MCU Rumor Roundup: New Details On AVENGERS 5 Plans, X-MEN Reboot's Villain, And Ghost Rider's Identity

MCU Rumor Roundup: New Details On AVENGERS 5 Plans, X-MEN Reboot's Villain, And Ghost Rider's Identity

More intriguing MCU rumors have found their way online today, including what Marvel Studios has planned for Avengers 5, which villain will take centre stage in the X-Men reboot, and Ghost Rider's identity.

By JoshWilding - Mar 18, 2024 09:03 AM EST
Filed Under: X-Men

The post-Avengers: Endgame Marvel Studios is still going through some growing pains, leading to big changes behind the scenes. Some projects have been scrapped, with others overhauled with new creative teams or courtesy of extensive reshoots (Daredevil: Born Again and Captain America: Brave New World). 

Rumours continue to swirl about where the Marvel Cinematic Universe goes next and scooper Daniel Richtman has today shared some big ones. 

He claims that, despite Jonathan Majors being fired from the role, Kang will still be the villain in Avengers 5 and Avengers: Secret Wars. However, Marvel Studios is supposedly looking to add another villain, though there's currently no word on who.

Of course, we'd be remiss not to mention previous reports that Doctor Doom could appear in the upcoming movies. 

Looking even further into the future. it appears Marvel Studios might have zeroed in on its choice of big bad for the rebooted X-Men franchise. Kevin Feige is still thought to be searching for a writer, but Richtman has heard that the current idea is for Mister Sinister to take centre stage.

He's expected to be a big part of X-Men '97, likely meaning Marvel Studios is using the animated revival as a means of familiarising fans with Nathaniel Essex. This feels like a wise move on the studio's part, particularly as Magneto has been done to death on screen. 

Finally, with recent chatter suggesting Ryan Gosling is joining the MCU, we have word on Marvel Studios' Ghost Rider plans. There's no mention of the actor, but Richtman confirms the MCU's Spirit of Vengeance will not be Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.' s Robbie Reyes.

Mister Sinister was created by writer Chris Claremont and artist Marc Silvestri and first appeared in the pages of Uncanny X-Men #221 in 1987. Sinister is a geneticist obsessed with achieving evolutionary perfection through manipulating DNA.

He possesses enhanced strength and a genius-level intellect, but it's his mastery of genetics which makes him most impressive. The villain also has an obsession with the Summers bloodline, and Scott Summers, in particular. 

In 2020, X-Men franchise producer Simon Kinberg confirmed there had once been plans for Mister Sinister to be featured in those movies. 

"We had a tease of it at the end of Apocalypse. The Essex Corp is something that you see in a tag at the end of Apocalypse," he explained. "We had talked about doing something with him, and I won't get into the specifics of it since it's no longer a 20th Century Fox property and now it's part of the MCU."

"I have no idea what the plan is. But Mister Sinister was going to be part of the Gambit movie starring Channing Tatum."

Let us know your thoughts on these rumours in the comments section below. 

RUMOR: Three Members Of The X-MEN In Marvel Studios' Upcoming Reboot Have Been Revealed
Related:

RUMOR: Three Members Of The X-MEN In Marvel Studios' Upcoming Reboot Have Been Revealed

Kevin Feige Confirms That The ETERNALS 2 Is Not In Development But Hints At Tiamut's Future Role In The MCU
Recommended For You:

Kevin Feige Confirms That The ETERNALS 2 Is Not In Development But Hints At Tiamut's Future Role In The MCU

