WWE Once Again Teasing Viewers With Angle Featuring ARROW Star Stephen Amell

LOL!...The Miz

Amell's acting is fine. When did anyone expect Arrow to be Shakespeare?

You mean Dusty not Dustin.

Was hoping big Dust's passing would have meant an end for the Stardust character, but hell, Cody is just so damn good with the character & persona, won't get him near the Main Event scene unfortunately but he's pretty good at taken whatever is handed to him & runs with it. Loved the comic style art they used for the Stardust / Neville match on RAW Monday Night.

Same old usual's on here complaining about Wrestling and using the same tiresome clichés as usual, the it's for children one though...... STOP RIGHT THERE. You're on a F*cking COMIC BOOK / COMIC BOOK MOVIE SITE & some of you are in your 30's, 40's & above & love your flame wars, so, the IRONY! Maybes you guys should be watching wrestling then if that's the case perhaps. LOL.

It's fun, it's a show & if it exposes more people to Arrow then all good. Say what you want about Amell's acting or call him 'wooden' as most of you reference, lets see you upload some videos & see how you would play Oliver Queen ey. Nothing wrong with Amell's portrayal of Oliver. Would you prefer a Smallville version of Oliver / Arrow instead? There's always worse out there than what we currently have.

Nope. That wasn't it. Skip to about 1:50.

@PlasmaSnake

Because you take his comments as pretentious, people poke fun at his acting? What's the correlation?

Yes, I have read his comments about the DCEU and he hasn't said anything bad. At least he's not comparing Comic-Con to genocide. Plus, the comments he has made has some points to it. It would be a slap in the face to anyone being a part of a DC-related series and having nothing to do with a part of a growing cinematic universe, especially who no one's been cast as the character you play on said TV series. And he also made a point of how Grant Gustin didn't even finish one season yet as The Flash while Warner Brothers randomly announces who'll play the same character in film as if they just wanted to take all the praise and claim Grant received. Warner Brothers have been very fickle with this whole process and Amell's choice of comments haven't sounded pretentious at all.

Plus, some say his comments about how Arrow really opened the doors for more CBTV is called pretentious as well and people say those comments makes him sound like he has an ego, but they do hold truth as even if just a little bit, Arrow did open those metaphorical doors wide open.




But this idea is just dumb. Amell doesn't need to be getting involved with WWE. His first little appearance was funny, but that should've been it.

And I still don't know who this Miz guy is even after watching the video someone posted. Is he supposed to be good or what?

@PlasmaSnake

Never is such an overused word on message boards the only reason Stephen Amell as Green Arrow or Grant Gustin as Flash wouldn't quite work in the Batman V Superman world is the writing and that would already be fixed because someone else would be writing them into the movies.

Heck, you are being so negative on Stephen Amell being able to ever appear on the big screen, however, Charlie Cox is the one that really doesn't fit into a MCU movie.

@PlasmaSnake

Your ignorance came full force with reading my reply and assuming that I wanted Amell or Gustin to be a part of the DCEU. Tell me kid, where in my comment did you assume this? Me defending some comments when they actually make sense does not equate to me believing the same thing those comments represent.

I don't know if you know this, but you can support comments even when you don't feel the same way.

I'm now waiting for you reply to let me know where exactly I said I wanted Amell and Gustin to be in the DCEU, or for you to apologize for making silly little assumptions.

@TMcFarlaneFan

"He is in a relationship with Arrow."

Yep, you have to be at least ten to think of such a silly comment. But then this is not surprising as you've never said one valuable comment on this website.

@oreilly

Oh, I don't mind what Babble-onian, err, @Babylonian has to say. If you even look at his profile, it seems like he thrives to stalk the articles I comment at just to reply to me when I've never even spoke to him really ever and he lives on replying to me to talk about Arrow and this supposed "anti-Arrow" site that he goes to and supposedly talks about me there, lmao. He's a child and a mentally disturbed one at that.

Plus, it's always funny that when I do tag him and talk about/to him, he scurries off like any other typical troll only to comment me at a later date and the same thing...I tag him and he doesn't say anything except scurrying off for another day.

One day he might grow up as all children usually do. Or this site should really have an age limit for when you can sign on to be allowed to comment, but any normal person who can read my comments will understand where I'm coming from since @PlasmaSnake didn't either read my first comment correctly or just wanted to come on here to poke fun at anyone who watches Arrow, really, as Babble-onian is very known to do as well.

@Babylonian

Stalk someone else, creep-o.

Or go back to your circle jerk on your anti-Arrow site.

@Babylonian

If it's easy to find, go back to your circle jerk then, boy.

Still waiting for that apology, @PlasmaSnake and for you to say you were clearly wrong by assuming such silly ideas.