THOR: LOVE AND THUNDER Star Natalie Portman Open To Mighty Thor Return But Is Waiting For Marvel Studios' Call
Related:

THOR: LOVE AND THUNDER Star Natalie Portman Open To Mighty Thor Return But Is Waiting For Marvel Studios' Call

THOR: LOVE & THUNDER's Russell Crowe On Actors Complaining About CBM Parts: Here’s Your Role, Play The Role
Recommended For You:

THOR: LOVE & THUNDER's Russell Crowe On Actors Complaining About CBM Parts: "Here’s Your Role, Play The Role"

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

dracula
dracula - 11/26/2019, 2:18 AM
Hopefully its good, i like ragnarok but one major problem i had with it is that they had to throw out the thor mythos to make a good thor movie. Its called ragnarok and it pretty much is only important for the begining and end of the movie. Part of the reason i proffer wonder woman and aquaman.

From what ive heard this was one of the few diversity changes marvel made that people actually came around on. Hopefully they can replicate that success
bkmeijer2
bkmeijer2 - 11/26/2019, 2:38 AM
@dracula - Although I don't really see it as a major problem, I do hope this one is gonna dive more into the mythos. And since Balder is an important figure post-Ragnarok in the mythos, I hope we get to see him too
dracula
dracula - 11/26/2019, 3:16 AM
@MalseMarcel - Hopefully Sif shows up as well. Maybe finally use the Enchantress, too bad they already used Executioner
Doomsday8888
Doomsday8888 - 11/26/2019, 3:21 AM
This.
This shit right here, i'm not a fan of continuously changing things drastically, not with Thor at least...
It's OK to stick with a new status quo for a lil bit, you know?

I wanted more from that Thor post Ragnarok.
Even more from the IW and...honestly non that much from the one in Endgame but that's me.

Giving Odinson a new eye was a mistake and didn't serve jackshit if not for a couple of shitty ass jokes.
CaptaCornflakes
CaptaCornflakes - 11/26/2019, 3:28 AM
@Doomsday8888 - Lol I can understand your points from last stupid one.

"Giving Odinson a new eye was a mistake and didn't serve jackshit if not for a couple of shitty ass jokes."

Are you confusing it with fat thor? because there is only one joke about putting the eye in and they never talk about it. And to be honest it's not really a mistake either imo. The only downside he doesent look as cool anymore.
Doomsday8888
Doomsday8888 - 11/26/2019, 3:36 AM
@MrFox
I remember that gag with Rocket etc...
It served no other purpose.
But having an eyepatch, i mean, yeah he's a total badass with it, but he also reminds us of Odin.
Now more than ever, he actually understands his father.
Now that he is King.
Shit was just perfect imho.
CaptaCornflakes
CaptaCornflakes - 11/26/2019, 3:40 AM
@Doomsday8888 - Lol what etc? It was one joke. And that has to serve some purpose in the story.

And he never needed no eye to be king. He's thor. Did king Bor have one eye?

But of course obviousaly since he has a eye he now does not understand odins character. What nonsense.
Doomsday8888
Doomsday8888 - 11/26/2019, 3:47 AM
@BountyCipher
Then my point still stands.
It served NO purpose AT ALL.

@MrFox
Helluva way to miss the point, buddy.
CaptaCornflakes
CaptaCornflakes - 11/26/2019, 3:49 AM
@Doomsday8888 - You don't have a point. You're just whinning about one shitty joke. It's childish as [frick].
Doomsday8888
Doomsday8888 - 11/26/2019, 4:03 AM
@BountyCipher
No, i meant giving him a new EYE served no purpose.
I was trying to be generous with that joke example.
By that i meant that one could always say that they did that in order to make that joke.
But like you said, it barely meant anything...
Dotanuki
Dotanuki - 11/26/2019, 7:51 AM
I wish they would adapt some of Jason Aaron's Thor run. Would love to see Gor and the multiple versions of Thor.
FOLLOW ComicBookMovie.com
View Recorder