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

HashTagSwagg
HashTagSwagg - 3/18/2024, 9:38 AM
I'm not reading any of that but it's nice to be able to leave a comment.
Reginator
Reginator - 3/18/2024, 9:40 AM
@HashTagSwagg - yes it is
SATW42
SATW42 - 3/18/2024, 9:48 AM
@HashTagSwagg - What is the point of this comment. I mean this honestly. "I'm not reading your article, but I'm glad I can comment" seems like the exact kind of comment that had Josh turning comments off
Vigor
Vigor - 3/18/2024, 9:55 AM
@SATW42 - he keeps trying different trolling techniques to see which nets him the most attention.
HammerLegFoot
HammerLegFoot - 3/18/2024, 10:31 AM
@Vigor - No one trolls better then Floppwatchers
Vigor
Vigor - 3/18/2024, 10:39 AM
@HammerLegFoot - agreed! He had me fooled
HammerLegFoot
HammerLegFoot - 3/18/2024, 9:40 AM
Back in the day I use to fan cast Keith David as Mister Sinister.
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 3/18/2024, 11:28 AM
@HammerLegFoot - I can see that fasho
TheFinestSmack
TheFinestSmack - 3/18/2024, 9:40 AM
Yay, more non-news. At least it's shoveled together into one article and not spread out into 3. Big respect there.
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 3/18/2024, 9:43 AM
I will count the number of scenes in DP3 where actors are not really in front of each other.

The new and cheap Marvel formula
Vigor
Vigor - 3/18/2024, 9:53 AM
@vectorsigma - I don't see dp3 mentioned anywhere in this article
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 3/18/2024, 10:07 AM
@Vigor - dont know, i didnt read it
Vigor
Vigor - 3/18/2024, 10:29 AM
@vectorsigma - sounds about right
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 3/18/2024, 9:51 AM
Sinister seems like a good choice for the overarching villain since not only has he not been done in live action before but it would then give them the opportunity to put Cyclops front & center too given their shared comic history which would be nice.

Tom Ellis please!!.

User Comment Image
StSteven
StSteven - 3/18/2024, 2:39 PM
@TheVisionary25 - I was thinking the exact same things about both Sinister AND Cyclops. Great minds and all that. 😊 Plus, with Sinister being a geneticist, that can be used as a way for Marvel to explain the existence of mutants in the MCU to the general audience. Sure, most folks are somewhat familiar with mutants to a certain level, but if Marvel is really going to go balls deep with the X-Men in their next couple of phases (which they should definitely do) they need the GA to be using "mutants" in everyday speech, kinda like the term "Multiverse" is being used (yes, I know that the "Multiverse Saga" has not gone as well as planned but it's not because of the general concept I think).

Like, when you get to the point where the late night talk show hosts can casually make references to mutants and the X-Men like they can currently do about the Avengers, Spider-Man, and the Multiverse, then you know that the concepts of mutants and the X-Men have permeated the general consciousness. Just as long as it's not over-saturated, which I think may have happened with the Multiverse idea being as everyone started using it, even for non-superhero type of content.
Nomis929
Nomis929 - 3/18/2024, 9:52 AM
I would love if the The Russo Brothers come back to direct the X-men movie.

User Comment Image

User Comment Image

User Comment Image
FireandBlood
FireandBlood - 3/18/2024, 9:54 AM
@Nomis929 - All of the MCU goats deserve a crack. Russo’s, Coogler, even Whedon.
Mrtoke
Mrtoke - 3/18/2024, 10:06 AM
@FireandBlood - how about gunn nab up Whedon for teen titans?
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 3/18/2024, 10:09 AM
@Nomis929 - as others have mentioned, i think Whedon is thr best option for xmen.

