surprisingly human mouth!

That was clearly considered for Spider-Man 3 early on, and we're not going to criticise them for adhering to the source material. As good as this looked on the page thanks to Todd McFarlane's artwork, it clearly wouldn't have worked in live-action, and just ends up basically being Spider-Man...with a mouth.

The costume design here sucks, but is pretty close to what we saw in the finished product. Honestly, we still don't know why Venom had to have the same webs Spidey did on his costume. 
 

2. Spider-Man's Black Suit

30493409333331244244

Okay, this isn't the Venom costume, but it is a pretty spectacular new behind-the-scenes shot of Spider-Man in the alien costume.

This looked great in action, but would it be unfair to say that mistakes were made in terms of how Spidey was portrayed in these parts of the movie. Basically making his red and blue costume black felt lazy, and kind of missed the point of what a transformation Peter Parker underwent when he gained the alien symbiote costume. 

A simple black costume with that classic white logo would have looked badass on screen, but we ended up with this. It's not awful, but certainly not amazing.
 

1. The Stuff Of Nightmares

304934093333312442443

Another very early design, this take on Venom also appears to be horror-movie inspired, and makes Eddie Brock look like an absolute madman as he bonds with his alien "other."

We're pretty sure this is supposed to be mid-transformation, and heading down this route instead of relying so heavily on visual effects would have been no bad thing. We're definitely not sure about the creepy spider logo on the villain's chest, but this may well have worked in action. 

One of the weirder alternate designs considered for Spider-Man 3, this just goes to show how much work was put into trying to find the right look for Venom in live-action...it's just a shame they failed to do so (we'd have probably gone for the comic-accurate take earlier in this feature).

Click HERE to check out the full gallery shared by The Venom Site!
 

SPIDER-MAN 3 Returns To Theaters For First Time Since 2007 And Picks Up A Surprising Victory
Related:

SPIDER-MAN 3 Returns To Theaters For First Time Since 2007 And Picks Up A Surprising Victory

SPIDER-MAN 3: Rarely-Seen Concept Art Reveals Just How Different Venom Almost Look In 2007 Movie
Recommended For You:

SPIDER-MAN 3: Rarely-Seen Concept Art Reveals Just How Different Venom Almost Look In 2007 Movie

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

FinnishDude
FinnishDude - 5/26/2021, 8:47 AM
I was actually mostly fine with how Venom looked in the finished movie. Venom/Brock being a huge roidrage monster is not a dealbreaker for me and the seed of an idea Raimi had with making them more clear evil reflection of Spider-Man/Peter was pretty good one. Removing the Venom-face, to give Grace more facetime, and making the character overall so shallow was where they went wrong.
Kingdork
Kingdork - 5/26/2021, 8:47 AM
I think Topher Grace as Brock was fiiiine. I mean he's basically modelled after Ultimate Eddie Brock the same way Sam Jackson is modelled after Ultimate Nick Fury (who was modelled after Sam Jackson to begin with). They just stick the overall origin story of the original 616 Brock on him. So yeah he's a mix of two source material.

But Venom plainly sucked from the design, to his lack of personality and screeching sounds.
Stinkor1
Stinkor1 - 5/26/2021, 8:53 AM
Venom looked great. Very McFarlane feel to him.


Topher sucked hard though as Brock. Very miscast.
tripttwe
tripttwe - 5/27/2021, 10:05 PM
@Stinkor1 - I felt Venom looked meh. Very un-McFarlane like.
PC04
PC04 - 5/26/2021, 8:54 AM
What'd they do to my boy?!
KWilly
KWilly - 5/26/2021, 8:54 AM



m1doriya
m1doriya - 5/26/2021, 8:54 AM
The unused total black suit looked like a porn parody version



The movie's textured black suit is perfect imo

The1st
The1st - 5/26/2021, 11:07 AM
@m1doriya - I get that some people love it, but to me it was just a color swap. Playing it safe and downright lazy. It was from a time when we were happy with anything remotely comic book accurate, or an easter egg in general. So I guess maybe it was a sign of the times. It isn't something that would happen today, you'd get something more accurate. I say this of course after watching the iron spider for multiple MCU films, but I think the black would be done justice this go round.
m1doriya
m1doriya - 5/26/2021, 11:37 AM
@The1st - it wasn't just a color swap, it has different symbol, eyes etc. and it looked great in action. Imagine the unused total black suit at night, we would hardly see anything.







MCU Spider-Man isn't accurate at all, so I doubt it

The1st
The1st - 5/26/2021, 11:41 AM
@m1doriya - Like I said, my opinion. It's not very imaginative to me.

WruceBayne
WruceBayne - 5/26/2021, 9:05 AM
I didn’t care for Spidey’s black suit in the movie. Raimi and Sony had a chance to bring his iconic black suit to life and fumbled it by a lazy repainting of an already existing suit.
VileBlood
VileBlood - 5/26/2021, 9:53 AM
@WruceBayne - "had a chance to bring his iconic black suit to life and fumbled it by a lazy repainting of an already existing suit."

tripttwe
tripttwe - 5/26/2021, 10:23 AM
@WruceBayne - THIS
WruceBayne
WruceBayne - 5/26/2021, 10:31 AM
@obredaan - 🤨
MrMediocre
MrMediocre - 5/26/2021, 10:45 AM
@WruceBayne - except it wouldn't have made much sense.

The reason why the Symbiote took the appearance it did, was because Peter thought he should try a new look, and thought that the Julia Carpenter Spider-Woman suit looked cool, so the Symbiote stole the design.

Since Secret Wars and Spider-Woman didn't exist in the Tobey-verse, it made sense for the Symbiote to try and recreate what Spider-Man was used to, albeit in it's limited color palette.
WruceBayne
WruceBayne - 5/26/2021, 10:52 AM
@MrMediocre - yeah I get what you’re saying but if you can make a man out of sand make sense then you could’ve come up with a way of a simple costume change
The1st
The1st - 5/26/2021, 11:11 AM
@MrMediocre - Interesting, yes, but that doesn't explain why the symbol is still basically present on Venom at the end of the film.
Blergh
Blergh - 5/26/2021, 9:07 AM
I really liked the aesthetic of the Raimi movies but I'll admit that both casting and final design didn't work.
I think SM3 is a product of Raimi passively retaliating against Sony. Corporate pushed him to use the character for sales and he ended up giving them the most corporate take on the character (uninformed, played by a hot in demand but unfit actor).

Anything regarding Venom and Sonys relationship with the character is calculated
ModHaterSLADE
ModHaterSLADE - 5/26/2021, 9:12 AM
Black suit looked great in a action. Shame Venom was so underwhelming.
MrDandy
MrDandy - 5/26/2021, 9:34 AM
Symbiote and black suit Spider-Man and venom were all terribly done in Spider-Man 3. Kind of wish the studio didn’t force raimi to use a villain that he didn’t want.
AtakanKaratas
AtakanKaratas - 5/26/2021, 10:00 AM
This film is good and even though it is the worst of the trilogy it has a special place in my heart. Has some very memorable sequences and a killer soundtrack. Venom and Black suit Spidey looked great in action too. I was fine with most of the designs.

I mean look at this beauty right here.

ThorArms
ThorArms - 5/26/2021, 10:17 AM
Venom design was fine. Topher acting was bad
HeeroG
HeeroG - 5/26/2021, 10:24 AM
Most of those designs with the mouth piece open or different are probably refrences for diferent stages of the transformation and would be enhanced by CGI in post-production...
After so many years you guys (Josh Wilding) still don't know how CGI works?
micvalpro
micvalpro - 5/26/2021, 10:45 AM
Topher should have been Spider-Man. He basically was Peter Parker in 70s show along with his girlfriend being the hot red head Mary Jane.
PapaSpank54
PapaSpank54 - 5/26/2021, 11:53 AM
Topher could have totally pulled off Venom, but the way the wrote him was just so lame. He might not have been the best Eddie Brock but he sounded about perfect compared to how I read Venom's voice. I still forget that scene where he's in the cab, that's almost ripped right out of Michelinie/MacFarlane Spidey! I know Raimi didn't care for Venom but I've read he came around on him some, and I think there's some minute details that show some love for him in the finished product. Spider-man 3 is definitely the weakest of the trilogy but it's also not as bad as it's made out to be.
View Recorder