And as mentioned, Gunn should get him first for DC. One cancelled director to another.
Nomis929
Nomis929 - 3/18/2024, 10:15 AM
@FireandBlood @vectorsigma - You don't think the controversy surrounding Whedon with the previous workplace harassment allegations might overshadow the movie?
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 3/18/2024, 11:30 AM
@Nomis929 - 100% would. Not sure how Whedon comes back from those allegations especially after his supposed rebuttal
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 3/18/2024, 11:43 AM
@Nomis929 - i think if they really want to get him, they can make people forget just like how Disney managed it when Gunn was cancelled. And it was a good decision after all with Guardians 3
Nomis929
Nomis929 - 3/18/2024, 11:54 AM
@MyCoolYoung - That's what I'm thinking.
FireandBlood
FireandBlood - 3/18/2024, 1:28 PM
@Mrtoke - Meh. Couldn’t care less what Gunn and WB are doing over there.
Corruptor
Corruptor - 3/18/2024, 8:52 PM
@Mrtoke - but don't leave any of them alone with him.
Corruptor
Corruptor - 3/18/2024, 8:54 PM
@Nomis929 - after what they did to Thanos they can stay right away, or respect the source.
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 3/18/2024, 11:06 PM
@FireandBlood - I'm going to blow your mind. Guillermo Del Toro for Ghost Rider.
mountainman
mountainman - 3/18/2024, 10:11 AM
I’ve always found Sinister to be an amazing villain, but I have a hard time imagining a live action movie that takes itself seriously where the villain is called Mr Sinister. It is one of the cheesiest villain names out there.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 3/18/2024, 10:14 AM
Think they should make Beyonder the villain in Avengers 5, where he's the ultimate Kang variant. Doom can then take his power and take centre stage in Avengers 6 (ie Secret Wars Part 2).

As for the X-Men, it's obvious they're still looking for a writer. The villain could be chosen though, and Sinister sounds plausible. Sinister in X1, Sentinels in X2, Apocalypse in X3, and Dark Phoenix in AvX would be great imo.
RedFury
RedFury - 3/18/2024, 10:15 AM
I stand by my feeling that using Doom in Secret Wars is too quick of an introduction of the character. Not to say they can't make it work of course.

But to have him start off with such a huge and powerful role, would make his future appearances seem small in comparison IMO. I like the idea of a slow burn, and building up to something monumental like they did with Thanos. I understand it would create a departure from the comics plot, but I believe it would service the character more if we got to see his presence felt over several years.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 3/18/2024, 10:22 AM
@RedFury - User Comment Image
ShimmyShimmyYA
ShimmyShimmyYA - 3/18/2024, 10:34 AM
@RedFury - people also don’t acknowledge the way marvel generally uses villains as things to be destroyed. Bringing in doom for that sets him up to be killed off quickly and then that’s even worse
RedFury
RedFury - 3/18/2024, 11:00 AM
@ShimmyShimmyYA - that's a good point too! Doom deserves better, and I think it's best to give him some breathing room.
ChrisRed
ChrisRed - 3/18/2024, 10:31 AM
As much as I want Sinister in live action, I don't think the first X-Men movie would be the right fit. It depends on the writing though.

Personally, I would use the Sentinels for the first film, firmly establishing mutants and their role in the MCU.
After that, the second movie would be a loose adaption of Mutant Massacre introducing both Sinister, his obsession with Scott and Jean and his Marauders including Gambit.
DarthAlgar
DarthAlgar - 3/18/2024, 11:30 AM
Damn. Onslaught should have been the Deadpool and Wolverine villain instead....
ProfessorWhy
ProfessorWhy - 3/18/2024, 12:09 PM
Would be cool if x-men 97 leads directly into the MCU, and the first movie rolls in fully loaded
CLTMAN29
CLTMAN29 - 3/18/2024, 12:16 PM
I’ve been saying for years Sinister should be the MCU reboot big bad. Years ago I wrote a dummy treatment for an X-Men rabbit with Sinister as the villain. I’ve always found him genuinely unnerving and creepy - he’s be a great choice. As there’s no f***ing Wolverine again I’ll be happy.
hainesy
hainesy - 3/18/2024, 1:01 PM
The problem is that "Mister Sinister" is a ridiculous name.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 3/18/2024, 1:29 PM
Minister Sinister would come after Magneto, and the Sentinels, then you do it
emeraldtaurus
emeraldtaurus - 3/19/2024, 8:56 AM
If Mr Sinister is in it....I'd love to see Henry Cavill play him !

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder